Back to Authors

McKone, Elizabeth L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-6369

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

Local Control and Survival Outcomes in Pediatric Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma: The Mayo Clinic Experience
McKone, Elizabeth L. , Roberts, Kristofer W., Harmsen, William S. , Breen, William G. , Mahajan, Anita , Rose, Peter S. , Ahmed, Safia K. , Allen‐Rhoades, Wendy , Laack, Nadia N.

Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology | June 26, 2026 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 261-269

10.1097/mph.0000000000003202 Get It

Objective: This single institutional analysis explored outcomes and factors associated with local control and survival in pediatric patients with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). Methods: Patients 18 years of age or younger diagnosed between October 1990 and November 2021 who received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were retrospectively identified. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and univariate Cox models. Results: Among 51 included patients, there were 33 extremity tumors (65%), with 80% T1/T2 and 90% M0. Surgery in 49/51 (96%) resulted in 32 (65%) R0 resections. All received EBRT, with brachytherapy or intraoperative radiotherapy boosts in 21/51 (41%). Thirty-four (66.7%) received chemotherapy. With 5.7 years median follow-up, 5-year OS and DFS were 70.7% and 67.9%, respectively. Positive margins were significantly associated with worse OS. Two-year local failure incidence was 18.1% for EBRT versus 5.3% for EBRT+boost (HR 3.67, P =0.24). Among 6 local failures, 5 received EBRT alone, including 3 with positive margins. Two treated with EBRT+boost had positive margins, neither with local recurrence. Conclusion: Multimodality treatment of pediatric NRSTS results in 5-year OS and DFS around 70%. Although complete resection remains essential, and the modern incidence of R1 resection has declined, IORT/brachytherapy boost may continue to have a role in selected patients with a high local recurrence risk.
Research through Evaluation for Large Language Model in Patient-Clinician Communications
Holmes, Jason, Hobson, Jared, Bennett, Alexandra, McKone, Elizabeth L. , Ebner, Daniel, Shiraishi, Satomi, Patel, Samir H. , Yu, Nathan Y. , Hallemeier, Chris L., Ball, Brooke E., Waddle, Mark, Liu, Wei, Hao, Yuexing , Holmes, Jason , Routman, David M. , Kalantari, Saleh , Ghassemi, Marzyeh

No container title available | June 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-9735115/v1 Get It

Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in healthcare applications. However, recruiting human evaluators to assess usability and effectiveness becomes challenging in the large-scale LLM-generated outcomes. Existing metrics are often outdated for evaluating LLM-based healthcare technologies. This paper proposes a Research through Evaluation (RtE) approach that can refine metrics and improve assessments of LLM-generated outputs. We deploy RtE in a retrospective comparative study of prostate cancer patient inquiries, comparing responses from human clinical care teams with those generated by a GPT-4-based in-basket bot. Through three rounds of co-evaluations with clinical professionals and an LLM-as-graders study with four LLMs, the RtE method shows that starting with small, iterative evaluations helps human graders adjust metrics to suit their daily practices better. Additionally, in the LLM-as-graders study, LLMs exhibit similar behavior, preferring the in-basket bot's responses over the clinical care team. Our methodology and findings demonstrate that the RtE method can enhance the transparency and robustness of evaluation metrics for LLM-generated content, with the potential to generalize to evaluations in other clinical practices.
Local Control and Survival Outcomes in Pediatric Non-rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma: The Mayo Clinic Experience
Laack, Nadia N. , Laack, Nadia N Issa , McKone, Elizabeth L. , Roberts, Kristofer W., Harmsen, William S. , Breen, William G. , Mahajan, Anita , Allen‐Rhoades, Wendy , Rose, Peter S. , Ahmed, Safia K.

No container title available | January 27, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.173797932.22133071/v1 Get It

Objective: Pediatric patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) undergo aggressive multimodality treatment. This single institutional analysis of outcomes in this group explored factors associated with local control and survival. Methods: Patients ≤18 years old diagnosed with NRSTS between 10/1990-11/2021 who received radiotherapy (RT) were retrospectively identified. Overall Survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier methods. Cumulative incidence of local and distant failure were estimated. Univariate analysis was performed. Results: Fifty-one pediatric patients with NRSTS were included. Extremity tumors were most common (33/51, 65%), with 80% T1 or T2 (AJCC 8 th ) and 90% non-metastatic. Surgery in 49/51 (96%) resulted in 32 (65%) R0 resections. All received RT (median EQD2 50 Gy, range 42.4-76.9), with brachytherapy or intraoperative (IORT) boosts in 21 cases (41%) (mean EQD2 24.5 Gy). Thirty-four (66.7%) received chemotherapy. With 5.7 years median follow up, 5-year OS and DFS were 70.7% and 67.9%, respectively. Positive margins were significantly associated with worse OS on univariate analysis. Two-year local failure incidence for EBRT was 18.1% and 5.3% for EBRT+boost (HR 3.67, p=0.24). Among 6 observed local failures, 5 occurred after EBRT alone, 3 of which had positive margins. Among the EBRT+boost group, 2 had positive margins, neither with local recurrence. Conclusion: Multimodality treatment of pediatric NRSTS results in 5-year OS and DFS around 70%. R0 resection is essential to optimize outcomes in this population. Although incidence of R1 resections has declined in the modern era, IORT/brachytherapy boost may have a role in selected patients at high-risk for local recurrence.
Application of Advanced Imaging to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Unanswered Questions
McKone, Elizabeth L. , Sutton, Elsa A., Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Phillips, Ryan , Phillips, Ryan M., Johnson, Geoffrey B

Journal of Clinical Medicine | January 15, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 446

10.3390/jcm13020446 Get It

Major advances in prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and management have occurred over the past decade, largely due to our improved understanding of the technical aspects and clinical applications of advanced imaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-cancer-specific positron emission tomography (PET). Herein, we review the established utility of these important and exciting technologies, as well as areas of controversy and uncertainty that remain important areas for future study. There is strong evidence supporting the utility of MRI in guiding initial biopsy and assessing local disease. There is debate, however, regarding how to best use the imaging modality in risk stratification, treatment planning, and assessment of biochemical failure. Prostate-cancer-specific PET is a relatively new technology that provides great value to the evaluation of newly diagnosed, treated, and recurrent prostate cancer. However, its ideal use in treatment decision making, staging, recurrence detection, and surveillance necessitates further research. Continued study of both imaging modalities will allow for an improved understanding of their best utilization in improving cancer care.