Citations

Context .—Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose. Objective .—To provide updated practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of MM. Data Sources .—Pathologists involved in the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and others with an interest in the field contributed to this update. Reference material includes peer-reviewed publications and textbooks. Conclusions .—There was consensus opinion regarding (1) distinction of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations (both epithelioid and spindle cell lesions), (2) cytologic diagnosis of MM, (3) key histologic features of pleural and peritoneal MM, (4) use of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM, (5) differentiation of epithelioid MM from various carcinomas (lung, breast, ovarian, and colonic adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell and renal cell carcinomas), (6) diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, (7) use of molecular markers in the diagnosis of MM, (8) electron microscopy in the diagnosis of MM, and (9) some caveats and pitfalls in the diagnosis of MM. Immunohistochemical panels are integral to the diagnosis of MM, but the exact makeup of panels used is dependent on the differential diagnosis and on the antibodies available in a given laboratory. Immunohistochemical panels should contain both positive and negative markers. It is recommended that immunohistochemical markers have either sensitivity or specificity greater than 80% for the lesions in question. Interpretation of positivity generally should take into account the localization of the stain (eg, nuclear versus cytoplasmic) and the percentage of cells staining (>10% is suggested for cytoplasmic membranous markers). These guidelines are meant to be a practical reference for the pathologist.

Background Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. Methods Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). Results Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less ‘ BRCA1 -like’ than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more ‘ BRCA1 -like’ than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. Conclusions Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.

Abstract The etiology of ovarian cancer is poorly understood but there is clearly a heritable component. Efforts to identify susceptibility alleles rarely consider interactions among alleles or their joint effects because it quickly becomes computationally intractable. In this study, we sought to identify multi-SNP effects jointly with a pathway-based analysis (GSEA-SNP) of 1,952 EOC cases and 2,042 frequency-matched controls genotyped with the Illumina 610K array. All subjects were self-reported non-Hispanic non-Jewish Caucasians, with SNP and sample call rates &gt; 95%. Subjects with ambiguous gender, unresolved identical genotypes and &lt; 80% European ancestry were excluded. SNPs with MAF &lt; 1% were excluded. Missing genotypes were inferred using Mach based on the HapMap CEU population. SNPs not within introns were annotated to genes within 100 bp. We retrieved the following databases of gene sets (GSs) from a compiled database, MsigDB: human chromosome and cytogenetic band, chemical and genetic perturbations, canonical pathways, microRNA binding targets, transcription factor targets (TFT), cancer gene neighborhood (CGN), Cancer modules and Gene Ontology. The GSEA-SNP approach calculates and rank orders the trend statistic for association between each SNP and EOC risk. The Enrichment Score (ES) estimates the overrepresentation of top-ranked SNPs for each GS; the statistical significance was estimated using 10,000 permutations. The ES was normalized according to the size of GS to yield Normalized Enrichment Score (NES). The false discovery (FDR) rate was estimated using NES to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing. A total of 5181 gene-sets were included in the analysis. When controlling the FDR at 15%, 14 of the GSs were highly enriched with association signals, including two chromosomal regions, 8q13 (p = 0.0055, FDR = 0.15) and 6p24 (p = 0.0012, FDR = 0.08). BIOCARTA_LYM_PATHWAY, a pathway related to cell adhesion and diapedesis of lymphocytes, was also significant (p = 0.0002, FDR = 0.12). A TFT GS, composed of genes with promoter regions around transcription start sites containing the motif GGCNRNWCTTYS, was associated with risk (p = 0.0004, FDR = 0.08). Currently, no known transcription factors bind to this computationally predicted motif. Molecular function of double stranded RNA binding was also enriched (p = 0.005, FDR = 0.10). The remaining enriched sets were CGN sets, for which the neighborhoods around the cancer genes were originally defined using correlation of gene expression from 4 large data sets of various cancer types. The enriched CGN included: CD48 (p = 0.011), CD53 (p = 0.009), CD97 (p = 0.011), INPP5D (p = 0.010), PTPN6 (p = 0.008), VAV1 (p = 0.011), ITGAL (p = 0.012), PTPRC (p = 0.012), and STAT6 (p = 0.010). In summary, these analyses detected biologically plausible GSs related to etiology of EOC, highlighting SNPs in core enrichment groups that were not identified using individual SNP tests. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4729. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4729

Abstract We performed a meta-analysis of 3 genome-wide association studies to identify additional common variants influencing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk. The discovery phase was composed of genome-wide association study data from 1121 cases and 3745 controls. Replication analysis was performed in 861 cases and 2033 controls. We identified a novel CLL risk locus at 6p21.33 (rs210142; intronic to the BAK1 gene, BCL2 antagonist killer 1; P = 9.47 × 10−16). A strong relationship between risk genotype and reduced BAK1 expression was shown in lymphoblastoid cell lines. This finding provides additional support for polygenic inheritance to CLL and provides further insight into the biologic basis of disease development.

Oncolytic reovirus is carried by cells to tumors and protected from neutralizing antibodies in the circulation.

Summary The guideline group regarding the diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis was selected to be representative of UK ‐based medical experts, together with a contribution from a single expert from the USA . MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched systematically for publications in E nglish from 1966 until A ugust 2011 using a variety of key words. The writing group produced the draft guideline, which was subsequently revised by consensus of the members of the General Haematology and Haemato‐oncology Task Forces of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology ( BCSH ). The guideline was then reviewed by a sounding board of UK haematologists, the BCSH and the British Society for Haematology Committee and comments incorporated where appropriate. The criteria used to state levels and grades of evidence are as outlined in the Procedure for Guidelines commissioned by the BCSH ; the ‘ GRADE ‘ system was used to score strength and quality of evidence. The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the investigation and management of primary myelofibrosis, as well as post‐polycythaemic myelofibrosis (post‐ PV MF ) and post‐thrombocythemic myelofibrosis (post‐ ET MF ) in both adult and paediatric patients.