Wang, Chang

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common type of lymphoma, arises from various pathogenic mechanisms including gene translocations and fusions. Detection of gene rearrangements using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard practice for DLBCL diagnosis and guides treatment decisions. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) DNA sequencing is a next-generation sequencing-based technology to identify genome-wide rearrangements using a single assay. In this study, Hi-C sequencing was performed using FFPE tissues from 159 patients with DLBCL, and identified 746 cancer genes at or proximal to the rearrangement breakpoints with a total of 1903 occurrences. Focusing on clinically important rearrangements, Hi-C detected 102 rearrangements of MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 in 92 patients and revealed the fusion partners, including 25 rearrangements missed by FISH. Causes of FISH negative results included FISH-cryptic breakpoints, complex or faint FISH signals, low percentage of FISH positivity, and issues related to tissue fixation. Moreover, in 20 patients (12.6%), Hi-C sequencing detected 22 rearrangements characteristic of other lymphoma types, including CCND1 rearrangements that could lead to reclassification as mantle cell lymphoma. Survival analysis for genome-wide rearrangements using machine learning models identified MYC, PD-L1, CCND1, BCL2, NTRK1/PRCC, RRAS, and FANCE rearrangements with significant prognostic effects in the DLBCL cohort. In conclusion, Hi-C sequencing detects gene rearrangements crucial for diagnosis in an unbiased and molecular manner and showed high sensitivity and specificity in our study. These advantages of Hi-C sequencing offer help to improve the workflow of clinical pathology laboratories, diagnostic precision, and treatment of large B-cell lymphoma.

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of malignant lymphoma. Previous studies have shown that DLBCL cells are susceptible to GPX4 (Glutathione peroxidase 4)-regulated ferroptosis, an iron-dependent type of programmed cell death characterized by increased reactive oxygen species and excessive lipid peroxidation. In addition to GPX4, FSP1 (Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1, previously known as AIFM2) is a glutathione-independent repressor of ferroptosis that has shown prognostic significance in solid tumors. In this study, we aimed to reveal the significance of GPX4 and FSP1 in DLBCL. Patients and Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GPX4 and FSP1 in a large cohorts of patients with de novo DLBCL, and evaluated their cytoplasmic and nuclear expression. Prognostic analysis was performed for FSP1 and GPX4 expression in patients treated with rituximab (R)-CHOP or CHOP chemotherapy, respective of TP53 mutation status, as p53 regulates ferroptosis and TP53 mutation is associated with poorer prognosis in DLBCL. Results: FSP1 expression with a ≥10% cutoff was positive in 42.3% of DLBCL cases. Patients with TP53 mutations had a non-significant trend of higher mean FSP1 expression than those with wild-type (Wt) TP53 (P=0.11). Prognostic analysis revealed that cytoplasmic FSP1+ expression was associated with significantly poorer overall survival and progression-free survival in Wt-TP53 DLBCLs treated with R-CHOP (P=0.016 and P=0.003, respectively), and only showed non-significant unfavorable trends in TP53 mutated DLBCLs and patients treated with CHOP. In contrast, GPX4 expression did not show a significant unfavorable prognostic effect in DLBCL, and in fact, was associated with a non-significant trend of better survival. Previously we have quantified immune cell abundance and PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment of the study cohort using multiplex fluorescent IHC. Correlative analysis found that FSP1+ patients had significantly higher mean and median abundance of CD68+ cells (both M1 and M2 macrophages) and CD11c+ cells than FSP1- patients. Further analysis in Wt-TP53 and mutated TP53 subcohorts found that only in the TP53 mutated DLBCL subcohort, FSP1 expression was associated with significantly higher mean and median CD163-CD68+ (M1) and overall CD68+ macrophages, whereas in the Wt-TP53 DLBCL subcohort, FSP1 expression was associated with significantly higher median (but not mean) CD163+CD68+ (M2) macrophages and CD11c+ cells. Summary: Cytoplasmic FSP1 expression but not GPX4 had significantly adverse prognostic effect in patients with Wt-TP53 DLBCL treated with standard immunochemotherapy. Our results also suggest that in addition to ferroptosis regulation, macrophage abundance was relevant for the prognostic effects of FSP1 expression. Citation Format: Beibei Lyu, Zijun Xu-Monette, Xiaoxian X. Zhao, Eric D. Hsi, Ming Chen, Carlo Visco, Alexandar Tzankov, Karen Dybkaer, Mu-En Wang, Chang Wang, Qingyan Au, Harry Nunns, Zenggang Pan, Benjamin Parsons, Santiago Montes-Moreno, Fenghuang Zhan, Michael B. Møller, Leon Bernal-Mizrachi, Youli Zu, Shanxiang Zhang, Weina Chen, Govind Bhagat, Yong Li, KEN H. YOUNG. Expression of the ferroptosis suppressor FSP1 but not GPX4 shows significant adverse prognostic effect in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with wild-type TP53 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 4661.

