Citations

Abstract Background: Rural/nonmetropolitan (nonmetro) counties face known barriers to comprehensive cancer care compared with metropolitan (metro) counties, which may impact the outcomes for lymphoma patients. We evaluated the impact metro vs nonmetro status on outcomes after a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the context of clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors. Methods: Of 7724 participants enrolled in the prospective LEO cohort study from 2015-2020, 7610 (98.5%) had their county of residence at diagnosis assigned a RUCC (2013) code. We compared outcomes of participants from metro (defined as RUCC 1-3, which are central counties with ≥1 urban areas of ≥50,000) vs nonmetro counties (RUCC 4-9, which are counties with smaller urban areas as well as completely rural). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from univariable and multivariable Cox models for associations of metro status with overall survival (OS). Cause of death (lymphoma [including treatment related], non-lymphoma, unknown) was assessed using a competing risk approach. Results: Compared with metro counties (N=6096), LEO participants from nonmetro counties (N=1514) were older (median age 64 vs 62 years; p<0.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic white (94% vs 75%; p<0.001) and married (84% vs 75%; p<0.001), and less likely to have completed graduate or professional school education (16% vs 27%; p<0.001). There were no notable differences (>5%) by metro status for sex, employment status, NHL subtype, stage, performance status, abnormal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international prognostic index (IPI), number of comorbidities, time from diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) or participation in a clinical trial. Compared with LEO participants from metro counties, those from nonmetro counties had inferior OS at 5 years (74.5% vs 78.4%; HR=1.23, CI 1.10-1.37; p<0.001). The OS association only slightly attenuated after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype (HR=1.20, CI 1.07-1.34; p=0.002), and held in models that adjusted for clinical prognostic factors (stage, NHL subtype, IPI, DTI), socioeconomic status (SES; education, marital status), health status (comorbidity, frailty), or lifestyle factors (smoking, body mass index). Using a competing risk model, the cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma (16.9% vs 14.1%; p=0.002) and non-lymphoma (5.9% vs 3.9%; p=0.002) was higher for participants from nonmetro vs metro counties, respectively. For participants <65 years, nonmetro vs metro status had inferior OS (HR=1.40, CI 1.17-1.67; p<0.001). This association remained after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype (HR=1.36, CI 1.14-1.63; p<0.001), as well as after adjustment for clinical prognostic, SES, health status, or lifestyle factors. The cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma was higher in participants from nonmetro vs metro counties (15.1% vs 11.5%; p=0.002), while there was no difference by metro status for non-lymphoma related deaths (2.1% vs 1.7%; p=0.47). In contrast, for participants age 65+ years, there was no differences by metro status for OS (HR=1.04, CI 0.91-1.20; p=0.56). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype, participants from nonmetro areas had inferior OS (HR=1.12, 0.97-1.29) although this was not statistically significant (p=0.13), and was attenuated in models adjusting for clinical, health status, or lifestyle factors. The cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma was no different in participants from nonmetro vs metro counties (18.9% vs 18.0%; p=0.37), while non-lymphoma related deaths were higher in nonmetro counties (9.9% vs 6.8%; p=0.017). Conclusion: LEO participants from nonmetro vs metro counties had inferior OS overall, although this was predominately observed for younger (<65 years) participants. These associations did not appear to be explained by demographic, NHL subtype, clinical, SES, health status, or lifestyle factors. Of particular note, the risk of death due to lymphoma was higher in nonmetro areas for participants <65 years but not those 65+ years, while the risk of death due to other causes was higher in nonmetro areas for participants 65+ years but not those <65 years. These findings require further study, particularly related to barriers to care, and suggest the potential need for age-specific strategies to optimize outcomes for NHL patients from nonmetro/rural areas.

