Snyder, Edward L.

Abstract Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion may be lifesaving, however transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) and transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) still pose a threat despite current donor selection and testing requirements. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) pathogen reduction (PR) is designed to inactivate infectious microbes and leukocytes in RBCs. The RedeS study evaluates the safety and efficacy of amustaline/GSH PR-RBCs compared to conventional RBCs in a broad spectrum of patients requiring acute and/or repeated RBC transfusion support. Methods RedeS is a Phase 3, prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-design study, with a 6-month extension option to evaluate patients requiring repeated transfusions including red cell exchange (RCE).Eligible subjects will be stratified according to site, baseline bleeding status and participation in the extension period. The study arms include a transfusion period of 28-days for anemia with any bleeding or non-bleeding patients or a 28-day+6-month extension for non-bleeding patients with chronic anemia requiring repeated simple transfusions, or for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) expected to receive three RCE procedures. The study will seek to enroll 600-800 subjects in the overall safety analysis, including ~140 repeatedly-transfused subjects in the 6-month extension including up to 30 subjects receiving three RCE procedures. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days after the last study transfusion, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to PR-RBCs. The primary efficacy endpoint is the hemoglobin (Hb) increment in subjects who are non-bleeding at baseline, adjusted for the grams of Hb transfused and averaged over multiple transfusions. With 352 evaluable transfused non-bleeding subjects (176 per treatment group) from either arm, the study will have 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Hb increment treatment difference of no more than 15% of the Control group mean, assuming a Control arm coefficient of variation of 50%. Discussion RedeS will characterize the safety of amustaline/GSH PR-RBCs and is designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of PR-RBCs to conventional RBCs with respect to Hb increment, a common pragmatic clinical assessment of RBC transfusion effectiveness.

Background: Transfusion has a persistent low risk of transfusion-transmitted infection and transfusion-associated graft- versus -host disease that may be addressed using pathogen reduction. The Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) trial tested whether amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced red cells are noninferior to conventional transfusions for support of acute surgical blood loss. Methods: A phase 3, double-blinded, noninferiority trial randomized cardiac or thoracic–aorta surgery patients with increased risk of red cell transfusion to receive pathogen-reduced or conventional red cells during and for 7 days postsurgery. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), which is defined as an increase from baseline of greater than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl serum creatinine within 48 h of surgery. Noninferiority was claimed if the upper bound 95% CI of the treatment difference was less than half (50%) of the observed conventional arm incidence. Adverse events and treatment-emergent red cell antibodies were assessed for 28 and 75 days, respectively. Results: A total of 581 subjects were randomized, and 321 (55%) were transfused with study red cells. Transfused subjects in both arms had similar baseline demographics, medical histories, hemoglobin levels, and surgical procedures. Hemoglobin day 3 nadir levels (8.6 g/dl [7.8 to 9.2] in the pathogen-reduced arm; 8.4 g/dl [7.8 to 9.3] in the conventional arm; P = 0.52) were comparable. Incidence of AKI by 48 h was 46 of 157 (29.3%) in the pathogen-reduced arm and 45 of 161 (28.0%) in the conventional arm (treatment difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, −8.9 to 10.4%; noninferiority margin, 14.0%; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). AKI within 7 days by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes staging criteria was not different (59 of 159 [37.1%] in the pathogen-reduced arm; 55 of 162 [34.0%] in the conventional arm; P = 0.53), but stage III was more common in the pathogen-reduced arm (pathogen-reduced arm, 15 of 159 [9.4%]; conventional arm, 7 of 162 [4.3%]; P = 0.075). Of 159 pathogen-reduced red cell recipients, 5 (3.1%) developed specific, low-titer antibodies without evidence of hemolysis. Conclusions: The incidence of AKI in recipients of pathogen-reduced red cells was noninferior to conventional red cell transfusion. Treatment-emergent antibodies were uncommon and not clinically significant.

