Miglis, Mitchell G.

Abstract Background The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) research criteria for possible prodromal multiple system atrophy (PP‐MSA) have not been prospectively validated. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PP‐MSA criteria in a longitudinal cohort of patients with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and to assess whether additional clinical features improve their predictive value. Methods Seventy‐six patients with PAF enrolled across eight centers in the Natural History Study of the Synucleinopathies were followed for ≥6 years or until phenoconversion. Participants were classified according to MDS PP‐MSA criteria and followed for development of MSA, Parkinson's disease, or dementia with Lewy bodies. Diagnostic performance was assessed longitudinally. Analyses were repeated using a stricter olfactory threshold (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]≤28) as an exclusion criterion. Results Thirty‐eight participants met PP‐MSA criteria, of whom 12 phenoconverted to MSA within 6 years. Sensitivity was 100% at year 1 and 92% at year 6, whereas specificity ranged from 56% to 67%. Positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 21% to 34%. Applying a stricter olfactory threshold improved specificity (90%–97%) and PPV (53%–83%), with a modest reduction in sensitivity (to 83%). Participants who phenoconverted to MSA were younger, had more severe urinary dysfunction, and greater orthostatic heart rate responses. Conclusions The PP‐MSA criteria demonstrate high sensitivity but limited specificity in patients with PAF. A stricter olfactory threshold improves diagnostic performance and may enhance cohort enrichment for clinical trials. © 2026 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Abstract Introduction Patients with Parkinson’s disease commonly underreport sleep symptoms, but the extent to which such mismatch may be present in people with isolated RBD (iRBD) is unknown. We evaluated how the patient–bedpartner (PT–BP) mismatch in night-time and daytime sleep complaints relates to cognition, apathy, dopaminergic degeneration, and cortical structure in iRBD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 425 iRBD participants (2018–2025) from the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium with clinicodemographic data, dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Using Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease (SCOPA)-Sleep, PT–BP mismatch was classified into overestimator (PT>BP), concordant (PT=BP), and underestimator (PT< BP) groups, separately for complaints during night and day. Outcomes included cognition (CDR-Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB], CDR-global, and individual subdomain tests), pareidolia, apathy, subregional DAT uptake, and cortical thickness. Group differences were tested with analysis of covariance adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, education, clinician-rated OSA treatment inadequacy, and the corresponding patient-reported SCOPA-Sleep domain (night or day), and estimated total intracranial volume for cortical thickness; pairwise tests used Bonferroni correction. Results The PT–BP mismatch was common (night – overestimator 127/425, 29.9% and underestimator 116/425, 27.3%; day – overestimator 77/425, 18.1% and underestimator 134/425, 31.5%). For night-time mismatch, underestimators showed lower CDR-SB and lower CDR-global than overestimators. In addition, underestimators exhibited more illusory responses, fewer correct noise rejections, and fewer total correct responses than overestimator and concordant groups. For daytime mismatch, CDR-SB was lower in underestimators versus overestimators; CDR-global was lower in underestimators and concordant participants versus overestimators. No significant associations were found for apathy. Subregional DAT uptake did not differ by mismatch group. Cortical thickness analyses revealed thinner right transverse gyrus in underestimator and concordant groups compared to the overestimator group and thinner left superior temporal gyrus in underestimator group compared to overestimator group, for night-time mismatch only. Conclusion The PT–BP subjective sleep mismatch can be used as a clinical marker associated with overall cognitive decline and cortical thinning in auditory and language processing areas, which may underlie impairment in perceptual interpretation and hallucination proneness. Further research is warranted to seek longitudinal change and phenoconversion in mismatch groups. Support (if any) #U19-AG071754 (NAPS Consortium)

Abstract Isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a usually prodromal manifestation of neurodegenerative disorders with α-synuclein pathology: Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Clinical trials in the iRBD population face substantial barriers: limited access to well-characterized cohorts, inconsistent assessment protocols across centers, and the absence of validated biomarkers of disease burden. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium was established to address these challenges and facilitate clinical trials for neuroprotective therapies targeting synucleinopathy at the earliest known stages. In this multi-site, longitudinal, observational study, nine academic centers across North America will enroll and follow over 500 individuals with iRBD from existing sleep centers. Sixty control participants, matched for age, sex, and race will also be recruited. A harmonized protocol—including a standardized clinical battery assessing motor, cognitive, autonomic, psychiatric, sensory, and sleep function; structured diagnostic adjudication; biospecimen collection; and centralized analysis of both polysomnography and neuroimaging data—is outlined herein and reflects NAPS Stage 2. Each participants completes these assessments annually, and are replaced in the event of phenoconversion. By unifying assessments and expanding geographic reach, NAPS lays the groundwork for efficient, well-powered clinical trials designed to delay or prevent progression of iRBD to overt PD, DLB, or MSA—ultimately enabling earlier, more effective therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative disease. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05826457).

