McDonald, Robert J.

Dynamic gadopiclenol-enhanced nodal and pedal MR lymphangiography was safe, with no adverse events, and feasible for imaging peripheral and central conducting lymphatic anatomy.

AbstractPurposeDental amalgam contains mercury and is commonly used in dental restorations. The impact of MRI on mercury excretion from dental amalgam is not well understood across clinical field strengths, especially 7T. We investigated the effects of MRI exposure on mercury excretion using fresh, lab‐created dental amalgam restorations and in extracted teeth with old, pre‐existing restorations.MethodsDonated, unfilled human teeth (n = 120) were restored with amalgam before being stored in saline, artificial saliva, or a dry box prior to MRI scanning. The teeth were placed in individual tubes of fresh artificial saliva and scanned at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T or left unscanned as controls. Mercury concentrations were measured 24–30 h later. Donated teeth with pre‐existing restorations (n = 40) were stored in artificial saliva, scanned at 7T or left unscanned as controls, and mercury concentration tested.ResultsFor teeth extracted and restored in a laboratory, no significant difference was found (F = 2.42, P = 0.072) between mean mercury concentrations of unscanned teeth (13.72 μg/L) and teeth scanned at 1.5T (10.88 μg/L), 3T (12.65 μg/L), or 7T (8.88 μg/L). For teeth extracted with previously placed restorations, no significant difference (P = 0.288) was found between unscanned controls (4.28 μg/L) and teeth scanned at 7T (6.63 μg/L).ConclusionMRI of dental amalgam does not significantly increase mercury excretion at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T compared to unscanned teeth. This holds true for controlled laboratory restorations as well as for those placed and lived with prior to extraction and scanning, demonstrating no added risk to the clinical patient or research subject.

Torus mandibularis is a benign osseous overgrowth arising from the lingual surface of the mandible. It is a common, incidental finding on imaging due to its relatively high prevalence. In the majority of cases, mandibular tori are asymptomatic. We report a novel presentation of a giant torus mandibularis causing bilateral obstruction of the submandibular ducts and consequent sialadenitis. Our patient presented with progressive pain centered in the floor of his mouth and had bilateral submandibular glandular enlargement on exam. Computed tomography showed a giant right torus mandibularis, which was causing obstruction and dilation of the bilateral submandibular ducts. Although conservative management was attempted, he ultimately underwent surgical resection of his torus with symptomatic improvement. This patient highlights a novel complication of torus mandibularis and illustrates successful treatment. Though not previously described, this complication may be underreported and should be considered in the appropriate clinical setting.