Kiss, Joseph E.

AbstractBackgroundImmunomodulatory strategies in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) include the use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The optimal application of these therapies is unknown and outcomes data are limited. We investigated treatment categories and laboratory and clinical outcomes of IVIG and/or TPE in HIT with a systematic literature review.Study Design and MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through December 2019 for studies combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to thrombocytopenia, heparin, TPE, and IVIG. The primary outcome was treatment indication. Secondary outcomes were platelet recovery, HIT laboratory parameters, heparin re‐exposure, and post‐treatment course. Case‐level data were analyzed by qualitative synthesis.ResultsAfter 4241 references were screened, we identified 60 studies with four main categories of IVIG and/or TPE use as follows: (a) treatment of refractory HIT (n = 35; 31%); (b) initial therapy (n = 45; 40%); (c) cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB; n = 30; 27%); and (d) other (n = 2; 2%). IVIG was most commonly used for the treatment of refractory HIT while TPE was primarily used to facilitate heparin exposure during CPB. Both IVIG and TPE were equally used as initial therapy. Heparin re‐exposure occurred without thrombotic event in 29 TPE‐treated patients and three IVIG‐treated patients.ConclusionIn patients with HIT, both TPE and IVIG are used for initial therapy or treatment of refractory HIT. However, TPE is more commonly used in patients undergoing CPB. Prospective studies may help clarify which treatment is indicated in HIT population subsets.

Abstract SERF-TTP is the first prospective case-control study to investigate epidemiology, risk factors & outcomes in patients with first episode of idiopathic TTP. METHODS: Each case of TTP is identified upon referral for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Exclusion criteria include organ or allogeneic stem cell transplant, anti-neoplastic therapy or malignancy. 2 age & gender-matched controls are identified for each case. Epidemiologic information, lab data & plasma samples are collected from each case. Case & control data are collected by standardized interview. Relative risk & 95% CI computed by chi-squared tests. ADAMTS13 activity & inhibitor are centrally measured on pre-TPE samples. ADAMTS13 activity is measured by FRETS-vWF73 assay (Peptides Int.). ADAMTS13 inhibitor is assessed by Technozym ADAMTS13 INH ELISA (Technoclone). RESULTS: Data is available for 67 cases & 138 controls. The median age of cases is 40, & 82% are female. Medical history & exposures are shown in Table 1. Clinical & lab characteristics vary by ADAMTS13 activity (Table 2). Low titer ADAMTS13 inhibitors are detectable in some patients with normal ADAMTS13 activity. 30 day survival of cases is 95.7%. Adverse reactions to TPE occur in 59% of patients, most commonly allergic(85%) or citrate-related reactions(65%). 14.7% had a venous access complication, 50% were catheter-related thromboses. 10% of all adverse events required an ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results from the case-control study suggest that predisposing factors for the development of TTP include recent infection or connective tissue disorder. Cardiovascular disease, prior history of venous thrombosis, clopidogrel use and lower income are more common in TTP cases than controls. Patients with normal ADAMTS13 activity are more likely to present with higher platelet count, abnormal renal function and neurologic symptoms. Case & Control Characteristics Cases (n=67) Controls (n=138) Relative Risk (95% CI) Medical History Connective Tissue Disease 11.9% 2.2% 5.4 (1.5–20.0) Cardiovascular Disease 13.4% 3.6% 3.7 (1.29–10.6) Prior Venous Thrombosis 13.4% 2.9% 4.6 (1.48–14.5) Infection (prior 2 wks) 32.8% 10.1% 3.2 (1.77–5.9) Medications (prior 12 wks) Antibiotics 31.3% 17.4% 1.8 (1.08–2.99) Clopidogrel 4.5% 0.7% 6.4 (0.65–62.9) Income Level < $25,000 42% 18% 2.3 (1.47–3.6) $25,000 – 70,000 37.3% 52.9% 0.7 (0.49–0.99) > $70,000 11.9% 24.6% 0.5 (0.24–0.98) Characteristics by ADAMTS13 activity ADAMTS13 activity N ADAMTS13 inhibitor (>15 u/ml) ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer (mean) Platelets (mean) Creatinine (mean) Neurologic symptoms Survival Comparison of ADAMTS13 ≤20% vs > 20%, p-values: * 0.0028, † 0.003, ‡ 0.73, # 0.48. < 5% 18 (37.5%) 100% 80.9 22,350 1.4 44% 94% 5–20% 4 (8.3%) 100% 76.4 20,000 1.1 75% 100% > 20% 26 (54.2%) 57.7% 22.5 58,810* 4.3† 58%‡ 89.5%#

