Gibier, Jean‐Baptiste

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.

Abstract Accumulating evidence suggests dysregulated immune checkpoint (IC) signaling can exacerbate COVID-19 severity, but the role of these molecules in the pathogenesis of fatal COVID-19-related diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) remains elusive. Understanding how IC proteins influence acute lung injury due to COVID-19 can provide insights into potential therapeutic strategies to modulate immune responses and improve patient outcomes. Here, in a single-center autopsy cohort, we determined the cellular localization of ICs in lung tissue from cases of fatal COVID-19, DAD-comparators, and non-fibrotic controls by using immunohistochemistry, and investigated their association with clinical outcomes. We expanded our findings by performing analyses of publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets from patients with fatal COVID-19 and non-fibrotic controls. We demonstrated the presence of protein-protein interaction networks of ICs in the lung cellular niche by performing transcriptomic profiling of lung tissue-derived RNA counts from patients with fatal COVID-19. Further, we leveraged data from the largest international, multi-center COVID-19 autopsy cohort and validated that, among patients with fatal COVID-19, those with higher PD-L1/CD274 expression in lung endothelial cells had more rapid clinical deterioration. Lastly, in a cohort of individuals with early COVID-19, IC plasma protein levels were elevated in those with persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and adverse clinical outcomes. Collectively, our data provide unique pathological insights into the role of IC dysregulation and differential disease severity in COVID-19.