Ipe, Tina S.

Introduction: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a lifesaving intervention with a low but persistent risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. Amustaline/glutathione RBC pathogen-reduction (PR) technology is designed to proactively inactivate a broad spectrum of viruses, bacteria, protozoa and leukocytes by chemically crosslinking nucleic acids and preventing replication and transcription. The Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) trial was a Phase III, double-blinded, randomized non-inferiority study comparing PR and conventional RBCs for the support of acute anemia. Methods/Study Design: Complex cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery patients received conventional (Control) or PR RBCs (Test) during and for 7 days after surgery. The protocol was conducted with ethics committee approval at all participating centers and written informed consent from all participants. Hemoglobin levels, blood utilization and serum creatinine were assessed as indicators of efficacy and oxygenation of tissues (Karkouti et al. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 Suppl 1: i29-i38). The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) measured as change in serum creatinine from baseline within 48 hours of surgery, a predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes including mortality by Day 30 post-surgery (Lassnig et al. Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 1597-1605). Secondary endpoints included AKI occurring up to 7 days post-surgery (KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for AKI, Kidney Inter, Suppl. 2012;2:1-138); death or the need for renal replacement therapy by 30 days post-surgery; PR RBC-specific antibodies; and death by day 75 post-surgery. With >292 subjects enrolled, the study had 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, assuming an AKI incidence of 30% with conventional RBCs and a non-inferiority margin of half the conventional RBC rate. Under these circumstances, an absolute treatment increase of 5% in the AKI rate in the PR RBC arm would fail the non-inferiority test. This work was supported by a contract with the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHS010020160009c) with Cerus Corporation. Results: Five-hundred and eighty-one subjects were randomized and 321 (55%) transfused in 18 US hospitals. In the modified intent-to-treat analysis subjects receiving Test and Control RBCs had similar median [IQR] total blood loss (1500 [940-2475] mL Test, 1733 [1060-2880] mL Control, p=0.310) and comparable median hemoglobin levels at baseline and immediately post-surgery (9.8 [8.9-10.9] g/dL Test, 9.6 [8.6-10.6] g/dL Control, p=0.157) and for 7 days after surgery, The PR RBC arm was transfused with fewer RBCs, measured as total RBC Hb transfused over 7-days (169.0 [102.0-240.0] g Hb PR arm, 188.0 [126.0-295.0] g Hb, conventional RBC arm, p=0.008). The incidence of AKI was 29.3% (46/157) for Test and 28.0% (45/161) for Control. The treatment difference was 0.74% (95% CI -8.9, 10.4%, non-inferiority margin 14.0%, p=0.001 for non-inferiority). Non-inferiority was also achieved by the per protocol analysis. Average mean change in serum creatinine within 48 hours of surgery was comparable (Test 0.020, Control 0.23 mg/dL, P=0.515). Adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths on study were not different. Five of 159 (3.1%) PR RBC recipients developed low titer PR RBC-specific antibodies without clinical signs of hemolysis. Flow cytometry analysis revealed persistent circulating PR RBCs with uniform antigen loss (modulation). Low level human IgG antibody binding was demonstrated in 3 of 5 subjects. Conclusions: PR RBCs showed equivalent hemoglobin support for acute bleeding patients undergoing cardiac or thoracic-aorta surgery while using less transfused total RBC Hb over 7 days. The incidence of AKI in patients transfused with PR RBCs was non-inferior to that observed with conventional RBCs, indicative of effective tissue oxygenation. Treatment-related antibodies to PR-RBC were observed only in Test subjects, the antibodies were low titer, transient, without clinical hemolysis, and persistent circulating PR RBCs were detected with modulated low level acridine antigen expression (www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03459287).

Abstract Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leucocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. Methods ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, paralleldesign, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to Day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from presurgery baseline within 48±4 hours of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥292 evaluable, transfused patients (>146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. Discussion RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBC.

AbstractBackgroundImmunomodulatory strategies in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) include the use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The optimal application of these therapies is unknown and outcomes data are limited. We investigated treatment categories and laboratory and clinical outcomes of IVIG and/or TPE in HIT with a systematic literature review.Study Design and MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through December 2019 for studies combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to thrombocytopenia, heparin, TPE, and IVIG. The primary outcome was treatment indication. Secondary outcomes were platelet recovery, HIT laboratory parameters, heparin re‐exposure, and post‐treatment course. Case‐level data were analyzed by qualitative synthesis.ResultsAfter 4241 references were screened, we identified 60 studies with four main categories of IVIG and/or TPE use as follows: (a) treatment of refractory HIT (n = 35; 31%); (b) initial therapy (n = 45; 40%); (c) cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB; n = 30; 27%); and (d) other (n = 2; 2%). IVIG was most commonly used for the treatment of refractory HIT while TPE was primarily used to facilitate heparin exposure during CPB. Both IVIG and TPE were equally used as initial therapy. Heparin re‐exposure occurred without thrombotic event in 29 TPE‐treated patients and three IVIG‐treated patients.ConclusionIn patients with HIT, both TPE and IVIG are used for initial therapy or treatment of refractory HIT. However, TPE is more commonly used in patients undergoing CPB. Prospective studies may help clarify which treatment is indicated in HIT population subsets.

AbstractImportanceNeuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients' response to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is currently incompletely characterized.ObjectiveOur study aims to understand the clinical status improvement of neuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients treated with TPE.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a multicenter retrospective study conducted between 1 January 2003 and 31 July 2017 at 13 US hospitals performing apheresis procedures. Subjects studied were diagnosed with neuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder who received TPE during presentation with acute disease.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was clinical status improvement in patients treated with TPE. Secondary measures were procedural and patient characteristics associated with response to treatment.ResultsWe evaluated 114 patients from 13 institutions. There was a female predilection. The largest ethnic group affected was non‐Hispanic Caucasian. The average age of diagnosis was 43.1 years. The average time to diagnosis was 3.1 years. On average, five procedures were performed during each treatment series. The most commonly performed plasma volume exchange was 1.0 to 1.25 using 5% albumin as replacement fluid. Most patients (52%) did not require an additional course of TPE and noted “mild” to “moderate” clinical status improvement. Maximal symptom improvement appeared by the fourth or fifth TPE treatment.Conclusion and RelevanceTPE improved the clinical status of patients. Adults responded more favorably than children. Procedural characteristics, including number of TPEs, plasma volume exchanged, and replacement fluid used, were similar between institutions. TPE was well‐tolerated and had a low severe adverse event profile.

We surveyed multiple apheresis centers represented by the authors for their clinical approach to the management of anticoagulation issues during therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). We present the results of their practices and a review of the pertinent literature. As plasma is removed during TPE, replacement with all or partial non‐plasma‐containing fluids (eg, 5% albumin) may lead to significant changes in hemostasis. These changes are amplified in patients who are receiving anticoagulation. We discuss various anticoagulants as well as the monitoring and adjustment of anticoagulation before, during, and after TPE. No single guideline can be applied, but rather, patients must be monitored individually, taking into account their often complex clinical conditions and medication profiles.