Citations

Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is often misdiagnosed or conflated with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) due to overlapping clinical presentations and neuropathological features. The presence of AD‐like features correlates with accelerated cognitive decline and a worse overall prognosis. Compared to AD, studies suggest that amyloid uptake in DLB may spare the occipital lobe. This project aims to investigate whether amyloid PET could be leveraged to differentiate between AD and DLB patients, with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy and supporting patient stratification and safety in anti‐amyloid trials. Method This study involves collaboration across six centres (University of Geneva, BioFINDER, AMPLE, AMYPAD PNHS, MCSA, GEHC), each contributing amyloid PET imaging data from patients diagnosed with DLB based on clinical or neuropathological assessments. Moreover, each center provided an additional subset of AD and healthy controls, then matched to DLB samples based on age/sex/APOE genotype/education for comparison. A sub analysis will be performed on patients with evidence of both DLB and AD markers. Given the relatively small sample size, key aspect of the methodological approach is to reduce technical sources of variability. The processing workflow includes rigorous quality control, formatting, normalisation to MNI space, harmonisation (differential smoothing), and MRI‐based segmentation. Result The dataset currently includes amyloid PET scans (acquired using [ 11 C]PiB, [ 18 F]Flutemetamol or [ 18 F]Florbetapir) and MRI scans from ∼130 DLB patients, along with ∼150 AD patients and ∼150 controls. In addition, 99 patients positive for the CSF α‐Synuclein Seeding Amplification Assay were included. Patient data were anonymized, and a harmonised database was created, including demographic characteristics, clinical history, and results from neuropsychological assessments. Conclusion The creation of a standardized, multi‐centre amyloid PET dataset for DLB will enable the study of amyloid PET patterns at the global, regional and voxel level, in comparison with uptake in AD patients and controls. This dataset will serve as a valuable resource for investigating the neuropathological underpinnings of DLB, improving diagnostic accuracy, and potentially guiding patient stratification in anti‐amyloid trials. Efforts to integrate [ 18 F]Florbetaben and additional data are ongoing.

Abstract Background PET visual reads for multi‐center studies are conducted centrally by one or a few experts. In CLARiTI, a broader network of raters will perform the reads, necessitating methods to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Method All ADRC sites ( N = 37) will prospectively acquire amyloid PET scans for 800 cognitively unimpaired and 1200 cognitively impaired participants. Each site can use one of four amyloid PET tracers ([ 18 F]florbetaben, [ 18 F]florbetapir, [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). PET scans will be visually interpreted by ten PET neuroimaging experts located across eight ADRCs, using their preferred hardware, software, and file format (DICOM, NIFTI). Calibration requires readers to perform blinded, independent visual interpretation of 180 amyloid PET scans (30 unique and 15 duplicate scans per tracer), previously read and selected by an expert (Table 1). An even mix of visually non‐elevated and elevated scans were selected, with quantitation spanning ‐26‐123 Centiloids (Figure 1), and 15% were visually borderline (similar proportion to ADNI4), with quantitation spanning 4‐48 Centiloids (mean 21). Kruskal‐Wallis H test showed no significant difference in the distribution of Centiloid values for scans in each tracer group, Χ 2 (3)=2.133, p = 0.545. Result Calibration scans were read by a second expert not serving in CLARiTI. There was 97% concordance and almost perfect agreement between readers (κ=0.932, p <0.001; Figure 2). Discordantly read scans were visually borderline elevated ( N = 2), borderline non‐elevated ( N = 1), and negative ( N = 1), with quantitation of 8‐21 Centiloids (mean 14). Intra‐rater reads were 98% concordant and had almost perfect agreement (κ=0.966, p <0.001). These findings hold promise for scaling‐up visual reads in CLARiTI, and we expect ≥80% concordance and substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ≥0.7) for inter/intra‐rater reliability. Conclusion Calibration is essential for accurate/reliable amyloid PET visual reads in large multi‐center studies with multiple raters. Through the calibration process, we will develop methods to improve the adjudication of borderline/challenging scans and formalize methods for visual reads of amyloid PET tracers that are investigational (i.e., [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). Involving multiple raters across different sites, who use diverse hardware/software/file format combinations, will mirror the natural heterogeneity present in real‐world clinical practice. This calibration set can also serve as a standardized training tool for other studies incorporating amyloid PET visual reads.