Back to Authors

Gupta, Gaurav K.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2951-0034

Mayo Clinic

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Citations 4

An Annual Review of Important Apheresis Articles in 2025 From the American Society for Apheresis Attending Physician Subcommittee
Zantek, Nicole D. , Lu, Wen , AlMozain, Nour , Lu, Wen , Almozain, Nour , Alsammak, Mohamed , Gupta, Gaurav K , Levenbrown, Yosef , Li, Yanhua , Tripathi, Parmatma Prasad , Tanhehco, Yvette C , Zantek, Nicole D , Dilly, Laura, Martin, Marisa C. Saint, Alsammak, Mohamed , Banez‐Sese, Grace, Chhibber, Vishesh, Costa, Victoria, DeChristopher, Phillip J., Durlen, Ivan , Gupta, Gaurav K. , Li, Yanhua , Mattiazzi, Adela D. , Noland, Daniel K., Prajapati, Vipulkumar, Singh, Nirupama, Siwach, Garima, Wu, Ding Wen , Wehrli, Gay , Tanhehco, Yvette C.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | June 13, 2026 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70142 Get It

ABSTRACT Apheresis medicine is a continually evolving field with numerous studies published each year. To help apheresis practitioners stay up to date with the current literature, members of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee identified and summarized 10 seminal articles published in 2025, from the field of apheresis medicine. PubMed was used to identify articles published in four topics including donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis collection for cellular therapy. These articles met at least one of the following criteria: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th Special Issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included while case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.
An Annual Review of Important Apheresis Articles in 2024 From the American Society for Apheresis Attending Physician Subcommittee
Lu, Wen , Dilly, Laura, Martin, Marisa C. Saint, Zantek, Nicole D., Alsammak, Mohamed , Banez-Sese, Grace C., Chhibber, Vishesh, Costa, Victoria, DeChristopher, Phillip J., Durlen, Ivan, Gupta, Gaurav K. , Li, Yanhua , Noland, Daniel K., Prajapati, Vipulkumar, Siwach, Garima, Tripathi, Parmatma Prasad , Tanhehco, Yvette C. , Gupta, Gaurav K , Levenbrown, Yosef , Stephens, Laura , Lu, Wen , Wu, Ding Wen , Banez‐Sese, Grace, Li, Yanhua, Mattiazzi, Adela D. , Martin, Marisa C. Saint, Singh, Nirupama, Siwach, Garima, Stephens, Laura D. , Wehrli, Gay

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | October 29, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70067 Get It

ABSTRACT The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee of the Physicians' Committee performed an annual review of articles published in 2024 related to apheresis medicine. The 10 seminal apheresis articles selected by the subcommittee members are summarized in this review. PubMed was used to identify manuscripts published in 2024 in four areas of interest: donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis for cellular therapy. Only full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included. Case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded. Articles were considered seminal if they met at least one of the following previously established criteria: novel finding(s), practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th special issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach.
How do I overcome apheresis collection challenges for sickle cell disease gene therapy
Tanhehco, Yvette C. , Gupta, Gaurav K. , Aqui, Nicole A., Hofmann, Jan , Thibodeaux, Suzanne R. , Wu, Yanyun , Liu, Hien , Godbey, Elizabeth A, Thibodeaux, Suzanne , Zubair, Abba, Gupta, Gaurav K , Singh, Nirupama , Shi, Patricia A. , Godbey, Elizabeth A. , Schneiderman, Jennifer , Zubair, Abba C.

Transfusion | October 19, 2025 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2250-2258

10.1111/trf.18461 Get It

Abstract Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy with limited treatment options. Genetic modification of the patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) offers an avenue to curative therapy using the patient's own cells. Many challenges exist in collecting sufficient numbers of starting material for manufacturing, beginning with the pre‐mobilization optimization of the patient to the mobilization, collection, and post‐collection phases. Study Design and Methods A working group within the Cellular Therapy Subcommittee of the American Society for Apheresis Clinical Applications Committee describes the challenges associated with apheresis collection of the starting material for gene therapy (GT) product manufacturing for patients with SCD and discusses potential strategies for overcoming these challenges. Results and Discussion Patients must undergo automated red blood cell exchange (RCE) to lower hemoglobin S in a relatively short window of time before apheresis collection of HSCs. The risks and benefits of transfusion as well as the logistics of providing adequate and appropriate blood products must be considered. Limited agents are available for mobilization of HSCs into the peripheral blood for collection and the timing of administration is short. Each collection cycle consists of RCE followed by at least three mobilization and apheresis collection events in addition to collecting backup cells. More than one cycle is typically needed to collect enough cells for GT drug product manufacturing. Optimization of patient factors and apheresis instrument parameters leads to better collection yields. Early and frequent ongoing coordination with all stakeholders involved is critical to developing personalized treatment plans for patients.
The report from ASFA COVID‐19 taskforce: Considerations and prioritization on apheresis procedures during the SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic
Yamada, Chisa , Hofmann, Jan , Witt, Volker, Gupta, Gaurav K. , Taskforce, The ASFA COVID‐19, Zantek, Nicole D. , Yamada, Chisa , Zantek, Nicole D , Gupta, Gaurav K , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Taskforce, The ASFA COVID‐19

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | September 12, 2021 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 878-881

10.1002/jca.21939 Get It

AbstractSince vaccination for SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus started, the trajectory of patient numbers infected with the virus has improved once; however, variants of SARS‐CoV‐2 have emerged and more people have been infected; therefore, pandemic status is still far from resolution. Government and social efforts to prevent coronavirus infection continue in most states in the US and globally even after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared some restriction relief for fully vaccinated people in March 2021. Healthcare institutions and various professional organizations have developed guidelines or policies to prevent the spread of these coronaviruses in the setting of apheresis. In this report, the issues that apheresis services may encounter under the current COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus disease) pandemic will be discussed with potential strategies that can be adapted for efficient and optimum use of apheresis resources.