Wilkoff, Bruce L.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in children and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients is hampered by poor long-term lead survival. Lead extraction is technically difficult and carries substantial morbidity. Manufacturers developed distinct strategies for this issue: thinner lead bodies or a Gore ePTFE coil coating. Both design changes were thought to improve ease of lead removal, but have not been directly compared in children or adults. The purpose of this study was to assess thin and ePTFE-coated ICD lead survival in pediatric and CHD pts. Methods: The Pediatric Lead Extractability and Survival Evaluation (PLEASE) Study began as a Phase IV multicenter open-label prospective study [ NCT00335036 ], facilitated by the Pediatric & Congenital EP Society. Initially designed as a randomized study, it changed to a parallel assignment registry when 1 lead had an advisory due to high incidence of failure, prompting concern about continued clinical equipoise. Pediatric and CHD pts who underwent ICD lead implant from 2005-2010 were eligible. The end date was NCDR ICD Registry v2.0 release (includes pediatric & lead data). 23 centers participated; each site obtained IRB approval. De-identified data was sent to the PI center for verification and statistical analyses. Results: A total of 982 ICD pts (357 VVI, 558 DDD, 67 CRT-D) entered the PLEASE study, incl. 423 pts (43%) with CHD. Mean age at implant = 18.3 ± 9.9 yrs. Thin (< 7Fr) ICD leads accounted for 51%, 23% were ePTFE-coated, 26% neither thin nor coated. There were 113 ICD lead failures (11.5%) at a mean lead-age of 2.2 ± 1.7 yrs, causing shocks in 55 pts. Failure occurred in 21% of thin leads vs 3.5% of ePTFE leads (p<0.01). Extraction was performed on 142 (14.5%) leads overall; 21% of thin leads (incl. extraction of 29 functioning leads due to recall) vs. 4.4% of ePTFE leads (p<0.01). There were 7 major extraction complications (4.9%), but no procedural mortality. Among thin leads, 90/270 (33.3%) of recalled leads failed vs 15/229 (6.6%) non-recalled thin leads. Conclusions: This Phase IV study demonstrates that ICD leads in children and CHD pts have suboptimal performance overall. Thinner leads were much more likely to fail and/or be extracted compared with ePTFE leads, chiefly driven by one lead type.

AbstractIntroductionA current limitation of single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is the lack of an atrial lead to reliably detect atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes. A novel ventricular based atrial fibrillation (VBAF) detection algorithm was created for single chamber ICDs to assess R‐R variability for detection of AF.MethodsPatients implanted with Visia AF™ ICDs were prospectively enrolled in the Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry from December 15, 2015 to January 23, 2019 and followed with at least 30 days of monitoring with the algorithm. Time to device‐detected daily burden of AF ≥ 6 min, ≥6 h, and ≥23 h were reported. Clinical actions after device‐detected AF were recorded.ResultsA total of 291 patients were enrolled with a mean follow‐up of 22.5 ± 7.9 months. Of these, 212 (73%) had no prior history of AF at device implant. However, 38% of these individuals had AF detected with the VBAF algorithm with daily burden of ≥6 min within two years of implant. In these 80 patients with newly detected AF by their ICD, 23 (29%) had a confirmed clinical diagnosis of AF by their provider. Of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AF, nine (39%) were newly placed on anticoagulation, including five of five (100%) patients having a burden >23 h.ConclusionsContinuous AF monitoring with the new VBAF algorithm permits early identification and actionable treatment for patients with undiagnosed AF that may improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Background Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. There is limited evidence on antibiotic prophylactic strategies to prevent CIED infection. Recently, the TYRX Envelope, which elutes a combination of rifampin and minocycline for a minimum of 7 days, was shown to significantly reduce major CIED infections in the WRAP-IT trial. We sought to characterize the pathogens among patients who experienced an infection in the current era. Methods All patients undergoing CIED replacement, upgrade, revision, or de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) received standard of care antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized 1:1 to receive TYRX or not. The primary endpoint was major CIED infection within 12 months of the procedure. Major infection was defined as an infection resulting in (1) system extraction or revision, (2) long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or (3) death. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results A total of 6,983 patients were randomized worldwide with 3,495 randomized to receive an envelope and 3,488 randomized to the control. At 12 months, 25 major infections (0.7%) were observed in the envelope group and 42 major infections (1.2%) in the control group, resulting in a 40% reduction of major infections (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36–0.98, P = 0.04). Of 63 infections assayed, causative pathogens were identified in 36 infections whereas cultures were negative in 27 cases. Staphylococcus species (n = 22) were the predominate pathogens and a 53% reduction was observed with the use of TYRX (Figure 1). Moreover, there was only 1 CIED pocket infection with Staphylococcus species in the envelope group compared with 14 pocket infections in the control group. A comparison of timing of infection in the envelope group showed the presence of 11 endocarditis/bacteremia infections at 103 ± 84 days compared with 14 pocket infections presenting at 70 ± 78 days from the procedure. Conclusion In this large randomized trial, the use of the TYRX Envelope containing rifampin and minocycline resulted in a significant reduction of major CIED infections and was effective against staphylococcal species, which are the predominant cause of pocket infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Background— The risks of sports participation for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients are unknown. Methods and Results— Athletes with ICDs (age, 10–60 years) participating in organized (n=328) or high-risk (n=44) sports were recruited. Sports-related and clinical data were obtained by phone interview and medical records. Follow-up occurred every 6 months. ICD shock data and clinical outcomes were adjudicated by 2 electrophysiologists. Median age was 33 years (89 subjects <20 years of age); 33% were female. Sixty were competitive athletes (varsity/junior varsity/traveling team). A pre-ICD history of ventricular arrhythmia was present in 42%. Running, basketball, and soccer were the most common sports. Over a median 31-month (interquartile range, 21–46 months) follow-up, there were no occurrences of either primary end point—death or resuscitated arrest or arrhythmia- or shock-related injury—during sports. There were 49 shocks in 37 participants (10% of study population) during competition/practice, 39 shocks in 29 participants (8%) during other physical activity, and 33 shocks in 24 participants (6%) at rest. In 8 ventricular arrhythmia episodes (device defined), multiple shocks were received: 1 at rest, 4 during competition/practice, and 3 during other physical activity. Ultimately, the ICD terminated all episodes. Freedom from lead malfunction was 97% at 5 years (from implantation) and 90% at 10 years. Conclusions— Many athletes with ICDs can engage in vigorous and competitive sports without physical injury or failure to terminate the arrhythmia despite the occurrence of both inappropriate and appropriate shocks. These data provide a basis for more informed physician and patient decision making in terms of sports participation for athletes with ICDs.

