Dekker, Evelien

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at increased risk of developing cancer, with the most common sites being colorectal, duodenal/ampullary and thyroid. In the last decade, an alarming increase in gastric cancer has been reported in the Western FAP population. These cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis, even in patients undergoing regular upper endoscopic surveillance. Most gastric cancers in Western patients with FAP occur in the proximal stomach, where a carpeting of fundic gland polyposis hampers visualization of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions during endoscopic surveillance. Although fundic gland polyps are the most prevalent proximal polyp, several different dysplastic lesions can be found in the stomachs of patients with FAP. including fundic gland polyps with dysplasia, foveolar-type adenomas, pyloric gland adenomas, and intestinal-type adenomas. Although adenomas are the most likely precursors to gastric cancer, the exact lesions responsible for gastric cancer in FAP are not yet fully understood. This review focuses on gastric polyposis and the characteristics of gastric cancer in Western patients with FAP, including risk factors, lesion detection, surveillance and management of gastric polyposis, and areas for future research.

ObjectivesThere have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices.MethodsTwo experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence‐based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three‐round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5‐point Likert scale.ResultsForty‐two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision‐making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care.ConclusionsAn international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow‐up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices.

Abstract Background and study aims There is limited consensus on the optimal method for measuring disease severity in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We aimed to systematically review the operating properties of existing endoscopic severity indices for FAP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized endoscopic outcomes or studies that evaluated the operating properties of endoscopic disease severity indices in FAP. Results A total of 134 studies were included. We evaluated scoring indices and component items of scoring indices, such as polyp count, polyp size, and histology. Partial validation was observed for polyp count and size. The most commonly reported scoring index was the Spigelman classification system, which was used for assessing the severity of duodenal involvement. A single study reported almost perfect interobserver and intra-observer agreement for this system. The InSIGHT polyposis staging system, which was used for assessing colorectal polyp burden, has been partially validated. It showed substantial interobserver reliability; however, the intra-observer reliability was not assessed. Novel criteria for high-risk gastric polyps have been developed and assessed for interobserver reliability. However, these criteria showed a poor level of agreement. Other scoring indices assessing the anal transition zone, duodenal, and colorectal polyps have not undergone validation. Conclusions There are no fully validated endoscopic disease severity indices for FAP. Development and validation of a reliable and responsive endoscopic disease severity instrument will be informative for clinical care and RCTs of pharmacological therapies for FAP.

10514 Background: FAP is the most common hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndrome and, if left untreated, will lead to colorectal cancer development in nearly all patients. Chronic inflammation, driven in part by the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, may promote polyp formation. Enteric-selective inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway may provide a treatment for FAP. Lorpucitinib is an oral, small molecule, potent pan-JAK inhibitor with favorable enteric-selective properties. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) results from a phase 1b study of lorpucitinib in patients with FAP (NCT05014360). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥6 polyps ≥2 mm in diameter in the rectum or colon with FAP ( APC germline mutation or obligate carrier) received lorpucitinib 75 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of lorpucitinib on colorectal polyp burden at Week 24, assessed by endoscopy at baseline and Week 24. Secondary objectives were safety, PK, and biomarker assessments of lorpucitinib activity. Results: Overall, 42 (23 pre-colectomy; 19 post-colectomy) patients with FAP were enrolled, with a median age of 33 (range, 19-61) years. No clear effect on polyp burden was observed at Week 24. Gut mucosal and polyp concentrations of lorpucitinib were much higher than plasma concentrations, indicating an enteric-selective distribution. Mean sigmoid colon, rectum, and polyp concentrations of lorpucitinib at Week 8 were 112-, 473-, and 108-fold higher, respectively, than the observed maximum plasma concentration at Week 8 (1 hour). At Week 8, lorpucitinib achieved JAK tyrosine kinase inhibition in mucosal biopsies as evidenced by a median 37% reduction in normalized pSTAT-3 levels. Lorpucitinib reduced serum-based inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A by Week 16 of therapy. Some patients reported an improvement of clinical symptoms such as less frequent bowel movements and less blood in the stool. The most common adverse events (AEs) were abdominal pain (16%), bilirubin increased (13%), headache (13%), lipase increased (13%), and diarrhea (13%). There were no treatment-related serious AEs, grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs, serious infections, or venous thromboembolisms. Conclusions: These results show that lorpucitinib had no clear effect on polyp burden. The study found that lorpucitinib is safe and exhibits an enteric-selective distribution in FAP patients. Inhibition of JAK tyrosine kinase signaling was associated with reduced STAT-3 phosphorylation in mucosal biopsies from FAP patients. While reductions observed in polyp burden were not clinically significant, lorpucitinib treatment lowered levels of several serum inflammatory biomarkers. Treatment with lorpucitinib was safe and well tolerated, and may improve clinical symptoms associated with FAP. Clinical trial information: NCT05014360 .

