Aims Reliable assessment of joint stiffness is essential for studying arthrofibrosis in preclinical animal models. This study presents a new dedicated biomechanics device for measuring knee stiffness in mouse, rat, and rabbit models of arthrofibrosis, with the aim of validating its performance and comparing it to a previously validated device. Methods The new system integrates a torque load cell, stepper motor, and absolute encoder in a through-hole, unified configuration for precise continuous torque-angle measurement, with custom limb brackets ensuring species-specific alignment at the joint’s centre of rotation. To validate this device and compare it to a previously validated device, arthrofibrosis was induced using established models of extra-articular immobilization in mice and intra-articular violation with immobilization in rats and rabbits, followed by defined remobilization periods. Torque-angle curves were recorded ex vivo across species-specific torque ranges, and measurement variability between the new and a previous validated device was statistically compared using Brown-Forsythe’s test. Results The onset of hyperextension in contralateral limbs occurred at mean angles of 152.4° (mice), 154.4° (rats), and 152.8° (rabbits), and at maximum torque, mean flexion angles were 79.2°, 87.3°, and 140.5°, respectively. No significant differences in measurement variability were observed between devices across all species. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that our new device provides reproducible torque-angle data while maintaining the statistical robustness of the previous device and offering improved mechanical design and operational standardization. By enabling standardized, cross-species joint stiffness quantification, this platform improves cross-study comparability and strengthens the translational reliability of preclinical arthrofibrosis research. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(6):716–725.
Primary total knee arthroplasty for primary and secondary osteonecrosis
Aims Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteonecrosis has historically been associated with concerns regarding aseptic loosening, and long-term data are limited. The purpose of this study was to update and expand our previous series with long-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, risk factors for failure, complications, and clinical outcomes in a consecutive cohort of TKAs performed for primary and secondary osteonecrosis. Methods We retrospectively identified 295 consecutive TKAs in 266 patients for osteonecrosis performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from January 2002 to July 2022. Of these, 207 TKAs (70%) were performed for primary osteonecrosis, and 88 (30%) for secondary osteonecrosis. The predominant cause of secondary osteonecrosis was steroid use (59%; n = 52), followed by post-traumatic (25%; n = 22), radiation-induced (9%; n = 8), and alcohol-induced (7%; n = 6) osteonecrosis. Implant survivorship was analyzed as a time-to-event outcome using Kaplan-Meier estimation. The mean age was 61 years (18 to 93), with 67% being female (n = 197). The mean follow-up was nine years (2 to 20). Results The 15-year survivorship free of any revision for the entire cohort was 92% (95% CI 87 to 97), with similar rates between primary and secondary osteonecrosis (92% (95% CI 87 to 98) vs 93% (95% CI 87 to 100), respectively; p = 0.459). Varus-valgus constraint implant designs (HR 10.8 (95% CI 2.7 to 43.4); p < 0.001) and tibial stem use (HR 12.0 (95% CI 4.1 to 35.1); p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of any revision. The 15-year survivorship free of aseptic loosening was 97% (95% CI 93 to 100) for the entire cohort. Age under 65 years (HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 5.4); p = 0.005) and secondary osteonecrosis (HR 1.9 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4); p = 0.044) were associated with an increased risk of any reoperation at 15 years. Conclusion TKA is a durable and reliable option for primary osteonecrosis at long-term follow-up. However, TKAs performed for secondary osteonecrosis carry a higher reoperation risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(4):455–462.
