Citations

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel is an effective treatment regimen for advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). However, the prognosis for patients remains poor, and thus there is an urgent medical need for novel and effective therapies to improve long-term outcomes. The aim of the ANNOUNCE 2 trial was to explore the addition of olaratumab (O) to gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) for advanced STS. Adults with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic STS, ≤2 prior lines of systemic therapy, and ECOG PS 0–1 were eligible. In Phase 2, patients were randomized 1:1 from two cohorts (O-naïve and O-pretreated) to 21-day cycles of olaratumab (20 mg/kg Cycle 1 and 15 mg/kg other cycles, Days 1 and 8), gemcitabine (900 mg/m2, Days 1 and 8), and docetaxel (75 mg/m2, Day 8). The primary objective was overall survival (OS) in the O-naïve population (α level = 0.20). Secondary endpoints included OS (O-pretreated), other efficacy parameters, patient-reported outcomes, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. A total of 167 and 89 patients were enrolled in the O-naïve and O-pretreated cohorts, respectively. Baseline patient characteristics were well balanced. No statistically significant difference in OS was observed between the investigational vs. control arm for either cohort (O-naïve cohort: HR = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.64−1.40), p = 0.78, median OS, 16.8 vs. 18.0 months; O-pretreated cohort: HR = 0.67 (95% CI: 0.39−1.16), p = 0.15, median OS 19.8 vs. 17.3 months). Safety was manageable across treatment arms. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of OS between the two arms in the O-naïve population, and therefore based on hierarchical evaluation no other outcomes in this study can be considered statistically significant. No new safety signals were observed.

ImportanceLip, oral, and pharyngeal cancers are important contributors to cancer burden worldwide, and a comprehensive evaluation of their burden globally, regionally, and nationally is crucial for effective policy planning.ObjectiveTo analyze the total and risk-attributable burden of lip and oral cavity cancer (LOC) and other pharyngeal cancer (OPC) for 204 countries and territories and by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) using 2019 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) Study estimates.Evidence ReviewThe incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to LOC and OPC from 1990 to 2019 were estimated using GBD 2019 methods. The GBD 2019 comparative risk assessment framework was used to estimate the proportion of deaths and DALYs for LOC and OPC attributable to smoking, tobacco, and alcohol consumption in 2019.FindingsIn 2019, 370 000 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 338 000-401 000) cases and 199 000 (95% UI, 181 000-217 000) deaths for LOC and 167 000 (95% UI, 153 000-180 000) cases and 114 000 (95% UI, 103 000-126 000) deaths for OPC were estimated to occur globally, contributing 5.5 million (95% UI, 5.0-6.0 million) and 3.2 million (95% UI, 2.9-3.6 million) DALYs, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, low-middle and low SDI regions consistently showed the highest age-standardized mortality rates due to LOC and OPC, while the high SDI strata exhibited age-standardized incidence rates decreasing for LOC and increasing for OPC. Globally in 2019, smoking had the greatest contribution to risk-attributable OPC deaths for both sexes (55.8% [95% UI, 49.2%-62.0%] of all OPC deaths in male individuals and 17.4% [95% UI, 13.8%-21.2%] of all OPC deaths in female individuals). Smoking and alcohol both contributed to substantial LOC deaths globally among male individuals (42.3% [95% UI, 35.2%-48.6%] and 40.2% [95% UI, 33.3%-46.8%] of all risk-attributable cancer deaths, respectively), while chewing tobacco contributed to the greatest attributable LOC deaths among female individuals (27.6% [95% UI, 21.5%-33.8%]), driven by high risk-attributable burden in South and Southeast Asia.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this systematic analysis, disparities in LOC and OPC burden existed across the SDI spectrum, and a considerable percentage of burden was attributable to tobacco and alcohol use. These estimates can contribute to an understanding of the distribution and disparities in LOC and OPC burden globally and support cancer control planning efforts.

