Sofka, Carolyn M.

Background The management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) is challenging, with 2 main options being conservative and surgical management. Orthobiologic therapies come to bridge the gap between these 2 options; however, inconsistencies in indication, composition, and heterogeneous evidence limit clinical decision-making. To address these challenges, 3 International Congress Meetings on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle were convened in Pittsburgh, USA (2017), Dublin, Ireland (2019), and New York, USA (2025) to establish agreement on the role of conservative management and injectable orthobiologic strategies in the treatment of OLT. Methods Seventy-five multidisciplinary experts from over 25 countries and 1 territory participated in a structured Delphi-based consensus process. Blinded surveys, structured questionnaires, and in-person discussions were used to develop and refine statements, supported by literature review and graded evidence (A1–E). Consensus strength was defined as consensus (51%-74%), strong consensus (75%-99%), or unanimous (100%) Results In total, 29 consensus statements were achieved across the 3 meetings. Strong agreement was reached regarding indications and expected outcomes of conservative management, including the role of immobilization and appropriate timing for surgical intervention. Orthobiologic injections, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and hyaluronic acid, were considered appropriate in select patients with persistent symptoms, although no superiority was demonstrated among formulations, preparation methods, or injection strategies. When used as adjuncts to surgical procedures, orthobiologics may improve radiological outcomes, with limited evidence for improvement in clinical outcomes. Technical considerations, including preferred harvest sites and a lack of standardized preparation protocols, were identified, along with key principles for patient counseling Conclusion These international consensus statements establish a standardized framework for the conservative management and use of injectable orthobiologic therapies in OLT. By clarifying indications, technical considerations, and current limitations, this work aims to improve consistency in clinical practice, guide treatment decision-making, and inform future research.

Background: Osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT) is often used to treat large osteochondral lesions of the talus and is generally associated with good outcomes. The addition of adjuncts such as cartilage extracellular matrix with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) may further improve the OAT procedure but have not been thoroughly studied. We hypothesized that the placement of ECM-BMAC around the OAT graft would improve radiographic and patient-reported outcomes following OAT. Methods: Patients who received OAT, with ECM-BMAC or BMAC alone, were screened and their charts were reviewed. For patients who did receive ECM-BMAC, the mixture was spread around the edges of the OAT plug and into any surrounding areas of cartilage damage. Survey and radiographic data were collected. Average follow-up in both groups was over 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were scored using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Tissue (MOCART) system. Outcomes were compared statistically between groups. Results: Patients treated with ECM-BMAC (n = 34) demonstrated significantly greater improvement of scores in the FAOS categories Symptoms (17 vs −3; P = .02) and Sports Activities (40 vs 7; P = .02), and the MOCART category Subchondral Lamina ( P = .008) compared to those treated with BMAC alone (n = 30). They also experienced significantly lower rates of postoperative cysts (53% vs 18%, P = .04) and edema (94% vs 59%, P = .02). Conclusion: The addition of ECM-BMAC to OAT was associated with improved imaging and clinical outcomes compared to OAT with BMAC alone.