The number of artificial intelligence (AI) tools for colonoscopy on the market is increasing with supporting clinical evidence. Nevertheless, their implementation is not going smoothly for a variety of reasons, including lack of data on clinical benefits and cost‐effectiveness, lack of trustworthy guidelines, uncertain indications, and cost for implementation. To address this issue and better guide practitioners, the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) has provided its perspective about the status of AI in colonoscopy as the position statement. WEO Position Statement: Statement 1.1: Computer‐aided detection (CADe) for colorectal polyps is likely to improve colonoscopy effectiveness by reducing adenoma miss rates and thus increase adenoma detection; Statement 1.2: In the short term, use of CADe is likely to increase health‐care costs by detecting more adenomas; Statement 1.3: In the long term, the increased cost by CADe could be balanced by savings in costs related to cancer treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, palliative care) due to CADe‐related cancer prevention; Statement 1.4: Health‐care delivery systems and authorities should evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of CADe to support its use in clinical practice; Statement 2.1: Computer‐aided diagnosis (CADx) for diminutive polyps (≤5 mm), when it has sufficient accuracy, is expected to reduce health‐care costs by reducing polypectomies, pathological examinations, or both; Statement 2.2: Health‐care delivery systems and authorities should evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of CADx to support its use in clinical practice; Statement 3: We recommend that a broad range of high‐quality cost‐effectiveness research should be undertaken to understand whether AI implementation benefits populations and societies in different health‐care systems.

AbstractThe European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) presents a short list of performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Current performance measures for colonoscopy mainly focus on detecting (pre)malignant lesions. However, these performance measures are not relevant for all colonoscopy indications in IBD patients. Therefore, our aim was to provide endoscopy services across Europe and other interested countries with a tool for quality monitoring and improvement in IBD colonoscopy. Eight key performance measures and one minor performance measure were recommended for measurement and evaluation in daily endoscopy practice.

Abstract Background The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has developed a core curriculum for high quality optical diagnosis training for practice across Europe. The development of easy-to-measure competence standards for optical diagnosis can optimize clinical decision-making in endoscopy. This manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the ESGE aiming to define simple, safe, and easy-to-measure competence standards for endoscopists and artificial intelligence systems performing optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps (1 – 5 mm). Methods A panel of European experts in optical diagnosis participated in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on Simple Optical Diagnosis Accuracy (SODA) competence standards for implementation of the optical diagnosis strategy for diminutive colorectal polyps. In order to assess the clinical benefits and harms of implementing optical diagnosis with different competence standards, a systematic literature search was performed. This was complemented with the results from a recently performed simulation study that provides guidance for setting alternative competence standards for optical diagnosis. Proposed competence standards were based on literature search and simulation study results. Competence standards were accepted if at least 80 % agreement was reached after a maximum of three voting rounds. Recommendation 1 In order to implement the leave-in-situ strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1–5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 90 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1–5 mm in the rectosigmoid. Histopathology is used as the gold standard. Level of agreement 95 %. Recommendation 2 In order to implement the resect-and-discard strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1–5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 80 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1–5 mm. Histopathology is used as the gold standard. Level of agreement 100 %. Conclusion The developed SODA competence standards define diagnostic performance thresholds in relation to clinical consequences, for training and for use when auditing the optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps.