Hannon, Charles P

Background The management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) is challenging, with 2 main options being conservative and surgical management. Orthobiologic therapies come to bridge the gap between these 2 options; however, inconsistencies in indication, composition, and heterogeneous evidence limit clinical decision-making. To address these challenges, 3 International Congress Meetings on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle were convened in Pittsburgh, USA (2017), Dublin, Ireland (2019), and New York, USA (2025) to establish agreement on the role of conservative management and injectable orthobiologic strategies in the treatment of OLT. Methods Seventy-five multidisciplinary experts from over 25 countries and 1 territory participated in a structured Delphi-based consensus process. Blinded surveys, structured questionnaires, and in-person discussions were used to develop and refine statements, supported by literature review and graded evidence (A1–E). Consensus strength was defined as consensus (51%-74%), strong consensus (75%-99%), or unanimous (100%) Results In total, 29 consensus statements were achieved across the 3 meetings. Strong agreement was reached regarding indications and expected outcomes of conservative management, including the role of immobilization and appropriate timing for surgical intervention. Orthobiologic injections, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and hyaluronic acid, were considered appropriate in select patients with persistent symptoms, although no superiority was demonstrated among formulations, preparation methods, or injection strategies. When used as adjuncts to surgical procedures, orthobiologics may improve radiological outcomes, with limited evidence for improvement in clinical outcomes. Technical considerations, including preferred harvest sites and a lack of standardized preparation protocols, were identified, along with key principles for patient counseling Conclusion These international consensus statements establish a standardized framework for the conservative management and use of injectable orthobiologic therapies in OLT. By clarifying indications, technical considerations, and current limitations, this work aims to improve consistency in clinical practice, guide treatment decision-making, and inform future research.

Background: Greater trochanteric (GT) fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are typically managed nonoperatively. However, outcome data for patient counseling remain limited. We evaluated the nonoperative results, focusing on fracture union rates and the presence of persistent limp in relation with fracture location, displacement magnitude, and direction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 postoperative GT fractures not associated with trochanteric osteolysis following primary THA performed between 1984 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 9 years. Fracture location was classified relative to the contralateral lesser trochanter as tip, waist, or base. Initial displacement, migration, final displacement, and bony union were assessed radiographically. Clinical outcomes included the presence of a persistent limp and Harris Hip Score. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with nonunion and limp. Results: Fractures were classified as tip (n = 32), waist (n = 29), or base (n = 21). The mean initial displacement was 8.9 mm, with 43% displaced >10 mm. Initial displacement was significantly lower in base fractures (4.8 mm) compared with tip (10.1 mm) or waist (10.8 mm) fractures (p < 0.05). The mean final displacement was 14.6 mm. 45% of fractures achieved complete bony union, and 38% of patients demonstrated a persistent limp. In multivariable analysis, greater final displacement (>12 mm), and tip and waist fractures were independently associated with nonunion. Posterior fracture displacement was significantly associated with persistent limp. Conclusions: Outcomes following nonoperative management of GT fractures after THA depend on fracture morphology and displacement characteristics. Tip and waist fractures and fractures with final displacement >12 mm have a higher risk of nonunion, whereas posterior and superior displacement is associated with persistent limp. Greater than 20 mm of displacement is associated with both limp and nonunion. These findings may assist surgeons in counseling patients and in identifying fracture patterns at higher risk for adverse outcomes of nonoperative management. Level of Evidence: Level III (Prognostic Study). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Contemporary rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasties (RH-TKAs) have shown reasonable short-term survivorship in smaller series, but concerns remain regarding risks of aseptic and septic failure. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of contemporary RH-TKAs in one of the largest series to date. Methods: We retrospectively identified 575 RH-TKAs (60% used for aseptic etiologies and 40% used during reimplantation in 2-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infection [PJI]) from 2002 to 2021 at a single institution. The mean age was 67 years, 58% were female, and the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m 2 . Sixty-five percent had Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type-2B or 3 bone loss. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 19 years). Results: Survivorship free from any revision was 76% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. The most common revision indications were PJI (54%) and aseptic loosening (20%). RH-TKA used in the primary setting showed better survivorship compared with RH-TKA used during reimplantation after PJI (79% versus 60% at 10 years). Survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening was 96% at 5 years and 90% at 10 years. Survivorship free from revision for PJI was 84% at 5 years and 81% at 10 years. Survivorship free from revision for PJI was even lower for RH-TKAs used during reimplantation, 74% at 5 years and 73% at 10 years. RH-TKA used during reimplantation in the treatment of PJI was associated with an increased risk of any revision (HR = 2, p < 0.001). Radiographic analysis of 425 knees that were not revised and had radiographs available for review showed that 6% of femoral components and 8% of tibial components had evidence of loosening at the time of final follow-up. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 33 to 69 at 2 years (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 90% in this large series of RH-TKAs. This represents one of the best survivorships free from aseptic loosening published to date. Knees with prior PJI had markedly poorer survivorship than knees treated for aseptic etiologies, with double the risk of revision. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aims Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteonecrosis has historically been associated with concerns regarding aseptic loosening, and long-term data are limited. The purpose of this study was to update and expand our previous series with long-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, risk factors for failure, complications, and clinical outcomes in a consecutive cohort of TKAs performed for primary and secondary osteonecrosis. Methods We retrospectively identified 295 consecutive TKAs in 266 patients for osteonecrosis performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from January 2002 to July 2022. Of these, 207 TKAs (70%) were performed for primary osteonecrosis, and 88 (30%) for secondary osteonecrosis. The predominant cause of secondary osteonecrosis was steroid use (59%; n = 52), followed by post-traumatic (25%; n = 22), radiation-induced (9%; n = 8), and alcohol-induced (7%; n = 6) osteonecrosis. Implant survivorship was analyzed as a time-to-event outcome using Kaplan-Meier estimation. The mean age was 61 years (18 to 93), with 67% being female (n = 197). The mean follow-up was nine years (2 to 20). Results The 15-year survivorship free of any revision for the entire cohort was 92% (95% CI 87 to 97), with similar rates between primary and secondary osteonecrosis (92% (95% CI 87 to 98) vs 93% (95% CI 87 to 100), respectively; p = 0.459). Varus-valgus constraint implant designs (HR 10.8 (95% CI 2.7 to 43.4); p < 0.001) and tibial stem use (HR 12.0 (95% CI 4.1 to 35.1); p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of any revision. The 15-year survivorship free of aseptic loosening was 97% (95% CI 93 to 100) for the entire cohort. Age under 65 years (HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 5.4); p = 0.005) and secondary osteonecrosis (HR 1.9 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4); p = 0.044) were associated with an increased risk of any reoperation at 15 years. Conclusion TKA is a durable and reliable option for primary osteonecrosis at long-term follow-up. However, TKAs performed for secondary osteonecrosis carry a higher reoperation risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(4):455–462.

Background: Surgeons often recommend weight loss for patients with obesity before total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unknown whether preoperative weight loss affects outcomes. The goals of this study were to determine how many patients with obesity lost weight before TKA, to identify weight loss predictors, and to evaluate if preoperative weight loss affected postoperative outcomes. Methods: Among 23,726 primary TKAs performed between 2002 and 2019, we identified 3,665 patients who had a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m 2 measured 1 to 24 months before surgery and had a weight measured at surgery. The mean patient age was 68 years, and 59% of patients were female. The mean patient BMI was 36 kg/m 2 . Univariable linear regressions evaluated weight loss predictors. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of preoperative weight change on discharge, operative time, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), complications, revisions, and reoperations. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: Overall, 20% of patients gained ≥5 pounds (1 pound = 0.45 kg), 39% maintained weight, 17% lost 5 to <10 pounds, 15% lost 10 to <20 pounds, and 9% lost ≥20 pounds before TKA. Male patients lost slightly more weight (−4.6 pounds) than female patients (−4.3 pounds) (p = 0.05). In univariable analyses, gaining >5 pounds was associated with increased odds of extended hospital length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; p = 0.01) and risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; p < 0.01). Losing 10 to <20 pounds was associated with increased risks of revision (HR, 2.0; p = 0.01), PJI (HR, 3.1; p < 0.01), and complications (HR, 1.6; p = 0.03). In multivariable analyses, compared with maintaining weight, losing 10 to <20 pounds was associated with an increased risk of PJI (HR, 2.6; p = 0.01), whereas gaining >5 pounds was associated with an increased risk of complications (HR, 1.5; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Few patients with obesity lost substantial weight before primary TKA, and reaching common preoperative weight loss goals was not associated with improved outcomes. Although a healthy weight is important for general health, weight loss before TKA may not be sufficient to improve postoperative outcomes for most patients with obesity. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Many surgeons use body mass index (BMI) cutoffs when offering total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, little is known about who loses weight before THA, and if weight loss improves outcomes. This study determined how many patients lost weight before primary THA, identified predictors of preoperative weight loss, and evaluated whether preoperative weight loss was associated with improved outcomes. Methods: Among 53,038 primary THAs that were performed between 2002 and 2019, we identified 2,463 patients who had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2 (measured 1 to 24 months before surgery) and had their weight measured at the time of surgery. The mean age was 66 years; 47% were women. The mean BMI was 35 kg/m 2 . Nonparametric models evaluated potential associations with weight loss. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of preoperative weight change on hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, operative time, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), complications, revision, and reoperation. The mean follow-up was 5 years. Results: Overall, 17% of the patients gained >5 pounds (2.27 kg), 38% maintained their weight, 16% lost 5 to <10 pounds (4.54 kg), 17% lost 10 to <20 pounds (9.07 kg), and 12% lost ≥20 pounds before THA. Only 28% of patients with a preoperative BMI of ≥40 kg/m 2 achieved a BMI of <40 kg/m 2 by the time of surgery; those who did required a mean of 1.3 years to lose the weight. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant improvements in operative time, length of stay, and discharge disposition, or survivorship free of PJI, complication, revision, or reoperation for any weight-loss category when compared with those who maintained their weight. Conclusions: Only 12% of patients lost ≥20 pounds, and only 28% of patients with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m 2 achieved a BMI of <40 kg/m 2 before primary THA. There was no decrease in complications, revisions, or reoperations for any preoperative weight-loss category when compared with those who maintained their weight. While weight loss benefits overall health, the results of this study call into question whether preoperative weight loss alone is enough to reduce postoperative complications for most patients. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: We previously reported the 5-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant. This study evaluates BHR survivorship as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 224 patients with contemporary indications, including 179 patients from the original study, were included in this analysis. Survivorship was calculated. Metal ion levels and radiographs were updated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with those for matched patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The mean follow-up was 14 years. Results: Survivorship free from any revision and from aseptic revision was 96.0% and 97.4% at 15 years, respectively. Two patients had undergone revision since the original study. The median serum cobalt and chromium levels were 1.4 and 1.5 ppb, respectively. The PROs were similar to those for the THA cohort. Equal proportions of patients remained active; however, the BHR group trended toward more remaining highly active (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Although activity was similar to THA at long-term follow-up, the BHR implant remains an excellent option for the treatment of osteoarthritis in younger male patients. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

» Perioperative corticosteroids are strongly recommended for reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting following elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty. » Corticosteroids may reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements. Similarly, corticosteroids appear to have a neutral-to-positive effect on length of stay, venous thromboembolism, mobility, delirium, acute kidney injury, and bone cement implantation syndrome (i.e., decreased length of stay). » Perioperative corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia among both diabetic and nondiabetic patients; however, there is no strong evidence indicating that these transient corticosteroid-induced glycemic derangements may increase the risk of postoperative infectious complications. » The dosage and frequency of perioperative corticosteroid administration play a critical role in optimizing postoperative outcomes, with higher doses showing promise in reducing opioid consumption, postoperative pain, and length of stay. » The optimal dosage and frequency of corticosteroids remain unclear; however, the perioperative administration of 8 to 16 mg dexamethasone, or equivalent steroid, appears reasonable and safe in most cases.