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Neuroimaging data typically arrives as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files, batched by exam. We use exam or study to denote a single imaging session of a participant, containing up to ∼40 series (the generic term for scans and derived products). Different series have different properties and applications, making their labeling complex. Filenames often change in transit, and Series Description tags (0008, 103E) are arbitrary, operator‐entered, and unreliably coupled to the series type. Furthermore, label preferences vary from site to site, making the application of a common classification system mandatory for multisite studies. Here we describe the system that we have developed and applied to the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and SCAN. Method Although Series Description is unreliable, DICOM includes other tags that parameterize MR pulse sequences and suggest their purpose. The mapping from these features to types is difficult to explicitly specify, especially since different manufacturers and protocols use different conventions. Thus we developed a machine learning classifier using 4060 semiautomatically labeled head and spinal series from 1.5 to 7T MR scanners, including both site‐specific and standard protocols designed to study a wide range of neurological conditions, including dementia, hydrocephalus, and multiple sclerosis. An 80%/20% split, stratified by type, was used for the training/test sets. After initial training, a few cases in the training set with high errors due to rarity were augmented and the model retrained. Performance was evaluated on the clean test set. Result The taxonomy is presented in Table 1. The classifier correctly identified 807 out of 812 (99.4%) series, with the error cases coming from outside the ADNI or SCAN protocols (Table 2). The confusion matrix is shown in Figure 1. Conclusion We implemented an automatic series type classifier with labels chosen to be generally useful for the brain MRI community. Some errors were noted, but the test set was deliberately challenging and the errors appear to be ones that could easily be made by a human. The classifier is expected to have good tolerance for as yet unseen head MR protocols but is likely unsatisfactory for body MRI.

Abstract Background Plasma neurofilament light chains (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are blood‐based biomarkers of axonal injury and astrocytic activation, respectively, that are elevated in those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relative to cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is a multishell diffusion MRI method capable of evaluating tissue microstructure at the axonal and dendritic level. We evaluated associations between temporal cortex orientation dispersion index (ODI), neurite density index (NDI) and isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF) and plasma NfL and GFAP concentrations. Method We included Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants (ages 60‐95 years) with diagnoses or CU ( n = 356) or MCI ( n = 60), and Alzheimer’s Dementia Research Center (ADRC) participants with dementia ( n = 51). NODDI imaging was obtained on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner with 2 mm isotropic resolution. NfL and GFAP were measured using the Simoa® Neurology 4‐Plex E Advantage kit. We fit separate linear regression models within each MCALT_ADIR122 cortical ROI with regional NODDI as the primary predictor and log‐transformed plasma concentration as the outcome. Models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, cortical thickness (or hippocampal & amygdalar volume) and total intracranial volume. Result The Table displays demographic data. Figures 1 & 2 show the relationship of NDI and ISOVF measures to plasma NfL concentrations across participants in individual ROIs (similar findings were noted with GFAP). A significant inverse relationship between NfL concentrations and NDI was observed in hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus as well as all temporal neocortical regions except the superior temporal gyrus ( p <0.001) (Figure 1), whereas higher NfL concentrations were associated with higher ISOVF in all regions ( p <0.001) (Figure 2). Fewer significant associations were also seen with ODI. After adjusting for age, cortical thickness/volume and other confounds, significant associations with NDI remain, particularly in hippocampal and amygdalar regions. Conclusion NODDI‐derived measures (NDI and ISOVF) within the temporal lobe cortical regions demonstrate significant associations with plasma biomarkers of axonal and astrocytic dysfunction that are elevated during cognitive decline. This association provides preliminary validation of the utility of NODDI in assessing cortical microstructural changes associated with cognitive decline.

Abstract Background The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post‐mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948. Methods We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland‐Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Results Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV‐V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland‐Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer‐specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias. Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.

