Yarur, Andres J

Abstract Background Large language models (LLMs) offer promise for systematic review data extraction, but performance in complex multidisciplinary domains and utility for clinical statement generation remain insufficiently described. Objectives To evaluate Google NotebookLM for AI-assisted data extraction and RAND/UCLA consensus statement generation in a systematic review of IBD, obesity, and cardiometabolic comorbidities. Methods Studies were organized into domain-specific notebooks; structured prompts generated standardized evidence tables. Two independent reviewers validated outputs against full-text articles using a four-category error classification. Cell-level accuracy and critical accuracy (cells free of major factual errors) were the primary metrics; workflow time was compared against a published conventional extraction benchmark. Concordance between AI-generated and expert-finalized statements was assessed. Results Across 57 articles, 1,710 data cells were extracted; 151 (8.83%) were flagged, yielding 91.17% cell-level accuracy. Major factual errors occurred in only 4 cells (0.23%), for a critical accuracy of 99.77%. Most errors were minor omissions (59.6%) or incomplete extractions (30.5%); domain error rates ranged from 7.08% to 11.33%. The pipeline required 17.7 versus a projected 165.1 person-hours (89.3% reduction). PICO-structured prompting generated 70 candidate statements; 58 of 112 finalized panel statements (51.8%) were AI-derived, and 85.7% were retained in the finalized set. Conclusion Google NotebookLM demonstrates feasibility as a primary extraction and synthesis tool in a multidisciplinary systematic review, with extractive incompleteness as the principal limitation and substantial time savings over conventional approaches. Its novel application to RAND/UCLA consensus statement generation extends AI-assisted evidence synthesis to clinical consensus generation workflow.

Abstract Background There is an unmet need for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments that show improved effectiveness while maintaining safety profiles comparable with existing advanced therapies. Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has been proposed as a strategy to combine benefits of different advanced therapies to improve outcomes. The ExiGem study (NCT06095128) aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) and tofacitinib (TOF) in adults with UC. We report results for the induction phase from the first 24 patients. Methods ExiGem is an ongoing phase 4, single-arm, multicentre study including adults with moderately to severely active UC (complete Mayo [cMayo] score of 6–12 with a rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 and centrally read endoscopic subscore ≥ 2). Eligible patients have previously had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to 1 or 2 anti-tumour necrosis factor α treatments. Patients receive induction therapy with intravenous (IV) VDZ 300 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 plus twice-daily oral TOF 10 mg for 8 weeks and then VDZ 300 mg IV monotherapy as maintenance from week 14. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in clinical remission by cMayo score at week 8. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and clinical remission by modified Mayo (mMayo) score at week 8. Changes in faecal calprotectin (FCP) levels and endoscopic improvement were evaluated. Efficacy data were analysed using non-responder imputation. For the final analysis a pre-specified Bayesian approach will be used. The safety profile of DTT was evaluated. Results Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. At week 8, 12/24 patients (50%) and 14/24 patients (58%) had clinical remission assessed by cMayo and mMayo scores, respectively; these rates were higher than pre-specified benchmark rates (Figure 1). Clinical response was observed in 21/24 patients (88%). At week 8, 14/24 patients (58%) showed endoscopic improvement, and 12/21 patients (57%) had normalization of FCP levels (< 250 µg/g). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 10 patients (42%), and 1 serious TEAE was reported (suspected viral infection). One severe adverse event (AE; cough) and 2 moderate AEs (herpes zoster, drug intolerance) were considered related to TOF. No moderate or severe AEs were considered related to VDZ. One patient withdrew from the study before week 8 owing to intolerance to TOF. Conclusion Initial data suggest that induction with a combination of VDZ and TOF can produce improved rates of response and remission in patients with UC with a comparable safety profile to existing advanced monotherapies. Further data, including outcomes of VDZ maintenance as monotherapy, are pending. Conflict of interest: Prof. Dr. Yarur, Andres: Andres Yarur has served as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda. This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Adam Errington PhD of PharmaGenesis Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, and funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Barnes, Edward: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI. Ha, Christina: Christina Ha has served as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Bausch Health, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Takeda, and Sanofi has received educational programming support from AbbVie, Celltrion, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda and has received consulting fees from AbbVie. Hudesman, David: Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax, BMS, Biocon, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer, Prometheus, CorEvitas, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi Research Support: Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Lukin, Dana: Dana Lukin has served as a consultant/advisory board member for AbbVie, AltruBio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Palatin, Pfizer, Prime, PSI, Takeda, and Vedanta has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Johnson & Johnson and serves as a speaker for AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson. Rubin, David T.: Grant support: Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax SA, Altrubio, Athos Therapeutics, Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect BioPharma, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech (Roche) Inc., Iterative Health, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Mirador, Odyssey Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Spyre, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Vedanta Biosciences, and Ventyx. Schreiber, Stefan Wolfgang: Stefan Schreiber has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck, Novartis/Sandoz, Pfizer, Protagonist, Takeda, and Ventyx Biosciences. Gower, Megan: Megan Gower is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Jones, Stephen: Stephen Jones is an independent medical consultant who provides services for Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Robinson, Ian: Ian Robinson is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Sanchirico, Marie: Marie Sanchirico is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Yajnik, Vijay: Vijay Yajnik is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Abstract Background A subset of risankizumab (RZB)-treated patients experience suboptimal or secondary loss of response to standard dosing. We explored factors associated with future RZB dose-optimization, and outcomes of optimization in a multicenter consortium of adults with Crohn’s Disease (CD). Methods Baseline characteristics at time of RZB initiation and subsequent clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical outcomes were collected in a multi-center cohort. Outcomes for dose-optimized RZB were reported as clinical response and remission (based on HBI or PGA when HBI unavailable), endoscopic remission (based on SEMA-CD or absence of ulcers when SEMA-CD not available), and biochemical response. Characteristics were compared between standard and dose-optimized groups using chi-square and two-sample t-tests. Additional models adjusting for age and sex assessed predictors of dose optimization. Results We identified 309 patients treated with standard dose and 58 for whom dose-optimized RZB was recommended. Of the 58, 29 were excluded from outcomes analysis due to lack of follow-up (n = 19) or insurance denial of dose optimization (n = 10). Demographic information is outlined in Table 1. Baseline characteristics associated with future dose optimization included number of prior advanced therapies (ATs) (OR, 1.29, p < 0.001), prior anti-TNF (OR,4.06; p = 0.022), and prior ustekinumab (UST) use (OR,1.82; p = 0.053) (Table 2). The 29 patients included in the outcome analysis received dose-optimized RZB for primary non-response (n = 2), partial response (n = 23), or secondary loss of response (n = 4) after a median of 321 days (IQR, 234-440) from index RZB start. Median follow-up after dose optimization was 217 days (IQR, 147-331). All patients were AT-exposed (Table 1). Baseline clinical symptoms were present in 27 patients (93.1%), with median HBI of 6.5 (IQR, 6.0-8.0). Active endoscopic disease was observed in 11/12 patients (91.7%) who had baseline endoscopy. Dosing was every 4 weeks in 19 (65.5%), every 6 weeks in 9 (31.0%), and combined IV re-induction plus every 4-weeks in 1 (3.4%) patient. Clinical response and remission was seen in 16 (55.2%) and 12 (41.4%) patients, respectively. A ≥ 50% CRP reduction was seen in 5/12 (41.7%) patients with baseline elevated CRP. Among 7 patients with baseline active endoscopic disease with available follow-up, 3 (42.9%) achieved endoscopic remission. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion In this multi-center retrospective cohort, prior AT-exposure (especially anti-TNF) was associated with need for RZB dose-optimization. Dose optimization successfully captured clinical response in a significant proportion of patients who experienced partial response or loss of response to RZB. Conflict of interest: Johnson, Amanda: Research grant: Abbvie, Spyre Therapeutics Ramesh, Prajith Raj: None Said, Hyder: No conflict of interest Huang, Katherine: No conflict of interest Devi, Jalpa: none Pekow, Joel R.: CVS Health - Consulting Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson - Stocks Alhobayb, Tamara: No conflict of interest Bassmeyer, Blake: No conflict of interest Mohamed, Mouhand: No conflict of interest Shivashankar, Raina: Abbvie and BMS - speaker bureau Janssen and Celltrion - grant for IBD fellowship funding Pfizer - consultant Rathi, Jaya: No conflict of interest Luu, Bryan: No conflict of interest Khan, Abdul: No conflict of interest Loftus, Jr, Edward: Grant: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Receptos, Robarts Clinical Trials, Takeda, Theravance, UCB. Personal Fees: AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB. Bishu, Shrinivas: None Patel, Anish: speaker: abbvie, J & J, Lilly, BMS, Pfizer, Phathom, Takeda consultant: abbvie Shukla, Richa: Speakers bureau - Abbvie and Lilly Yarur, Andres: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Ungaro, Ryan: Personal Fees: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI.