PURPOSE Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with frequent metastatic relapse after curative surgery. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit for advanced disease. Multiomics profiling studies have identified homologous recombination deficiency in uLMS. In preclinical studies where olaparib and temozolomide provided modest activity, the combination was highly effective for inhibiting uLMS tumor growth. PATIENTS AND METHODS NCI Protocol 10250 is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study evaluating olaparib and temozolomide in advanced uLMS. Patients with progression on ≥1 prior line received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 orally once daily with olaparib 200 mg orally twice a day both on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was the best objective response rate (ORR) within 6 months. A one-stage binomial design was used. If ≥5 of 22 responded, the treatment would be considered promising (93% power; α = .06). All patients underwent paired biopsies that were evaluated with whole-exome sequencing (WES)/RNAseq and a RAD51 foci formation assay. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were evaluable. The median age was 55 years, and 59% had received three or more prior lines. Best ORR within 6 months was 23% (5 of 22). The overall ORR was 27% (6 of 22). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable). Hematologic toxicity was common (grade 3/4 neutropenia: 75%; thrombocytopenia: 32%) but manageable with dose modification. Five of 16 (31%) of tumors contained a deleterious homologous recombination gene alteration by WES, and 9 of 18 (50%) were homologous recombination-deficient by the RAD51 assay. In an exploratory analysis, mPFS was prolonged for patients with homologous recombination-deficient versus homologous recombination-proficient tumors (11.2 v 5.4 months, P = .05) by RAD51. CONCLUSION Olaparib and temozolomide met the prespecified primary end point and provided meaningful clinical benefit in patients with advanced, pretreated uLMS.

Background: An electrocardiogram (ECG)-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm has shown good performance in detecting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM AI-score). However, its clinical application may be challenging due to the low disease prevalence and potentially high false-positive rate when screening unenriched cohorts. Aims: To identify clinical characteristics associated with false-positive HCM AI-score results to improve screening tool application. Methods: From a cohort of 20,677 patients with a digital 12-lead ECG in routine clinical practice in 2021, we performed a detailed chart review of the 200 patients with highest HCM AI-score to determine their HCM status and collect clinical data. Stepwise forward logistic regression was used to create a clinical variable-based “candidacy for HCM screening” score (CHS score), differentiating true- and likely true-positive from likely false-positive HCM AI-score results. We then validated the CHS score in 200 patients with the highest HCM AI-scores from an independent cohort of 15,147 patients with an ECG in 2022. Results: Among the 200 patients in 2021 (median age 71 years, 48% female), 96 (48%) were likely false-positive HCM AI-score results, 71 (36%) definite or likely true-positive results, and 33 (16%) indeterminate. The CHS score included a history of surgical septal myectomy, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, cardiac valve replacement, and pacemaker, and had an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for the differentiation of true- versus false-positive AI results. In the 2022 cohort, the CHS score had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76 - 0.88). After limiting the cohort to HCM candidates identified by the CHS score, the false-positive results rate was reduced to 27/114 (24%). Conclusions: By applying the CHS score to patients with positive HCM AI-screening results, the false-positive rate decreased from 49% to 24%. Utilizing a clinical model used in tandem with an AI model improved diagnostic yield.

