Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

7716 citation(s) found for "Ma, Daniel".

Design and validation of a biomechanics device for preclinical arthrofibrosis models
Carstens, Mason , Meißner, Nils , Weintraub, Matthew T. , Pichurin, Oksana , Morrey, Mark E. , Sánchez‐Sotelo, Joaquín , Thaler, Roman , Abdel, Matthew P. , Carstens, Mason F. , Thaler, Roman , Abdel, Matthew P , Meissner, Nils , Sanchez-Sotelo, J. , Morrey, Mark E , Berry, Daniel J.

Bone & Joint Research | June 19, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 716-725

10.1302/2046-3758.156.bjr-2025-0620.r1 | PMID 42315157 Get It

Aims Reliable assessment of joint stiffness is essential for studying arthrofibrosis in preclinical animal models. This study presents a new dedicated biomechanics device for measuring knee stiffness in mouse, rat, and rabbit models of arthrofibrosis, with the aim of validating its performance and comparing it to a previously validated device. Methods The new system integrates a torque load cell, stepper motor, and absolute encoder in a through-hole, unified configuration for precise continuous torque-angle measurement, with custom limb brackets ensuring species-specific alignment at the joint’s centre of rotation. To validate this device and compare it to a previously validated device, arthrofibrosis was induced using established models of extra-articular immobilization in mice and intra-articular violation with immobilization in rats and rabbits, followed by defined remobilization periods. Torque-angle curves were recorded ex vivo across species-specific torque ranges, and measurement variability between the new and a previous validated device was statistically compared using Brown-Forsythe’s test. Results The onset of hyperextension in contralateral limbs occurred at mean angles of 152.4° (mice), 154.4° (rats), and 152.8° (rabbits), and at maximum torque, mean flexion angles were 79.2°, 87.3°, and 140.5°, respectively. No significant differences in measurement variability were observed between devices across all species. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that our new device provides reproducible torque-angle data while maintaining the statistical robustness of the previous device and offering improved mechanical design and operational standardization. By enabling standardized, cross-species joint stiffness quantification, this platform improves cross-study comparability and strengthens the translational reliability of preclinical arthrofibrosis research. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(6):716–725.
Research through Evaluation for Large Language Model in Patient-Clinician Communications
Holmes, Jason, Hobson, Jared, Bennett, Alexandra, McKone, Elizabeth L. , Ebner, Daniel, Shiraishi, Satomi, Patel, Samir H. , Yu, Nathan Y. , Hallemeier, Chris L., Ball, Brooke E., Waddle, Mark, Liu, Wei, Hao, Yuexing , Holmes, Jason , Routman, David M. , Kalantari, Saleh , Ghassemi, Marzyeh

No container title available | June 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-9735115/v1 | PMID 42370275 Get It

Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in healthcare applications. However, recruiting human evaluators to assess usability and effectiveness becomes challenging in the large-scale LLM-generated outcomes. Existing metrics are often outdated for evaluating LLM-based healthcare technologies. This paper proposes a Research through Evaluation (RtE) approach that can refine metrics and improve assessments of LLM-generated outputs. We deploy RtE in a retrospective comparative study of prostate cancer patient inquiries, comparing responses from human clinical care teams with those generated by a GPT-4-based in-basket bot. Through three rounds of co-evaluations with clinical professionals and an LLM-as-graders study with four LLMs, the RtE method shows that starting with small, iterative evaluations helps human graders adjust metrics to suit their daily practices better. Additionally, in the LLM-as-graders study, LLMs exhibit similar behavior, preferring the in-basket bot's responses over the clinical care team. Our methodology and findings demonstrate that the RtE method can enhance the transparency and robustness of evaluation metrics for LLM-generated content, with the potential to generalize to evaluations in other clinical practices.
Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging
Dirr, McKenzie A. , Ahmed, Areeba, Schlessinger, Daniel I., Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa, Smith, SJ, Gullapalli, Thanvi, Dragovic, Doroteja, Chang, Joycie, Zhang, Elizabeth, Alam, Murad, Group, Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study, Anvery, Noor , Kang, Bianca Y. , Wong, Clarissa, Iyengar, Sanjana, Yanes, Arianna F. , Cotseones, Jill, Ashchyan, Hovik J. , Patel, P. M., Sheikh, Umar A., Franklin, Matthew , Hanna, Courtney, Chiren, Sarah G., Schmitt, J, Furlan, Karina C., Alexiades, Macrene, Alhusayen, Raed, Alster, Tina S. , Beer, Kenneth, Bertucci, Vince , Bloom, Jason D. , Briceño, César A., Bucay, Vivian, Butterwick, Kimberly J., Hugues, Cartier, Casabona, Gabriela, Connolly, Karen , Cox, Sue Ellen , Darmanescu, Monica, Boulle, Koenraad De , Desai, Shraddha, Donofrio, Lisa, Dover, Jeffrey S., Draelos, Zoe, Eisen, Daniel B. , El-Domyati, Moetaz, El-Garem, Yehia, Fischer, John, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, GALADARI, Hassan, Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P., Goodman, Greg J., Hanke, C. William , Humphrey, Shannon, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Jagdeo, Jared, Karen, Julie, Kauvar, Arielle, Ag, Kibbi, KIM, JENNY, Lacerda, D T D, Lask, G, Lopez, Grace M., Lupo, Mary P. , Mariwalla, Kavita , Matarasso, Seth, Mekokishvili, L, Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, P, Orringer, Jeffrey S. , Osaki, Tammy H. , Ozog, David, Pacheco, Theresa, Polder, Kristel, Rossi, Anthony M, Sadick, Neil, Saedi, Nazanin, Schlessinger, Joel, Sharad, Jaishree , Shenoy, SuchitraM, Sinclair, Rd, Solish, Nowell, Piansay‐Soriano, Miriam Emily , Sulyman, Omotara , Szeimies, Rolf‐Markus , Tanzi, Elizabeth L., Taub, Amy Forman , Taylor, Mark B., Thomas, J. Regan, Torezan, Luis, Tosti, Antonella, Touma, Dany, Almeida, Ada Regina Trindade de , Vedamurthy, Maya , Viana, Giovanni, Waldman, Abigail, Weinkle, Susan, Weiss, Robert, Poon, Emily, Cartee, Todd V. , Sobanko, Joseph F. , Eisen, Daniel B. , Ahmed, Areeba , Schlessinger, Daniel Isaac , Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa J, Christensen, Rachel E. , Ibrahim, Sarah A. , Cotseones, J.K., Umar, Sheikh Ahmad , Furlan, Karina Colossi , Alexiades, Macrene , Alhusayen, Raed , Beer, Kenneth Robert, Briceño, César Augusto , Bucay, Vivian , Casabona, Gabriela , Cotofana, Sebastian , Desai, Shraddha , Dover, Jeffrey S. , Draelos, Zoe Diana , Eisen, Daniel B., El-Domyati, Moetaz M. , El-Garem, Yehia, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Friedmann, Daniel P. , Galadari, Hassan , Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P. , Goodman, Greg , Green, Jeremy B. , Halachmi, Shlomit , Humphrey, Shannon , Jagdeo, Jared R. , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Kauvar, Arielle N.B. , Kibbi, Abdul‐Ghani , Kim, John V. S., LASK, GARY P., Matarasso, Seth L., Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, Patricia , Osaki, Tammy H. , Pacheco, Theresa , Polder, Kristel D., Saedi, Nazanin, Shenoy, Manjunath , Sinclair, Rod, Solish, Nowell , Torezan, Luís , Tosti, Antonellá , Waldman, Abigail , Weiss, Robert, Maher, Ian A. , Kirkham, Jamie J

JAMA Dermatology | June 17, 2026 | Volume: 162 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 829

