Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

12576 citation(s) found for "Ma, John".

Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle , Kavoussi, Louis, Wren, Sherry M. , Fowler, Dennis, Anvari, Mehran, Bianco, Francesco, Liang, Xiao, Li, Zheyong, Yin, Xiaoyu, Piccoli, Micaela, Marks, John, Shen, Baiyong, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara, Hagendoorn, Jeroen, Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew, Oleynikov, Dmitry, Jones, Stephanie B., Bindal, Vivek , Kim, Hyun Koo, Hyung, Woo Jin, Hashimoto, Daniel, Chen, Liaohai Leo, Burt, Bryan M., Lafaro, Kelly, Elli, Fernando, Wilson, Erik, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Morgan, Annette, Bartlett, Stephen T., Rashidi, Laila, Yu, Liu, Gawkins, Bill, Hinoul, Piet, Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee, Raoof, Mustafa, Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya, Bernard, Jordana , Wang, Yulun, Broering, Dieter C., Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo, Fong, Yuman , Raptis, Dimitri , Wren, Sherry M , Aldousari, Saad , Ruurda, Jelle P. H. , Bindal, Vivek , Melstrom, Laleh , Celotto, Francesco , Kudsi, Yusef , Ratti, Francesca , Bernard, Jordana , Kavoussi, Louis R., Fowler, Dennis L. , Anvari, Mehran , Bianco, Francesco Maria , Piccoli, Micaela , Marks, John, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara , Hagendoorn, Jeroen , Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew , Oleynikov, Dmitry , Hyung, Woo Jin , Hashimoto, Daniel A. , Burt, Bryan M. , Lafaro, Kelly J. , Elli, Fernando, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Rashidi, Laila, Hinoul, Piet , Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee , Raoof, Mustafa , Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya , Bröering, Dieter C. , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo

World Journal of Surgery | July 14, 2026 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2274-2288

10.1002/wjs.70468 | PMID 42444290 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Implementation of remote robotic‐assisted surgery (rRAS) has the potential to significantly improve access to high‐quality surgical care for patients worldwide. Advances in robotic systems and telecommunications now enable highly reliable, low latency, and cybersecure connectivity. These technological developments, together with the broader adoption of telemedicine, have driven an increasing interest in the implementation of rRAS. Methods The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non‐expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day‐long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines. Results Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico‐legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations). Conclusions There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.
MAGIC Composite Score Predicts Outcomes of Second-Line Therapy for Acute GVHD
Sebastian, Tara, Weber, Daniela, Etra, Aaron M., Vasova, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis, Choe, Hannah K., DeFilipp, Zachariah, Quagliarella, Francesco, Bedirian, Karni, Diniz, Marcio Augusto, Aguayo-Hiraldo, Paibel, Bader, Peter, Baez, Janna, Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya, Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O., Katsivelos, Nikolaos, Kitko, Carrie L., Kraus, Sabrina, Louloudis, Ioannis E., Morales, George, Nakamura, Ryotaro, Olson, Timothy S., Qayed, Muna, Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran, Schechter, Tal, Wang, Tingyu, Wolf, Matthias, Young, Rachel, Zeiser, Robert, Hogan, William J., Levine, John E., Ferrara, James L.M., Sebastian, Tara M. , Weber, Daniela , Etra, Aaron , Vášová, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis , Choe, Hannah , DeFilipp, Zachariah , Quagliarella, Francesco , Bedirian, Karni, Aguayo‐Hiraldo, Paibel , Bader, Peter , Baez, Janna , Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya , Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Katsivelos, Nikolaos , Kitko, Carrie L. , Kraus, Sabrina , Morales, George , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Olson, Timothy S. , Qayed, Muna , Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran , Schechter, Tal , Wölfl, Matthias , Young, Rachel , Zeiser, Robert , Hogan, William J. , Levine, John E. , Ferrara, James L.M.

