Jairath, V

Introduction Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%–50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission. Methods and analysis The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure. Ethics and dissemination The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals). Trial registration number NCT05230173 .

Abstract Background Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is a concern for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), as prolonged use is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective, reversible Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD and demonstrated CS-sparing efficacy, with a consistent safety profile through maintenance week (wk) 52.1-4 Here, we evaluated the long-term efficacy of UPA in achieving CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients enrolled in the ongoing U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods Patients who completed the U-ENDURE 52-wk maintenance study were eligible for the subsequent LTE study wherein they continued their previously assigned treatment (once daily UPA 15 mg [UPA15] or UPA 30 mg [UPA30]). Efficacy was assessed from LTE wk 0-wk48, among patients with 2 year (yr) (100 wk) of total maintenance therapy, within the overall population and in patients with baseline CS use (induction wk 0). CS-free endpoints (without CS use for ≥90 days before evaluation), included clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score [SF/APS] and CD Activity Index [CDAI]), endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission, were evaluated using both as-observed and nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods, with NRI analysis presented in text. Safety was not evaluated here but was reported previously.3 Results Among patients with 2 yr of total maintenance therapy, 35.7% (87/244) received CS at baseline, with 13.1% (32/244) receiving CS at any time during the LTE study regardless of baseline CS use. Among patients taking baseline CS and those who received CS at any time during the LTE study (n=20), the median (range) time of CS use was 127.5 (2-1589) days. CS-free clinical remission was achieved at LTE wk 0 and wk 48 per SF/APS (overall population: UPA15, 71.7%, 58.9%; UPA30, 81.8%, 57.7%; patients with baseline CS use: UPA15, 71.8%, 53.8%; UPA30, 79.2%, 54.2%, NRI, Fig.1A-B) and CDAI criteria (overall population: UPA15, 74.8%, 60.7%; UPA30, 83.9%, 65.0%; patients with baseline CS use: UPA15, 74.4%, 56.4%; UPA30, 81.3%, 58.3%, NRI, Fig.1C-D). At LTE wk 48, a high fraction of UPA-treated patients achieved CS-free endoscopic response (overall population: UPA15, 48.6%; UPA30, 55.5%; patients with baseline CS use: UPA15, 38.5%; UPA30, 60.4%, NRI) and CS-free endoscopic remission (overall population: UPA15, 33.6%; UPA30, 46.0%; patients with baseline CS use: UPA15, 28.2%; UPA30, 54.2%, NRI, Fig.2). Conclusion Patients with moderate-to-severe CD who received long-term UPA maintenance treatment sustained high rates of CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes, suggesting that UPA may serve as an effective long-term CS-sparing therapy. References 1.RINVOQ [package insert], extended-release tablets, FDA Prescribing Information. AbbVie Inc; 2022. Accessed 1 June 2022.2. 2.RINVOQ [package insert], prolonged-release tablets. EMA Summary of Product Characteristics. AbbVie; 2022. Accessed 1 June 2022. 3.Loftus EV and Panes J et al. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1966-1980. J 4.M C Dubinsky, et al. JCC, 17; (Supp_1); 2023: i104–i106.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPatients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are hospitalised for acute severe flares represent a high‐risk orphan population.AimTo provide guidance for clinical trial design methodology in these patients.MethodsWe created a multi‐centre consortium to design and conduct a clinical trial for a novel therapeutic intervention (hyperbaric oxygen therapy) in patients with UC hospitalised for moderate–severe flares. During planning, we identified and addressed specific gaps for inclusion/exclusion criteria; disease activity measures; pragmatic trial design considerations within care pathways for hospitalised patients; standardisation of care delivery; primary and secondary outcomes; and sample size and statistical analysis approaches.ResultsThe Truelove‐Witt criteria should not be used in isolation. Endoscopy is critical for defining eligible populations. Patient‐reported outcomes should include rectal bleeding and stool frequency, with secondary measurement of urgency and nocturnal bowel movements. Trial design needs to be tailored to care pathways, with early intervention focused on replacing and/or optimising responsiveness to steroids and later interventions focused on testing novel rescue agents or strategies. The PRECIS‐2 framework offers a means of tailoring to local populations. We provide standardisation of baseline testing, venous thromboprophylaxis, steroid dosing, discharge criteria and post‐discharge follow‐up to avoid confounding by usual care variability. Statistical considerations are provided given the small clinical trial nature of this population.ConclusionWe provide an outline for framework decisions made for the hyperbaric oxygen trial in patients hospitalised for UC flares. Future research should focus on the remaining gaps identified.