Background: As the number of primary total hip arthroplasty procedures performed each year continues to rise, so too do the number of complications, including periprosthetic femoral fracture 1–9 . Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures are difficult to treat because they require the surgeon to simultaneously manage a femoral fracture and gain new implant fixation. Fluted tapered stems have advanced the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by providing immediate axial and rotational implant fixation distal to the fracture 10–18 . Modular fluted tapered stems provide the added practical advantage of allowing length and anteversion adjustment after implantation of the distal fixation portion of the stem. Description: In this technique, a modified extended trochanteric osteotomy incorporating the fracture is utilized to gain access to the loose femoral implant and femoral diaphyseal canal. The femoral diaphyseal canal is then sequentially reamed in 1-mm increments. A fluted tapered stem with the appropriate length, diameter, and axial and rotational stability is inserted into the canal. A proximal body is then chosen that establishes the appropriate leg length, femoral offset, and version. The final proximal body is engaged into the fluted tapered stem. Finally, the fracture is fixed around the implant with a combination of cables or wires. Alternatives: Historically, implants such as extensively porous coated stems were utilized to treat Vancouver B2 or B 3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Unfortunately, these implants were associated with high rates of failure and revision 7,9 . Rationale: The introduction of a fluted tapered stem provided a more reliable implant that achieves immediate axial and rotational stability. In addition, utilizing a fluted tapered stem allowed for a more soft-tissue-preserving approach to these complex injuries, in turn allowing the fracture to be reduced around the implant proximally with cerclage cables and or wires. Modular fluted tapered stems provide the additional advantage of allowing the surgeon to modify leg length, offset, and femoral version, independently of the fluted tapered stem. As a result of these unique advantages, these stems were introduced several years ago for the treatment of Vancouver B 2 or B 3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Expected Outcomes: Contemporary series have demonstrated that the use of a modular fluted tapered stem leads to improved implant survivorship and clinical outcomes with lower complication rates for Vancouver B2 and B 3 periprosthetic femoral fractures 1,10–12,14–19 . Important Tips: Template both the fluted tapered stem and proximal body preoperatively. The proximal body should be templated at the ideal hip center of rotation that appropriately restores leg lengths and offset. Template the fluted tapered stem so that it provides appropriate isthmic fit and bypasses the most distal extent of the fracture by at least 2 cortical diameters. Utilize a modified extended trochanteric osteotomy for your exposure in order to facilitate visualization of the fracture and to provide direct access to the femoral canal. Place a prophylactic cable prior to preparing the femur for the implant in order to help prevent iatrogenic fracture. Place a trial stem and obtain intraoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in order to assess the position of the implants and the risk of anterior cortical perforation. When placing the final implants, be sure the fluted tapered stem has both axial and rotational stability. Reduce and fix the fracture after the final implants are placed and the hip is reduced. Acronyms and Abbreviations: AP = anteroposterior MFT = modular fluted tapered (stem) ETO = extended trochanteric osteotomy THA = total hip arthroplasty CT = computed tomography PJI = periprosthetic joint infection

Background: Removal of well-fixed femoral components during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be difficult and time-consuming 1 , leading to numerous complications, such as femoral perforation, bone loss, and fracture. Extended trochanteric osteotomies (ETOs), which provide wide exposure and direct access to the femoral canal under controlled conditions, have become a popular method to circumvent these challenges. ETOs were popularized by Wagner (i.e., the anterior-based osteotomy), and later modified by Paprosky (i.e., the lateral-based osteotomy) 2 . Description: The decision to utilize the laterally based Paprosky ETO versus the anteriorly based Wagner ETO is primarily based on surgeon preference, the location and type of in situ implants, and the osseous anatomy. Typically, a laterally based ETO is most facile in conjunction with a posterior approach and an anteriorly based ETO is most commonly paired with a lateral or anterolateral approach. Attention must be paid to maintaining vascularity to the osteotomy fragment, including minimizing stripping of the vastus lateralis from the osteotomy fragment and maintaining abductor attachments to the osteotomy fragment. When utilizing a laterally based ETO, the posterior border of the vastus lateralis must be carefully elevated to provide exposure for performance of the osteotomy. When an anteriorly based osteotomy is performed, the surgeon may instead extend the abductor tenotomy proximally with use of a longitudinal split of the vastus lateralis distally, which helps to keep the anterior and posterior sleeves of soft tissue in