No container title available | July 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357664 | PMID 42523406 Get It

ABSTRACT Approximately 30% of patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) develop steroid-refractory disease and have very poor outcomes. Ruxolitinib has become the standard of care for steroid-refractory acute GVHD, but it is unclear which patients derive benefit. The MAGIC Composite Score (MCS), an algorithm that combines clinical symptoms and biomarkers, has been validated to predict outcomes at the start of primary GVHD treatment. Here, we evaluated its performance at the initiation of second-line treatment in 278 patients. MCS stratified patients into three risk groups (MCS1-3), with the majority (88%) classified as intermediate or high risk. Increasing MCS score was associated with progressively higher 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates (16%, 41%, and 73%; p<0.001), lower 1-year survival (77%, 56%, and 24%; p<0.001), and lower complete response (CR) rates at day 28 (47%, 38%, and 20%, respectively; p<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for 1-year NRM was significantly higher with MCS compared to clinical symptoms alone (0.70 vs. 0.63; p=0.023). Among patients treated with ruxolitinib, higher MCS similarly predicted higher NRM and lower survival and CR rates. Patients classified as MCS2/3 had poor outcomes despite ruxolitinib, underscoring the need for novel therapies in this patient population. In conclusion the MCS is an accurate predictor of outcomes for patients who require second-line treatment and may be of use as an eligibility criterion for future clinical trials in this high-risk population. Key Points MAGIC Composite Scores that integrate clinical symptoms and biomarker scores predict outcomes of second-line therapy for acute GVHD more accurately than clinical symptoms alone. MCS identifies patients with high NRM despite treatment with ruxolitinib.
Drivers of Diagnostic Variation in a Digital Global Kidney Transplant Reader Study
Hofstraat-Boersma, Rianne, Long, Romy du , Buzzanca, Giorgio , Abiola, Adeyemi A., Albadri, Sam, Ali, Zahabia, Altaleb, Ahmed, Banu, Sultana G., Barry, Marc , Bhalodia, Ami , Bianco, Paola, Broecker, Verena , Buelow, Roman, Cheunsuchon, Boonyarit , Crisi, Giovanna M., Daneshvar, Simin, Dokouhaki, Pouneh, Drachenberg, C., Florquin, Sandrine, Gibson, Ian W., Gujarathi, Saurabh, Hendricks, Allen R. , Islam, Jaynul, Ismail, Wesam, Jagannathan, Geetha , Kläger, Johannes, Krizova, Adriana , Kurien, Anila A., Kwon, Boomi , Ledesma, Felipe L., Martin, Jonne, Mehta, Shweta S., Messias, Nidia , Mignano, Salvatore , Miranda, Monik E., Moeckel, Gilbert, Pala, Chiara, Ranson, Marc A., Rodriguez, A Castell, Rosenberg, Avi, Setty, Suman , Sheaff, M., Soares, Maria F.S., Surintrspanont, Jerasit , Terinte-Balcan, George, Testa, Francesca , Ticas, David O. Hendriquez, Toniolo, Maria F., Midden, Dominique van, Velagapudi, R, Viswanathan, Seethalakshmi , Stillfried, Saskia von, Kalverboer, Nienke , Bruns, Imke B. , Callegaro, Giulia , Vries, A A F De, Peters-Sengers, Hessel, Kers, Jesper, Hofstraat, Rianne , Adefidipe, Adeyemi Abiola, Albadri, Sam , Angioi, Andrea , Banu, Sultana Gulshana, Bianco, Paola, Buelow, Roman David, Chauveau, Bertrand , Chen, Guoli , Crisi, Giovanna Maria, Dendooven, Amélie , Drachenberg, Cinthia Beskow , Farris, Alton B. , Ferlicot, Sophie , Florquin, Sandrine , Fontana, Francesco , Gibier, Jean‐Baptiste , Gibson, Ian W. , Husain, Sufia , Ismail, Wesam, Kläger, Johannes Philipp , Kozakowski, Nicolas , Kurien, Anila Abraham , L’Imperio, Vincenzo , Ledesma, Felipe L , Low, Julia P. , Miranda, Monik Ediana , Price, Brendon , Ranson, Marc Andres, Roelofs, Joris J. T. H. , Sadeghipour, Alireza , Sekulic, Miroslav , Setty, Suman , Soares, Maria Fernanda , Terinte‐Balcan, George , Ticas, David Henriquez, Toniolo, María Fernanda , Midden, Dominique van , Velagapudi, Ramya Krishna , Stillfried, Saskia Freifrau von , Wu, Chih‐Ying , Water, Bob van de , Helm, Danny van der , Sengers, Hessel Peters , Kers, Jesper