Introduction: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a lifesaving intervention with a low but persistent risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. Amustaline/glutathione RBC pathogen-reduction (PR) technology is designed to proactively inactivate a broad spectrum of viruses, bacteria, protozoa and leukocytes by chemically crosslinking nucleic acids and preventing replication and transcription. The Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) trial was a Phase III, double-blinded, randomized non-inferiority study comparing PR and conventional RBCs for the support of acute anemia. Methods/Study Design: Complex cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery patients received conventional (Control) or PR RBCs (Test) during and for 7 days after surgery. The protocol was conducted with ethics committee approval at all participating centers and written informed consent from all participants. Hemoglobin levels, blood utilization and serum creatinine were assessed as indicators of efficacy and oxygenation of tissues (Karkouti et al. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 Suppl 1: i29-i38). The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) measured as change in serum creatinine from baseline within 48 hours of surgery, a predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes including mortality by Day 30 post-surgery (Lassnig et al. Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 1597-1605). Secondary endpoints included AKI occurring up to 7 days post-surgery (KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for AKI, Kidney Inter, Suppl. 2012;2:1-138); death or the need for renal replacement therapy by 30 days post-surgery; PR RBC-specific antibodies; and death by day 75 post-surgery. With >292 subjects enrolled, the study had 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, assuming an AKI incidence of 30% with conventional RBCs and a non-inferiority margin of half the conventional RBC rate. Under these circumstances, an absolute treatment increase of 5% in the AKI rate in the PR RBC arm would fail the non-inferiority test. This work was supported by a contract with the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHS010020160009c) with Cerus Corporation. Results: Five-hundred and eighty-one subjects were randomized and 321 (55%) transfused in 18 US hospitals. In the modified intent-to-treat analysis subjects receiving Test and Control RBCs had similar median [IQR] total blood loss (1500 [940-2475] mL Test, 1733 [1060-2880] mL Control, p=0.310) and comparable median hemoglobin levels at baseline and immediately post-surgery (9.8 [8.9-10.9] g/dL Test, 9.6 [8.6-10.6] g/dL Control, p=0.157) and for 7 days after surgery, The PR RBC arm was transfused with fewer RBCs, measured as total RBC Hb transfused over 7-days (169.0 [102.0-240.0] g Hb PR arm, 188.0 [126.0-295.0] g Hb, conventional RBC arm, p=0.008). The incidence of AKI was 29.3% (46/157) for Test and 28.0% (45/161) for Control. The treatment difference was 0.74% (95% CI -8.9, 10.4%, non-inferiority margin 14.0%, p=0.001 for non-inferiority). Non-inferiority was also achieved by the per protocol analysis. Average mean change in serum creatinine within 48 hours of surgery was comparable (Test 0.020, Control 0.23 mg/dL, P=0.515). Adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths on study were not different. Five of 159 (3.1%) PR RBC recipients developed low titer PR RBC-specific antibodies without clinical signs of hemolysis. Flow cytometry analysis revealed persistent circulating PR RBCs with uniform antigen loss (modulation). Low level human IgG antibody binding was demonstrated in 3 of 5 subjects. Conclusions: PR RBCs showed equivalent hemoglobin support for acute bleeding patients undergoing cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery while using less transfused total RBC Hb over 7 days. The incidence of AKI in patients transfused with PR RBCs was non-inferior to that observed with conventional RBCs, indicative of effective tissue oxygenation. Treatment-related antibodies to PR-RBC were observed only in Test subjects, the antibodies were low titer, transient, without clinical hemolysis, and persistent circulating PR RBCs were detected with modulated low level acridine antigen expression (www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03459287).

Abstract Patients treated with antineoplastic therapy often develop thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion, which has potential to exacerbate pulmonary injury. This study tested the hypothesis that amotosalen-UVA pathogen–reduced platelet components (PRPCs) do not potentiate pulmonary dysfunction compared with conventional platelet components (CPCs). A prospective, multicenter, open-label, sequential cohort study evaluated the incidence of treatment-emergent assisted mechanical ventilation initiated for pulmonary dysfunction (TEAMV-PD). The first cohort received CPC. After the CPC cohort, each site enrolled a second cohort transfused with PRPC. Other outcomes included clinically significant pulmonary adverse events (CSPAE) and the incidence of treatment-emergent acute respiratory distress syndrome (TEARDS) diagnosed by blinded expert adjudication. The incidence of TEAMV-PD in all patients (1068 PRPC and 1223 CPC) was less for PRPC (1.7 %) than CPC (3.1%) with a treatment difference of –1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], –2.7 to –0.2). In patients requiring ≥2 PCs, the incidence of TEAMV-PD was reduced for PRPC recipients compared with CPC recipients (treatment difference, –2.4%; 95% CI, –4.2 to –0.6). CSPAE increased with increasing PC exposure but were not significantly different between the cohorts. For patients receiving ≥2 platelet transfusions, TEARDS occurred in 1.3% PRPC and 2.6% CPC recipients (P = .086). Bayesian analysis demonstrated PRPC may be superior in reducing TEAMV-PD and TEARDS for platelet transfusion recipients compared with CPC recipients, with 99.2% and 88.8% probability, respectively. In this study, PRPC compared with CPC demonstrated high probability of reduced severe pulmonary injury requiring assisted mechanical ventilation in patients with hematology disorders dependent on platelet transfusion. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02549222.