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequently implicated in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a recent study (Salman MY, Blood Adv 2025), it was reported that IDH2 mutation subtypes, R140 and R172, may respond differently to intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we evaluated mid-cycle and end-of-cycle bone marrow blast responses in AML patients with IDH2 R140, IDH2 R172, and IDH1 R132 mutations, aiming to determine whether these subtypes exhibit different response dynamics. Methods: We reviewed the charts of AML patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between the years 2016 - 2023 that had available next generation sequencing (NGS) data. Institutional review board approval was obtained. All data were recorded at the time of AML diagnosis. Patients without molecular data or not treated with intensive chemotherapy (7+3 or CPX-351) were excluded from this study. Bone marrow blast percentages were assessed at mid-induction (days 14-21) and end of cycle (counts recovery). Blast clearance dynamics and complete remission rates were compared across IDH mutation subgroups and correlated with outcomes. GraphPad Prism 10.0.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 381 AML patients, 31 had IDH2 mutations (23 with R140 and 8 with R172), and 8 had IDH1 mutations (all R132). Among patients with IDH2 mutations, those with R172 had numerically higher median mid-cycle bone marrow blast percentage compared to R140 (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.37). There was no significant difference in mid-cycle blast percentages between patients with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations (4.5% vs. 4%, p = 0.8). At mid-cycle, 68% of patients with IDH2 R140 had blast counts <5%, compared to 38% of those with IDH2 R172, suggesting a trend for faster mid-cycle clearance in the R140 group, though not statistically significant (OR 3.57, p = 0.2). In a broader comparison, 60% of IDH2-mutated patients and 50% of IDH1-mutated patients achieved blast clearance (blasts <5%) at mid-cycle, though not statistically significant (p = 0.7). At the end of the induction, patients with IDH2 R140 had significantly lower median bone marrow blast percentages compared to those with R172mutations (2% vs. 4%, p = 0.01). Similarly, patients with IDH1 mutations showed low blast counts compared to the IDH2 group (1.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.1). A higher proportion of IDH2 R140 patients achieved blast clearance compared to those with R172 mutations (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.06), while proportion of patients who achieved blast clearance were similar between IDH1 and IDH2 patients (87.5% vs 93.1%, P = 0.5). Analysis of overall complete remission rates (including both complete remission [CR] and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) within the IDH2-mutated group showed a higher rate in patients with the R140 mutation compared to those with R172 (87% vs. 75%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). When comparing IDH1- and IDH2-mutated patients, overall complete remission rates were 75% and 84%, respectively, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.6). Kaplan–Meier analysis of time to end-of-induction blast clearance revealed no statistically significant difference between IDH2 R140 and R172 patients (median time to clearance: 31 vs. 37 days, p = 0.3). Similarly, no difference was observed between IDH1 and IDH2-mutated patients (33 vs. 31 days, p = 0.9). Overall survival analyses showed no significant difference between IDH2 R140 and R172 groups (median 66.8 months vs not reached, P = 0.4). Likewise, no difference was observed between IDH1 and IDH2 patients (44.4 months vs not reached, P = 0.7), indicating similar overall survival across mutation subtypes. Conclusion: IDH2-R140 was associated with more effective blast cytoreduction following intensive induction compared to IDH2-R172. Although not statistically significant, IDH2 R172consistently showed trends toward higher blast percentages, delayed response, and lower overall complete remission rates. These findings align with the recent study reporting significantly slower blast reduction and delayed response in R172-mutated AML. Also, no significant differences were found between IDH1- and IDH2-mutated patients in terms of response kinetics or overall survival. Together, these findings highlight potential biological differences among IDH mutation subtypes that may impact treatment response and require further investigation in larger prospective cohorts.

Abstract Background: Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by cleavage of gasdermin (GSDM) family proteins that form pores in the plasma membrane, cell rupture, and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Its pro-inflammatory potential has garnered significant research attention in recent years but has not been studied in lymphoma. Patients and Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry for cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) in two large cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with multiplex fluorescent IHC (mfIHC) data, and analyzed for prognostic and immune impact. Results: Cleaved GSDMD was frequently expressed in DLBCL, and only the cytoplasmic (versus nuclear) form of expression correlated with significantly better patient survival in two DLBCL cohorts. To understand the expression at the single-cell level, we examined mfIHC results, which revealed that GSDMD+cells were tumor or immune cells, and varied in Ki-67, BCL2, and MYC expression. Cases with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression had higher mean and median levels of CD38+ (activated) M1 macrophages in two cohorts and lower PD-1/PD-L1 expression, as well as phenotypes of cognate interactions between live activated M1 macrophages, DLBCL cells, and T cells in spatially resolved immune landscape by mfIHC. In contrast, phagocytosis of pyroptotic lymphoma cells by M2 macrophages and cell death of T cells were observed in cases with predominantly nuclear form of cleaved GSDMD expression. Bulk gene expression profiling analysis identified a large proportion of RNA genes upregulated in DLBCLs with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression, and deconvolution analysis found decreased frequency of the “Inflammatory” lymphoma microenvironment (LME) subtype, increased frequency of cell states and ecotypes with favorable prognostic associations, and decreased frequency of T cell exhaustion states. Summary: Analysis of pyroptosis-inducing cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) expression in a large number of DLBCL patients revealed dinstinctive cytoplasmic and nuclear expression patterns in live and pyroptotic cells associated with different prognostic and immune effects. Cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression is a marker of cognate interactions between live cells (e.g., activated M1 macrophages) associated with adaptive responses and favorable prognostic effects, whereas nuclear cleaved GSDMD expression is associated with immunosuppressive mechanisms, including T cell death and phagocytosis by M2 macrophages.