Prospective clinical trial analyzing serum mast cell tryptase levels and arthrofibrosis rates after total knee arthroplasty
Aims Arthrofibrosis affects a notable percentage of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Elevated serum mast cell tryptase (SMCT) levels have been linked to fibrosis, suggesting that SMCT could serve as a biomarker for arthrofibrosis. As such, the aims of this study were to assess SMCT levels in TKA patients, and their possible association with arthrofibrosis and clinical outcomes in a prospective clinical trial. Methods We conducted a prospective study involving 219 patients undergoing primary TKA at a single academic medical centre between January 2018 and December 2022. SMCT levels were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at six weeks, three months, and one year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included revision rates, complications, and Knee Society Scores (KSSs). Allergic and inflammatory conditions were assessed for their influence on SMCT levels. Results At one year postoperatively, eight patients had developed arthrofibrosis (4%), and three (1.5%) had undergone manipulation under anaesthesia. The mean preoperative SMCT level was 5.6 µg/L (SD 3.4), which decreased significantly to 4.1 µg/L (SD 2.7) immediately postoperatively (p < 0.001). At six weeks the mean SMCT level was 6.4 µg/l (SD 4.1), and was 6.1 µg/l at both three months (SD 4.1) and one year (SD 4.0). Elevated preoperative SMCT levels were not significantly associated with the risk of arthrofibrosis development (OR 3; p = 0.370), nor were immediate postoperative levels (OR 2; p = 0.754) or those at six weeks (OR 1; p = 0.989). Of note, elevated SMCT levels at three months (OR 5; 95% CI 0.4 to 64; p = 0.191) and one year (OR 13; 95% CI 1 to 232; p = 0.077) trended toward an increased risk of arthrofibrosis development, without reaching significance. Conclusion In patients undergoing TKA, with the numbers included in this study, there was no significant difference in SMCT levels between patients who did and did not develop arthrofibrosis at any timepoint. However, there was a trend towards elevated SMCT levels at three months and one year in those who developed arthrofibrosis, which merits further study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2025;14(11):1045–1052.
Primary total hip arthroplasty using jumbo femoral heads (40 and 44 mm)
Aims The use of jumbo femoral heads, defined as those with a diameter of ≥ 40 mm, in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity, to mitigate dislocation. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of dislocation, implant survival, and clinical outcomes of a large cohort of primary THAs with jumbo femoral heads. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,828 primary THAs with jumbo femoral heads, which were undertaken for osteoarthritis, in 1,578 patients between January 2000 and December 2022, at a single academic medical centre. The femoral head diameter was 40 mm in 1,584 THAs (87%) and 44 mm in 244 THAs (13%). The outer diameter of the acetabular component ranged from 52 mm to 72 mm in those with 40 mm heads, and from 54 mm to 78 mm in those with 44 mm heads. The types of bearing included ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (1,229 THAs; 67%) and metal-on-polyethylene (599 THAs; 33%). Elevated liners were used in 472 THAs (26%) and 1,083 (59%) were lateralized. The most common operative approach was posterior (1,388 THAs; 76%). Outcomes of interest included the rate of dislocation, revision for dislocation, any revision, any reoperation, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The mean age of the patients at the time of THA was 64 years (8 to 94); 1,477 (81%) were male, and their mean BMI was 28 kg/m² (5 to 55). The mean follow-up was six years (2 to 14). Results The ten-year survival free of dislocation was 97% (95% CI 96 to 98; 97% for 40 mm heads (95% CI 95 to 98) and 99% for 44 mm heads (95% CI 97 to 100) (hazard ratio 3 (95% CI 1 to 14); p = 0.106)). The ten-year survival free of revision for dislocation was 99.6% (95% CI 99 to 100) (99.5% for 40 mm heads (95% CI 98 to 100) and 100% for 44 mm heads (p = 0.546)). The ten-year survival free of any revision and any reoperation was 95% (95% CI 94 to 97) and 93% (95% CI 91 to 95), respectively. There were no significant differences in survival free of any revision (p = 0.746) or any reoperation (p = 0.762) between the two groups. Conclusion In this large single-centre study of the use of jumbo femoral heads in primary THAs, the ten-year survival free of dislocation was 97%, with extremely few revisions for dislocation. These results highlight the potential for jumbo femoral heads to reduce the risk of dislocation and enhance implant longevity without compromising other clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(7):698–706.