Bressler, Brian

Abstract Background Regulatory guidance for Crohn’s disease trials recommends coprimary efficacy end points that evaluate both symptoms and mucosal inflammation. We aimed to characterize the operating properties of commonly used disease activity assessments alone and in combination. Methods Endoscopic and clinical data were available for 129 participants from the Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator Naïve Patients in Crohn’s Disease trial. Readers scored the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease and the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity using standardized conventions. Index reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Index responsiveness was assessed using standardized effect sizes based upon treatment assignment. Outcomes were evaluated for optimal sensitivity to treatment effect. Results Substantial inter-rater reliability was observed when the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease and Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity were used as continuous measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.73; and 0.62 95% CI, 0.36-0.77) compared with moderate reliability when dichotomized (0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; and 0.51; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78). The Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease, Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, patient-reported outcome-2, and Crohn’s Disease Activity Index were similarly responsive (standardized effect size, 0.43, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; 0.38, 95% CI, 0.0-0.76; 0.53, 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). A composite outcome of Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score <150 and Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity score <6 was most sensitive to treatment effect (28.9%; 95% CI, 11.0%-46.8%; P = .003). Conclusion Endoscopic indices were more reliable as continuous measures. Composite outcomes including endoscopy improved sensitivity to treatment effect.

Abstract Background In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), risks of infection and malignancies increase with age. Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of UC. This analysis assessed age as a risk factor for adverse events of special interest (AESI) in the tofacitinib UC clinical program. Methods Data were from phase 2 and 3 induction studies, a phase 3 maintenance study, and an open-label, long-term extension study. Efficacy and/or safety outcomes were analyzed in the Induction, Maintenance, and Overall Cohorts (patients who received ≥ 1 dose of tofacitinib), stratified by age. The effects of baseline demographic and disease-related factors on AESI incidence were assessed by Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. Results In the Overall Cohort (1157 patients with ≤ 6.8 years’ tofacitinib treatment), age was a statistically significant predictor of herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and NMSC. Other statistically significant predictors included prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor failure for HZ, NMSC, and opportunistic infection events, and prior duration of UC for malignancies excluding NMSC. In the Induction and Maintenance Cohorts, a higher proportion of tofacitinib-treated than placebo-treated patients (numerical difference) achieved the efficacy endpoints (endoscopic improvement, clinical remission, clinical response) across all age groups. Conclusions Older individuals receiving tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy to treat UC may have an increased risk of HZ, malignancies (excluding NMSC), and NMSC versus similarly treated younger patients, consistent with findings from the general population. Across all age groups, tofacitinib demonstrated greater efficacy than placebo as an induction and maintenance therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Numbers NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951; NCT01458574; NCT01470612.

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib were demonstrated in Phase (P)2/3 induction studies, a 52-week, P3 maintenance study, and are being further investigated in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study.1,2 Here, we provide an updated analysis of age as a risk factor for adverse events (AEs) in the tofacitinib UC clinical programme.3 Methods Proportions of AEs and serious AEs (SAEs), and incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) for AEs of special interest (AESIs), were determined for two cohorts: the Maintenance Cohort (patients who received placebo or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily [BID] in the maintenance study) and the Overall Cohort (all tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID-treated patients in the P2/P3/OLE studies; as of May 2019), stratified by age. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess whether older age was associated with increased risk of AESIs in the Overall Cohort. Results In the Maintenance Cohort, IRs of AEs and SAEs were generally similar between treatment groups, with no age-related trend in the proportions of AEs in tofacitinib-treated patients. AESIs were infrequent in both treatment groups; however, herpes zoster (HZ; non-serious and serious) IRs were numerically higher in the ≥40 to <50 and ≥50 years age groups for patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg BID vs. placebo and tofacitinib 10 vs. 5 mg BID. In the Overall Cohort, IR of serious infections was generally similar between age groups, while IRs of opportunistic infections (OIs) and HZ (non-serious and serious), malignancy (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC and major adverse cardiovascular events increased with increasing age. The IRs of HZ and NMSC were significantly greater in patients ≥50 years compared with patients <30 years, and in patients ≥30 to <40 years for NMSC. In multivariate analyses, older age was identified as a significant predictor of malignancy (excl. NMSC), NMSC and HZ. Conclusion In the Overall Cohort, there was a trend for an increase in the rates of OIs, HZ, malignancy (excl. NMSC) and NMSC with increasing age. In multivariate analyses, older age was associated with increased risk of malignancy (excl. NMSC), NMSC and HZ. The results of this analysis are generally consistent with previous studies suggesting older age may be associated with an increased risk of certain AESIs in patients with UC, and in some instances in the general population.4 References