Abstract Introduction: The ZRSR2 gene, located at Xp22.2, encodes a protein component of the RNA spliceosome. Alterations in ZRSR2 have been reported in various myeloid neoplasms (MN) and their precursors. They are frequently accompanied by other co-mutations, most commonly TET2. Isolated ZRSR2 mutations, however, are less commonly encountered and their clinicopathologic features have not been well documented. Aim: To describe the clinicopathologic features of MN and their precursors with isolated ZRSR2 mutations. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with confirmed/suspected MN using a 35-47 gene MN-targeting NGS panel. MN and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) cases with isolated likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) ZRSR2 mutations were identified. Pathology diagnoses were rendered following the 2022 WHO/ICC classification and the slides were reviewed by three pathologists. Electronic medical records were reviewed for collection of relevant laboratory data. This study was approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board. Results: Of 164 ZRSR2-mutated cases, 10 cases with isolated LP/P mutations in ZRSR2 were identified. Patients were all male, with a median age 69.5 years. Three patients were diagnosed with CCUS, five with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), one with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, MDS/MPN) and one with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Six patients had additional variants of undetermined significance (VUS) detected in ASXL1, CALR, EZH2, IDH2 and TET2. The other four patients had no additional variants identified by NGS but had cytogenetic abnormalities. One patient with MPAL had MECOM and IGH gene rearrangements detected on cytogenetic analysis. All patients had macrocytic anemia. One CMML patient with accompanying VUS in TET2 also had absolute monocytosis. BM cellularity and erythroid and granulocytic morphology were variable, ranging from unremarkable to left-shifted and dysplastic morphology. Nine (90%) cases showed atypical megakaryocyte morphology, characterized by hypolobated forms and osteoclast-like forms with separated and eccentrically located nuclear lobes. Interestingly, this megakaryocytic morphology was also observed in CCUS cases, albeit with lower frequency, below the 10% threshold necessary for the diagnosis of MDS. Megakaryocyte distribution was normal. Conclusions: Isolated LP/P ZSRS2 mutations are seen in a spectrum of myeloid neoplasms, including CCUS. They show a strong association with macrocytic anemia and megakaryocytic atypia/dysplasia. The presence of additional cytogenetic alterations and variants of undetermined significance is a confounding factor in determining the role of ZRSR2 mutations in driving the pathogenesis and morphologic features of these diseases.

Abstract Introduction: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare multi-systemic disease where abnormal proteins in plasma cells misfold and create amyloid fibrils that can deposit in organs and tissues, where they cause damage and increased risk of mortality. Cardiac involvement is the most important factor in determining AL amyloidosis prognosis as well as the difference in free light chains (dFLC), with a dFLC less than 50 mg/L indicating better prognosis. In most countries, daratumumab in combination with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) is the preferred first-line therapy (FLT) for AL amyloidosis. There is no expert consensus for definitions of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis and preferred second-line therapy (SLT). This prospective study examined healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives on treatment and management of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis patients building on research by Milani, et al (2017). Methods: The Amyloidosis Research Consortium (ARC) conducted an international cross-sectional online survey from April to July 2025. HCPs who treat AL amyloidosis patients were identified from ARC's database and sent an email with individual links to complete the survey. Members of the International Society of Amyloidosis also received email notifications for study participation. Measures included HCP demographics, practice characteristics, FLT and SLT preferences, clinical trial perspectives, and use of clinical criteria including dFLC values, relapsed/refractory definitions, and hematologic and organ progression. Target enrollment was 50 HCPs. Final enrollment was 55 HCPs with evaluable data from 49 respondents included in analysis. This preliminary analysis examined respondent characteristics, treatment preferences, and clinical trial perspectives; results of the full analysis will be presented in a forthcoming manuscript. Responses were analyzed descriptively using STATA. Results: Respondents were based in the United States (60%), Europe (30%), Australia (4%), South America (4%), and South Korea (2%). The majority were hematologists or oncologists (85% and 10%, respectively), male (67%), between the ages of 36 and 65 years old (90%), and practice at academic institutions (94%). Most had more than 10 years of experience treating AL amyloidosis patients (80%), with almost half having 20 years or more experience (46%) On average, HCPs treat 100 AL amyloidosis patients per year (mean 63.9, SD 111.1), with 30% newly diagnosed (mean 25.1%, SD 17.8%), 30% observed off therapy (mean 27.0%, SD 13.8%), 18% on maintenance therapy (mean 16.7%, SD 9.7%), and 23% relapsed/refractory (mean 19.8%, SD 10.7%). Half of respondents (50%) use the EU modification of the 2004 Mayo Clinic staging system and 42% use the 2012 Mayo Clinic staging system for AL amyloidosis. Most HCPs treat all newly diagnosed AL patients with the same regimen (88%). HCPs primarily use D-CyBorD as their preferred FLT (88%). Less than 10% of HCPs use autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for FLT. One-quarter of clinicians routinely conduct bone marrow biopsies to confirm CR after FLT (25%). Nearly all HCPs participated in at least one interventional clinical trial (91%) for AL amyloidosis in the past 5 years, with average participation in 5 interventional trials (mean 4.81, SD 2.75). Most HCPs have participated in at least one observational clinical trial (66.7%) for AL amyloidosis with an average participation of 3 observational trials (mean 2.3, SD 1.8). Most HCPs were uncomfortable waiting for a patient's dFLC to rise to greater than 50 mg/L to meet eligibility for trials of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis patients. (60%). Conclusions: These preliminary findings provide insight into HCPs real-world FLT preferences for AL amyloidosis patients. More than 90% of HCPs in our study prefer to use D-CyBorD as FLT, with less than 10% preferring ASCT as FLT. This is a significant shift from the 2017 study, which found that more than 70% of HCPs preferred ASCT as FLT, however this was conducted prior to FDA approval of daratumumab (2021). Like the 2017 study, most HCPs remain uncomfortable waiting for dFLC to rise to 50 mg/L to meet clinical trial eligibility for relapsed/refractory patients. The findings from our subsequent full analysis will provide additional insights into the real-world management of more advanced AL patients and may help inform future research.

Abstract Background Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurs in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although IgM-isotype antibodies are part of the laboratory criteria, their clinical value remains uncertain. We evaluated real-world aPL testing patterns to quantify the prevalence of isolated IgM positivity. Methods We analyzed aPL testing data across the Mayo Clinic sites between January 2006 and July 2025, lined up with the publication of the revised Sapporo (Sydney) classification criteria. For each patient, we identified the first time in which any aPL test was performed. We assessed available results for Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) isotypes IgG and IgM, and anti–beta 2 glycoprotein (B2GP1) isotypes IgG and IgM. Positivity rates were calculated for each marker, and a subgroup of patients who had results for all three test categories at the initial workup was identified. In this cohort, we assessed the distribution of single, double, and triple positivity. We also quantified the number and percentage of patients who were positive only for IgM isotypes (aCL or B2GP1), with negative LA and IgG at initial testing. Antibodies were considered positive based on international criteria and internal standards. aCL and B2GP1 were positive if ≥40 units. LA positivity followed ISTH SSC guidelines, requiring demonstration of a phospholipid-dependent inhibitor in the following assays: screening, mixing, and confirmatory steps in DRVVT or aPTT-based platelet neutralization procedure (PNP), Staclot LA delta and HEX LA delta assays. Criteria for a positive result was as follows: DRVVT: prolonged screen and inhibited mix with screen/confirm ratio >1.2; Staclot LA delta: >7 seconds; PNP: shortening of the APTT clotting time with PNP by ≥5 seconds before 2023 and ≥2 seconds thereafter; HEX LA delta >13 seconds. Results A total of 99,814 unique patients underwent testing for at least one aPL marker. The most frequently tested was LA (n = 75,085), with a positivity rate of 10.29% (7,730/75,085). Among antibody isotypes, positivity rates were 1.2% (846/69,539) for aCL IgG, 1.7% (1,198/69,640) for aCL IgM, 1.9% (732/37,791) for B2GP1 IgG, and 2.0% (762/37,601) for B2GP1 IgM. Among the 30,274 patients who underwent simultaneous testing for LA, aCL IgG/IgM, and B2GP1 IgG/IgM, 1.3% (n = 407) were triple-positive, 1.4% (n = 427) were double-positive, and 9.9% (n = 3,009) had a single positive marker. The