continuity. In either approach, dissection of the vastus lateralis involves managing several large vascular perforators. We prefer performing careful blunt dissection to identify the perforators and prophylactically controlling them, with ligation of large vessels and electrocautery of smaller vessels. Vascular clips are also available in case difficult-to-control bleeding is encountered. In general, an oscillating saw (with preference for a thin blade) is utilized to complete the posterior longitudinal limb of the ETO, extending approximately 12 to 16 cm distally from the tip of the greater trochanter. Although a 12 to 16-cm zone is required to maintain maximum vascularity to the osteotomized fragment, the osteotomy length must ultimately be determined by (1) the length of the femoral component to be removed; (2) the presence of distal bone ingrowth, ongrowth, or cement; and (3) the presence of distal hardware or stemmed knee components. A smaller oscillating saw is then utilized to complete the transverse limb at the previously identified distal extent. A high-speed pencil-tip burr is utilized to complete the corners of the osteotomy in a rounded configuration, and a combination of saws and pencil-tip burrs is utilized to create partial proximal and distal anterior longitudinal limbs of the osteotomy to the extent allowed by the soft-tissue attachments. The anterior longitudinal limb may be further weakened in a controlled fashion with use of serial drill holes. The anterior longitudinal limb then undergoes controlled fracture by placement of 2 to 4 broad straight osteotomes in the posterior longitudinal limb. These osteotomes are carefully levered anteriorly in unison with a gentle, steady force. After the ETO is completed, intramedullary prostheses, hardware, and cement are removed; the acetabulum is addressed as needed; and a final femoral stem is implanted, if appropriate. After completion of the osteotomy, the osteotomized fragment must be retracted gently, with care taken to avoid a fracture and maintain vascularity. To this end, debridement of the endosteum of the osteotomized fragment, including any cement removal, should be avoided until the end of the procedure, when the osteotomy is ready to be closed. Our preferred method for closure is to place 1 prophylactic cable 1 cm distal to the osteotomy, 1 to 2 cables along the diaphyseal segment of the osteotomy, and 1 Luque wire above the less trochanter. A Luque wire is our specific choice for the location above the lesser trochanter because it sits in the effective joint space; however, the use of Luque wires distal to the lesser trochanter is also acceptable. A strut allograft or locking plate can be utilized to reinforce the osteotomy in rare cases or to bridge interprosthetic stress risers. Trochanteric implants are typically avoided because of the low rate of clinically relevant trochanteric migration with this closure technique and because of the high rate of symptomatic implants with trochanteric claws or plates. Alternatives: An alternative osteotomy of similar exposure is the transfemoral osteotomy. Additionally, a variety of non-extended trochanteric osteotomies, such as trochanteric slide osteotomies, offer more limited exposure. Rationale: Femoral surgical exposure for revision THA can be aided by performing transfemoral osteotomies, but these provide less precise control of the separate proximal femoral osteotomized segment(s), and healing and fixation can be less reliable. Less invasive osteotomies such as non-extended trochanteric osteotomies typically do not provide adequate exposure in challenging cases for which ETO is being considered. Expected Outcomes: ETOs have high union rates, and notable trochanteric migration is infrequent. The most common complications are fracture of the osteotomy fragment intraoperatively or postoperatively. Radiographic and clinical union is achieved in 98% of patients. The mean proximal trochanteric osteotomy fragment migration prior to union is 3 mm. ETO fragment migration of >1 cm occurs in just 7% of hips. Postoperative greater trochanter fractures occur in 9% of hips. The 10-year survivorship free of revision for aseptic femoral loosening, free of femoral or acetabular component removal or revision for any reason, and free of reoperation for any reason is 97%, 91%, and 82%, respectively 3 . Important Tips: Attention should be paid to patient anatomy, deformity, surgical approach, and implant type when choosing to perform a laterally based Paprosky or anteriorly based Wagner ETO. Appropriate length of the posterior longitudinal limb of the ETO is approximately 12 to 16 cm distally from the tip of the greater trochanter. Attention must be paid to maintaining vascularity to the osteotomy fragment, including minimizing stripping of the vastus lateralis from the osteotomy fragment and maintaining abductor attachments to the osteotomy fragment. A high-speed pencil-tip burr should be utilized to complete the corners of the osteotomy in a rounded configuration in order to avoid stress risers. The anterior longitudinal limb is completed by controlled fracture of the remaining intervening segment in order to maintain vastus lateralis attachments and vascular supply to the osteotomy fragment. The ETO is closed with use of cerclage cables and/or double-stranded Luque wires, typically utilizing a total of 3 to 4 in order to obtain secure fixation without compromising local biology. Acronyms and Abbreviations: MFT = modular fluted tapered