Abstract Background Despite advances in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research, limited information exists regarding the absolute risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals with abnormal AD biomarkers, particularly when accounting for competing risks of death. This knowledge gap is critical as the field addresses disease‐modifying treatments targeting CU individuals with preclinical AD. We focus on the predictive value of AD amyloid stages defined by amyloid PET Centiloid values. Methods We included 5,858 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) to evaluate AD amyloid stage as a predictor of clinical progression to MCI or dementia. The data includes long‐term follow‐up information on death and dementia beyond active study participation, which mitigates potential bias due to dropout. We predicted 10‐year and lifetime risks of MCI and dementia, accounting for the competing risks of death, given amyloid PET stages, sex, APOE4 status, and baseline age. Results are based on a hidden Markov model. Results AD amyloid staging based on amyloid PET Centiloid values was the strongest predictor of lifetime risk for MCI or for dementia (Figure 1). Higher Centiloid levels amplified age effects on the risk of MCI, whereas for dementia, amyloid stage effects surpassed age effects. For 10‐year risk, age was the dominant factor, whereas for lifetime risk, amyloid stages had a greater influence. While smaller in magnitude than the effects of amyloid stages and age, APOE4 carrier status and (on average) male sex were also associated with increased risk of MCI and dementia. For a female APOE4 carrier at age 65, lifetime risk was 41%/61%/76% for low/moderate/high amyloid PET levels. The 10‐year absolute risk for a female APOE4 carrier with high amyloid PET was 4%/29%/58% when assessed at starting ages 65, 75, and 85. Conclusions AD amyloid staging is a critical predictor of lifetime risk for cognitive impairment, underscoring its importance in guiding treatment decisions if interventions are approved for preclinical AD in the future. Effective patient evaluation should focus on biomarker‐based amyloid staging rather than simple binary biomarker classification, with careful consideration of age, sex, and APOE4 status to ensure a comprehensive benefit‐risk assessment for future therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers are essential for visualizing pathology in Alzheimer’s (AD). High detectability to tau is crucial for early detection and monitoring of tau deposition. This study compares the noise to dynamic range ratio (NRR) of [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]MK6240, [ 18 F]PI2620, and [ 18 F]RO948, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Methods 460 individuals from the HEAD study (23 cognitively unimpaired (CU) young, 249 CU old and 188 cognitively impaired) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 tau‐PET scans; 94 additionally received [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948. A subset of 28 individuals (15 CU and 13 CI) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 follow‐up scans (1.5 ± 0.1 years later). Annual change was measured as [(followup‐baseline)/time between scans]. Noise was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of CU Aβ‐ participants aged ≤65 (SD CUAβ‐≤65 ). The dynamic range was calculated as the SD across all subjects (SD range ). A lower the NRR (=SD CUAβ‐≤65 /SD range ) indicates more detectability. Analyses were performed at both region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise levels. Results Across the whole cohort, [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited lower NRR than [ 18 F]FTP in all regions. Voxel‐wise, differences were most pronounced in the frontal medial temporal regions (Figure 1). Within the four‐tracers subset, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]FTP showed the highest NRR in Braak II, followed by [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]MK6240. In Braak IV‐VI, [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated the lowest values, followed by [ 18 F]PI2620, [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]RO948. Similarly, in metatemporal‐ROI and Braak III, [ 18 F]MK6240 remained the lowest, however followed by [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 (Figure 2). Lower [ 18 F]MK6240 NRR was due to larger SD range , while [ 18 F]FTP's lower values stemmed from smaller SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Conversely, high [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 values are driven by larger SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Longitudinal analyses further confirmed that [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited the lowest NRR across the entire brain, including AD‐related regions, with voxel‐wise differences mainly in the temporal and parietal lobes. Conclusion Tau‐PET tracers exhibit significant variability in detectability. [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated lower NRR, implying better detectability across all regions, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Despite differences in NRR, [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]PI2620 followed similar pattern. These results provide insights into the differential tracer detectability, helping guide their optimal use in detecting and tracking tau pathology. Ongoing follow‐up scans will further clarify longitudinal tracer detectability and its implications for tau progression in AD.