remaining 87.3% (n = 26,431) tested negative for all three. Of the 3,009 patients with only one positive marker, 9.8% (n = 296) were positive exclusively for aCL IgM, and 7.4% (n = 224) were positive exclusively for B2GP1 IgM. Among all fully tested patients, 2.2% (668/30,274) were positive for only IgM isotypes (either aCL or B2GP1) in the absence of IgG and LA positivity. Specifically, 0.9% (n = 296) were exclusively positive for aCL IgM and 0.7% (n = 224) for B2GP1 IgM. Additionally, 0.5% (n = 148) were simultaneously positive for both aCL IgM and B2GP1 IgM, without associated IgG or LA markers. Had only IgG and LA been assayed, 17.4 % (668/3843) of initially positive patients—and one-third of those classified as triple-positive—would have been missed. Conclusion Within this large-scale analysis of real-world APS test ordering practice, less than one-third of orders included a comprehensive characterization. Isolated IgM positivity, defined as aCL or B2GP1 IgM in the absence of IgG and LA, was infrequent yet represents a sizable proportion of initial positive aPL testing. How these results impact APS diagnosis and management of APS requires further study.

Abstract Background: Glofit, a CD20/CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown efficacy in prospective trials, including the Phase III STARGLO study evaluating glofit plus gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (GemOx) in transplant-ineligible patients (pts) with R/R large B-cell lymphoma (BCL). However, concerns raised by the FDA's Oncology Drug Advisory Committee regarding the generalizability of the STARGLO data to U.S. pts underscore the need for real-world evidence. We report real-world outcomes of Glofit-GemOx in U.S. pts with R/R aggressive BCL. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review across 8 U.S. academic centers, identifying 31 pts with R/R aggressive BCL treated with Glofit-GemOx outside clinical trials. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Results: At Glofit-GemOx initiation: median age was 72 years (range, 34–88); 90% had stage III/IV disease. Histologic subtypes included DLBCL in 58% (n=18), high-grade BCL in 29% (n=9), PTLD/DLBCL in 6.5% (n=2), follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3B in 3.2% (n=1), and Burkitt lymphoma (BL) in 3.2% (n=1). Germinal center B-cell phenotype was seen in 80% of evaluable cases. Double- (n=8) or triple-hit (n=1) cytogenetics were observed in 31% (n=9). Elevated LDH was present in 74%, and 16% had B symptoms. Median ECOG performance status was 1 (range, 0–3), and 23% (n=7) had received prior CAR T-cell therapy. Pre-treatment biopsy was performed in 77% (n=24) with CD20 expression tested in 74% (n=23). CD20 expression was negative in 3 pts by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry. Pts received a median 1 prior line of therapy (range, 0-6); Glofit-GemOx was administered as 1L in 7% (n=2), and 2L in 58% (n=18). Median 4 cycles (range, 1-11); both 1L pts had prior FL (1 and 3 prior lines for FL). Twelve pts remain on therapy, 2 on Glofit monotherapy. Four pts were unevaluable (2 death pre-assessment; 2 pending evaluation). Among 27 evaluable pts, ORR was 78% (21/27) and CR rate was 41% (11/27). Among CD20- negative cases on pre- Glofit-GemOx biopsy (n=3), ORR was 33% (1/3), with 1 CR lasting 3.5 months. Of 11 pts who progressed on Glofit-GemOx, 6 were rebiopsied; 1 showed CD20 loss, 1 was previously CD20-negative. Among the 24 pts who received Glofit-GemOx as destination therapy, ORR of 75% (15/20 evaluable). Among pts with prior CAR T (n=7), the ORR and CR rate were both 43% (3/7). None received Glofit-GemOx within 30 days of CAR T-cell infusion; 4 received within 6 mo; 2 of whom achieved CR. Seven pts (24%) received Glofit-GemOx as bridging to CAR T. ORR pre-CAR T was 86% (6/7); 4 pt successfully proceeded to CAR T, 2 are pending infusion, and 1 progressed after 2 cycles and transitioned to alternate therapy. Three pts were evaluable post-CAR T with an ORR of 100% (3/3) and CR rate of 67% (2/3). At data cutoff, 23/31 pts were alive. Full PFS and OS data will be presented at ASH. Notable individual responses included a patient with relapsed BL post–DA-EPOCH-R who received Glofit-GemOx as 2L therapy and achieved a 6 mo CR without consolidation before progression. Another patient treated with Glofit-GemOx in the 7L setting after prior allogeneic transplant achieved a 3 mo CR prior to progression. CRS occurred in 58% (18/31), with grade ≥3 in 13% (4/31), including 2 possible treatment-related deaths. One occurred in a frail patient after the 1st dose, though neutropenic fever was present prior to Glofit administration. The second followed influenza A infection, respiratory failure, and possible grade 4 ICANS after the 2nd dose; attribution to CRS vs. infection was unclear. ICANS occurred in 10% (3/31), with one possible grade ≥3 case. Conclusions: This is the first U.S.