Abstract Background : Many idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP) patients have severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, an enzyme that cleaves ultralarge von Willebrand multimers. We recently reported that thienopyridine-associated TTP is characterized by an immunologic pathway with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and a non-immunologic pathway with higher ADAMTS13 activity levels. We now compare findings for idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP patients. Methods : Clinical findings and laboratory findings were evaluated for 51 idiopathic and 39 thienopyridine-associated TTP. Results: Clinical findings were similar between idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP for both severe ADAMTS13 deficient and non-deficient patients. Differences were noted in gender and age, relapse rates, and survival. Conclusion : Among TTP patients with ADAMTS13 deficiency, relapses are frequent in idiopathic TTP patients and Rituximab may be useful, while for thienopyridine-associated TTP patients spontaneous relapse are rare as long as no re-exposure occurs. Among ADAMTS13 non-deficient patients, survival is high following therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for idiopathic patients but not for thienopyridine-associated TTP patients. Despite similarities, idiopathic and thienopyridine associated TTP probably have different initiating factors. ADAMTS13 activity and clinical characteristics in idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP Idiopathic severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=29) †Thienopyridine severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=26) Idiopathic non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=22) †Thienopyridine non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=13) *p<0.05 for comparison of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency versus non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. †Thienopyridine-associated TTP clinical and presenting neutralizing autoantibody data was summarized from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology publication by Bennett et al. in 2007. ‡Thienopyridine-associated TTP remission autoantibody data was summarized Tsai et al, 2002, Bennett et al, 2000, and Orimo et al, 2002, and included 3 patients. §Data from average of ADAMTS13 deficient and non-deficient cohorts. Mean Age 41 67 47 60 Sex (% female) 79% 54% 86% 39% Platelet count/mm3 (mean)* 18,978 9,269 51,409 35,000 Platelet count <20,000/mm3* 69% 96% 23% 38% Hemoglobin (mg/dl; mean) 8.5 8.3 9.0 8.4 Creatinine (mg/dl; mean)* 1.5 2.2 3.2 3.0 Creatinine >2.5 mg/dl* 11% 27% 48% 46% 30-day survival 96% 85% 90% 62% Long-term relapse* 42% 8% 0% 0% Neutralizing autoantibodies to ADAMTS13 (prior to TPE) § 79% 100% 27% 0% Neutralizing autoantibodies to ADAMTS 13 (measured at remission) § 55% 33%‡ 33% 0%

Abstract Background: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is increasingly common among patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease. Differences in the mechanisms of action as compared to warfarin could impact transfusion patterns and clinical outcomes in patients, especially for those presenting with major hemorrhage. The management of patients taking these newer medications and corresponding outcomes are relevant to optimizing clinical decision making in situations of major hemorrhage. Methods: We tested the hypothesis that inpatient all-cause mortality among patients presenting with major hemorrhage differs based on the home-administered anticoagulant medication class (DOAC versus warfarin). A cohort of patients presenting to twelve US hospitals from 2013 to 2016 was identified using the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS)-III Recipient Database. Primary ICD diagnosis codes, issued blood products, laboratory data, and early mortality events were used in the application of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition of major hemorrhage. Exposure status was defined as a record of home-administered DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban; exposed) or warfarin (non-exposed). Patients with multiple encounters and those transferred into or out of network were excluded from the analysis. Proportional hazards regression was used to compare all-cause mortality and hospital length of stay. We then repeated the analysis using a cohort matched on propensity scores to account for confounding by age, gender, concurrent aspirin and anti-platelet use, liver and renal dysfunction, cancer, CHA2DS2-VASc score, traumatic injury, and hospital. We then repeated the propensity score matched analysis stratified by anatomic location of bleed and traumatic injury. Results: More than 1.5 million hospitalizations were screened for eligibility. Exclusion of minors, outpatients, hospitalizations without a medication of interest, absence of major hemorrhage, multiple hospitalizations, and hospital transfers resulted in 3,731 patients available for the unadjusted analysis. Inpatient all-cause mortality was lower among DOAC users when the entire cohort was considered (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.45 - 0.80, p=0.0005). Implementation of propensity score matching to account for confounding abrogated this difference (HR=0.84, 95%CI 0.58 - 1.22, p=0.36). Time to hospital discharge was shorter for DOAC users (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 - 1.30, p=0.0034). Transfusion patterns were similar by medication, except for plasma transfusion occurring in 42% of warfarin encounters and 11% of DOAC encounters. Vitamin K was administered in 63% of warfarin encounters, whereas specific DOAC reversal agents were largely unavailable during the analysis period [used in 5 (1%) DOAC