No container title available | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357318 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.
Amyloid PET Quantitation and Centiloid Thresholds in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Chiotis, Konstantinos, Allen, Isabel E., Rabinovici, Gil D., Joie, Renaud La , Group, Meta-Centiloid Study, Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M., Benzinger, Th., Betthauser, Tobey J., Bluma, Marina, Bombois, Stephanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Bouteloup, Vincent , Braskie, Meredith N., Brendel, Matthias, Brickman, Adam M., Bryant, Natalie, Bullich, Santiago , Carrillo, Maria C., Casaletto, Kaitlin, Cash, David M., Chang, Chiung-Chih, CHANG, H L, Chao, Yishu , Collij, Lyduine E., Corrada, Maria M., Craft, Suzanne , Dickerson, Bradford C., Dubois, Bruno, Dufouil, Carole, Fajardo, Alfonso, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan, Frings, Lars , Frisoni, Giovanni B., Gardner, Raquel C., Gnörich, Johannes , Gordon, Brian A., Gu, Yuna , Guan, Yihui, Guo, Tengfei, Hanseeuw, Bernard J., Hansson, Oskar, Harrison, Theresa M., Huang, Qi, Huang, ST , Iaccarino, Leonardo, Ishii, Kazunari, Ishi, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Johnson, Sterling C., Kato, Takashi, Katsumi, Yuta, Kaye, Jeffrey, Kolinger, Guilherme D., Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lao, Patrick J., Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J., Lowe, Val J. , Luchsinger, José A., Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Meyer, Philipp T., Mezenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, Nordberg, Agneta, O’Brien, John T., O’Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis, Peretti, Debora E., Rowe, Christopher C., Rowe, James B., Schwartz, Daniel L., Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Snyder, Heather M. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan, Taggett, Jacinda Z., Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Vaillancourt, David E., Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Vijverberg, Jort, Villemagne, Victor L. , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei-en, Weiner, Michael, Woodworth, Davis, Xiao, Cally , Xie, F, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, Mijin, Severanc, A4, ABIDE, ADNI*, ADNI-DoD, AgeWell, AIBL, AMYPAD, BACS, BATON, BIOCARD, BLSA, BioFINDER-2, BrANCH, CPAS, DETECT-AD, GEMS, GHABS, HABS, HABS-HD, IDEAS, IMAP, INSIGHT-preAD, Insight46, K-ROAD, LEADS, MCSA, MULNIAD, MEMENTO, SCAN, PREVENT-AD, SPIN,, Corrada, María M. , La Joie, Renaud , Blazhenets, Ganna , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Blūma, Marina , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Braskie, Meredith N. , Brendel, Matthias , Brickman, Adam M. , Carrillo, María C. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Chiung‐Chih , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chêne, Geneviève , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dubois, Bruno , Dufouil, Carole , Fortea, Juan , Garibotto, Valentina , Gordon, Brian A. , Guan, Yihui , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Ishii, Kazunari , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Katsumi, Yuta , Kaye, Jeffrey , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kolinger, Guilherme Domingues , Landau, Susan , Landeau, Brigitte , Lao, Patrick , Lee, Sangwon, Lleó, Alberto , Lopresti, Brian J. , Malpetti, Maura , March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Nakamura, Akinori , Nordberg, Agneta , O'Brien, John Tiernan , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Pappas, Ioannis , Quenon, Lisa , Rowe, Christopher Cleon , Rowe, James B. , Rudolph, Marc D. , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Smith, Ruben, Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Taggett, Jacinda , Toga, Arthur W. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villain, Nicolas , Wang, Wei‐en , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Yun, M R

JAMA | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jama.2026.13116 | PMID 42441390 Get It