Abstract Background We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab (RZB) for Crohn’s disease (CD) in routine clinical practice. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a multicenter consortium of CD patients treated with RZB. Co-primary outcomes were week 12 clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] score of ≤4 or physician global assessment in those without HBI or with ileostomy) and 6-month endoscopic remission (Simplified Endoscopic Mucosal Assessment for Crohn’s Disease of 0-1 or absence of ulcers). Secondary outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, radiographic response, cumulative clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 6 and 12 months, and adverse events. Results A total of 309 patients were included (median disease duration 14 years [IQR, 6-24]; median follow-up 7.1 months [IQR, 4.1-10.3]). Most patients (85.8%) were advanced therapy (AT)-exposed, and 169 (54.7%) had prior ustekinumab (UST) exposure. Week 12 clinical remission rates were 49.7% (98/197) overall, and 44.2% (50/113) vs 57.1% (48/84) in UST-exposed vs naïve patients (P = .073). Among those with active disease on baseline endoscopy (n = 122) who had an available follow-up at 6 months, 52.4% (22/42) achieved endoscopic remission. Cumulative rates of clinical and endoscopic remission at 12 months were 65.0% and 49.5%, respectively. Cumulative 12-month endoscopic remission was 33.9% (19/56) in UST-exposed and 68.1% (32/47) in UST-naïve patients (P < .001). Risankizumab was well-tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Conclusions In this large multicenter cohort of patients with CD, RZB was well-tolerated and effective in achieving favorable clinical and endoscopic outcomes in both AT-exposed and naïve populations, including those with exposure to UST.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to establish the clinical utility of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-supported, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach (precision-guided dosing [PGD]) by assessing the impact of pharmacokinetic (clearance [CL]) and clinical laboratory parameters on adalimumab (ADA) dosage adjustments during maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In the EMPOWER study, blood was collected at any time post-ADA injection. Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing was conducted in an accredited lab. Inputs for the PGD test included ADA concentrations, antibodies to ADA, albumin levels, and the current dosing regimen. CL was calculated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Results were reported to health care providers (HCPs) within 3 days. HCPs’ treatment decisions were recorded and classified as treatment reduction, continuation, intensification, or ADA discontinuation. The physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity was collected. Relationships between drug concentrations, CL, disease activity, and physician decision-making were assessed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 213 cases were assessed by 21 HCPs. ADA treatment was intensified in 24% and discontinued in 13% of cases. An ADA concentration ≤ 10 μg/mL was associated with a 23.7-fold and 3.0-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification and PGA > 0, respectively, compared to concentrations > 10 μg/mL. An ADA concentration < 5 μg/mL was associated with a 3.3-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation. CL ≥ 0.318 L/day was associated with a 10.4-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification. Higher CL (>0.8 L/day) was associated with a 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation and PGA > 0, respectively. Conclusions: PGD enables earlier and precise optimization of ADA dosing by predicting trough levels at any time during the therapy cycle. Optimized dosing to achieve target ADA concentrations and low clearance is crucial to mitigate therapy discontinuation and active disease in IBD patients.