Introduction: We have previously shown that ECG-derived age (ECG-Age) predicts all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, reflecting physiologic age. We hypothesized that ECG-Age minus chronological age (Age-Gap) would be associated with coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessed by computer tomography. Methods: We developed a neural network model to predict ECG-Age using 12 lead ECGs from 399,750 training, 99,977 validation and 275,056 testing patients. We then applied the algorithm to 41,202 consecutive patients that from 1997-2020 underwent clinically indicated CAC and ECG within 1 year. Major modifiable CV risk factors were collected as part of preventive cardiology or general medical evaluations. Exclusion criteria were statin therapy, pacemakers, or history of coronary artery disease. Results: We included 41,202 subjects (68.5% males, 83.6% Caucasian), mean chronological age was 55.2±9.1 yrs and the ECG-Age was 56.01±9.3 yrs. The mean Age-Gap was -0.78±7 yrs, R 2 =0.78, p<0.0001. Mean CAC score was 140.2±532.3, and 21,483 (52%) had CAC >0. After adjustment for age and sex, those older by ECG (defined as having a positive Age-Gap) were more likely to have CAC>0 (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.34-2.37 for those with >1 but <2 SD of a positive Age-Gap; and OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34-2.37 for those with ≥2 SD of a positive Age-Gap), while those younger by ECG were less likely to have any CAC (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.87 for those with >1 but <2 SD of a negative Age-Gap; and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84 for those with ≥2 SD of a negative Age-Gap), respectively. This association remained significant after multivariate adjustment, Fig. A and increased with CAC burden, Fig. B , all P for trend <0.01. Conclusions: The difference between physiologic AI-ECG age and chronologic age, something likely representing rate of biological aging, is associated with presence of CAC, further supporting the hypothesis that AI-ECG age can identify people more likely to have subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Evaluating the Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Transgender Patients Undergoing Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy with Artificial Intelligence Introduction: An artificial intelligence (AI) electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm has been demonstrated to identify a patient’s birth designated sex with 90.4% accuracy with an AUC = 0.97. However, the algorithm has not been evaluated in transgender and gender diverse individuals. We aimed to determine how the algorithm output varies among transgender individuals seen at the Mayo Clinic Transgender and Intersex Specialty Care Clinic (TISCC) who are undergoing gender-affirming hormonal treatment (GAHT). Methods: We applied the algorithm (which assessed the probability of “male” between 0 and 1, with < 0.5 considered as “female” and > 0.5 as “male”) to ECGs obtained from patients in the TISCC before and after the initiation of GAHT. GAHT frequently involves the use of testosterone in transgender men, and estrogen and anti-androgen agents in transgender women. Patient characteristics, including the date of the initiation of GAHT, were collected through chart review. Results: Among transgender women, the AI model probability of “male” decreased from 0.84± 0.25 (12/86 classified as males) to 0.59±0.36 (68/173 classified as male) with GAHT (p < 7.8e-10). Among transgender men, the AI model probability of “male” increased from 0.16 ± 0.28 (7/47 classified as male) to 0.41 ±0.38 (22/53 classified as male) with GAHT (p < 2.4e-4). Conclusion: After GAHT initiation, the Mayo Clinic AI ECG algorithm assigns a higher probability of being male among transgender men and a lower probability of being male among transgender women. These findings warrant further investigation into the electrocardiographic differences across genders and the effects of GAHT on the human heart.

Introduction: Over 100 FDA-approved medications, electrolyte perturbations, and many disease states can prolong the QTc beyond its 99 th percentile value resulting in acquired QT prolongation. In contrast, approximately 1 in 2000 people have congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) hallmarked by pathological QT prolongation secondary to genetic defects in the heart. Hypothesis: An artificial intelligence (AI) deep neural network (DNN) can distinguish patients with LQTS from those with acquired QT prolongation. Methods: The study cohort included all patients with LQTS evaluated in the Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic and controls from Mayo Clinic’s ECG data vault comprising over 2.5 million patients. For the AI-DNN model, every patient/control with ≥ 1 ECG above age- and sex- specific 99 th percentile values for QTc [> 460 ms for all patients (male/female) < 13 years of age, or > 470 ms for men and > 480 ms for women above this age] was included. An AI-DNN involving a multi-layer c onvolutional n eural n etwork (CNN) was developed to classify patients. LQTS patients were age- and sex- matched to controls at 1:5 ratio. Results: Among the 1,599 patients with genetically confirmed LQTS, 808 had ≥ 1 ECG with QTc above the threshold (2,987 ECGs) compared to 361,069/2.5M controls (14% of Mayo Clinic patients getting an ECG, ‘presumed negative’; 989,313 ECGs). Following age- and sex- matching and splitting, 3,309 (training), 411 (validation) and 887 (testing) control ECGs were used. This model distinguished LQTS from those with acquired QT prolongation with an AUC of 0.896 (accuracy 85%, sensitivity 77%, specificity 88%, PPV 0.58, NPV 0.94). After exclusion of patients with a wide QRS (>150 ms) or pacemaker, the model remained successful in distinguishing the two groups (AUC 0.85, accuracy 78%, sensitivity 78%, specificity 87%, PPV 59%, NPV 94%). Conclusions: For patients with a QTc exceeding its 99 th percentile values, this novel AI-DNN functions as a LQTS mutation detector being able to identify patients with abnormal QT prolongation secondary to a LQTS-causative mutation rather than acquired QT prolongation with a >50% positive predictive value. This algorithm may facilitate screening for this potentially lethal, yet highly treatable, genetic heart disease.

