Martin, Emma C. St.

Abstract Background Missense mutations in IDH1 are well-established therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In contrast, the synonymous IDH1 variant p.Gly105Gly (rs11554137), present in 5–10% of AML cases, has been considered a benign polymorphism due to its high population frequency (5.7% overall, 0.7–10.5%) and lack of protein-altering effect. However, prior studies have associated this variant with inferior outcomes (Wagner, J Clin Oncol, 2010), though findings have been inconsistent. Few studies have examined its prognostic significance in the context of treatment intensity or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Methods With IRB approval, clinical and genomic data were extracted from the Mayo Clinic AML database for patients diagnosed between Jan 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2025. Patients were stratified by IDH1 Gly105Gly (rs11554137) status via NGS on bone marrow. Outcomes included co-mutation profiles, treatment response, measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparametric flow cytometry, and survival. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were adjusted for age at diagnosis, ELN 2022 risk category, and SCT conditioning regimen. Results Among 379 AML patients, 36 (9.5%) harbored the IDH1 Gly105Gly (rs11554137) variant (cases) (median VAF 49%, IQR 48–49.2). In the full cohort, median age was 68 years (IQR 59–74), M:F ratio was 1.5; 75% had de novo AML, and median follow-up was 52 months. Among cases, common cytogenetic abnormalities included complex karyotype (28%), del(7q) (14%), and trisomy 8 (6%), while frequently mutated genes included DNMT3A (19%), IDH2 (17%), and BCOR (14%). Of 345 treated patients, 43% received intensive, and 56% received low-intensity regimens, including hypomethylating agent (HMA) alone (n=13), HMA+venetoclax (n=159), and targeted therapy (n=7). Among cases, complete remission (CR) rates were higher with intensive vs. low-intensity therapy (70% vs. 17%, p=0.03). MRD positivity post induction was more common in cases (66% vs. 26%, p=0.01), suggesting suboptimal leukemic clearance. Among 103 patients who underwent allogeneic SCT in CR1 (47% received myeloablative conditioning), morphologic relapse occurred in 64.3% of cases compared to 23.6% of controls (p = 0.004). Cases experienced significantly inferior median RFS (8 months [95% CI 5–NA] vs. not reached for controls, p <0.001), indicating more durable post-SCT remission in the control group. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, ELN risk, conditioning intensity, MRD status, and complex karyotype, the IDH1 Gly105Gly variant remained independently associated with shorter RFS (HR 3.97, 95% CI: 1.74–9.05, p = 0.001). Complex karyotype was also an independent predictor of relapse (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.28–8.73, p = 0.014). Consistent with this, logistic regression revealed a significantly increased odds of post-SCT relapse among cases (OR 7.95, 95% CI: 2.19–35.27, p=0.001), independent of clinical covariates. Relapsed cases were significantly more likely to harbor FLT3-ITD mutations than relapsed controls (p=0.041). Pathway-level analysis revealed increased frequency of mutations in signal transduction genes (FLT3-ITD, CSF3R, NF1) (p=0.002). All CNS relapses among cases occurred in patients harboring at least one of these mutations. Despite the higher relapse rate, there were no significant differences in OS (14.4 vs. 11.3 months, p=0.36) between cases and controls. The IDH1 Gly105Gly variant was not independently associated with OS (HR 1.26, p=0.30). In contrast, age (p<0.0001) and adverse ELN risk (p<0.0001) were significant predictors of inferior OS. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of IDH1 Gly105Gly is most pronounced in the post-SCT setting. Conclusion The synonymous IDH1 Gly105Gly variant (rs11554137) is an independent predictor of post-SCT relapse in AML, potentially mediated by co-occurring mutations in signal transduction pathways. Despite no observed impact on OS, likely due to effective salvage therapies, the variant's link to lower CR rates with low-intensity therapy and higher MRD burden suggests treatment intensity influences its clinical relevance. These findings support reevaluating the prognostic role of synonymous variants in AML and call for larger studies and mechanistic investigations into splicing, transcript stability, and translation.

