Citations

TPS283 Background: Emerging evidence suggests that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can delay systemic therapy in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, the optimal timing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) initiation in this setting remains undefined. While deferred ADT following MDT may preserve quality of life, early short-course ADT/ARPI may eradicate micrometastatic disease and extend progression-free survival. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying PSMA-positive prostate cancer (PC) signals and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as real-time biomarkers of MRD and treatment response. Methods: DIVINE [NCT06378866] is an open-label, phase II, randomized trial enrolling men with omCSPC defined by 1–5 metastases (≥1 extrapelvic) on conventional imaging (CT/MRI and bone scan) and testosterone >100 ng/dL. PSMA PET may be obtained for correlative purposes but does not determine eligibility. Participants (N = 220) are randomized 1:1 to: Arm A (Early systemic): SBRT plus 6 months of ADT + ARPI. Arm B (Deferred systemic): SBRT alone with observation, reserving systemic therapy until radiographic progression not amenable to further SBRT (mrPD). SBRT is delivered per institutional standard; repeat SBRT is allowed until lesions become non-addressable. The primary endpoint, modified radiographic progression-free survival (mrPFS), is the time from randomization to death or radiographic progression not amenable to further MDT, defined by PCWG3 (bone) and modified RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) criteria on conventional imaging. Soft-tissue progression requires ≥ 20% increase in measurable disease or a new lesion; bone progression requires ≥ 2 new confirmed lesions. Secondary endpoints include OS, biochemical PFS, time to local and distant progression, and grade 3–5 adverse events during systemic therapy. Exploratory endpoints evaluate EV and ctDNA kinetics as MRD markers, correlation of PSMA-positive EV burden with outcomes, and duration of response after short-course ADT/ARPI. Correlative analyses will longitudinally quantify PSMA-positive EVs and ctDNA at baseline, on treatment, and at progression to define MRD dynamics and resistance patterns. The trial uses Pocock–Simon dynamic allocation by EV strata and metastatic burden to ensure balance across arms. The trial is open and actively enrolling across all Mayo Clinic sites; as of October 2025, 35 of the planned 220 patients have been accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT06378866 .

ABSTRACT We report a case of significant clinical improvement after starting odevixibat in a 27-year-old patient with refractory pruritus due to progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1. He had poor response to multiple therapies and experienced profound decline in quality of life, describing his symptoms as emotionally exhausting and difficult to endure. He was evaluated for liver transplantation in March 2020 but was denied due to preserved liver function. Odevixibat was started in November 2021, resulting in biochemical improvement and dramatic sustained resolution of pruritus. He resumed normal activities, achieving excellent quality of life.

PURPOSE The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.

Purpose: To determine current dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) practice patterns of American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members and identify surgeon and case-related factors impacting preference for endoscopic versus external DCR and the use of preoperative imaging. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based anonymous 16-question survey was distributed to 277 American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members enrolled in survey-based research. The survey assessed surgeons’ demographics, practice settings, surgical preferences, and imaging practices. Responses were summarized and compared using statistical tests for frequency distribution. Results: A total of 111 surgeons (40.0%) responded to the survey. Utilization of endoscopic DCR (endoDCR) was highly variable, with 57% of junior surgeons (<5 years in practice) using it for >66% of their cases, compared with only 18.3% of surgeons with >15 years postfellowship experience. High utilization of endoDCR (>66% of cases) was more common in academic surgeons compared with private practice (48.4% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.01). The most cited reasons for endoDCR were scar avoidance and revision surgery. For external DCR, anatomical barriers and concern for mass/need for biopsy were common indications. Most surgeons only order imaging for certain indications, such as prior sinonasal surgery, facial trauma, suspected tumor, or atypical presentation. Conclusion: Utilization of endoDCR was correlated with years in practice, with younger surgeons preferring the endoscopic technique. A large majority felt that the relevance of imaging is low in most patients. Future research is needed to standardize case-based indications for endoscopic versus external approaches and preoperative imaging.

INTRODUCTION: High-quality colonoscopy requires accurate risk stratification for surveillance per the 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines and adherence to 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality benchmarks. Both are operationally challenging in clinical practice. We developed and validated Colon-Pilot, a large language model—powered clinical decision support system using GPT-4o to automate and standardize both functions. METHODS: The system was evaluated in 2 operational modes: (i) a human-in-the-loop clinical decision support validation of surveillance recommendations for 596 colonoscopies, comparing concordance with 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines against expert consensus, and (ii) an automated administrative audit applying Colon-Pilot to 42,632 colonoscopies across the Mayo Clinic Health System to calculate 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy priority quality indicators. Recommendations were autogenerated unless predefined safety criteria triggered manual review. RESULTS: Colon-Pilot issued recommendations for 522 of 596 cases (87.6%) and flagged 12.4% for manual review. For automated cases, guideline-concordant accuracy was 97.5% (Cohen κ = 0.970) versus 69.7% (κ = 0.781) for original endoscopist recommendations. Discordant artificial intelligence (AI) cases (n = 13) most often recommended longer-than-appropriate intervals (62%). Applied to the enterprise data set, Colon-Pilot calculated performance exceeding 2024 targets: adenoma detection rate 49.8% (≥35%), sessile serrated lesion detection rate 17.7% (≥6%), bowel preparation adequacy 91.8% (≥90%), and cecal intubation rate 97.4% (≥95%). DISCUSSION: Colon-Pilot demonstrated high fidelity in applying surveillance guidelines and automated quality benchmarking, outperforming unassisted endoscopists in guideline adherence. By combining safety protocols with large-scale automated reporting, it offers a scalable solution for improving both efficiency and quality in colorectal cancer prevention.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vaginal Cancer outline the recommended diagnostic workup, staging considerations, and treatment options for this rare malignancy. Because vaginal cancer is uncommon and shares many biologic and clinical characteristics with cervical cancer, several management recommendations, particularly systemic therapy, are extrapolated from evidence and practices established for cervical cancer. This guideline excerpt summarizes key components of management, including diagnostic evaluation and workup, principles of staging, pathology considerations, radiation therapy principles, and primary treatment recommendations for both early-stage and advanced disease. It also details approaches to manage relapses, including locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, and provides an in-depth overview of systemic therapy recommendations for vaginal cancer.

