Back to Authors

Balogun, Rasheed A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-6949

Mayo Clinic

University of Virginia

Citations 4

Development of a Uniform Apheresis Case Report Form for Standardized Collection of Apheresis Data
Johnson, Andrew D., Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M. , Karam, Oliver , Nellis, Marianne E. , Schwartz, Joseph, Wu, Yanyun , Armendariz, Tomas , Burgstaler, Edwin A. , Collins, Laura , Geile, Kira, Pavenski, Katerina , Sanchez, Amber P. , Witt, Volker, Muthusamy, Amutha, Ramesh, Vidhyalakshmi , Thao, Mai See , Chlebeck, Therese M., Zantek, Nicole D. , Karam, Oliver , Armendariz, Tomas , Burgstaler, Edwin, Zantek, Nicole D , Balogun, Rasheed A. , Schneiderman, Jennifer , Winters, Jeffrey L. , Pavenski, Katerina , Pederson, Thomas

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | October 18, 2024 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.22146 Get It

ABSTRACTApheresis is performed worldwide for an increasing number of indications. The development of common data elements (CDE) for apheresis related areas may facilitate conduct of new research, enhance quality initiatives including benchmarking, and improve patient care. This report describes the systematic development of the Uniform Apheresis Case Report Form (UACRF) as part of the Apheresis in the United States (ApheresUS) program. A consensus panel of 17 diverse experts in apheresis, related specialties, and electronic case report form (eCRF), and database development was assembled. The panel met via online conferencing from November 17, 2020 to December 1, 2021. A draft document was posted online for public comment from October 11, 2021 to November 10, 2021. Feedback was collected using an online survey tool. The consensus panel revised the UACRF. This version was converted to an eCRF with additional changes made to improve usability in this format. The final version of the UACRF was created on August 24, 2023. The UACRF contains 16 modules: procedure and subject eligibility, patient demographics, general procedure information, laboratory parameters, vascular access, common procedure elements, eight procedure specific modules (mononuclear cell collection and seven therapeutic modalities), outcomes, and site information. A total of 137 data elements were created, including 57 with one or more subelements. The UACRF is the first systematic attempt to develop CDE for therapeutic apheresis and white blood cell collections. Further validation of the UACRF is necessary to confirm the tool's ability to collect the relevant data elements and determine the usability of the form.
Update to the ASFA guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in ANCA‐associated vasculitis
Balogun, Rasheed A. , Sanchez, Amber P. , Klingel, Reinhard , Witt, Volker, Aqui, Nicole A., Meyer, Erin , Padmanabhan, Anand , Wu, Yanyun , Zantek, Nicole D. , Connelly‐Smith, Laura , Zantek, Nicole D , Connelly-Smith, Laura , Dunbar, Nancy M , Pham, Huy P. , Schneiderman, Jennifer , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Dunbar, Nancy M.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | August 8, 2020 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 493-499

10.1002/jca.21820 Get It

AbstractSince 1986, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) has published practice guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in the Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue. Since 2007, updated guidelines have been published every 3 years to reflect current evidence based apheresis practice with the most recent edition (8th) published in 2019. With each edition, the guidelines are reviewed and updated based on any newly published literature since the last review. The PEXIVAS study, an international, randomized controlled trial comparing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) vs no TPE and standard vs reduced dose steroid regimen on the primary composite outcome of end stage renal disease or death in patients with ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV), was published in February 2020. This study represents the largest study on the role of therapeutic apheresis in AAV published to date and prompted the JCA Special Issue Writing Committee to reassess the current AAV fact sheet for updates based on this newly available evidence. This interim fact sheet summarizes current ASFA recommendations for the evidence‐based use of therapeutic apheresis in AAV and supersedes the recommendations published in the 2019 guidelines.
Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice—Evidence‐Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Sixth Special Issue
Winters, Jeffrey L. , Padmanabhan, Anand , Balogun, Rasheed A. , Delaney, Meghan , Linenberger, Michael , Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M. , Williams, Mark E. , Wu, Yanyun , Shaz, Beth H. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Winters, Jeffrey L , Shaz, Beth H

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | July 19, 2013 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 145-284

10.1002/jca.21276 Get It

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) JCA Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizating indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence‐based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Sixth Edition of the ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence‐based medicine in the recommendations by consistently applying the category and GRADE system definitions, but eliminating the “level of evidence” criteria (from the University HealthCare Consortium) utilized in prior editions given redundancy between GRADE and University HealthCare Consortium systems. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was utilized in the Fourth and Fifth Editions, has been largely maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. This article consists of 78 fact sheets (increased from 2010) for therapeutic indications in ASFA categories I through IV, with many diseases categorized having multiple clinical presentations/situations which are individually graded and categorized. J. Clin. Apheresis 28:145–284, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
A multicenter evaluation of a new therapeutic plasma exchange procedure
Winters, Jeffrey L. , Burgstaler, Edwin A. , Gottschall, Jerome L. , Balogun, Rasheed A. , Houghton, Jaime, Lee, Wanda J., Snyder, Edward L. , Winters, Jeffrey L

Transfusion | April 15, 2013 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3269-3278

10.1111/trf.12189 Get It

BackgroundThe AMICUS (Fenwal, Inc.) was cleared in the United States for platelet (PLT) and plasma collection in 1996 with subsequent clearances for the collection of other blood products. Although not previously used for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), new disposables, software, and hardware were developed to enable TPE on the AMICUS.Study Design and MethodsA multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, crossover paired treatment protocol was performed. Thirty patients with orders for at least two TPE procedures were randomly assigned to the AMICUS or the COBE Spectra (TerumoBCT) for the first treatment. Each patient was crossed over to the other device using the same procedure settings from the first procedure. The primary objective compared efficiency of plasma removal (EPR) with secondary objectives of comparing PLT and hemoglobin (Hb) waste plasma content, coagulation factor and complement activation, fluid balance tracking accuracy, procedure length, and adverse events.ResultsThe EPR for the AMICUS (81.9 ± 7.62%) was superior to that of the COBE Spectra (75.2 ± 6.29%; p = 0.00001). The AMICUS also demonstrated statistically higher fluid balance accuracy (99.84%) compared to that of the COBE Spectra (98.83%; p < 0.0001) and a statistically shorter procedure time (103.9 ± 30.8 vs. 110.5 ± 27.1 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to PLT and Hb content in the waste plasma, change in patient PLT count, or changes in markers of coagulation and complement cascade activation were seen. Frequency and severity of adverse reactions were similar.ConclusionThe AMICUS separator can effectively perform TPE. The AMICUS demonstrated superior plasma removal efficiency compared to the COBE Spectra with no evidence of significant differences in PLT removal, hemolysis, and coagulation or complement activation.