Back to Authors

Hofmann, Jan

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9572-8528

Mayo Clinic

University of California, San Francisco

Citations 4

How do I overcome apheresis collection challenges for sickle cell disease gene therapy
Tanhehco, Yvette C. , Gupta, Gaurav K. , Aqui, Nicole A., Hofmann, Jan , Thibodeaux, Suzanne R. , Wu, Yanyun , Liu, Hien , Godbey, Elizabeth A, Thibodeaux, Suzanne , Zubair, Abba, Gupta, Gaurav K , Singh, Nirupama , Shi, Patricia A. , Godbey, Elizabeth A. , Schneiderman, Jennifer , Zubair, Abba C.

Transfusion | October 19, 2025 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2250-2258

10.1111/trf.18461 Get It

Abstract Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy with limited treatment options. Genetic modification of the patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) offers an avenue to curative therapy using the patient's own cells. Many challenges exist in collecting sufficient numbers of starting material for manufacturing, beginning with the pre‐mobilization optimization of the patient to the mobilization, collection, and post‐collection phases. Study Design and Methods A working group within the Cellular Therapy Subcommittee of the American Society for Apheresis Clinical Applications Committee describes the challenges associated with apheresis collection of the starting material for gene therapy (GT) product manufacturing for patients with SCD and discusses potential strategies for overcoming these challenges. Results and Discussion Patients must undergo automated red blood cell exchange (RCE) to lower hemoglobin S in a relatively short window of time before apheresis collection of HSCs. The risks and benefits of transfusion as well as the logistics of providing adequate and appropriate blood products must be considered. Limited agents are available for mobilization of HSCs into the peripheral blood for collection and the timing of administration is short. Each collection cycle consists of RCE followed by at least three mobilization and apheresis collection events in addition to collecting backup cells. More than one cycle is typically needed to collect enough cells for GT drug product manufacturing. Optimization of patient factors and apheresis instrument parameters leads to better collection yields. Early and frequent ongoing coordination with all stakeholders involved is critical to developing personalized treatment plans for patients.
Apheresis medicine in the era of advanced telehealth technologies: An American Society for Apheresis position paper part II: Principles of apheresis medical practice in a 21st century electronic medical practice environment
Linz, Walter J. , Andrzejewski, Chester , Hofmann, Jan , Linz, Walter

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | November 27, 2021 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 122-126

10.1002/jca.21951 Get It

The report from ASFA COVID‐19 taskforce: Considerations and prioritization on apheresis procedures during the SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic
Yamada, Chisa , Hofmann, Jan , Witt, Volker, Gupta, Gaurav K. , Taskforce, The ASFA COVID‐19, Zantek, Nicole D. , Yamada, Chisa , Zantek, Nicole D , Gupta, Gaurav K , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Taskforce, The ASFA COVID‐19

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | September 12, 2021 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 878-881

10.1002/jca.21939 Get It

AbstractSince vaccination for SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus started, the trajectory of patient numbers infected with the virus has improved once; however, variants of SARS‐CoV‐2 have emerged and more people have been infected; therefore, pandemic status is still far from resolution. Government and social efforts to prevent coronavirus infection continue in most states in the US and globally even after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared some restriction relief for fully vaccinated people in March 2021. Healthcare institutions and various professional organizations have developed guidelines or policies to prevent the spread of these coronaviruses in the setting of apheresis. In this report, the issues that apheresis services may encounter under the current COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus disease) pandemic will be discussed with potential strategies that can be adapted for efficient and optimum use of apheresis resources.
Report of the ASFA apheresis registry study on Wilson's disease
Pham, Huy P. , Cooling, Laura , Hofmann, Jan , Kim, Haewon C., Morgan, Shanna, Schneiderman, Jennifer , Wong, Edward C.C. , Wu, Yanyun , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Pagano, Monica B. , Yamada, Chisa , Pham, Huy P

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | August 14, 2015 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 11-15

10.1002/jca.21396 Get It

PurposeWilson's disease is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder that results in accumulation of copper in the liver, brain, cornea and kidney. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used to remove copper and provide a bridge to liver transplantation. We report here the collective experiences through the ASFA apheresis registry on Wilson's disease.MethodsThe ASFA apheresis registry is a multi‐center registry study. Both prospective and retrospective data, with the latter involving data collection back to January 2000 are entered in the registry. The registry includes patient demographics, apheresis procedural information, treatment schedules, and treatment outcomes and complications.ResultsA total of 10 patients (3 males and 7 females) with Wilson's disease treated between 2005 and 2013 were included. Median age of first diagnosis and first TPE were 16 and 17 years, respectively. Via central venous access, these patients underwent a total of 43 TPEs; the median number of TPE procedures per patient was 3.5. All of the TPEs used ACD‐A as anticoagulation, 42/43 TPEs targeted 1–1.25 plasma volumes, and 41/43 TPEs were performed with 100% fluid balance. Post TPE procedures, 9 patients underwent liver transplantation; all 10 patients had at least a 6‐month survival.ConclusionsAll 10 patients with Wilson's disease who underwent TPE had a positive outcome in terms of 6‐month survival. In this first report of the ASFA apheresis registry study, we have demonstrated the value of using this registry to collect apheresis‐related patient outcomes from multiple centers. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:11–15, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.