Abstract Measurement of D-dimer, a fibrin degradation product, is crucial for diagnosing thrombotic and fibrinolytic conditions. Despite its expanding utility, D-dimer testing faces challenges due to varying assay methodologies and nonstandardized reporting. To understand D-dimer reporting practices, the College of American Pathologists Hemostasis and Thrombosis Committee analyzed proficiency testing data from D-dimer surveys conducted between 2020 and 2023 across multiple laboratories. The data demonstrate that laboratories commonly report units that differ from the assay package insert when reporting their proficiency testing results. We sought to assess variability in reporting practices and opportunities for improvement in D-dimer reporting amongst participants. To accomplish this, we harmonized all D-dimer results to ng/mL fibrinogen equivalent units from one distributed sample and assessed distinct populations of entries per instrument/reagent combination. Notable trends emerged from this analysis. Data from laboratories using the same instrument/reagent combinations clustered around different means, suggesting issues with unit reporting and/or conversion. Entries reported in mg/L or ug/mL D-dimer units commonly exhibited significant deviations from the dominant population. For one instrument/reagent combination, most reported values differed by approximately twice the certificate of analysis value. This analysis highlights potential issues with D-dimer reporting in proficiency testing. Whether these issues translate into issues with clinical D-dimer reporting requires further study.

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials (CV trials), despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CVD. Purpose We aim to determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. Methods The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data was extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention and age of the participants. We calculated the proportion of women and the ratio of number of females to male participants (F:M ratio) for each trial. The female participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. Results We identified 1,079 registered CV trials, which included 1,396,104 participants, of whom 571,641 (41.0%) were women. The median F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (0.5), coronary heart disease (CHD) (0.39), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (0.32) and heart failure (HF) (0.51), but was higher for obesity (1.44) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (2.86) CV trials. F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle intervention (1.51) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on CHD (0.66), ACS (0.79), and stroke (0.74). There was a trend to increasing PPR from 2017 to 2023, p=0.056. Conclusion Representation of women in CV trials varies by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. Better understanding of reasons for these differences may enable more tailored interventions to improve representation of women globally and across therapeutic areas.Figure 1 Figure 2

Abstract Background Inducible ST-segment depression during stress echocardiography (SE) is associated with a higher risk in patients with inducible regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA). Objective To assess ST segment elevation's prevalence and functional correlates during SE. Methods ECG response was analyzed in 1712 patients (age 63±12 years; 1011 men, 59%) undergoing SE for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) prospectively recruited at 39 laboratories. Among the patients analyzed, 1286 (75%) performed SE with exercise, 306 (18%) with dobutamine and 120 (7%) with a vasodilator. ECG response was considered abnormal in case of ST-segment shift &gt;1.0 mm from baseline at 80 ms from the J point developed in ≥2 contiguous leads during SE. The stress to rest (∆) change in the wall motion score index (WMSI) was assessed in all patients. Coronary angiography was available in 765 patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were the outcome measure in 746 patients with follow-up information. Results No significant ST segment shift was observed in 1000 patients (58%, Group 1), ST-segment depression occurred in 609 patients (35.5%, Group 2), and ST-segment elevation in 103 patients (6%, Group 3). ST-segment elevation occurred in 66/1286 patients (5.2%) with exercise, 30/306 with dobutamine (10%), and 7/120 with vasodilators (6%, p = ns vs. exercise and p&lt;0.01 vs. dobutamine). The prevalence of stress-induced RMWA was higher in Group 2 (38.1%) compared to Group 3 (33%) and Group 1 (11.9%. P&lt; 0.001 vs. Groups 2 and 3); however, the ΔWMSI was more pronounced in Group 3 compared to Group 2 and Group 1 (p = ns vs. Group 2 and p&lt;0.001 vs. Group 1). (Figure, left panel). Non-significant CAD (defined as coronary stenosis &lt;50% on coronary angiography) was more prevalent in Group 1 (36%) and 3 (40%) compared to Group 2 (17.5%, p&lt;0.01 vs. Group 1 and 3). . During a median follow-up of 387 days (IQ range 314-603 days), 150 events occurred in 112 patients: 14 all-cause deaths, 39 acute myocardial infarctions, 19 atrial fibrillations, 34 late coronary revascularizations, and 44 acute heart failure hospitalizations. The exposure-adjusted event rate was the lowest in Group 1 compared to Groups 2 and 3 (Figure, right panel). Conclusion In all-comers with CCS, the electrocardiographic pattern of ST-segment elevation is not rare, more frequent with dobutamine, associated with more stress-to-rest change in RWMA and more events despite less extensive underlying anatomic CAD. The paradox of more ischemia with less coronary stenosis is consistent with a coronary vasospastic origin as an important yet frequently overlooked cause of stress-induced ST segment elevation.Figure