Abstract Background Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a parasomnia that reflects an evolving α‐synucleinopathy disorder, providing an opportunity to study early pathological changes. While diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have shown white matter changes in iRBD, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) may offer better biological specificity in characterizing microstructural alterations through measures of Neurite Density Index (NDI), Orientation Dispersion Index (ODI), and Free Water Fraction (FWF). Method We included 77 participants with polysomnography‐confirmed iRBD from the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium and 154 age‐ and sex‐matched cognitively unimpaired controls from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. White matter microstructure was evaluated using standardized multi‐shell diffusion on 3T MRI, quantifying DTI metrics (fractional anisotropy, FA; and mean diffusivity, MD) and NODDI parameters across bilateral white matter tracts defined by the JHU “Eve” WM atlas. Group differences were assessed using conditional logistic regression, with correlations to motor performance evaluated using the Purdue Pegboard and Alternating Finger Tapping tests. Result Compared to controls, iRBD participants demonstrated widespread and bidirectional white matter changes across major white matter pathways (see Figure 1 for glass brain visualizations). While predominantly showing decreases, FA exhibited some increases, particularly in the corticospinal tract. MD showed a largely opposite pattern with predominantly increased values across tracts. NODDI metrics revealed complex bidirectional patterns: ODI was broadly increased across multiple tracts with focal decreases, while NDI showed a pattern of predominantly decreased values alongside localized increases. FWF demonstrated a mixed pattern with predominant decreases across most tracts. In addition, both DTI and NODDI metrics showed extensive, moderate correlations with the Purdue Pegboard Test and Alternating Finger Tapping performance ( T = 2.0, p < 0.05, Figure 2). Conclusion Our study highlighted widespread and complex bidirectional white matter microstructural alterations in individuals with iRBD, demonstrating significant correlations with dexterity and motor performance even during the prodromal stage. These results suggest that extensive white matter abnormalities occur early in prodromal α‐synucleinopathies and highlight the value of advanced diffusion imaging techniques in characterizing iRBD and its potential prediction of phenoconversion to overt neurodegenerative disorders.

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the test performance of cutaneous phosphorylated alpha‐synuclein (P‐SYN) in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), individuals with reduced Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and healthy controls. Methods This is the first subgroup analysis of the Synuclein‐One study, a prospective, blinded study evaluating P‐SYN detection from skin biopsies in 218 subjects with a referral diagnosis of control ( N = 151) and DLB ( N = 67). All subjects completed detailed examinations, questionnaires, and had skin biopsies for detection of P‐SYN. DLB patients were included if meeting the 4th DLB consensus probable criteria. Control subjects, aged 40–99, had no history, examination findings, or symptoms suggestive of a synucleinopathy or neurodegenerative disease. An expert review panel, blinded to pathological data, determined the final diagnosis. Controls with reduced MoCA (MoCA < 26, N = 26) at screening were analyzed separately. Results After expert panel review, only 50/67 patients met consensus criteria for DLB, 26/151 controls had a reduced MoCA, and 120/151 controls had a normal MoCA. The proportions of subjects with cutaneous P‐SYN detected by skin biopsy were 96.0% (48 of 50) of the DLB group, 31% (8 of 26) of the controls with reduced MoCA, and 3.3% (4 of 120) of the controls with normal MoCA. Interpretation In this prospective, blinded, cross‐sectional study, a high proportion of subjects meeting clinical consensus criteria for DLB had P‐SYN detected in skin biopsies. Almost 1/3 of subjects with reduced MoCA testing also had P‐SYN detected. These results support a role for skin biopsy detection of P‐SYN in patients with DLB. Trial Registration NCT04700722

Abstract Background In 2021, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation established the Multi‐Disciplinary Post‐Acute Sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection Collaborative to provide guidance from established Long COVID clinics for the evaluation and management of Long COVID. The collaborative previously published eight Long COVID consensus guidance statements using a primarily symptom‐based approach. However, Long COVID symptoms most often do not occur in isolation. Aims This compendium aims to equip clinicians with an efficient, up‐to‐date clinical resource for evaluating and managing adults experiencing Long COVID symptoms. The primary intended audience includes physiatrists, primary care physicians, and other clinicians who provide first‐line assessment and management of Long COVID symptoms, especially in settings where subspecialty care is not readily available. This compendium provides a holistic framework for assessment and management, symptom‐specific considerations, and updates on prevalence, health equity, disability considerations, pathophysiology, and emerging evidence regarding treatments under investigation. Because Long COVID closely resembles other infection‐associated chronic conditions (IACCs) such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, the guidance in this compendium may also be helpful for clinicians managing these related conditions. Methods Guidance in this compendium was developed by the collaborative's established modified Delphi approach. The collaborative is a multidisciplinary group whose members include physiatrists, primary care physicians, pulmonologists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech and language pathologists, patients, and government representatives. Over 40 Long COVID centers are represented in the collaborative. Results Long COVID is defined by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as “an IACC that occurs after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems.” The current global prevalence of Long COVID is estimated to be 6%. Higher prevalence has been identified among female gender, certain racial and ethnic groups, and individuals who live in nonurban areas. However, anyone can develop Long COVID after being infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. Long COVID can present as a wide variety of symptom clusters. The most common symptoms include exaggerated fatigue and diminished energy windows, postexertional malaise (PEM)/postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), cognitive impairment (brain fog), dysautonomia, pain/myalgias, and smell and taste alterations. Holistic assessment should include a traditional history, physical examination, and additional diagnostic testing, as indicated. A positive COVID‐19 test during acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is not required to diagnose Long COVID, and currently, there is no single laboratory finding that is definitively diagnostic for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis of Long COVID. A basic laboratory assessment is recommended for all patients with possible Long COVID, and consideration for additional labs and diagnostic procedures is guided by the patient's specific symptoms. Current management strategies focus on symptom‐based supportive care. Critical considerations include energy conservation strategies and addressing comorbidities and modifiable risk factors. Additionally, (1) it is essential to validate the patient's experience and provide reassurance that their symptoms are being taken seriously because many patients have had their symptoms dismissed by loved ones and clinicians; (2) physical activity recommendations must be carefully tailored to the patient's current activity tolerance because overly intense activity can trigger PEM/PESE and worsened muscle damage; and (3) treatment recommendations should be delivered with humility because there are many persistent unknowns related to Long COVID. To date, there are limited data to guide medication management specifically in the context of Long COVID. As such, medication use generally follows standard practice regarding indications and dosing, with extra attention to prioritize (1) patient preference via shared decision‐making and (2) cautious use of medications that may improve some symptoms (eg, cognitive/attention impairment) but may worsen other symptoms (eg, PEM/PESE). Numerous clinical trials are investigating additional treatments. The return‐to‐work process for individuals with Long COVID can be challenging because symptoms can fluctuate, vary in nature, affect multiple functional areas (eg, physical and cognitive), and often manifest as an “invisible disability” that may not be readily acknowledged by employers or coworkers. Clinicians can help patients return to work by identifying suitable workplace accommodations and resources, providing necessary documentation, and recommending occupational or vocational therapy when needed. If these efforts are unsuccessful and work significantly worsens Long COVID symptoms or impedes recovery, applying for disability may be warranted. Long COVID is recognized as a potential disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Conclusion To contribute to the overall health and well‐being for all patients, Long COVID care should be delivered in a holistic manner that acknowledges challenges faced by the patient and uncertainties in the field. For more detailed information on assessment and management of specific Long COVID symptoms, readers can reference the collaborative's symptom‐specific consensus guidance statements.

ImportanceFinding a reliable diagnostic biomarker for the disorders collectively known as synucleinopathies (Parkinson disease [PD], dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB], multiple system atrophy [MSA], and pure autonomic failure [PAF]) is an urgent unmet need. Immunohistochemical detection of cutaneous phosphorylated α-synuclein may be a sensitive and specific clinical test for the diagnosis of synucleinopathies.ObjectiveTo evaluate the positivity rate of cutaneous α-synuclein deposition in patients with PD, DLB, MSA, and PAF.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis blinded, 30-site, cross-sectional study of academic and community-based neurology practices conducted from February 2021 through March 2023 included patients aged 40 to 99 years with a clinical diagnosis of PD, DLB, MSA, or PAF based on clinical consensus criteria and confirmed by an expert review panel and control participants aged 40 to 99 years with no history of examination findings or symptoms suggestive of a synucleinopathy or neurodegenerative disease. All participants completed detailed neurologic examinations and disease-specific questionnaires and underwent skin biopsy for detection of phosphorylated α-synuclein. An expert review panel blinded to pathologic data determined the final participant diagnosis.ExposureSkin biopsy for detection of phosphorylated α-synuclein.Main OutcomesRates of detection of cutaneous α-synuclein in patients with PD, MSA, DLB, and PAF and controls without synucleinopathy.ResultsOf 428 enrolled participants, 343 were included in the primary analysis (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [9.1] years; 175 [51.0%] male); 223 met the consensus criteria for a synucleinopathy and 120 met criteria as controls after expert panel review. The proportions of individuals with cutaneous phosphorylated α-synuclein detected by skin biopsy were 92.7% (89 of 96) with PD, 98.2% (54 of 55) with MSA, 96.0% (48 of 50) with DLB, and 100% (22 of 22) with PAF; 3.3% (4 of 120) of controls had cutaneous phosphorylated α-synuclein detected.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study, a high proportion of individuals meeting clinical consensus criteria for PD, DLB, MSA, and PAF had phosphorylated α-synuclein detected by skin biopsy. Further research is needed in unselected clinical populations to externally validate the findings and fully characterize the potential role of skin biopsy detection of phosphorylated α-synuclein in clinical care.