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 in Participants at Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Miner, A, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Groh, Jenna R., Singh, Alpana, Dieckhoff, Kari, Tripodis, Yorghos, Adler, Charles H., Balcer, Laura J. , Bernick, C L, Peskind, Elaine, Asken, Breton M., Tanner, Jeremy A., Rabinovici, Gil D., Banks, Sarah J., Barr, William B., Wethe, Jennifer V., Cantu, Robert C., Dodick, David W., Mez, Jesse, Palmisano, J, Martin, Brett, Stein, Thor D., McKee, Ann C., Cummings, Jeffrey L., Shenton, Martha E., Reiman, E Bieto, Rc, Stern, Ashton, Nicholas J., Alosco, Michael L., Chen, Kewei, Protas, Hillary, Su, Yi, Boker, Connie, Au, Rhoda, Farrer, Lindsay, Helm, Robert, Kowall, Neil, Mercier, Gustavo, Otis, James, Weller, Jason, Bragg, Tahlia, Simkin, Irene, Trujillo-Rodriguez, Diana, Amerongen, Suzan van , Andino, Alondra, Conneely, Shannon, Diamond, Courtney, Fagle, Tessa, Haller, Olivia, Hunt, Tennyson, Gullotti, Nicole, Kossow, Bailey, Kugelmass, Carrie, Mariani, Megan, Mayville, Brian, McLaughlin, Kathleen, Nanna, Mary, DiPopolo, Marty, Platt, Taylor, Rice, Fiona, Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael, Annis, Douglas, Chaisson, Christine, Dixon, Diane, Finney, Carolyn, Gallagher, Kerrin, Hartlage, Kaitlin , Lu, Jun, Ojo, E O, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani, Baucom, Zachary, Tuz‐Zahra, Fatima , Yhang, Eukyung , Bouix, Sylvain, Fitzsimmons, Jennifer, Lin, Alexander P., Koerte, Inga K., Pasternak, Ofer, Arciniega, Hector , Billah, Tashrif , Bonke, Elena, Breedlove, Katherine M. , Carrington, Holly, Coello, Eduardo , Coleman, Michael J., John, Omar , Jung, Leonard, Liao, Huijun, Loy, Maria, Rizzoni, Elizabeth, Schulz, V. D., Silva, Annelise, Vessey, Brynn, Wiegand, Tim L.T, Miller, Jason, Ritter, Aaron , Sabbagh, Marwan, Cruz, Raelynn de la, Durant, Jan, Golceker, Morgan, Harmon, Nicolette, Kaylegian, Jaeson, Long, Rachelle, Nance, Christine, Sandoval, Priscilla, Staples, Miranda, Clark, Emma F., Serrano, Andrew, Geda, Yonas, Duffy, Amy, Falk, Bryce, Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle , Osgood, Thomas, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick, GOLDBERG, JUDITH, Joseph, Binu , Kirov, Ivan, Lui, Yvonne, Marmar, Charles, Wisniewski, T R, Al-Kharafi, Alhassan, George, Allan, Hasanaj, Lisena, Martin, Sammie, Riley, Edward, Runge, William, Serrano, Liliana , Iliff, Jeffrey, Li, Gail, Janssen, D, Meabon, James, Piantino, Juan, Schindler, Abigail, Thomas, Ronald, Colasurdo, Elizabeth , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Gurney, Jenny , Greenwald, Richard, Johnson, Keith A., Singh, Alpana , Singh, Alpana , Miner, Annalise E., Zetterberg, Henrik , Blennow, Kaj , Groh, Jenna R. , Singh, Alpana, Tripodis, Yorghos , Adler, Charles H. , Bernick, Charles , Peskind, Elaine R. , Asken, Breton M. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Banks, Sarah J. , Barr, William , Wethe, Jennifer V. , Cantu, Robert C. , Dodick, David W. , Mez, Jesse , Stein, Thor D. , McKee, Ann C. , Cummings, Jeffrey L. , Shenton, Martha E. , Reiman, Eric M. , Ashton, Nicholas J. , Alosco, Michael L. , Protas, Hillary , Au, Rhoda, Weller, Jason , Trujillo‐Rodriguez, Diana , Fagle, Tessa, Mariani, Megan, McLaughlin, Kathleen , Pulukuri, Surya Vamsi , Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael D , Annis, Douglas, Finney, Carolyn, Lu, Jun, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani , Baucom, Zachary, Bouix, Sylvain , Koerte, Inga K , Pasternak, Ofer , Bonke, Elena M. , Carrington, Holly , Coleman, Michael J. , Liao, Huijun, Schulz, Vivian, Wiegand, Tim L. T. , II, Robert W. Turner , Marek, Kenneth , Geda, Yonas E. , Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick S.F. , Kirov, Ivan, George, Allan, Meabon, James S. , Piantino, Juan , Thomas, Ronald G. , Colasurdo, Elizabeth A. , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Johnson, Keith A.