-based real-world analysis of Glofit-GemOx, including more U.S. pts than the STARGLO trial, appear to demonstrate comparable response rates, potentially supporting its use as both bridging and destination therapy. Notable toxicities, including CRS, were observed, with 2 possible treatment-related deaths, with plausible alternate non-treatment related causes. Favorable responses were seen in bridging therapy and high-risk subgroups (transformed, HGBCL) which were excluded in the STARGLO trial. These findings support the real-world utility of Glofit-GemOx in the management of R/R aggressive BCL but underscore the need for caution due to associated toxicities. Further real-world and prospective evaluation are warranted, particularly in rare subgroups and as bridging therapy.

Abstract Introduction Detecting genetic abnormalities is mandatory during diagnostic workup and for potential individualization of therapy selection in multiple myeloma (MM) and its precursor conditions. At present, this requires invasive bone marrow (BM) biopsies, severely limiting early detection, patient monitoring, and the precise selection of therapy. The current standard for detecting genetic alterations in MM is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which cannot detect point mutations and other clinically relevant alterations. Consequently, the IMS-IMWG guidelines were recently updated to require next-generation sequencing for the classification of high-risk MM. Moreover, the importance of identifying alterations in therapeutic targets (e.g., BCMA, GPRC5D) for guiding immunotherapies is becoming increasingly recognized. To address this need, we recently launched GenoPredicta, a CLIA-approved Laboratory Developed Test that enables routine monitoring, informing diagnosis, and treatment selection by comprehensively and robustly characterizing MM genomes with whole genome sequencing (WGS) from a minimum of ~50 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) isolated from peripheral blood (PB) or tumor cells from BM. Here, we describe the characterization of clinical and research samples with GenoPredicta, highlighting resistance-conferring genetic alterations that can only be detected by sequencing and that are consistent with patients' clinical histories, while further demonstrating the complete concordance of GenoPredicta with prior FISH results. Methods Tumor cells were isolated from BM and/or PB samples using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (after CD138+ enrichment for PB) and subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS), from which we identified copy number alterations, structural variants, and single nucleotide variants and indels. For a subset of samples, the BM was also characterized by FISH, using a standard clinical panel for characterizing MM; for other samples prior FISH results were available from patients' clinical records. Results The analytical validation of GenoPredicta, conducted on a retrospective cohort of >60 viably frozen samples from >30 patients, showed complete concordance between BM and PB for detected genomic abnormalities, with all clinically relevant events (11 translocations and 125 CNVs) observed in BM recapitulated in PB (100% recall). All events identified by FISH in 14 samples (8 translocations and 30 CNVs) were also identified in the BM (100% recall), with 50 translocations and 30 CNVs not detected by FISH also absent in the WGS data (100% precision). The abnormalities detected in these samples also included multiple high-risk events not assayed by FISH, including biallelic TP53 loss (Del 17p coupled with a deleterious TP53 mutation, observed in 4 patients) and MYC::IGL translocations (2 patients). Moreover, for all fresh peripheral blood clinical samples with FISH results available from patients' histories, GenoPredicta recalled 100% of reported events. Among these clinical samples, we notably observed a case with both a biallelic GPRC5D deletion and a TNFRSF17 (BCMA) deletion combined with a truncating mutation on the remaining allele. This was consistent with the patient's clinical history showing progression after therapy with talquetamab (anti-GPRC5D bispecific), and previous nonresponse to teclistamab (anti-BCMA bispecific) after prior therapy with Cilta-cel (BCMA-directed CAR T). GenoPredicta also detected other mutations likely to confer resistance to immunotherapies, including loss-of-function mutations in IKZF3 and deletions of FCRL5 in frozen peripheral blood research samples. Conclusion We demonstrate that WGS-based characterization of MM from BM or CTCs is a viable replacement for FISH for clinical diagnosis and monitoring, with blood-based measurements enabling comprehensive profiling of the myeloma cancer genome. Importantly, this includes genetic alterations that confer resistance to therapy, allowing for both early detection of such alterations and more precise selection of therapy.

