Back to Authors

Schwartz, Joseph E.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-3566

Mayo Clinic

Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) Omaha Nebraska USA

Citations 12

Poor Mobilization and Plerixafor Use in Matched Related Peripheral Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Donors
Draper, Nicole, Connelly‐Smith, Laura , Alquist, Caroline R. , Fernando, Leonor P. , Jones, Andrew R. , Schmidt, Amy E. , Harmon, Charles S., Lee, Esther , Linnik, Yevgeniy , Cooling, Laura , Godbey, Elizabeth A, Cooling, Laura , Godbey, Elizabeth A. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Jones, Andrew, Harmon, Charles

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70074 Get It

ABSTRACT Plerixafor (PLX) is FDA approved for use in autologous peripheral blood stem cell donors but not in allogeneic donors. This study was completed by members of the ASFA HPC Donor Subcommittee to examine the incidence and characteristics of poor mobilizers (PM) among matched related donors (MRD), as well as factors associated with PLX use in MRD. Risks of poor mobilization in MRD were older age, especially donors older than 60 years, lower baseline platelet counts, and heavier recipients. PLX use in PM was low but safe, tripling the success rate for collection. This study adds evidence to the body of literature to support use of PLX in allogeneic donors who are PM.
A multi‐institutional survey of apheresis services among institutions in the United States
Yurtsever, Nalan, Jacobs, Jeremy W. , Park, Yara A. , Lauro, Deisen, Torres, Sarina, Ward, Dawn C. , Stephens, Laura D. , Adkins, Brian D. , Yurtsever, Nalan , Stephens, Laura , Tormey, Christopher A , Adkins, Brian David , Jacobs, Jeremy W , Yurtsever, Nalan , Booth, Garrett S. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Woo, Jennifer S. , Allen, Elizabeth S. , Tormey, Christopher A.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | July 9, 2024 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.22138 Get It

AbstractIntroductionApheresis practices in the United States (US) have not been comprehensively characterized to date. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating apheresis therapy through a national survey.MethodsA multi‐institutional survey was conducted between April and July 2023. The survey, comprising 54 questions, focused on institutional demographics, procedures, equipment, staffing, training, and impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Responses from 22 institutions, primarily academic medical centers, were analyzed.ResultsTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was the most common procedure, followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (HPC‐A) and red blood cell exchange (RCE). CAR‐T cell collections were widespread, with some institutions supporting over 30 protocols concurrently. Most sites used the Spectra Optia Apheresis System, were managed by a transfusion medicine service, and employed internal apheresis providers. Insufficient staffing levels, exacerbated by the COVID‐19 pandemic, were common and most often addressed using overtime.DiscussionThe survey highlighted the ubiquity of TPE, expanding cellular collections and staffing challenges. The role of apheresis in supporting cellular therapy, particularly in newly developing cell and gene therapies and clinical trials, was evident. Staffing issues during the pandemic emphasized the need for innovative recruitment strategies.ConclusionThis nationwide survey provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of apheresis practices in large US academic centers.
Update to the ASFA guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in ANCA‐associated vasculitis
Balogun, Rasheed A. , Sanchez, Amber P. , Klingel, Reinhard , Witt, Volker, Aqui, Nicole A., Meyer, Erin , Padmanabhan, Anand , Wu, Yanyun , Zantek, Nicole D. , Connelly‐Smith, Laura , Zantek, Nicole D , Connelly-Smith, Laura , Dunbar, Nancy M , Pham, Huy P. , Schneiderman, Jennifer , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Dunbar, Nancy M.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | August 8, 2020 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 493-499

10.1002/jca.21820 Get It

AbstractSince 1986, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) has published practice guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in the Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue. Since 2007, updated guidelines have been published every 3 years to reflect current evidence based apheresis practice with the most recent edition (8th) published in 2019. With each edition, the guidelines are reviewed and updated based on any newly published literature since the last review. The PEXIVAS study, an international, randomized controlled trial comparing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) vs no TPE and standard vs reduced dose steroid regimen on the primary composite outcome of end stage renal disease or death in patients with ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV), was published in February 2020. This study represents the largest study on the role of therapeutic apheresis in AAV published to date and prompted the JCA Special Issue Writing Committee to reassess the current AAV fact sheet for updates based on this newly available evidence. This interim fact sheet summarizes current ASFA recommendations for the evidence‐based use of therapeutic apheresis in AAV and supersedes the recommendations published in the 2019 guidelines.
The ABC's of disaster management: Managing apheresis operations during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic
Vossoughi, Sarah , Burgstaler, Edwin A. , Burgstaler, Edwin A , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Schwartz, Joseph E.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | June 30, 2020 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 243-245