Abstract Background: Germline predisposition states (GPS), including inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are seen in 5-10% of individuals with myeloid neoplasms (MN). Given overlap with somatic driver genes, blood, saliva, and buccal swabs are suboptimal specimens for GPS testing in MN; the latter two due to contamination with blood cells(Jerez, 2024). Skin biopsy with fibroblast culture-derived DNA remains the gold standard, but the process is expensive, takes 6-8 weeks to complete, and fibroblast culture failure can occur in some patients with telomere biology disorders. Given the need to rapidly screen donors for HSCT and adjust therapy/conditioning in certain IBMFS, we developed a rapid hematologic germline testing algorithm using hair follicle-derived DNA. Methods The study was conducted after IRB approval through the Mayo Clinic GPS/IBMFS clinic. To perform PCR-based hair follicle testing, we obtained 15-25 hair follicles (bulbs) per patient. The bulbs were placed in a microcentrifuge tube and subjected to a 24-hour digestion and extraction protocol using a modified version of the QIAGEN DNA Purification from Dried Blood Spots protocol. DNA quality was assessed by Nanodrop and Qubit.Testing included either validation of known or suspected germline variants (e.g., RUNX1, DDX41, ETV6), or panel testing (e.g., GPS or IBMFS). Pathogenic variants were validated by repeat testing in a CAP/CLIA certified lab prior to medical decision making. 23 patients underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) in a CAP/CLIA lab, and 13 patients had concurrent germline testing using alternate DNA sources (8 skin biopsies, 1 saliva, 4 buccal swabs). Results Ninety-three patients (49 male, 53%) underwent hair follicle-derived germline DNA testing (median age 63 years). Indications for germline testing included the presence of a suspected variant on somatic testing with variant allele frequency (VAF) between 35%-60% ( n= 66, 71%), patient age <50 years (n=26, 28%), antecedent thrombocytopenia (n=15, 16%), presence of syndromic features (n=4, 4%), patient history of multiple malignancies (n=4, 4%), and positive family history (n=15, 16%). Time to reporting variants after receipt of hair follicle-derived DNA was <14 days. There were zero complications associated with the procedure. DNA quality as assessed by Nanodrop revealed a median nucleic acid concentration of 25.64 ng/μL. The median A260/A280 ratio was 1.86 (range 0.701-2.133) and the median A260/A230 ratio was 1.27 (range -8.193-9.223). DNA quality was insufficient for chromosomal microarray (CMA) assessments. Of 93 patients evaluated, 67 (72%) had ≥1 germline variant, with 3 having >1 germline variant for a total of 72 variants. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified included: DDX41 (30, 41.7%), TP53 (4, 5.6%), ANKRD26 (4, 5.6%), RUNX1 (4, 5.6%), GATA2 (3, 4.2%), TERT (3, 4.2%), JAK3 (2, 2.8%), SAMD9/SAMD9L (2, 2.8%), ATM (2, 2.8%), and 1 each (1.4%) in BCL2, BCOR, BPGM, CDKN2A, CEBPA, CHEK2, CSF3R, CXCR4, DNMT3A, ETV6, GATA1, MPL, MPO, POT1, PTPN11, RPL5, and SH2B3. In the 13 patients that had concurrent germline testing, results were identical in all cases, except for 1 false negative in a buccal specimen (PTPN11) and 1 case of germline mosaicism, where the TP53 variant was identified in the blood and hair follicle DNA but not in skin fibroblast DNA. After testing, 30 (44.7%) patients had a change in their management plan: 8 (27%) with DDX41-GPS were observed due to known latency of DDX41-mutant MN, 6 (20%) were referred for HSCT based on the germline variant (CEBPA, DDX41, GATA1, GATA2, RPL5, TP53), 6 (20%) were placed on an enhanced surveillance plan for cancer screening (1 ANKRD26, 3 TERT, 2 TP53), 4 (13%) patients undergoing HSCT had related donors removed from consideration as they were carriers (2 DDX41, 1 ANKRD26, and 1 SAMD9), 2 (7%) patients with neutropenia and underlying germline variants (1 ATM, 1 DDX41) had G-CSF therapy discontinued due to concerns for clonal stimulation, and 1 (3%) patient with a germline CDKN2A mutation (hematological diagnosis- CMML) was recommended to avoid radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Conclusion In summary, we validate a rapid and simple hair follicle-derived DNA based germline assessment for patients with hematological disorders and demonstrate a positive impact on clinical care in 44% of patients. We are currently optimizing DNA quality so that germline copy number alterations can be better detected using CMA.