JAMA Network Open | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2622966

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.22966 | PMID 42440317 Get It

Importance In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), assess its performance as a beta-amyloid (Aβ) biomarker in participants with RHI exposure at risk for CTE, and explore concordance with CTE neuropathology in a postmortem subsample. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study used data from the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of CTE (DIAGNOSE CTE) Research Project, collected from September 2016 to October 2023. Participants were former American football players (case participants) and asymptomatic men unexposed to RHI (control participants). A subsample had available neuropathologic data. Exposures RHI, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses, and levels of CTE certainty. Main Outcomes and Measures Plasma p-tau217 (classified as positive [≥0.63 pg/mL], intermediate [0.40-0.62 pg/mL], and negative [&amp;lt;0.40 pg/mL]), Aβ–positron emission tomography (PET; 18 F-florbetapir; with Aβ-positive defined as a standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] ≥1.10), and tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir). TES diagnoses were assigned by multidisciplinary consensus conference. Analyses of postmortem brains controlled for age, race, and APOE ε4 status. Results Among 231 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.75 [8.25] years), 177 were former football players (117 professional and 60 college) and 54 were unexposed participants. Former football players had higher baseline mean (SD) p-tau217 concentrations than unexposed participants (0.35 [0.26] pg/mL vs 0.27 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008), although this was driven by a higher proportion of Aβ-PET–positive participants among former players. Plasma p-tau217 increased over time across the sample (B = 0.207 [95% CI, 0.117-0.298]; P &amp;lt; .001), with no significant time × exposure group interactions. Among football players, p-tau217 showed no time × group interactions with TES diagnosis, TES-CTE certainty, or RHI metrics. Higher p-tau217 concentration correlated with higher global Aβ-PET SUVR (B = 0.058 [95% CI, 0.053-3.501; P = .01), with a few discordant cases (5 participants were p-tau217–negative and Aβ-PET–positive; 7 participants were p-tau217–positive and Aβ-PET–negative). P-tau217 had similar areas under the curve for projecting Aβ-PET positivity as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 and CSF Aβ40/42 measures (p-tau217: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.96]; CSF p-tau181/Aβ42: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]; CSF Aβ40/42: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]). Among 9 brain donors, 6 had CTE (stages II-IV; none with Alzheimer disease). Seven had negative or intermediate p-tau217, concordant with Aβ-PET. Two p-tau217 outliers with stage III CTE had normal concentrations upon additional testing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that plasma p-tau217 concentration is unlikely to be useful for the detection of CTE, but it does show utility for ruling out Aβ pathology in participants at risk for CTE.
Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade for Relapse Prevention in Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody–Associated Disease
A, Prera Vilaseca, Bilodeau, Philippe, Gakis, Georgios , Savransky, Andrea, Oliveira, Joao Mahler Ferreira, Nguyen, Linda, Hooshmand, Sam I., Satyanarayan, Sammita , Moseley, Carson E., Haley, Leah , Roy-Hewitson, Chantal, Marrodan, M, Casallas, Adriana, Manín, Analisa , Chen, H, Grzezulkowska, Aniela, Contentti, Edgar Carnero, Galleguillos, Lorna, Upchurch, Margaret, Jackson-Tarlton, Caitlin S. , Guo, Joanne Chu-Yueh, Fabian, Michelle, Caparó-Zamalloa, César, Paterno, R, Waubant, Emmanuelle, Boschetti, Laura Ordoñez, Correale, Jorge, Villa, Andrés M., Banwell, Brenda, Marignier, Romain, Pittock, Sean J., Greenberg, Benjamin , Bennett, Jeffrey L., Cho, Tracey, Clardy, Stacey, Solomon, Andrew J., Ja, Gelfand, Obeidat, Ahmed Z., Blackburn, Kyle, Tenembaum, Silvia , Chen, John J., Sotirchos, Elias S., Levy, Michael, Flanagan, Eoin P., Group, and The Americas MOGAD Treatment, Murillo, Fabian, Syc-Mazurzek, Stephanie B., Jiang, Mulan , Rezende, N, Wingerchuk, D M, Horsman, Susan E. , Bilodeau, Philippe‐Antoine , Bilodeau, Philippe A , Vilaseca, Andreu , Hooshmand, Sam , Moseley, Carson E. , Marrodán, Mariano , Vanegas, Adriana Casallas , Hoshina, Yoji , Contentti, Edgar Carnero , Galleguillos, Lorna , Virupakshaiah, Akash , Arrambide, Georgina , Caparó‐Zamalloa, César , Waubant, Emmanuelle L. , Ordóñez-Boschetti, Laura, Villa, Andres Maria , Marignier, Romain , Pittock, Sean J. , Bennett, Jeffrey L. , Cho, Tracey , Clardy, Stacey , Solomon, Andrew , Kister, Ilya , Zamvil, Scott S. , Gelfand, Jeffrey M. , Repovic, Pavle , Obeidat, Ahmed Zayed , Blackburn, Kyle , Chen, John J., Sotirchos, Elias S. , Levy, Michael , Flanagan, Eoin P. , Syc‐Mazurek, Stephanie B. , Cacciaguerra, Laura , Rezende, Nathane Braga da Silva, Wingerchuk, Dean M.