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697 | PMID 42307924 Get It

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.
Learning Curves and Complexity Evolution in Robotic Liver Surgery
Kuemmerli, Christoph , Hess, Gabriel Fridolin , Billeter, Adrian T. , Benedetto, Fabrizio Di , Odorizzi, Roberta, Sucandy, Iswanto , Aegerter, Noa L. E., Berchtold, Caroline , Bernardi, L. , Cristaudi, Alessandra , Balzano, E , Koh, Ye-Xin, Lin, Charles Chung-Wei, Fukumori, Daisuke , Tschuor, Christoph , White, Steve, Kroge, P Von, Heumann, Asmus , Meyere, Céline De, D’hondt, M, Haak, Fabian, Stättner, Stefan, Primavesi, Florian, Morgül, Haluk , Andreou, A, Ratti, F, Esquer, Ignacio Sánchez, Robles-Campos, Ricardo, Lopez-Lopez, Victor, Wakabayashi, Go , Nebbia, Martina, Rahbari, Nuh N., Ferretti, Stefano, Ettore, Giuseppe , Croner, RS , Dong, Y, Starlinger, P, Nickel, F, Müller, Beat P., Hess, Gabriel F , Guidetti, Cristiano , di Benedetto, Fabrizio , Sucandy, Iswanto , Aegerter, Noa L E , Berchtold, Caroline , Bernardi, Lorenzo , Cristaudi, Alessandra , Balzano, Emanuele , Ghinolfi, Davide , Goh, Brian K P , Fukumori, Daisuke , Tschuor, Christoph , Pandanaboyana, Sanjay , De Meyere, Celine , Seehofer, Daniel , Esquer, Ignacio Sánchez , Müller, Philip C , Koh, Ye-Xin , Lin, Charles Chung-Wei, Tschuor, Christoph , Kroge, Philipp H. von , D’Hondt, Mathieu , Haak, Fabian , Stättner, Stefan , Primavesi, Florian , Ratti, Francesca , Robles-Campos, Ricardo, López‐López, Víctor , Wakabayashi, Taiga , Nebbia, Martina , Gilg, Stefan , Birgin, Emrullah , Ferretti, Stefano , Ettore, Giuseppe Maria, Rahimli, Mirhasan , Nickel, Felix , Müller-Stich, Beat Peter

Annals of Surgery | June 17, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/sla.0000000000007123 | PMID 42307103 Get It

Objective: To evaluate the institutional learning curve of robotic liver resection (RLR), its association with surgical complexity and outcomes in an international multicenter cohort. Summary of Background Data: RLR is increasingly adopted worldwide, but the dynamics of the learning process and its impact on surgical outcomes remain poorly defined. Methods: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent RLR between 06/2013 and 12/2024 across 22 expert centers. Based on the first 150 cases at each center, three phases were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Risk-adjusted generalized additive models were used to assess the learning process. Benchmark performance was compared to international reference values. Results: Among 2,331 patients, the most common indications were hepatocellular carcinoma (36%), benign lesions (23%) and colorectal liver metastases (21%). Operative time decreased after achieving competency (case #62), from 240 to 220 minutes ( P <0.001). Major morbidity reached a plateau during the proficiency phase (cases #63–138; 9% vs. 11%, P =0.144), while progression to mastery (cases #139–150) was associated with a higher rate of textbook outcome (76% vs. 87%, P =0.021). In contrast, conversion (5.1% vs. 4.9% vs. 2%), bile leak (4.0% vs. 5.3% vs. 3.8%), and 90-day mortality (0.7% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.9%) remained low and stable across all learning phases. Importantly, benchmark criteria for operative time, hospital stay, and textbook outcome were met across all complexity groups, including during the early learning phase. Conclusions: Robotic liver surgery shows progressive outcome improvement with early achievement of benchmark-level results and stable performance across increasing complexity. These findings indicate that, in experienced centers, RLR can be safely implemented and integrated into clinical practice, supporting its key role in modern hepatobiliary surgery.
GLUT9b- and ABCG2-mediated collecting duct urate transport uncovers a vasopressin-independent mechanism of renal water reabsorption
Hadla, Mohamad , Mardirossian, Jean Marc , Bichet, Daniel, Borghol, Abdul Hamid , Abboud, Georges, Ghanem, Ahmad , Chini, Eduardo N., Harris, Peter, Alper, Seth L., Vallon, Volker , Chini, Eduardo, Hadla, Mohamad , Vallon, Volker , Bichet, Daniel Georges , Abboud, Georges , Chini, Eduardo N. , Harris, Peter C. , Torres, Vicente E. , Alper, Seth L. , Chebib, Fouad T.