Abstract Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leucocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. Methods ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, paralleldesign, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to Day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from presurgery baseline within 48±4 hours of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥292 evaluable, transfused patients (>146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. Discussion RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBC.

AbstractBackgroundPlatelet transfusion carries risk of transfusion‐transmitted infection (TTI). Pathogen reduction of platelet components (PRPC) is designed to reduce TTI. Pulmonary adverse events (AEs), including transfusion‐related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occur with platelet transfusion.Study designAn open label, sequential cohort study of transfusion‐dependent hematology‐oncology patients was conducted to compare pulmonary safety of PRPC with conventional PC (CPC). The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment‐emergent assisted mechanical ventilation (TEAMV) by non‐inferiority. Secondary outcomes included: time to TEAMV, ARDS, pulmonary AEs, peri‐transfusion AE, hemorrhagic AE, transfusion reactions (TRs), PC and red blood cell (RBC) use, and mortality.ResultsBy modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT), 1068 patients received 5277 PRPC and 1223 patients received 5487 CPC. The cohorts had similar demographics, primary disease, and primary therapy. PRPC were non‐inferior to CPC for TEAMV (treatment difference −1.7%, 95% CI: (−3.3% to −0.1%); odds ratio = 0.53, 95% CI: (0.30, 0.94). The cumulative incidence of TEAMV for PRPC (2.9%) was significantly less than CPC (4.6%, p = .039). The incidence of ARDS was less, but not significantly different, for PRPC (1.0% vs. 1.8%, p = .151; odds ratio = 0.57, 95% CI: (0.27, 1.18). AE, pulmonary AE, and mortality were not different between cohorts. TRs were similar for PRPC and CPC (8.3% vs. 9.7%, p = .256); and allergic TR were significantly less with PRPC (p = .006). PC and RBC use were not increased with PRPC.DiscussionPRPC demonstrated reduced TEAMV with no excess treatment‐related pulmonary morbidity.

BackgroundThe AMICUS (Fenwal, Inc.) was cleared in the United States for platelet (PLT) and plasma collection in 1996 with subsequent clearances for the collection of other blood products. Although not previously used for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), new disposables, software, and hardware were developed to enable TPE on the AMICUS.Study Design and MethodsA multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, crossover paired treatment protocol was performed. Thirty patients with orders for at least two TPE procedures were randomly assigned to the AMICUS or the COBE Spectra (TerumoBCT) for the first treatment. Each patient was crossed over to the other device using the same procedure settings from the first procedure. The primary objective compared efficiency of plasma removal (EPR) with secondary objectives of comparing PLT and hemoglobin (Hb) waste plasma content, coagulation factor and complement activation, fluid balance tracking accuracy, procedure length, and adverse events.ResultsThe EPR for the AMICUS (81.9 ± 7.62%) was superior to that of the COBE Spectra (75.2 ± 6.29%; p = 0.00001). The AMICUS also demonstrated statistically higher fluid balance accuracy (99.84%) compared to that of the COBE Spectra (98.83%; p < 0.0001) and a statistically shorter procedure time (103.9 ± 30.8 vs. 110.5 ± 27.1 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to PLT and Hb content in the waste plasma, change in patient PLT count, or changes in markers of coagulation and complement cascade activation were seen. Frequency and severity of adverse reactions were similar.ConclusionThe AMICUS separator can effectively perform TPE. The AMICUS demonstrated superior plasma removal efficiency compared to the COBE Spectra with no evidence of significant differences in PLT removal, hemolysis, and coagulation or complement activation.