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 30% of all NHL cases. DLBCL diagnosis relies on histologic examination, immunophenotyping, molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to differentiate it from similar NHL subtypes with overlapping morphological features, including more high-grade lymphomas like double-hit lymphoma. Because FISH is performed in a panel of single- or dual-target test format and analyzed through microscopy and manual image analysis, assessment of multiple target biomarkers can be cumbersome and expensive. As additional biomarkers for diagnosis, subtyping, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making become available, target panels will become larger, posing additional challenges to clinical laboratories. Patients and Methods In this study, Hi-C sequencing of FFPE samples was performed to identify all genomic rearrangements by a single sequencing analysis for an unselected DLBCL case series of 159 patients, and the results were compared to FISH for the detection of clinically important variants. Results Hi-C sequencing showed superior performance compared to FISH: standard FISH for DLBCL includes testing for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6. Between FISH and Hi-C, these biomarkers were detected 105 times, of which, FISH detected 80/105 (76%) and Hi-C detected 102/105 (97%). The cohort included 4 double-hit lymphomas by FISH but Hi-C sequencing detected five. Besides DLBCL diagnostic biomarkers (MYC, BCL2, BCL6), many additional biomarkers were detected by Hi-C sequencing including variants not tested by FISH because the clinical suspicion was ambiguous and the relevant FISH probes were not used, and those not tested because the biomarkers were not thought to be common and, hence, left out of the FISH panel. In total, Hi-C sequencing detected additional biomarkers in 42 (26%) cases, including (1) variants targeted by FISH (i.e. MYC, BCL2, BCL6) but negative, (2) classification biomarkers for other lymphomas (CCND1, MALT, IRF4), and (3) those not tested because the biomarkers are not common and not included in the FISH panel. These additional biomarkers were supportive of suspected diagnosis of DLBCL versus double-hit lymphoma (24 cases), prompted reconsideration of a different diagnosis that may have led to different treatments (6 cases, e.g. mantle cell lymphoma), or biomarkers such as PDL1, ALK, and ATM which have implications for targeted therapies and/or inclusion in clinical trials (5 cases). Conclusion The Hi-C FFPE sequencing technology has the potential to improve the workflow of pathology labs for detection of a wide range of structural variants informing precision diagnosis and treatment for lymphomas.

Abstract Background: Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by cleavage of gasdermin (GSDM) family proteins that form pores in the plasma membrane, cell rupture, and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Its pro-inflammatory potential has garnered significant research attention in recent years but has not been studied in lymphoma. Patients and Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry for cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) in two large cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with multiplex fluorescent IHC (mfIHC) data, and analyzed for prognostic and immune impact. Results: Cleaved GSDMD was frequently expressed in DLBCL, and only the cytoplasmic (versus nuclear) form of expression correlated with significantly better patient survival in two DLBCL cohorts. To understand the expression at the single-cell level, we examined mfIHC results, which revealed that GSDMD+cells were tumor or immune cells, and varied in Ki-67, BCL2, and MYC expression. Cases with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression had higher mean and median levels of CD38+ (activated) M1 macrophages in two cohorts and lower PD-1/PD-L1 expression, as well as phenotypes of cognate interactions between live activated M1 macrophages, DLBCL cells, and T cells in spatially resolved immune landscape by mfIHC. In contrast, phagocytosis of pyroptotic lymphoma cells by M2 macrophages and cell death of T cells were observed in cases with predominantly nuclear form of cleaved GSDMD expression. Bulk gene expression profiling analysis identified a large proportion of RNA genes upregulated in DLBCLs with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression, and deconvolution analysis found decreased frequency of the “Inflammatory” lymphoma microenvironment (LME) subtype, increased frequency of cell states and ecotypes with favorable prognostic associations, and decreased frequency of T cell exhaustion states. Summary: Analysis of pyroptosis-inducing cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) expression in a large number of DLBCL patients revealed dinstinctive cytoplasmic and nuclear expression patterns in live and pyroptotic cells associated with different prognostic and immune effects. Cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression is a marker of cognate interactions between live cells (e.g., activated M1 macrophages) associated with adaptive responses and favorable prognostic effects, whereas nuclear cleaved GSDMD expression is associated with immunosuppressive mechanisms, including T cell death and phagocytosis by M2 macrophages.