JAMA Neurology | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.2220 | PMID 42440328 Get It

Importance Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated disease (MOGAD) lacks proven relapse-preventive therapies. While clinical trials are ongoing, safety data may be limited and approved drugs are costly. Studies of interleukin 6 receptor blocker (IL-6RB) in MOGAD are limited by small numbers and no comparative studies, contributing to low use. Objective To evaluate the impact of IL-6RB therapy on relapse rates in MOGAD and compare relapse frequency with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2025) included a historical IVIG-treated cohort of varying doses. The study took place across sites in North and South America (US, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru). Patients with MOGAD (n = 116, no excluded patients) who received at least 1 dose of an IL-6RB were included. These data were analyzed in January 2026. Exposures Tocilizumab or satralizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures Annualized relapse rate (ARR) during IL-6RB therapy, time to next relapse after treatment initiation, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared with the IVIG cohort using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for age, sex, prior ARR, and concomitant therapies. Results A total of 116 patients with MOGAD (89% relapsing) receiving IL-6RB (tocilizumab, 104 [90%] and satralizumab, 12 [10%]) were included; overall, 60.3% were female, 39.7% were male, and 18% were younger than 18 years. The median (IQR) IL-6RB treatment follow-up was 1.4 (0.7-2.5) years and 23 relapses occurred during 241.8 person-years of IL-6RB therapy. The ARR decreased from 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70) for relapsing MOGAD before IL-6RB to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.14) during IL-6RB treatment (incidence rate ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.16). Adverse events occurred in 58 patients (50%), most commonly mild infections, although 10 (9%) had severe infections. In the IVIG cohort (n = 59), 30 relapses occurred over 133.8 person-years (ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32). After IPTW, IL-6RB was associated with a lower hazard ratio (HR) than the group who underwent IVIG therapy less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.0-9.8), with no significant difference vs the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.8-4.5). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter observational cohort, IL-6RB use in MOGAD was associated with low relapse rates and a favorable safety profile, though severe infections occurred occasionally. Relapse rates were lower than the group who underwent IVIG less than 1 g/kg every 4 weeks but not significantly different from the group who underwent IVIG 1 g/kg or more every 4 weeks. This supports IL-6RB as a potential relapse-prevention therapy in MOGAD; the wide availability and relative affordability of tocilizumab may enable broad global use.
Community-informed development of an in-person forum to promote breast cancer screening and research preparedness in rural and low-socioeconomic status women
Sharma, Pravesh , Imsande, Kaylynn G., Vitriago, Anni, Seibel, Maria, Pritchett, Josh, Rudder, B. de, Tran, Linh T., Larson, Stephanie L., Flock, Carolyn, Murphy, Crystal, Asiedu, Gladys B. , Odedina, Folakemi T., Lynch, Brian, Haddad, Tufia C. , Pritchett, Joshua , Rudder, Bongi, Larson, Stephanie, Patten, Christi , Asiedu, Gladys B , Haddad, Tufia, Sharma, Pravesh , Imsande, Kaylynn G, Larson, Stephanie, Flock, Carolyn R., Murphy, Crystal, Patten, Christi A. , Odedina, Folakemi

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1017/cts.2026.10788 | PMID 42534402 Get It

Abstract Rural and low-socioeconomic status women face social determinants of health barriers leading to disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening and markedly reduced participation in clinical trials. To address this gap, we developed the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources, and Education) intervention using a community-engaged approach. This paper describes how Community Advisory Board feedback informed the development of Mayo Clinic Health System’s WeCARE intervention components. Their input was systematically analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to identify determinants of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and to guide actionable refinements to intervention content and delivery.
Anti‐amyloid nanobody‐Fc fusion protein drives potent amyloid clearance through microglial recruitment
Ding, Zonghui , Gibson, Katelin A. , Nascari, David , Tallant, Lauren E., Dickson, Dennis W., Fryer, John D., Nascari, David G , Tallant, Lauren , Bouchal, Samantha M. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Fryer, John Denis

Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/trc2.70269 | PMID 42444752 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Anti‐amyloid beta (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies are effective at lowering amyloid in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whether Fc‐mediated effector function is absolutely required for efficacy is not completely understood. This is important for optimizing therapeutic efficacy and mitigating side effects such as amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Antibodies lacking Fc effector function, like single‐domain antibodies (nanobodies), offer a unique tool to dissect these mechanisms, as their small size facilitates blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration and allows Fc‐mediated functions to be studied independently. METHODS We immunized a llama with Aβ aggregates and constructed a phage display library to screen for aggregate‐specific nanobodies. Lead candidates were characterized by epitope mapping and binding affinity to amyloid plaques in both murine and human AD brain tissues. We further assessed their BBB permeability and evaluated their efficacy in clearing pre‐existing plaques in amyloid precursor protein (APP)/presenilin 1 (PS1) mice. RESULTS We identified two lead nanobodies, 3A11 and 2D10, that bind distinct epitopes and specifically bind Aβ plaques in murine and human AD brain tissues. Following systemic administration, the monovalent, unmodified (Fc‐less) 2D10 nanobody, but not 3A11, successfully crossed the BBB and engaged amyloid plaques in APP/PS1 mice. However, despite robust target engagement, the Fc‐less 2D10 failed to recruit microglia or reduce plaque burden. In contrast, an engineered 2D10‐Fc fusion antibody potently cleared amyloid plaques, achieving a reduction in pathology comparable to aducanumab treatment. This efficacy was directly correlated with Fc‐mediated microglial recruitment and activation, demonstrating that the Fc domain is essential for phagocytic plaque removal. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate that Fc effector function is indispensable for microglial‐mediated amyloid clearance in vivo. By clarifying this fundamental mechanism, this study provides a framework for the rational design of next‐generation immunotherapies. Furthermore, 2D10‐Fc represents a promising therapeutic candidate, combining the high‐affinity targeting of nanobodies with the effector power necessary for robust plaque clearance.
Prognostic Factors in Primary Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large‐Scale, Multi‐Institutional Competing‐Risks Analysis
Girardi, Fábio Muradás , Machado, Cristian David Cardona, Wysong, Ashley, Ran, Nina A., Granger, Emily , Koyfman, Shlomo A. , Vidimos, Allison T. , Carr, David R., Shahwan, Kathryn T. , Hirotsu, Kelsey E. , Carter, Joi B., Mangold, Aaron R., Srivastava, Divya, Brodland, David G., Zitelli, John A., Willenbrink, Tyler J., Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Nijhawan, Rajiv I. , Ruiz, Emily S., Cañueto, Javier , Granger, Emily E , Willenbrink, Tyler J , Wysong, Ashley , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Mangold, Aaron R. , Srivastava, Divya , Zitelli, John A. , Ruiz, Emily S.

Journal of Surgical Oncology | July 12, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jso.70325 | PMID 42437512 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Current staging systems for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNCSCC), such as AJCC8 and BWH, often fail to adequately stratify high‐risk patients, particularly due to the exclusion of important biological and host factors. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors for HNCSCC outcomes in the largest multi‐institutional retrospective series to date. Methods De‐identified data from 8,610 primary HNCSCC tumors, treated with curative intent surgery across multiple international centers, were analyzed. Outcomes included local recurrence (LR), locoregional metastasis (LM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease‐specific death (DSD). Multivariable Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with robust standard errors clustered at the patient level were fitted to generate exploratory hypotheses regarding independent hazard determinants. Results During a median follow‐up of 31.4 months (IQR 14.2–52.8), the cumulative incidence was 3.3% for LR, 2.7% for LM, 0.5% for DM, and 1.2% for DSD. Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, and large‐caliber perineural invasion (LCPNI) were the strongest predictors, being significantly associated with at least three of the four outcomes. Notably, factors currently excluded from or weighted differently in staging systems also proved critical: Immunosuppression was significantly associated with LR (SHR 2.03) and DSD (SHR 1.70); and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was independently associated with LM (SHR 3.00). Poor differentiation demonstrated high prognostic impact, being a significant predictor for all four endpoints. Conclusion Tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, LCPNI, immunosuppression status, and LVI are the most critical independent factors for HNCSCC prognosis. Our multi‐institutional data provide a robust framework for hypothesis generation, highlighting that incorporating host biological features and non‐anatomic variables could significantly refine future staging system discussions.