Background: Historically, microfracture has been used to treat small talar osteochondral lesions with good results, whereas osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) has proven effective for the treatment of larger lesions. It is not clear which method is more effective for medium-sized lesions around the critical size of 150 mm 2 , above which microfracture outcomes tend to be poor. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential advantages of OAT augmented with a combination of extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) compared to debridement with ECM-BMAC (DEB) in the treatment of medium-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Methods: Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively for patients treated by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were scored using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Tissue (MOCART) system and were evaluated for the presence of cysts and edema. Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria, with 25 who received an OAT procedure. Age, body mass index, lesion size, lesion location, and follow-up time were similar between groups. Average MRI follow-up times were 16.7 months for the OAT group and 20.3 months for the DEB group ( P = .38). Results: Patients treated with OAT had significantly higher average total MOCART scores (69 vs 55, P = .04) and significantly lower rates of cyst (14% vs 55%, P < .01), edema (59% vs 90%, P = .04), revision surgery (0% vs 19%, P = .05), and therapeutic injection for pain (4% vs 30%, P = .02) compared to patients treated with DEB. No significant differences were detected in patient-reported outcome scores between groups. Conclusion: The native hyaline cartilage introduced by OAT appears to result in higher-quality repair tissue when compared to DEB, as evidenced by OAT patients’ higher MOCART scores and lower rates of cyst and edema. There was no difference in clinical outcome scores, though OAT patients did not require revision surgery or therapeutic injection for pain as frequently as DEB patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Background: Microfracture (MF) has been used historically to treat osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs), with favorable outcomes reported in approximately 80% to 85% of cases. However, MF repairs have been shown to degrade over time at long-term follow-up, suggesting that further study into optimal OLT treatment is warranted. The use of adjuvant extracellular matrix with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) has not been extensively evaluated in the literature. We present a comparison of patient-reported and radiographic outcomes following ECM-BMAC repair vs traditional MF. Methods: Patients who underwent MF (n = 67) or ECM-BMAC (n = 62) treatment for an OLT were identified and their charts were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated and patient-reported outcome scores, either Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) or Patient-Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, were collected. MRIs were scored by a radiologist, fellowship trained in musculoskeletal radiology, using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) system. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: On average, patients treated with ECM-BMAC demonstrated a higher total MOCART score compared to the MF group (73 ± SD 11.5 vs 54.0 ± 24.1; P = .0015). ECM-BMAC patients also had significantly better scores for the Infill, Integration, and Signal MOCART subcategories. Last, patients treated with ECM-BMAC had a lower rate of revision compared to those treated with MF (4.8% vs 20.9%; P = .007). FAOS scores were compared between groups, with no significant differences observed. Conclusion: When comparing outcomes between patients treated for an OLT with ECM-BMAC vs traditional MF, we observed superior MRI results for ECM-BMAC patients. The rate of revision surgery was higher for MF patients, although patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups. The use of ECM-BMAC as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of OLTs may result in improved reparative tissue when compared to MF. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative series.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to directly compare clinical outcomes following the treatment of medium-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) using a microfracture technique augmented with Extracellular Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (MFX) versus OAT to determine which treatment is superior for medium-sized lesions. Methods: Patients treated for an OLT between 2015 and 2018 by a single surgeon, fellowship-trained in sports medicine and foot and ankle, were screened for this study. Retrospective chart review determined treatment, lesion size, lesion location, concurrent injuries, and demographic information. Patients at a minimum of 12 months follow-up, treated with MFX or OAT, and lesions sized 80-165mm2 were eligible for inclusion. All surgical repairs were augmented with an adjuvant mixture of micronized cartilage extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC). Patient-reported functional outcomes were collected through our institution’s prospective Registry database. Patients treated prior to March 2016 were administered preoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaires. Those treated after this date were administered preoperative Physical Function, Pain Interference, Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Depression, and Pain Intensity Patient-Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) domains. Both FAOS and PROMIS were administered postoperatively. Postoperative MRIs were assessed using a modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. Student’s paired and two-group t-tests were used to evaluate for statistically significant pre-to-postoperative change and differences between procedure groups (p less than 0.05). Results: Twenty-seven patients treated with MFX (age range, 14-58) and twenty-three patients treated using OAT (age range, 22-64) were identified. All OAT patients received a single-plug transplantation. The final average lesion size ± standard deviation (SD) for patients treated with MFX was 115.44mm2± 22.51 (range, 156-80mm2) and 121.78mm2± 23.98 (range, 165-80mm2) for those treated using OAT (p=0.34). On average, functional outcome scores improved pre-to-postoperatively across all scales within both groups. Statistically significant improvements were detected in PROMIS Physical Function (Δ=8.32, p=0.01), Pain Interference (Δ=-7.15, p=0.02), Global Physical Health (Δ=5.87, p=0.03), and Pain Intensity (Δ=-7.06, p=0.05) domains for the MFX cohort. For the OAT patient group, significant pre-to-postoperative change was seen in the FAOS subcategories of Pain (Δ=28.70, p=0.03), Sports Activities (Δ=43.12, p<0.01), and Quality of Life (Δ=43.75, p=0.01); overall FAOS score (Δ=29.93, p=0.01); and PROMIS Physical Function (Δ=13.66, p=0.01), Pain Interference (Δ=-14.58, p<0.01), Global Physical Health (Δ=12.2, p=0.01), Depression (Δ=-4.13, p=0.02), and Pain Intensity (Δ=-16.56, p=0.02) domains. On average, with the exception of the postoperative Sports Activities subscale, postoperative FAOS and pre-to-postoperative change in FAOS were higher and greater in the OAT patient group. Similarly, on average, the OAT group had better PROMIS t-scores indicating higher function or less pain and greater pre-to-postoperative change in each PROMIS domain. The OAT cohort’s average postoperative Pain Interference t-score (± SD) of 43.09 (± 5.81) and Depression t-score of 40.06 (± 6.84) were significantly lower than their respective counterparts in the MFX cohort: 50.08 (± 9.47) for Pain Interference and 48.09 (± 7.86) in Depression. (Table 1) Finally, the mean overall MOCART score was 55.67 (± 24.11) within the MFX cohort, average follow-up 15.29 months, and 71 (± 15.60) within the OAT cohort average follow-up 15.8 months. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.04). Conclusion: The OAT group had a higher MOCART score indicating the use of a single osteochondral autograft plug may result in better structural repair than microfracture abrasion chondroplasty augmented with a mixture of adjuvant ECM-BMAC. In addition, higher average FAOS scores, better average PROMIS t-scores, and greater pre-to-postoperative change in the OAT patient group indicate functional results may be better in this group as well. Specifically, significantly lower Pain Interference and Depression domains and significantly higher Global Mental Health scores indicate patients treated using OAT experience less pain and better psychological benefits postoperatively compared to patients treated using MFX. These results suggest filling the lesion with transplanted autograft bone and native, hyaline cartilage may perform better than and the biomechanically inferior fibrocartilage produced following microfracture even when augmented with adjuvant therapy. OAT may result in better overall clinical outcomes, specifically in a population of patients with medium sized lesions (range, 80 mm2 -165 mm2).