10.1002/jca.21803 Get It

What's in Your CART? Clinical insights on challenges in mononuclear cell collection for CAR‐T therapy
Annen, Kyle , Zubair, Abba C. , Schwartz, E. von, Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M. , Zubair, Abba C , Schwartz, Eileen, Schwartz, Joseph E. , Annen, Kyle

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | March 18, 2020 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 234-235

10.1002/jca.21776 Get It

Therapeutic plasma exchange for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A multicenter retrospective study by the ASFA neurologic diseases subcommittee
Ipe, Tina S. , Fernando, Leonor P. , Gokhale, Amit , Johnson, Andrew D., Kim, Haewon C., Monis, Grace F., Mo, Yunchun D., Morgan, Shanna, Sanford, Kimberly , Schmidt, Amy E. , Wu, Yanyun , Yamada, Chisa , Wong, Edward C.C. , Webb, Jennifer , Wu, Yanyun , Yamada, Chisa , Ipe, Tina S , Raval, Jay S. , Jacquot, Cyril , Pagano, Monica B. , Pham, Huy P. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Waldman, Amy , Winters, Jeffrey L.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | November 9, 2019 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 25-32

10.1002/jca.21754 Get It

AbstractImportanceNeuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients' response to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is currently incompletely characterized.ObjectiveOur study aims to understand the clinical status improvement of neuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients treated with TPE.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a multicenter retrospective study conducted between 1 January 2003 and 31 July 2017 at 13 US hospitals performing apheresis procedures. Subjects studied were diagnosed with neuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder who received TPE during presentation with acute disease.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was clinical status improvement in patients treated with TPE. Secondary measures were procedural and patient characteristics associated with response to treatment.ResultsWe evaluated 114 patients from 13 institutions. There was a female predilection. The largest ethnic group affected was non‐Hispanic Caucasian. The average age of diagnosis was 43.1 years. The average time to diagnosis was 3.1 years. On average, five procedures were performed during each treatment series. The most commonly performed plasma volume exchange was 1.0 to 1.25 using 5% albumin as replacement fluid. Most patients (52%) did not require an additional course of TPE and noted “mild” to “moderate” clinical status improvement. Maximal symptom improvement appeared by the fourth or fifth TPE treatment.Conclusion and RelevanceTPE improved the clinical status of patients. Adults responded more favorably than children. Procedural characteristics, including number of TPEs, plasma volume exchanged, and replacement fluid used, were similar between institutions. TPE was well‐tolerated and had a low severe adverse event profile.
Report of the ASFA apheresis registry on muscle specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis
Yamada, Chisa , Pham, Huy P. , Wu, Yanyun , Cooling, Laura , Kim, Haewon C., Morgan, Shanna, Wong, Edward C.C. , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Pham, Huy P , Yamada, Chisa

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | March 6, 2016 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 5-11

10.1002/jca.21454 Get It

Background: Anti‐muscle specific kinase antibody positive (MuSK Ab) myasthenia gravis (MG) patients are known to have different clinical course compared to anti‐acetylcholine receptor Ab positive MG patients. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been reported to be effective; however, little is known of the response and of TPE procedural information. An ASFA Apheresis Registry was developed to analyze those data. Methods: The study collected detailed de‐identified patient data, TPE procedures, and treatment outcome/complications. Collected data was described in aggregate. Results: A total of 15 MuSK Ab MG patients with exacerbation of MG symptoms, 13 females/2 males, median age 44, were investigated. Thirty TPE courses (median 5 procedures/course, total 145 procedures) were evaluated. All TPE procedures were performed with citrate anticoagulation, 1 − 1.25 plasma volume exchange in 100% fluid balance, and 90% of courses used only albumin as replacement. Calcium was added to albumin or given orally as needed. TPE was performed every other day in 55% of courses. Adverse events occurred in 3.4% of procedures. Ten patients (67%) experienced relapses within a median of 7 weeks. Objective symptoms were resolved in more than 75% of courses. Overall subjective improvement rates were 94.1%/93.3% after 3/4 TPE procedures, respectively. Thirty‐one percent of patients responded poorly with minimal recovery. Conclusion: Overall subjective improvement was seen up to 94% of patients after one course of TPE. Some patients were poor‐responders. Five TPE may be adequate for initial course with additional TPE as needed. Based upon this preliminary data, we will modify our future data collection. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:5–11, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Report of the ASFA apheresis registry study on Wilson's disease
Pham, Huy P. , Cooling, Laura , Hofmann, Jan , Kim, Haewon C., Morgan, Shanna, Schneiderman, Jennifer , Wong, Edward C.C. , Wu, Yanyun , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Pagano, Monica B. , Yamada, Chisa , Pham, Huy P