INTRODUCTION: There are limited real-world data comparing the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database, to compare the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with UC. The primary aim was to assess the risk of a composite outcome of hospitalization requiring intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 and 12 months. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, mean hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, and calprotectin, and prior UC medications including recent oral or intravenous steroid use between the cohorts. Risk was expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 526 patients in the upadacitinib cohort (mean age 40.4 ± 16.3, 44.8% female sex, 76.6% White race) and 1,149 patients in the tofacitinib cohort (mean age 42 ± 17.1, 41.9% female sex, 76% White race). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome of need for intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 months (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49–1.09). However, there was a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44–0.89) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months. There was no difference in the risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48–1.02) but lower risk of colectomy (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27–0.79). In sensitivity analysis, there was also a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94), including lower risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99) and colectomy (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.92) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study utilizing real-world data showed that upadacitinib was associated with improved disease-specific outcomes at 12 months compared with tofacitinib in patients with UC.

Abstract Background and study aims There is limited consensus on the optimal method for measuring disease severity in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We aimed to systematically review the operating properties of existing endoscopic severity indices for FAP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized endoscopic outcomes or studies that evaluated the operating properties of endoscopic disease severity indices in FAP. Results A total of 134 studies were included. We evaluated scoring indices and component items of scoring indices, such as polyp count, polyp size, and histology. Partial validation was observed for polyp count and size. The most commonly reported scoring index was the Spigelman classification system, which was used for assessing the severity of duodenal involvement. A single study reported almost perfect interobserver and intra-observer agreement for this system. The InSIGHT polyposis staging system, which was used for assessing colorectal polyp burden, has been partially validated. It showed substantial interobserver reliability; however, the intra-observer reliability was not assessed. Novel criteria for high-risk gastric polyps have been developed and assessed for interobserver reliability. However, these criteria showed a poor level of agreement. Other scoring indices assessing the anal transition zone, duodenal, and colorectal polyps have not undergone validation. Conclusions There are no fully validated endoscopic disease severity indices for FAP. Development and validation of a reliable and responsive endoscopic disease severity instrument will be informative for clinical care and RCTs of pharmacological therapies for FAP.

Abstract Background Regulatory guidance for Crohn’s disease trials recommends coprimary efficacy end points that evaluate both symptoms and mucosal inflammation. We aimed to characterize the operating properties of commonly used disease activity assessments alone and in combination. Methods Endoscopic and clinical data were available for 129 participants from the Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator Naïve Patients in Crohn’s Disease trial. Readers scored the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease and the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity using standardized conventions. Index reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Index responsiveness was assessed using standardized effect sizes based upon treatment assignment. Outcomes were evaluated for optimal sensitivity to treatment effect. Results Substantial inter-rater reliability was observed when the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease and Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity were used as continuous measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.73; and 0.62 95% CI, 0.36-0.77) compared with moderate reliability when dichotomized (0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; and 0.51; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78). The Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease, Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, patient-reported outcome-2, and Crohn’s Disease Activity Index were similarly responsive (standardized effect size, 0.43, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; 0.38, 95% CI, 0.0-0.76; 0.53, 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). A composite outcome of Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score <150 and Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity score <6 was most sensitive to treatment effect (28.9%; 95% CI, 11.0%-46.8%; P = .003). Conclusion Endoscopic indices were more reliable as continuous measures. Composite outcomes including endoscopy improved sensitivity to treatment effect.