Mau, Brayden

Background & Aims: Multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is an established stool-based colorectal cancer screening test, yet long-term performance is not well-described. We evaluated follow-up colonoscopy rates & quality, neoplasia yield, and repeat-testing adherence over 10 years with an integrated screening program. Methods: We assembled a retrospective cohort of mt-sDNA tests (September 2014–July 2025) within a multi-site health system. A validated large-language-model pipeline extracted colonoscopy, pathology, and quality endpoints from free-text reports. Detection outcomes (adenoma detection rate, advanced neoplasia, modified advanced adenoma, sessile serrated lesion (SSL), and negative exams) were calculated among high-quality exams; adenocarcinoma, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate (CIR) used all screening exams. We assessed colonoscopy completion ≤1 year after positive mt-sDNA, follow-up colonoscopy findings, findings by time-to-colonoscopy, and adherence to repeat mt-sDNA after negative result. Results: Among 148,624 tests in 110,410 individuals, positivity was 13.6%. Of 19,506 positives, 65.1% completed colonoscopy within 12 months (median 82 days). Colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA had high yield: advanced adenoma diagnosis was 30.7%; adenocarcinoma was 1.3%. Of patients who had colonoscopy within 3 years of a negative mt-sDNA test, 45.2% had adenoma/serrated lesion, 9.3% had advanced adenoma and 0.5% had colon cancer. Adenoma detection rate after positive mt-sDNA (>50%) exceeded specialty society quality benchmarks and increased over time; Longer intervals (>6 months) to colonoscopy after a positive test were associated with higher advanced adenoma (trend P=0.001).After an initial negative mt-sDNA, only 35.3% were screened again by mt-sDNA testing within 3 years. Conclusions: Over a decade,mt-sDNA screening achieved high colonoscopy qualitybut revealed critical gaps in the care cascade. One-third of positive tests lacked timely follow-up and nearly two-thirds of negative tests were not repeated on schedule, suggesting opportunities for system-level interventions.

INTRODUCTION: High-quality colonoscopy requires accurate risk stratification for surveillance per the 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines and adherence to 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality benchmarks. Both are operationally challenging in clinical practice. We developed and validated Colon-Pilot, a large language model—powered clinical decision support system using GPT-4o to automate and standardize both functions. METHODS: The system was evaluated in 2 operational modes: (i) a human-in-the-loop clinical decision support validation of surveillance recommendations for 596 colonoscopies, comparing concordance with 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines against expert consensus, and (ii) an automated administrative audit applying Colon-Pilot to 42,632 colonoscopies across the Mayo Clinic Health System to calculate 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy priority quality indicators. Recommendations were autogenerated unless predefined safety criteria triggered manual review. RESULTS: Colon-Pilot issued recommendations for 522 of 596 cases (87.6%) and flagged 12.4% for manual review. For automated cases, guideline-concordant accuracy was 97.5% (Cohen κ = 0.970) versus 69.7% (κ = 0.781) for original endoscopist recommendations. Discordant artificial intelligence (AI) cases (n = 13) most often recommended longer-than-appropriate intervals (62%). Applied to the enterprise data set, Colon-Pilot calculated performance exceeding 2024 targets: adenoma detection rate 49.8% (≥35%), sessile serrated lesion detection rate 17.7% (≥6%), bowel preparation adequacy 91.8% (≥90%), and cecal intubation rate 97.4% (≥95%). DISCUSSION: Colon-Pilot demonstrated high fidelity in applying surveillance guidelines and automated quality benchmarking, outperforming unassisted endoscopists in guideline adherence. By combining safety protocols with large-scale automated reporting, it offers a scalable solution for improving both efficiency and quality in colorectal cancer prevention.