Journal of Clinical Investigation | June 16, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 14 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci197021 | PMID 42298327 Get It

Renal water reabsorption is classically regulated by vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) signaling through cyclic AMP and protein kinase A, driving apical accumulation of aquaporin-2 (AQP2). However, collecting duct water handling is also modulated by vasopressin-independent mechanisms. Here, we examined intracellular soluble urate as a vasopressin-independent regulator of AQP2 trafficking. Intracellular urate accumulation in collecting duct cells was mediated by enhanced apical urate uptake via GLUT9b and reduced apical urate efflux through ABCG2, triggering phosphodiesterase-4 activation, reduced cAMP, and downstream AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation. The resulting AQP2 accumulation at the apical membrane was independent of V2R signaling, required ongoing endocytosis, and was associated with features of postendocytic apical trafficking of internalized AQP2. In vivo ABCG2 inhibition with probenecid increased apical AQP2 abundance and markedly attenuated tolvaptan-induced polyuria in both wild-type and Pkd1 RC/RC autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) mice in a uricase-independent manner while preserving tolvaptan’s ADPKD-modifying efficacy. In a phase II trial with tolvaptan-treated patients with ADPKD, probenecid reduced urine volume and nocturia frequency. Together, these findings support a vasopressin-independent urate/AMPK/AQP2 pathway that regulates renal water handling and, in a preclinical ADPKD model, can uncouple cyst growth attenuation from the dose-limiting aquaretic effects of V2R antagonism.
Multi-sampling allows intra-tumoral heterogeneity querying and vulnerability profiling in glioblastoma
Garcia, David M., Lin, Wan‐Hsin , Wickland, Daniel P. , Jessen, Erik , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Haydu, Lauren E. , Brooks, Mieu , Feathers, Ryan W. , Kinsella, Lindsey , Sereduk, Chris , Rosenfeld, Steven S. , Chaichana, Kaisorn L. , Anastasiadis, Panos Z. , Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Alfredo , Jessen, Erik , Tran, Nhan L , Chaichana, Kaisorn L , Anastasiadis, P Z , Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Tran, Nhan L.

Neuro-Oncology | June 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/neuonc/noag139 | PMID 42296327 Get It

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a devastating cancer with limited treatment options, largely due to its heterogeneity. While supramaximal resection has recently provided survival benefits, therapeutic profiling of different tumor compartments, particularly its infiltrative edge remains largely unexplored. Methods Here, we leveraged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided multi-sampling, collecting 2 cores and 2 margins per case, to query GBM heterogeneity. Whole-exome and RNA-seq with drug testing in two patient-derived 3D models were used to reveal similarities and differences in genomic and transcriptomic makeups, cellular compositions, and drug responses across cores and margins. Bioinformatics interrogations further identified response biomarkers. Results Mutation analysis showed that oncogenes exhibited a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity than tumor suppressor genes, regardless of MRI status. While the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype with extracellular matrix remodeling, stress response, and immune programs were preferentially enriched in enhancing cores, proneural tumors with neurological processes favored non-enhancing margins. Using a 15-drug GBM-targeted panel, ERK (ulixertinib) and PI3K pathway (paxalisib, CC-115) inhibitors showed preferential efficacy in enhancing cores and non-enhancing margins, respectively. The anti-apoptosis, pan-Bcl2 agent navitoclax and the epigenetic drug trotabresib represented the most effective, tumor-wide monotherapies. Importantly, drug combinations generally outperformed single agents across all regions. Conclusions This work demonstrates the regional heterogeneity of therapeutic vulnerabilities in GBM ex vivo, showing various drugs with tumor-wide or MRI-enhancement informed activity. These findings offer preclinical bases of numerous monotherapies and drug combinations for future clinical trial design.
Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Johnson, Douglas, Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, C. A., Bateni, Sarah, Baumgartner, Joel, Bichakjian, Christopher, Boland, Genevieve , Chandra, Sunandana , Chen, David, Choi, Jacob, DiMaio, Dominick, Dronca, Roxana, Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Guild, Samantha, Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen, Karakousis, Giorgos, Kendra, Kari, Kiuru, Maija, Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan, Logan, Theodore, Materin, Miguel, Nelson, Kelly, Olson, Daniel, Pa, Ott, Puzanov, Igor, Rothermel, Luke, Salama, April K., Shannon, Adrienne, Singh, Arun, Stacey, Andrew, Tsai, Katy, Wuthrick, Evan, Xing, Yan, McMillian, Nicole, Espinosa, Sara, Swetter, Susan M. , Johnson, Douglas B., Barker, Christopher A. , Baumgartner, Joel , Bhatia, Shailender , Bichakjian, Christopher K. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Guild, Samantha, Hu‐Lieskovan, Siwen , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kiuru, Maija H. , Lanning, Ryan M. , Logan, Theodore F. , Materin, Miguel Angel , Nelson, Kelly C., Olson, Daniel , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Puzanov, Igor , Rothermel, Luke D. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit , Wuthrick, Evan , McMillian, Nicole R.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 15, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 272-277

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0027 | PMID 42297031 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous provide strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma, which is among the most common cancers in the United States. The outcome of cutaneous melanoma is significantly influenced by stage at initial presentation. Generally, localized disease and smaller primary tumors have been associated with more favorable prognosis. Thus, the select content featured in this issue focuses on risk factors associated with cutaneous melanoma development and which should be considered during an initial assessment. These include (1) phenotypic predispositions, (2) personal medical history or comorbidities, (3) genetic predispositions, and (4) environmental factors.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 3.2026
Patel, Anand , Patel, Anand , Pollyea, Daniel Aaron , Altman, Jessica K. , Assi, Rita, Bachiashvili, Kimo, Bhatt, Vijaya Raj , Fathi, Amir T. , Fedorov, Kateryna, Foran, James M. , Gojo, Ivana , Goldberg, Aaron, Hall, Aric C. , Jonas, Brian A., Levine, Matthew R., Mangan, James, Mannis, Gabriel N. , Marcucci, Guido , Mims, Alice S , Moriarty, Kelsey, Ali, Moaath Mustafa, Neff, Jadee , Nejati, Reza , Olin, Rebecca L. , Patel, Anand, Percival, Mary‐Elizabeth M. , Perl, Alexander E. , Pettit, Kristen, Rao, Dinesh S. , Ravandi‐Kashani, Farhad, Schwabkey, Zaker, Shallis, Rory, Stahl, Maximilian, Stone, Richard M. , Thota, Swapna, Uy, Geoffrey L., Walker, Alison, Wang, Eunice, Awotiwon, Ajibola, Roth, Sydney L., Stehman, Katie

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 15, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 222-229

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0028 | PMID 42297017 Get It

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and/or other tissues. It is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths from leukemias in the United States. 1 The NCCN Guidelines Panel for AML convenes annually to update recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AML in adults. These recommendations are based on a review of recently published clinical trials that have led to significant improvements in treatment or have yielded new information regarding biologic factors that may have prognostic importance. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding the monitoring and management of measurable (minimal) residual disease.
An Annual Review of Important Apheresis Articles in 2025 From the American Society for Apheresis Attending Physician Subcommittee
Zantek, Nicole D. , Lu, Wen , AlMozain, Nour , Lu, Wen , Almozain, Nour , Alsammak, Mohamed , Gupta, Gaurav K , Levenbrown, Yosef , Li, Yanhua , Tripathi, Parmatma Prasad , Tanhehco, Yvette C , Zantek, Nicole D , Dilly, Laura, Martin, Marisa C. Saint, Alsammak, Mohamed , Banez‐Sese, Grace, Chhibber, Vishesh, Costa, Victoria, DeChristopher, Phillip J., Durlen, Ivan , Gupta, Gaurav K. , Li, Yanhua , Mattiazzi, Adela D. , Noland, Daniel K., Prajapati, Vipulkumar, Singh, Nirupama, Siwach, Garima, Wu, Ding Wen , Wehrli, Gay , Tanhehco, Yvette C.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | June 13, 2026 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70142 | PMID 42287024 Get It

ABSTRACT Apheresis medicine is a continually evolving field with numerous studies published each year. To help apheresis practitioners stay up to date with the current literature, members of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee identified and summarized 10 seminal articles published in 2025, from the field of apheresis medicine. PubMed was used to identify articles published in four topics including donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis collection for cellular therapy. These articles met at least one of the following criteria: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th Special Issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included while case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.