Back to Authors

Eckdahl, Steven J.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

No Increased Mercury Release from Dental Restorations at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T MRI
Burkett, Brian J. , Rasmussen, Chad M. , Fillmore, W. Jonathan , McDonald, Robert J. , Fagan, Andrew , Erdahl, Sarah A , Eckdahl, Steven J., Welker, Kirk M. , Fagan, Andrew J , Burkett, Brian , McDonald, Jennifer S.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | September 27, 2023 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 660-669

10.1002/mrm.29872 Get It

AbstractPurposeDental amalgam contains mercury and is commonly used in dental restorations. The impact of MRI on mercury excretion from dental amalgam is not well understood across clinical field strengths, especially 7T. We investigated the effects of MRI exposure on mercury excretion using fresh, lab‐created dental amalgam restorations and in extracted teeth with old, pre‐existing restorations.MethodsDonated, unfilled human teeth (n = 120) were restored with amalgam before being stored in saline, artificial saliva, or a dry box prior to MRI scanning. The teeth were placed in individual tubes of fresh artificial saliva and scanned at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T or left unscanned as controls. Mercury concentrations were measured 24–30 h later. Donated teeth with pre‐existing restorations (n = 40) were stored in artificial saliva, scanned at 7T or left unscanned as controls, and mercury concentration tested.ResultsFor teeth extracted and restored in a laboratory, no significant difference was found (F = 2.42, P = 0.072) between mean mercury concentrations of unscanned teeth (13.72 μg/L) and teeth scanned at 1.5T (10.88 μg/L), 3T (12.65 μg/L), or 7T (8.88 μg/L). For teeth extracted with previously placed restorations, no significant difference (P = 0.288) was found between unscanned controls (4.28 μg/L) and teeth scanned at 7T (6.63 μg/L).ConclusionMRI of dental amalgam does not significantly increase mercury excretion at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T compared to unscanned teeth. This holds true for controlled laboratory restorations as well as for those placed and lived with prior to extraction and scanning, demonstrating no added risk to the clinical patient or research subject.
Total arsenic in urine: palladium-persulfate vs nickel as a matrix modifier for graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry
Nixon, David E., Mussmann, G V, Eckdahl, Steven J., Moyer, Thomas P.

Clinical Chemistry | January 13, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1575-1579

10.1093/clinchem/37.9.1575 Get It

Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of nickel and palladium with or without added potassium persulfate as matrix modifiers for the determination of total arsenic in urine. Complete recovery of pure aqueous solutions of As(III), As(V), cacodylic acid (DMA), monomethylarsinic acid (MMA), and o-arsanilic acid was attained by using both nickel and palladium modifiers. Combined arsenobetaine and arsenocholine (so-called fish arsenic), extracted from a certified control material of dogfish muscle (DORM-1), were completely recovered with Pd-S2O8 matrix modification, but not with nickel. Excellent agreement with target values for arsenic in urines from the Centre de Toxicologie du Quebec, supplied by the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, was attained irrespective of the arsenic source when we used Pd-S2O8 as the matrix modifier.