Back to Authors

Alsammak, Mohamed

0000-0003-2890-7731

Mayo Clinic

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Citations 2

An Annual Review of Important Apheresis Articles in 2025 From the American Society for Apheresis Attending Physician Subcommittee
Zantek, Nicole D. , Lu, Wen , AlMozain, Nour , Lu, Wen , Almozain, Nour , Alsammak, Mohamed , Gupta, Gaurav K , Levenbrown, Yosef , Li, Yanhua , Tripathi, Parmatma Prasad , Tanhehco, Yvette C , Zantek, Nicole D , Dilly, Laura, Martin, Marisa C. Saint, Alsammak, Mohamed , Banez‐Sese, Grace, Chhibber, Vishesh, Costa, Victoria, DeChristopher, Phillip J., Durlen, Ivan , Gupta, Gaurav K. , Li, Yanhua , Mattiazzi, Adela D. , Noland, Daniel K., Prajapati, Vipulkumar, Singh, Nirupama, Siwach, Garima, Wu, Ding Wen , Wehrli, Gay , Tanhehco, Yvette C.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | June 13, 2026 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70142 Get It

ABSTRACT Apheresis medicine is a continually evolving field with numerous studies published each year. To help apheresis practitioners stay up to date with the current literature, members of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee identified and summarized 10 seminal articles published in 2025, from the field of apheresis medicine. PubMed was used to identify articles published in four topics including donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis collection for cellular therapy. These articles met at least one of the following criteria: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th Special Issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included while case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.
Transfusion of Amustaline/Glutathione Pathogen-reduced Red Blood Cells in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial
Sekela, Michael , Snyder, Edward L. , Toyoda, Yoshiya , Alsammak, Mohamed , Sodha, Neel R. , Beaver, Thomas M. , Pelletier, J. Peter R. , Gorham, James D. , McNeil, John W. , Pearl, Ronald G. , Nuttall, Gregory A. , Reece, T. Brett , Collaborators, and the ReCePI Study, Sekela, Michael E , Welsby, Ian J , Alsammak, Mohamed , Sodha, Neel R , Beaver, Thomas M , Pelletier, J Peter R , Gorham, James D , McNeil, John S , Sniecinski, Roman M , Nuttall, Gregory A , Sarode, Ravi , Benjamin, Richard J , Collaborators, and the ReCePI Study

Anesthesiology | August 12, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1196-1210

10.1097/aln.0000000000005716 Get It

Background: Transfusion has a persistent low risk of transfusion-transmitted infection and transfusion-associated graft- versus -host disease that may be addressed using pathogen reduction. The Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) trial tested whether amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced red cells are noninferior to conventional transfusions for support of acute surgical blood loss. Methods: A phase 3, double-blinded, noninferiority trial randomized cardiac or thoracic–aorta surgery patients with increased risk of red cell transfusion to receive pathogen-reduced or conventional red cells during and for 7 days postsurgery. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), which is defined as an increase from baseline of greater than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl serum creatinine within 48 h of surgery. Noninferiority was claimed if the upper bound 95% CI of the treatment difference was less than half (50%) of the observed conventional arm incidence. Adverse events and treatment-emergent red cell antibodies were assessed for 28 and 75 days, respectively. Results: A total of 581 subjects were randomized, and 321 (55%) were transfused with study red cells. Transfused subjects in both arms had similar baseline demographics, medical histories, hemoglobin levels, and surgical procedures. Hemoglobin day 3 nadir levels (8.6 g/dl [7.8 to 9.2] in the pathogen-reduced arm; 8.4 g/dl [7.8 to 9.3] in the conventional arm; P = 0.52) were comparable. Incidence of AKI by 48 h was 46 of 157 (29.3%) in the pathogen-reduced arm and 45 of 161 (28.0%) in the conventional arm (treatment difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, −8.9 to 10.4%; noninferiority margin, 14.0%; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). AKI within 7 days by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes staging criteria was not different (59 of 159 [37.1%] in the pathogen-reduced arm; 55 of 162 [34.0%] in the conventional arm; P = 0.53), but stage III was more common in the pathogen-reduced arm (pathogen-reduced arm, 15 of 159 [9.4%]; conventional arm, 7 of 162 [4.3%]; P = 0.075). Of 159 pathogen-reduced red cell recipients, 5 (3.1%) developed specific, low-titer antibodies without evidence of hemolysis. Conclusions: The incidence of AKI in recipients of pathogen-reduced red cells was noninferior to conventional red cell transfusion. Treatment-emergent antibodies were uncommon and not clinically significant.