Background —In a previous randomized trial, the 12F laser sheath removed pacing leads via the implant vein more successfully than traditional mechanical tools alone. Two larger sizes of laser sheath, the 14F and 16F models, were developed to extract defibrillator leads and large-diameter pacing leads implanted for the chronic. These devices use pulsed ultraviolet laser light to core though fibrotic tissue grown over the lead body to free the lead from the vasculature. A mandatory prospective registry studied the safety and effectiveness profiles of the larger laser sheaths vis-à-vis the 12F laser sheath. Methods and Results —In this study, 863 patients underwent extraction of 1285 leads at 52 sites. Patients treated with the 14F device tended to have older leads than the 12F population; the 16F population, which comprised mostly defibrillator patients, were younger, had younger leads, and were more often male than the 12F population. Clinical success (extracting the entire lead or the lead body minus the distal electrode) was observed in 91% to 92% of cases for all device sizes. The overall complication rate was 3.6%, with 0.8% perioperative mortality. Incidence of complications was independent of laser sheath size. Conclusions —The 14F and 16F laser sheaths offer an extraction option for larger long-term transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator leads that is as safe and effective as the 12F laser sheath.

Background— Delivery of inappropriate shocks caused by misdetection of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) remains a substantial complication of implanted cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Whether use of optimally programmed dual-chamber ICDs lowers this risk compared with that in single-chamber ICDs is not clear. Methods and Results— Subjects with a clinical indication for ICD (n=400) at 27 participating centers received dual-chamber ICDs and were randomly assigned to strictly defined optimal single- or dual-chamber detection in a single-blind manner. Programming minimized ventricular pacing. The primary end point was the proportion of SVT episodes inappropriately detected from the time of programming until crossover or end of study. On a per-episode basis, 42% of the episodes in the single-chamber arm and 69% of the episodes in the dual-chamber arm were due to SVT. Mortality (3.5% in both groups) and early study withdrawal (14% single-chamber, 11% dual-chamber) were similar in both groups. The rate of inappropriate detection of SVT was 39.5% in the single-chamber detection arm compared with 30.9% in the dual-chamber arm. The odds of inappropriate detection were decreased by almost half with the use of the dual-chamber detection enhancements (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.94; P =0.03). Conclusions— Dual-chamber ICDs, programmed to optimize detection enhancements and to minimize ventricular pacing, significantly decrease inappropriate detection.