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are increasing. The appropriateness of their use in mild-moderate UC is less clear, as is the role of surgical intervention. Our aim was to define the appropriateness of therapeutic options in a range of clinical scenarios in mild-moderate UC METHODS: We applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to rate appropriateness of treatment choices in patients with mild-moderate UC; severe disease (likely to need hospitalization or surgery within 2 weeks) was excluded. A literature review was presented to the BRIDGe group, a panel of 13 IBD specialists, as well as 1 external IBD expert and 2 IBD surgical experts. 12 chapters were constructed including failed 5-ASA, steroid or thiopurine therapy, and primary/secondary non-response to biologics or tofacitinib. Scenarios were also divided by disease extent (proctitis vs more extensive) and activity (mild vs moderate) creating 260 scenarios in all. Panellists used a modified Delphi method to anonymously rate the appropriateness of a therapy on a 1-9 scale (1-3 not appropriate, 4-6 uncertain, 7-9 appropriate). Disagreement was assessed using a validated index (DI) and was defined as a DI > 1. The panellists then convened in person to discuss areas of disagreement, followed by a second round of rating. Scenarios rated a median of 7 or higher were deemed appropriate and those rated 3 or lower were deemed inappropriate. Scenarios rated 4-6 were considered uncertain, as were any with a DI > 1 RESULTS: Appropriateness was agreed in 131 and inappropriateness in 47 scenarios. Greatest disagreement was around the use of thiopurines, but no scenario had a DI > 1. There were 82 scenarios were rated uncertain. Biologics and tofacitinib were more likely to be rated appropriate for treatment resistance and greater disease activity; disease extent less likely to influence decision making. Surgery was felt to be appropriate in 8 scenarios, generally in more extensive and active disease that had failed to respond to medical therapy. Surgery was felt to be inappropriate in 16 scenarios and was uncertain in 24 CONCLUSION: Although there was little disagreement amongst an expert panel of IBD physicians and surgeons, there remained uncertainty about the use of medical and surgical therapy in nearly one third of situations in patients with mild-moderate UC. These results could be used to guide the design of clinical trials for these patient groups in order to guide best practice.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib were demonstrated in Phase (P) 2/3 induction studies (NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951), a 52-week, P3 maintenance study (NCT01458574), and are being further investigated in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (NCT01470612). This analysis assessed age as a risk factor for adverse events (AEs) in the tofacitinib UC clinical program. METHODS: Analyses of AEs were performed for 2 cohorts: the Maintenance Cohort (patients who received placebo or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily in the maintenance study) and the Overall Cohort (all tofacitinib-treated patients in the P2/P3/OLE studies [as of December 2016]), stratified by age (≥65 years vs <65 years). AEs of special interest included serious infections (SIs), opportunistic infections (OIs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and gastrointestinal perforations. Risk factors (based on baseline characteristics) for SIs, OIs, HZ, and NMSC in the Overall Cohort were evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional regression models. RESULTS: AEs occurred in 75.3% (placebo) and 75.9% (tofacitinib) of patients in the Maintenance Cohort, and 82.1% in the Overall Cohort (in which 83.9% received predominantly tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily). Most patients (Maintenance Cohort: 180/198 [90.9%] and 364/394 [92.4%] receiving placebo and tofacitinib, respectively; Overall Cohort: 1,080/1,157 [93.3%]) were aged <65 years. In both the placebo and tofacitinib groups of the Maintenance Cohort, rates of AEs, serious AEs, severe AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (placebo: 83.3%, 11.1%, 11.1%, and 22.2%; tofacitinib: 80.0%, 16.7%, 10.0%, and 16.7%) vs <65 years (placebo: 74.4%, 6.1%, 9.4%, and 18.3%; tofacitinib: 75.5%, 4.4%, 7.1%, and 8.8%). AEs of special interest were generally infrequent in both the placebo and tofacitinib groups of the Maintenance Cohort. In the Overall Cohort, AE, serious AE, and severe AE rates were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (88.3%, 19.5%, and 15.6%) vs <65 years (81.7%, 14.3%, and 12.2%). OI, HZ, malignancies (excluding NMSC), NMSC, and MACE rates were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (3.9%, 14.3%, 2.6%, 5.3%, and 2.6%) vs <65 years (1.7%, 5.0%, 0.6%, 0.7%, and 0.2%); SI and gastrointestinal perforation rates were similar between age groups (≥65 years: 2.6% and 0.0%; <65 years: 2.9% and 0.4%). In multivariate modeling in the Overall Cohort, increasing age (every 10 years) was associated with increased risk of OIs (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.54 [1.15, 2.08]) and HZ (1.58 [1.34, 1.87]), but not SIs or NMSC (univariate modeling: 1.0 [0.78, 1.27] and 2.31 [1.46, 3.66]). CONCLUSION(S): In the tofacitinib UC program, AE rates were higher among patients aged ≥65 years vs those aged <65 years, regardless of whether they received tofacitinib or placebo. In multivariate analyses, older age was associated with increased OI and HZ risk. Although this is consistent with the general population, due to the small number of patients aged ≥65 years (<10% of the total), these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Abstract Background & Aims Crohn’s disease (CD) is a lifelong illness with substantial morbidity, although new therapies and treatment paradigms have been developed. We provide guidance for treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to severe active luminal CD. Methods We performed a systematic review to identify published studies of the management of CD. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform and then finalized and voted on by a group of specialists. Results The consensus includes 41 statements focused on 6 main drug classes: antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologic therapies, and other therapies. The group suggested against the use of antibiotics or 5-aminosalicylate as induction or maintenance therapies. Corticosteroid therapies (including budesonide) can be used as induction, but not maintenance therapies. Among immunosuppressants, thiopurines should not be used for induction, but can be used for maintenance therapy for selected low-risk patients. Parenteral methotrexate was proposed for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with corticosteroid-dependent CD. Biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, were recommended for patients failed by conventional induction therapies and as maintenance therapy. The consensus group was unable to clearly define the role of concomitant immunosuppressant therapies in initiation of treatment with a biologic agent. Conclusions Optimal management of CD requires careful patient assessment, acknowledgement of patient preferences, evidence-based use of existing therapies, and thorough assessment to define treatment success.