Dryden, Gerald W.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPatients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are hospitalised for acute severe flares represent a high‐risk orphan population.AimTo provide guidance for clinical trial design methodology in these patients.MethodsWe created a multi‐centre consortium to design and conduct a clinical trial for a novel therapeutic intervention (hyperbaric oxygen therapy) in patients with UC hospitalised for moderate–severe flares. During planning, we identified and addressed specific gaps for inclusion/exclusion criteria; disease activity measures; pragmatic trial design considerations within care pathways for hospitalised patients; standardisation of care delivery; primary and secondary outcomes; and sample size and statistical analysis approaches.ResultsThe Truelove‐Witt criteria should not be used in isolation. Endoscopy is critical for defining eligible populations. Patient‐reported outcomes should include rectal bleeding and stool frequency, with secondary measurement of urgency and nocturnal bowel movements. Trial design needs to be tailored to care pathways, with early intervention focused on replacing and/or optimising responsiveness to steroids and later interventions focused on testing novel rescue agents or strategies. The PRECIS‐2 framework offers a means of tailoring to local populations. We provide standardisation of baseline testing, venous thromboprophylaxis, steroid dosing, discharge criteria and post‐discharge follow‐up to avoid confounding by usual care variability. Statistical considerations are provided given the small clinical trial nature of this population.ConclusionWe provide an outline for framework decisions made for the hyperbaric oxygen trial in patients hospitalised for UC flares. Future research should focus on the remaining gaps identified.

BACKGROUND: Brain fog has been minimally studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD patients frequently consume probiotics, whether sanctioned by a physician or not. However, probiotic consumption in itself has been shown to increase the incidence of brain fog. We aimed to study the association between brain fog in IBD patients with or without probiotic use. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among patients visiting a busy IBD clinic. Patients aged >18 with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, without pre-existing psychiatric illness or current use of opioid medications were included. They were divided into 2 groups: those using probiotics and those who did not. Patients were given a questionnaire that included details about symptoms of brain fog. Groups were analyzed by chi-square test for differences in baseline demographics, and Mann Whitney U test to compare outcomes between groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients included (mean age 44±2 years), 35 (53%) were female and 59 (89.4%) were Caucasian. Among these patients, 31.8% (n = 21) took probiotics as dietary supplements with the majority (67%, n = 14) taking probiotics for over a year. Overall, there was a trend for an association between probiotic use and brain fog in all patients (p = 0.080) but no statistical significance was attained. However, brain fog was significantly associated with probiotic use among Caucasian patients (p = 0.044). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant association between brain fog and male patients using probiotics (p = 0.004). Duration of probiotic use was also associated with brain fog (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Consumption of probiotics was independently associated with brain fog in men, as well as Caucasian patients with IBD respectively. Given the high prevalence of probiotic use in IBD patients, prospective studies are warranted to examine the causal relationship between probiotics and IBD-associated brain fog to guide prescription of probiotic supplements for IBD.