McCauley, Mark

Abstract Background In 2021, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation established the Multi‐Disciplinary Post‐Acute Sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection Collaborative to provide guidance from established Long COVID clinics for the evaluation and management of Long COVID. The collaborative previously published eight Long COVID consensus guidance statements using a primarily symptom‐based approach. However, Long COVID symptoms most often do not occur in isolation. Aims This compendium aims to equip clinicians with an efficient, up‐to‐date clinical resource for evaluating and managing adults experiencing Long COVID symptoms. The primary intended audience includes physiatrists, primary care physicians, and other clinicians who provide first‐line assessment and management of Long COVID symptoms, especially in settings where subspecialty care is not readily available. This compendium provides a holistic framework for assessment and management, symptom‐specific considerations, and updates on prevalence, health equity, disability considerations, pathophysiology, and emerging evidence regarding treatments under investigation. Because Long COVID closely resembles other infection‐associated chronic conditions (IACCs) such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, the guidance in this compendium may also be helpful for clinicians managing these related conditions. Methods Guidance in this compendium was developed by the collaborative's established modified Delphi approach. The collaborative is a multidisciplinary group whose members include physiatrists, primary care physicians, pulmonologists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech and language pathologists, patients, and government representatives. Over 40 Long COVID centers are represented in the collaborative. Results Long COVID is defined by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as “an IACC that occurs after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems.” The current global prevalence of Long COVID is estimated to be 6%. Higher prevalence has been identified among female gender, certain racial and ethnic groups, and individuals who live in nonurban areas. However, anyone can develop Long COVID after being infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. Long COVID can present as a wide variety of symptom clusters. The most common symptoms include exaggerated fatigue and diminished energy windows, postexertional malaise (PEM)/postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), cognitive impairment (brain fog), dysautonomia, pain/myalgias, and smell and taste alterations. Holistic assessment should include a traditional history, physical examination, and additional diagnostic testing, as indicated. A positive COVID‐19 test during acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is not required to diagnose Long COVID, and currently, there is no single laboratory finding that is definitively diagnostic for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis of Long COVID. A basic laboratory assessment is recommended for all patients with possible Long COVID, and consideration for additional labs and diagnostic procedures is guided by the patient's specific symptoms. Current management strategies focus on symptom‐based supportive care. Critical considerations include energy conservation strategies and addressing comorbidities and modifiable risk factors. Additionally, (1) it is essential to validate the patient's experience and provide reassurance that their symptoms are being taken seriously because many patients have had their symptoms dismissed by loved ones and clinicians; (2) physical activity recommendations must be carefully tailored to the patient's current activity tolerance because overly intense activity can trigger PEM/PESE and worsened muscle damage; and (3) treatment recommendations should be delivered with humility because there are many persistent unknowns related to Long COVID. To date, there are limited data to guide medication management specifically in the context of Long COVID. As such, medication use generally follows standard practice regarding indications and dosing, with extra attention to prioritize (1) patient preference via shared decision‐making and (2) cautious use of medications that may improve some symptoms (eg, cognitive/attention impairment) but may worsen other symptoms (eg, PEM/PESE). Numerous clinical trials are investigating additional treatments. The return‐to‐work process for individuals with Long COVID can be challenging because symptoms can fluctuate, vary in nature, affect multiple functional areas (eg, physical and cognitive), and often manifest as an “invisible disability” that may not be readily acknowledged by employers or coworkers. Clinicians can help patients return to work by identifying suitable workplace accommodations and resources, providing necessary documentation, and recommending occupational or vocational therapy when needed. If these efforts are unsuccessful and work significantly worsens Long COVID symptoms or impedes recovery, applying for disability may be warranted. Long COVID is recognized as a potential disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Conclusion To contribute to the overall health and well‐being for all patients, Long COVID care should be delivered in a holistic manner that acknowledges challenges faced by the patient and uncertainties in the field. For more detailed information on assessment and management of specific Long COVID symptoms, readers can reference the collaborative's symptom‐specific consensus guidance statements.

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young people. Recently, a patient with HCM with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinoatrial block was found to have a missense mutation, E169K, in the junctophilin 2 (JPH2) protein. Loss of JPH2 has been shown to affect intracellular Ca2+ release in the heart. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of E169K mutation on Ca2+ handling and arrhythmogenesis. Hypothesis: The JPH2 E169K mutation promotes sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ leak causing abnormal atrial conduction and AF. Methods and Results: We evaluated our hypothesis by generating 3 mice that overexpressed 1) JPH2 with E169K mutation (EK-Tg), 2) WT JPH2 (WT-Tg) and 3) JPH2 with inactive P584S mutation (PS-Tg). On Western Blot, JPH2 expression was increased by 2-3 fold in all the mouse groups compared to non-transgenic controls. Echocardiography at 6 months of age revealed normal fractional shortening in all mice. At baseline, EK-Tg mice had a shorter RR interval (104±1 ms, n=10) vs. WT-Tg (123±5 ms, n=8, p=0.001) and PS-Tg mice (121±5 ms, n=5, p<0.001). EK-Tg mice also had a shorter PR interval (36±1 ms, n=10) vs. WT-Tg (41±1 ms, n=8, p=0.01) and PS-Tg mice (39±1 ms, n=5, p=0.15). On intracardiac electrophysiology studies, EK-Tg mice had shorter AVERP (39±2 ms, n=10) vs. WT-Tg (51±2 ms, n=8, p=0.005) and PS-Tg mice (48±3 ms, n=5, p=0.05). On overdrive pacing of the atria in the presence of epinephrine and caffeine, EK-Tg mice had a 57% incidence of AF (n=10) vs. 21% in WT-Tg (n=8, p<0.05) and 33% in PS-Tg mice (n=5, p=0.2). Isolated cardiomyocytes from EK-Tg mice had a higher Ca2+ spark frequency (6.7±0.8 events/100 um/s, n=20) vs. cardiomyocytes from WT-Tg (1.8±0.5 events/100 um/s, n=10, p<0.001) and PS-Tg mice (3.3±1.0 events/100 um/s, n=16, p<0.05). Lastly, JPH2 levels were lower in RyR2 channels immunoprecipitated from EK-Tg mice vs. RyR2 from WT-Tg mice (65% vs. 100%, p<0.05). Conclusion: The JPH2 mutation, E169K, leads to reduced binding of JPH2 with RyR2, increased SR Ca2+ leak, abnormal atrial conduction and AF. The data suggest that JPH2 may serve as a critical stabilizing molecule for RyR2; further approaches to stabilize this interaction may lead to improved control of AF in susceptible populations.