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | August 14, 2015 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 11-15

10.1002/jca.21396 Get It

PurposeWilson's disease is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder that results in accumulation of copper in the liver, brain, cornea and kidney. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used to remove copper and provide a bridge to liver transplantation. We report here the collective experiences through the ASFA apheresis registry on Wilson's disease.MethodsThe ASFA apheresis registry is a multi‐center registry study. Both prospective and retrospective data, with the latter involving data collection back to January 2000 are entered in the registry. The registry includes patient demographics, apheresis procedural information, treatment schedules, and treatment outcomes and complications.ResultsA total of 10 patients (3 males and 7 females) with Wilson's disease treated between 2005 and 2013 were included. Median age of first diagnosis and first TPE were 16 and 17 years, respectively. Via central venous access, these patients underwent a total of 43 TPEs; the median number of TPE procedures per patient was 3.5. All of the TPEs used ACD‐A as anticoagulation, 42/43 TPEs targeted 1–1.25 plasma volumes, and 41/43 TPEs were performed with 100% fluid balance. Post TPE procedures, 9 patients underwent liver transplantation; all 10 patients had at least a 6‐month survival.ConclusionsAll 10 patients with Wilson's disease who underwent TPE had a positive outcome in terms of 6‐month survival. In this first report of the ASFA apheresis registry study, we have demonstrated the value of using this registry to collect apheresis‐related patient outcomes from multiple centers. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:11–15, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
A comparison of adverse reaction rates for PAS C versus plasma platelet units
Stubbs, James R. , Francis, Richard O. , Goss, Cheryl , Cushing, Melissa M. , Shaz, Beth H. , Mair, David , Brantigan, Barbara, Heaton, W. Andrew, Cohn, Claudia S. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Shaz, Beth H

Transfusion | April 16, 2014 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1927-1934

10.1111/trf.12597 Get It

BackgroundPlasma constituents have been implicated in some types of platelet (PLT) transfusion reactions. Leukoreduced apheresis PLTs stored in InterSol have 65% less plasma than apheresis PLTs stored in 100% plasma (PPs). This study compared transfusion reaction rates in InterSol PLTs (PLT additive solution [PAS] C) versus PPs.Study Design and MethodsThe study design was an open‐label, nonrandomized retrospective review. Statistical methods were applied to substantiate noninferiority and superiority of PAS C compared to PP in terms of transfusion reaction rates. Adverse reactions (ARs) were categorized using the Biovigilance Component of the National Healthcare Safety Network. Active surveillance was used to monitor all transfusions, both with ARs and without ARs.ResultsA total of 14,005 transfusions from six study sites were included, with 9845 PP transfusions given to 2202 patients and 4160 PAS C to 1444 patients. A total of 165 ARs were reported. Percentages of transfusions with ARs were 1.37% for PPs, 0.55% for PAS C, and 1.13% overall. The relative risk (RR) for PAS C versus PPs was calculated as 0.403 with an upper confidence limit (UCL) of 0.663. Overall, ARs with the highest incidence were allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), at 0.66 and 0.40% of total transfusions reported, respectively. The relative risks (UCLs) for ATRs and FNHTRs, respectively, were 0.350 (0.686) and 0.336 (0.827).ConclusionsPAS C PLTs were statistically superior and noninferior to PPs with respect to the transfusion‐related AR rate. PAS C noninferiority and superiority were also demonstrated for ATRs and FNHTRs, separately.
How we developed and use the A merican S ociety for A pheresis guidelines for therapeutic apheresis pro
Shaz, Beth H. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Shaz, Beth H

Transfusion | November 21, 2013 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 17-25

10.1111/trf.12499 Get It

The decision to treat a patient with therapeutic apheresis depends on multiple factors, such as what does the patient most likely have, is the diagnosis amenable to apheresis treatment, what is the harm‐versus‐benefit ratio of apheresis treatment in this patient, and what are the internal and external issues associated with receiving apheresis treatment? The “ G uidelines on the U se of T herapeutic A pheresis in C linical P ractice— E vidence‐based A pproach from the Writing C ommittee of the A merican S ociety for A pheresis” addresses these issues and helps aid in clinical decision making. The development and application of these G uidelines as well as potential new applications will be discussed in this article.