Introduction: Deep-learning artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from the electrocardiogram (ECG). Preliminary data indicate that AI-ECG may also track treatment response in HCM patients (pts) receiving mavacamten (Mava). In this placebo-controlled analysis, we investigated the performance of AI-ECG in HCM detection and its changes during Mava treatment compared to placebo in the phase 3, EXPLORER-HCM trial. Methods: Pts with non-paced ECGs enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM, evaluating Mava over 30 weeks of treatment, were included. All pts had a 12-lead ECG pre-treatment, at each study visit, and 8 weeks after treatment end. Two independently developed AI-ECG convolutional neural network algorithms from the Mayo Clinic and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) were applied to all ECGs suitable for analysis. Serial AI-ECG-predicted scores, which correlate with HCM likelihood (range 0-1), were examined between Mava and placebo groups. Results: A total of 101 Mava and 110 placebo pts were included (mean age 58.6, female 40%). At baseline, the mean Mayo and UCSF AI-ECG scores for HCM were 0.82 and 0.65, with 94% and 88% of pts exceeding the respective diagnostic thresholds of 0.11 (Mayo) and 0.4 (UCSF). During 30 weeks of follow-up in the Mava group, the algorithms showed a mean AI-ECG score reduction of 0.32 (Mayo) and 0.17 (UCSF) in all pts between start and end of treatment. In comparison, AI-ECG scores decreased by 0.05 (Mayo) and increased by 0.02 (UCSF) in the placebo group (Mava vs placebo, t-test p-values <0.001 for both algorithms; Figure ) Conclusion: In the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, two independent deep-learning AI-ECG algorithms correctly identified most HCM pts and demonstrated significant reductions in predicted HCM scores after treatment with Mava when compared to placebo. This relative normalization of the ECG suggests disease-modifying properties of Mava, deserving further investigation.

Background: We developed a deep learning algorithm to predict elevated coronary artery calcium (CAC) score from 12-lead electrocardiograms (CAC- ECG). We tested the hypothesis that this CAC-ECG algorithm will independently predict long-term survival. Methods: We leveraged a historical cohort of 43,210 consecutive patients who from the years 1997-2020 underwent clinically indicated ECG-gated unenhanced chest computed tomography (CT) to identify and quantify CAC and had an ECG within 1 year of the CT. Data on cardiovascular risk (CV) factors, and to calculate the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) for ASCVD was collected as part of preventive cardiology or general medical evaluations. We used the oldest CAC in record and excluded those taking statins at the time of the CAC. The algorithm was trained in 60% of the cohort, and the association between CAC-ECG and survival was evaluated with multivariate cox proportional hazard models in 40% of the remaining observations. Results: Of the 17,284 evaluated patients, mean ± SD age 55.9 ± 9.9, 33% female, 3,714 (21%) had elevated CAC ≥ 300. During an average of 15±5.9 years follow-up, 848 (5%) patients died. The algorithm’s area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect a CAC ≥ 300 were 0.83, 0.90%, 0.56%, 0.60%. Those with elevated CAC had a nearly two-fold risk of death, a value similar to those deemed positive by the ECG-CAC algorithm ( Figure A ). Risk of death increased with CAC-ECG probability quartiles ( Figure A ). The CAC-ECG algorithm enhanced predicted capabilities of the PCE across all ASCVD risk subgroups ( Figure B ), as well as in those with no CAC and elevated CAC ( Figure C ), all p for trend <0.001. Conclusions: A deep learning-enabled CAC-ECG algorithm was independently associated with long-term survival and enhanced current risk prediction paradigms. The CAC-ECG algorithm could help identify individuals at risk in primary prevention of CV disease.