Abstract Introduction: The landscape of classical hematology has undergone substantial evolution over the last decade, marked by new diagnostic tools, nuanced therapeutic strategies, and an expanding understanding of underlying pathophysiology. This increasing complexity often presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These challenges are further compounded by workforce shortages in classical hematology marked by educational gaps, geographic limitations, and difficulty accessing prompt specialty care. Unlike the well-established “Tumor Boards” in oncology, a comparable dedicated, widely accessible forum for classical hematology has largely been absent. This gap contributes to potential practice heterogeneity and isolation, especially across dissimilar care settings and geographic regions, impacting the consistent application of evidence-based practices and access to specialized expertise. To address this critical need, the “Blood Board” initiative was created to serve as an informal, virtual resource for discussing classical hematology topics and cases, fostering diverse perspectives, and collaborative problem-solving. Methods: The Blood Board was formally launched in April 2025, operating as a bi-monthly, hour-long virtual meeting conducted via non-recorded videoconferencing. The forum was designed with broad inclusivity in mind, welcoming all healthcare professionals involved in the care of adult patients with classical hematologic disorders, including trainees such as hematology/oncology fellows, academic and community-based hematologists, and any other interested providers. To date, dissemination of this initiative has been by word of mouth and e-mails containing a calendar invitation have been sent to anyone interested in participating (https://forms.gle/doyHNSx1SVFBJZmy8). To facilitate participation from various practice models and geographical locations, the virtual format was prioritized, eliminating barriers of travel and time commitment often associated with traditional in-person conferences. Participation is voluntary, encouraging an open and informal environment for de-identified case presentations, didactic discussions, and expert opinion sharing. Self-reported data on participant demographics (e.g., role, practice setting) and geographical representation have been collected to assess the initiative's reach and impact. Results: To date, sessions have consistently garnered engagement with a median of five participants in attendance at each session. There have been over 20 unique participants representing a broad spectrum of roles including both trainees and practicing hematologists/hematologist-oncologists and drawing from private practice, community-based hospitals, and academic medical centers. Over half of all participants were either in fellowship or within five years of completion of training. The virtual format has successfully overcome geographical limitations, attracting attendees from numerous states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Wisconsin highlighting its broad appeal and potential for knowledge dissemination across a wide professional network. Conclusions: The Blood Board has demonstrated utility and met a previously unaddressed need. Sustained intellectual interest in Blood Board, coupled with a wide geographical and professional reach underscores a critical role for accessible, free, and multidisciplinary collaborative platforms in the evolving field of classical hematology. Similar to Tumor Boards, Blood Board promotes knowledge exchange and evidence-based care, garners expert support for challenging cases, and harmonizes clinical approaches, which we hope may ultimately improve patient care outcomes across diverse settings. Furthermore, this platform facilitates a national classical hematology community to support workforce development. Future goals include expanding dissemination efforts, measuring specific educational benefits, analyzing impacts on patient care, and increasing participant diversity, including recruitment of advanced practice providers and pharmacists.

AbstractGermline predisposition syndromes (GPS) result from constitutional aberrations in tumor suppressive and homeostatic genes, increasing risk for neoplasia in affected kindred. In this study, we present clinical and genomic data on 144 Mayo Clinic patients with GPS; 59 evaluated prospectively using an algorithm‐based diagnostic approach in the setting of a dedicated GPS/ inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) clinic. Seventy‐two (50%) patients had IBMFS (telomere biology disorders‐32,Fanconi anemia‐18, Diamond Blackfan Anemia – 11, congenital neutropenia–5, Schwachman‐Diamond Syndrome‐5 and Bloom Syndrome‐1), 27 (19%) had GPS with antecedent thrombocytopenia (RUNX1‐FPD‐15, ANKRD26‐6, ETV6‐2, GATA1‐1, MPL‐3), 28 (19%) had GPS without antecedent thrombocytopenia (GATA2 haploinsufficiency‐16, DDX41‐10, CBL‐1 and CEBPA‐1) and 17 (12%) had general cancer predisposition syndromes (ataxia telangiectasia‐7, heterozygous ATM variants‐3, CHEK2‐2, TP53‐2, CDK2NA‐1, NF1‐1 and Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome‐1). Homozygous and heterozygous ATM pathogenic variants were exclusively associated with lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), while DDX41 GPS was associated with LPD and myeloid neoplasms. The use of somatic NGS‐testing identified clonal evolution in GPS patients, with ASXL1, RAS pathway genes, SRSF2 and TET2 being most frequently mutated. Fifty‐two (91%) of 59 prospectively identified GPS patients had a change in their management approach, including additional GPS‐related screening in 42 (71%), referral for allogenic HSCT workup and screening of related donors in 16 (27%), medication initiation and selection of specific conditioning regimens in 14 (24%), and genetic counseling with specific intent of fertility preservation and preconceptual counseling in 10 (17%) patients; highlighting the importance of dedicated GPS screening, detection and management programs for patients with hematological neoplasms.