Abstract Background: Germline predisposition states (GPS), including inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are seen in 5-10% of individuals with myeloid neoplasms (MN). Given overlap with somatic driver genes, blood, saliva, and buccal swabs are suboptimal specimens for GPS testing in MN; the latter two due to contamination with blood cells(Jerez, 2024). Skin biopsy with fibroblast culture-derived DNA remains the gold standard, but the process is expensive, takes 6-8 weeks to complete, and fibroblast culture failure can occur in some patients with telomere biology disorders. Given the need to rapidly screen donors for HSCT and adjust therapy/conditioning in certain IBMFS, we developed a rapid hematologic germline testing algorithm using hair follicle-derived DNA. Methods The study was conducted after IRB approval through the Mayo Clinic GPS/IBMFS clinic. To perform PCR-based hair follicle testing, we obtained 15-25 hair follicles (bulbs) per patient. The bulbs were placed in a microcentrifuge tube and subjected to a 24-hour digestion and extraction protocol using a modified version of the QIAGEN DNA Purification from Dried Blood Spots protocol. DNA quality was assessed by Nanodrop and Qubit.Testing included either validation of known or suspected germline variants (e.g., RUNX1, DDX41, ETV6), or panel testing (e.g., GPS or IBMFS). Pathogenic variants were validated by repeat testing in a CAP/CLIA certified lab prior to medical decision making. 23 patients underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) in a CAP/CLIA lab, and 13 patients had concurrent germline testing using alternate DNA sources (8 skin biopsies, 1 saliva, 4 buccal swabs). Results Ninety-three patients (49 male, 53%) underwent hair follicle-derived germline DNA testing (median age 63 years). Indications for germline testing included the presence of a suspected variant on somatic testing with variant allele frequency (VAF) between 35%-60% ( n= 66, 71%), patient age <50 years (n=26, 28%), antecedent thrombocytopenia (n=15, 16%), presence of syndromic features (n=4, 4%), patient history of multiple malignancies (n=4, 4%), and positive family history (n=15, 16%). Time to reporting variants after receipt of hair follicle-derived DNA was <14 days. There were zero complications associated with the procedure. DNA quality as assessed by Nanodrop revealed a median nucleic acid concentration of 25.64 ng/μL. The median A260/A280 ratio was 1.86 (range 0.701-2.133) and the median A260/A230 ratio was 1.27 (range -8.193-9.223). DNA quality was insufficient for chromosomal microarray (CMA) assessments. Of 93 patients evaluated, 67 (72%) had ≥1 germline variant, with 3 having >1 germline variant for a total of 72 variants. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified included: DDX41 (30, 41.7%), TP53 (4, 5.6%), ANKRD26 (4, 5.6%), RUNX1 (4, 5.6%), GATA2 (3, 4.2%), TERT (3, 4.2%), JAK3 (2, 2.8%), SAMD9/SAMD9L (2, 2.8%), ATM (2, 2.8%), and 1 each (1.4%) in BCL2, BCOR, BPGM, CDKN2A, CEBPA, CHEK2, CSF3R, CXCR4, DNMT3A, ETV6, GATA1, MPL, MPO, POT1, PTPN11, RPL5, and SH2B3. In the 13 patients that had concurrent germline testing, results were identical in all cases, except for 1 false negative in a buccal specimen (PTPN11) and 1 case of germline mosaicism, where the TP53 variant was identified in the blood and hair follicle DNA but not in skin fibroblast DNA. After testing, 30 (44.7%) patients had a change in their management plan: 8 (27%) with DDX41-GPS were observed due to known latency of DDX41-mutant MN, 6 (20%) were referred for HSCT based on the germline variant (CEBPA, DDX41, GATA1, GATA2, RPL5, TP53), 6 (20%) were placed on an enhanced surveillance plan for cancer screening (1 ANKRD26, 3 TERT, 2 TP53), 4 (13%) patients undergoing HSCT had related donors removed from consideration as they were carriers (2 DDX41, 1 ANKRD26, and 1 SAMD9), 2 (7%) patients with neutropenia and underlying germline variants (1 ATM, 1 DDX41) had G-CSF therapy discontinued due to concerns for clonal stimulation, and 1 (3%) patient with a germline CDKN2A mutation (hematological diagnosis- CMML) was recommended to avoid radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Conclusion In summary, we validate a rapid and simple hair follicle-derived DNA based germline assessment for patients with hematological disorders and demonstrate a positive impact on clinical care in 44% of patients. We are currently optimizing DNA quality so that germline copy number alterations can be better detected using CMA.