encounters]. There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient all-cause mortality in the stratified analysis (warfarin as reference): HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.31 - 1.55) for traumatic head injuries; HR = 1.10 (95%CI 0.62 - 1.95) for non-traumatic head injuries; HR = 0.62 (95%CI 0.20 - 1.94) for traumatic, non-head injuries; and HR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.29 - 1.63) for non-traumatic, non-head injuries. Conclusions: Analysis of a population taking oral anticoagulation and presenting with major hemorrhage showed that transfusion of plasma was more commonly employed to treat major hemorrhage among warfarin users than DOAC users. Inpatient all-cause mortality was lower among DOAC users in the overall cohort; however, accounting for potential confounding factors using propensity score matching abrogated this difference. Hospital length of stay was shorter for DOAC users compared to warfarin users. Stratification by location of bleed and traumatic injury did not alter these findings. Less plasma use and a shorter length of hospitalization in this study, combined with no observable difference in inpatient all-cause mortality, suggests that outcomes following major hemorrhage are at least no different for DOAC users as compared to warfarin users. Disclosures Mast: Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Kor:NIH: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; CSL Behring: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 2203 Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is frequently characterized by severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, the cause of which is unknown. An important exception is ticlopidine-associated TTP (tc-TTP), the most common drug-induced TTP syndrome. In 1998, a possible association of TTP with ticlopidine was reported. In 1999, two additional series reported this association. In 2000, a fourth study reported severe A DAMTS13 deficiency among six of seven tc-TTP persons- suggesting a causal pathway. All of these reports were from the United States. Recently, we reported characteristics of 186 acquired idiopathic (ai)- TTP patients in Japan with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, noting that clinical and laboratory findings for ai-TTP patients in Japan differed from those for cohorts of ai-TTP patients in Europe and North America- raising concern that TTP findings vary by region of the world. (PLOS One 2011) We now on report clinical and laboratory characteristics of a cohort of TTP patients from Japan with tc-TTP, and compare these findings to three cohorts of tc-TTP in the United States and one cohort of ai-TTP patients from Japan. Methods: We queried a database of thrombotic microangiopathy patients identified from a national TTP referral laboratory in Japan of cases identified between 1998 and 2008. Severe ADAMTS13 deficiency was characterized by activity levels < 5%. All tc-TTP patients and 186 of 911 ai-TTP patients in the database had severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and first onset of TTP. Comparisons were made to tc-TTP patients reported previously from the United States. Results: Characteristics of ai- TTP with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency in Japan and tc-TTP in Japan and US Conclusions: These data from Japan validate insights about tc-TTP initially proposed in 1998, 1999, and 2000 in the United States. Ticlopidine is a likely cause of TTP, the mechanism is via a cross-reactive antibody to ADAMTS13:AC resulting in formation of an ADAMTS13:INH, and therapeutic plasma exchange is necessary for treatment. Disclosures: Ortel: Eisai: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Instrumentation Laboratory, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Fujimura:Baxter BioScience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) conducted a 1 day consensus conference on Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) during its annual meeting in Atlanta, GA, on April 10, 2012. The authors of this article, a subcommittee of ASFA's Clinical Applications Committee, developed several questions with regard to definitions, classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and future research in TTP. These questions were provided to the seven invited speakers who are the experts in the field of TTP. Two moderators conducted the proceedings of the conference which was attended by more than 100 participants. After each presentation, there was an open discussion that included moderator‐selected written questions submitted by the audience. A medical writer‐generated transcript of the proceedings as well as each presentation was made available to the authors. Each summary was reviewed and approved by the respective speaker before submission of this article. The subcommittee also developed seven key questions for blinded, electronic polling conducted by the moderators to generate a consensus amongst the speakers. This article includes these presentation summaries as well as results of the electronic poll. J. Clin. Apheresis 29:148–167, 2014. © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Apheresis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.