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers have been used to monitor the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, different tracers present distinct patterns of binding throughout the brain, challenging the harmonization of their findings. Leveraging the HEAD Study, the largest head‐to‐head study of tau‐PET tracers, we recently developed the Uniτ scale, which cross‐sectionally harmonizes Flortaucipir and MK6240 onto a universal tau‐PET measurement. Here, we provide a preliminary evaluation of the Uniτ scale’s longitudinal performance in HEAD and two independent cohorts. Methods We assessed 422 individuals across the AD spectrum with longitudinal tau‐PET from three cohorts: HEAD [13 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 9 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240], ADNI [74 CU, 208 CI, tracer: Flortaucipir], and TRIAD [72 CU, 46 CI, tracer: MK6240]. Standardized uptake ratios (SUVRs) were harmonized to Uniτ using the Uniτ Ecosystem ( unitau.app ). Braak I‐II and the Meta‐Temporal regions were used as regions of interest. Annual tau‐PET uptake change was calculated, and the effect size was defined as the mean annual change divided by its standard deviation. Results In HEAD, annual change in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II across CU and CI was only detectable in MK6240 (Figure 1A). However, both tracers detected significant annual changes in the Meta‐Temporal ROI for CI (Figure 1B). In both ADNI (Flortaucipir) and TRIAD (MK6240), changes in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II regions were not significant (Figures 2‐3A). However, across all cohorts, the Meta‐Temporal ROI consistently showed detectable annual tau‐PET increases—most pronounced among CI—leading to larger effect sizes than in Braak I‐II (Figures 1‐3B). The Uniτ harmonization did not fundamentally alter the pattern of the findings. However, in ADNI (Flortaucipir), Uniτ yielded a slightly higher effect size than SUVR in CU for both Braak I‐II and Meta‐Temporal regions. Conclusion In this large longitudinal sample, our findings confirm that Flortaucipir and MK6240 can detect tau PET changes over time likely associated with the progression of tau tangle pathology. While MK6240 appears to show greater progression in CU, both tracers progress similarly in CI. Our data also suggested that Uniτ harmonized tau PET measurements maintain the longitudinal characteristics of each tau PET tracer for use in clinical trials.

Abstract Background The Joint Propagation Model (JPM)‐based CenTauR scale was recently introduced to harmonize tau‐PET quantification across different radiotracers. This study examined how CenTauR harmonization enhances the comparability of tau‐PET quantification across matched cohorts using different tracers. The evaluation focused on three key aspects: (1) comparing tau‐PET positivity rates as defined by CenTauR, (2) evaluating its diagnostic accuracy for symptomatic AD, and (3) analyzing longitudinal changes in tau‐PET rates over time. Method The JPM, developed by the CPAD‐led Tau PET Harmonization Working Group (Leuzy et al., Alzheimers Dement. 2024; Figure 1A), models relationships between anchor point subjects and head‐to‐head tau‐PET SUVR data onto the CenTauR scale, providing conversion equations for multiple tracers. JPM equations were applied to [¹⁸F]flortaucipir SUVR (Meta‐temporal ROI) data from 561 cognitively impaired participants in the ADNI and OASIS‐3 studies. Using ROC analysis, we determined the CenTauR cut‐off for positivity (T+) that maximized the Youden index for discriminating between FDA‐approved positive/negative visual reads. Three separate cohorts, scanned using [¹⁸F]flortaucipir (ADNI), [¹⁸F]MK‐6240 (CPAS), and [¹⁸F]RO‐948 (BioFINDER‐2), were matched 1:1 by age, MMSE, amyloid‐β, and clinical diagnosis. CenTauR‐based metrics were compared across these cohorts. Result A cut‐off of 18 CenTauRs was found to optimally classify [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET visual reads (Figure 1B). The matching procedure identified 1089 participants (363 per cohort). The frequency of T+ using the 18 CenTauRs cut‐off for the Meta‐Temporal ROI was highly comparable across tracers across groups, except for the Aβ‐positive cognitively unimpaired group, where variability was more pronounced due to a smaller sample size (Figure 2A). Similarly, tau‐PET discriminative accuracy for symptomatic AD vs controls remained similar across [ 18 F]flortaucipir and [ 18 F]MK‐6240 (Figure 2B). In a separate sample of 212 matched participants from ADNI ([¹⁸F]flortaucipir) and AIBL ([¹⁸F]MK‐6240) with baseline and 1‐year follow‐up tau‐PET scans, 1‐year change in CenTauRs was comparable (Figure 2C). An exploratory voxelwise transformation, utilizing the Meta‐Temporal conversion equation in a representative case scanned with both [¹⁸F]flortaucipir and [¹⁸F]MK‐6240, demonstrates the potential for voxelwise CenTauR harmonization (Figure 3). Conclusion These analyses suggest that CenTauR harmonization increases the comparability of tau‐PET data acquired with different tracers. Additional validation analyses with larger cohorts including other radiotracers ([¹⁸F]PI‐2620) are underway.