Abstract Background There is limited data on the clinical effectiveness of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAKi), in patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of UPA in pCD. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data on adults (&gt;17 years) who initiated UPA at 45 mg/day for active pCD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada. Standardized data extraction and entry protocols were followed. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a ≥3-point reduction in Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) between baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes included normalization of CRP (&lt;5 mg/L) or hsCRP (&lt;1 mg/L), clinical remission (PDAI ≤4), and rates of hospitalization, antibiotic use, corticosteroid initiation, and new pCD-related surgeries. Fistula healing on MRI pelvis fistula protocol was defined as an absence of T2-weighted hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images. Predictive analyses used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate baseline factors influencing time to PDAI remission, including BMI, CRP, albumin, PDAI, pCD disease duration, Montreal location and prior biologic exposure (&lt;2 vs 2+). Results A total of 81 patients were treated with UPA for pCD (median age 35 years and 54.3% male). Most had ileocolonic disease (65.4%), with 54% presenting with complex fistulas. Of these, 92.6% had prior anti-TNF exposure, and 91 (88.9%) had prior exposure to 2+ biologics (Table 1). During a median follow-up of 4 months, clinical response (PDAI) was achieved in 17.3%. Improvement was observed in pain and restriction of activities (27.2%), restriction of sexual activity (13.6%), reduction in number of fistulas (11.1%), degree of induration (11.1%), and discharge (35.8%). Median CRP reduction was 21.05% [IQR: 0.00–74.53], and 21.0% achieved a ≥50% reduction in CRP. MRI healing was limited to 17.7% (6/34). Proctitis decreased from 23.5% at baseline to 7.4% at follow-up. During follow-up, hospitalizations occurred in 9.9%, 14.8% required antibiotics, 8.6% underwent examination under anesthesia in 8.6%, seton placement in 6.2%, and abscess drainage in 6.2%. Patients with ileocolonic disease showed the highest remission (54%) and response (15%) rates, while MRI healing was limited across all Montreal locations (7.4%). Lower baseline CRP (p &lt; 0.05) and PDAI scores (p &lt; 0.01) predicted shorter time to remission. Number of prior biologic exposures (p =0.2) and Montreal location (p = 0.7) were not predictive of time to PDAI remission (Figure 1). Conclusion UPA in a real-world cohort is effective in the management of treatment-refractory pCD. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). One in ten CD patients may need a permanent ostomy (colostomy or ileostomy) during their disease course, and this may impact the efficacy of UPA, given its extended-release formulation. However, there is no data available in this population since patients with an ostomy are excluded from registrational CD trials. This study addresses this gap by comparing the real-world clinical effectiveness of UPA in CD patients with and without ostomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network of sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) CD patients treated with UPA from May 19th, 2023 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients were categorized based on presence or absence of an ostomy during the previous 5 years, after exclusion of patients with rheumatologic disease indications for UPA usage. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and CD severity indicators (CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid and other biologics usage, hemoglobin, and body weight). Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for clinical effectiveness as a composite outcome (corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits) and secondary individual outcomes, at one year post-treatment, with a significance threshold set at p &lt; 0.05. Results The study sample of CD patients on UPA included 170 with and 1,428 without a prior ostomy. There were 144 patients in each cohort after PSM. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts are shown in Figure 1. After PSM (Figure 2), there were no significant differences between patients with CD on UPA, with and without prior ostomy, for composite outcomes (HR 0.93, p = 0.64), corticosteroid use (HR 0.78, p = 0.18), hospitalizations (HR 1.13, p = 0.64), or emergency room visits (HR 0.99, p = 0.97). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 0.95, p = 0.76), switch to another advanced therapy (HR 1.62, p = 0.06), or elevated biomarkers, including CRP (&gt;10 mg/L, HR 1.00, p = 0.99) and fecal calprotectin (&gt;150 µg/g, HR 0.85, p = 0.63) at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In CD patients, UPA demonstrated similar effectiveness for clinical outcomes of corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits and other secondary outcomes, regardless of their ostomy status.

Abstract Background Tumor necrosis factor-like ligand 1A (TL1A) is upregulated in inflammatory bowel disease and believed to promote inflammation and intestinal fibrosis. RO7790121, an anti-TL1A antibody, showed promising results in the phase IIa TUSCANY trial.1 Here we report post-hoc analyses of patient-reported outcomes from the TUSCANY-2 trial. Methods This phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, treat-through, dose-ranging study evaluated RO7790121 in patients (pts) aged 18–75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) (total Mayo score [MS] ≥6, endoscopic subscore ≥2). Pts were randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) RO7790121 50mg, 150mg, 450mg or matched placebo (PBO) monthly during the 12-week induction period, and SC RO7790121 50mg, 150mg or 450mg monthly during the 40-week treat-through maintenance period. To assess efficacy of RO7790121 in supporting pts achieving early symptomatic improvement, rectal bleeding (RB), stool frequency (SF) and partial modified MS (RB+SF) were evaluated at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14. The exploratory endpoint of symptomatic remission, defined as a RB subscore of 0 and a SF subscore of 0 or 1, was assessed throughout induction. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results Overall, 245 pts received ≥1 dose of RO7790121 or PBO. At Week 2, pts receiving RO7790121 were more likely to report a RB subscore of 0 (34% RO7790121; 20% PBO) and less likely to report a RB subscore of 2 or 3 (25% RO7790121; 40% PBO) (Figure). Improvements in SF increased from Week 2 and throughout induction, with ~60% of pts receiving RO7790121 reporting a SF subscore of 0 or 1 at Weeks 12 and 14, vs ~40% for PBO. Greater rates of symptomatic remission were observed in pts receiving RO7790121 vs PBO throughout induction and from Week 2 (17.5% RO7790121; 8.9% PBO) (Table). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported during induction in 117/245 pts, the most common (reported in ≥5% of pts in any treatment group) were nausea, urinary tract infection and UC (highest in the 50mg arm), anemia (highest in the placebo arm) and fatigue, headache and pyrexia (highest in the 450mg arm). Serious TEAEs were reported in ten pts during induction (PBO=4; 50mg=3; 450mg=3); two were treatment related (PBO=1; 450mg=1). There were six treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs and a generally similar safety profile was observed during the maintenance period. Conclusion Greater and earlier improvements in RB and SF were observed in pts receiving RO7790121 vs PBO. These results indicate early symptom relief and a favorable safety profile for pts treated with RO7790121, supporting its further clinical development. RO7790121 is currently being evaluated in phase III studies (NCT06589986 and NCT06588855). References 1.Danese S, Klopocka M, Scherl EJ, et al. Anti-TL1A antibody PF-06480605 safety and efficacy for ulcerative colitis: A phase 2a single-arm study. Clin GastroenterolHepatol. 2021;19(11):2324-2332.e6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.011

Abstract Background The SEQUENCE trial, in bio-exposed Crohn's disease (CD) patients, demonstrated non-inferiority for clinical remission at 24 weeks and superiority for endoscopic remission at week 48 for risankizumab (RZB) compared to ustekinumab (UST). However, this comparison has not been adequately explored in bio-naive CD patients. Our study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness among bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB vs. UST in a real-world setting, using data from a US-based multicenter cohort. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) bio-naive CD patients initiated on RZB or UST from June 17th, 2022 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients with prior advanced therapy usage and those with approved rheumatologic disease indications for RZB/UST were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and indicators of CD severity, including CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid use, hemoglobin, and body weight. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for one-year post-treatment composite outcomes (need for corticosteroids, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, surgeries) with a priori significance threshold of p &lt; 0.05. Results The study sample included 1,630 bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB and 3,105 with UST. Among patients on UST, 658 (21%) were dosed every four to six weeks, after the first dose. Baseline characteristics of the PSM RZB and UST cohorts are shown in Table 1 with 1,568 patients in each cohort. After PSM (Figure 1), there were no significant differences in composite outcome (HR 1.077, p = 0.170), corticosteroid use (HR 1.099, p = 0.110), CD-related surgery (HR 1.231, p = 0.284), hospitalization (HR 0.947, p = 0.615) or ER visits (HR 1.041, p = 0.687). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 1.062, p = 0.366), switch to different advanced therapy (HR 1.097, p = 0.468) or elevated disease biomarkers, including CRP (&gt;10mg/l, HR 1.186 p = 0.101) or fecal calprotectin (&gt;150 µg/g; HR 1.109, p = 0.407) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In this real-world experience allowing for drug optimization, no difference was observed in bio naïve patients between UST and RZB as far as clinical remission and progression of CD.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the benefit of etrasimod monotherapy and the impact of concomitant corticosteroids (CS) and/or 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) therapy. Methods In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, patients with moderately to severely active UC were randomized 2:1 to etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo for 52 and 12 weeks, respectively. Oral CS or 5-ASA were allowed at baseline. Patients in the monotherapy subgroup received etrasimod or placebo without concomitant CS and/or 5-ASA at baseline. Predefined primary (clinical remission) and key secondary efficacy endpoints aligned with those from both trials and were assessed at Week 12 and Week 52. Safety was assessed up to Week 52. Results Clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 and 52 were significantly higher for etrasimod compared with placebo in patients receiving monotherapy (Week 12: 26.2% vs 4.8%; Week 52: 35.7% vs 4.0%). Differences vs placebo were statistically significant for all predefined endpoints at both time points in patients receiving monotherapy or etrasimod with concomitant 5-ASA only (all P &lt; .05); numerical differences, due to small sample sizes, vs placebo were observed for all endpoints in the CS only and CS + 5-ASA subgroups. Safety was consistent with the overall population. Conclusions Etrasimod monotherapy showed consistent efficacy and safety vs placebo; no apparent benefit was observed with concomitant CS and/or 5-ASA in patients receiving etrasimod. Clinical trial registration NCT03945188; NCT03996369.