Abstract Heterozygous germline variants of DDX41 occur in 2-4% of adult Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) cases, making them the most prevalent cause of inherited predisposition to these diseases. Homozygous deleterious variants are never observed in the germline, and loss of both DDX41 alleles causes apoptosis of proliferative cells, consistent with essentiality. Most disease-associated germline variants cause loss of full-length protein expression (truncating). However, 30-40% are missense (non-truncating) and their role in disease risk compared to truncating variants remains in question. Previous reports have shown that both truncating and non-truncating Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (P/LP) variants (defined by ACMG scoring) are associated with DDX41-specific disease features, including co-mutation of the contralateral allele of DDX41. In contrast, variants of unknown significance (VUS) are less associated with these features. Acquired co-mutations of DDX41, of which p.R525H accounts for 50-70%, are restricted to DDX41-mutated patients and are always missense. Our previous studies indicated that p.R525H lacks the essential DDX41 function and cannot support hematopoietic progenitor proliferation. However, the frequency with which this mutation occurs and the absence of acquired truncating mutations suggest that p.R525H has a specific effect on DDX41 function that is distinct from complete loss and promotes pathogenesis specifically in the context of existing P/LP DDX41 mutation. To understand how germline non-truncating variants predispose to disease, we characterized the effect of six recurrent non-truncating P/LP variants (p.G173R, p.R219H, p.P258L, p.Y259C, p.K331del, and p.I396T) and three VUS (p.K9E, p.Y33H, and p.M155H) on DDX41 function. We utilized a genetic complementation approach in murine lineage-negative (Linneg) bone marrow cells with inducible deletion of DDX41. We found that all non-truncating P/LP and VUS forms of DDX41 could fully rescue the colony forming potential of Ddx41-deficient cells to a similar level as wild-type protein, whereas the p.R525H variant completely failed to rescue. To determine the effect of the non-truncating variants on DDX41 function at endogenous expression levels, we utilized CRISPR to modify the DDX41 alleles in MOLM13 human AML cells. We produced viable, proliferating cell lines with homozygous mutations for all 3 VUS and 4/6 P/LP variants. For p.P258L and p.K331del, like p.R525H, we could not produce homozygous mutant cell lines despite screening hundreds of clones and finding several with heterozygosity. To further study the P/LP variants that were functional in the cell line, we generated C57Bl/6 mouse lines harboring p.G173R, p.Y259C, and p.I396T mutations in the endogenous Ddx41 alleles. Heterozygous mutant mice were phenotypically normal in all three strains. However, we could not obtain homozygous mutant mice for p.G173R or p.Y259C, indicating these cannot support embryonic/fetal development. In contrast, p.I396T-homozygous mutant mice were born at Mendelian ratios and were phenotypically normal until at least 15 months of age. Since p.R525H mutation is common in patients with non-truncating P/LP variants, we sought to model the combined effect of these mutations. We utilized the Linneg cells with inducible knockout of Ddx41, co-expressed each non-truncating variant with p.R525H by viral transduction, and monitored the colony formation potential. Remarkably, cultures expressing P/LP variants or M155I combined with p.R525H had dramatically reduced colony formation, while wild-type DDX41 and the other 2 VUS supported normal colony formation when co-expressed with p.R525H. Thus, we conclude p.R525H has a dominant-negative effect on certain non-truncating DDX41 variants. This is consistent with the emerging idea that the presence of an acquired hotspot DDX41 co-mutation is sufficient to classify a non-truncating DDX41 variant as pathogenic.Our results demonstrate that many DDX41 missense variants retain protein function when overexpressed. However, at endogenous expression levels, some P/LP variants are unable to support cell proliferation, indicative of hypomorphic effects on protein function. In patients, acquisition of the p.R525H mutation in the contralateral allele disrupts the functionality of P/LP variants through dominant-negative effects, leading to hematopoietic progenitor defects that are hallmark of the DDX41 pathogenesis.