Finn, Quentin

Abstract Background Precise cross‐tracer harmonization of tau PET imaging is essential for comparing tau burden across different tracers and studies. Here, we evaluated the performance of the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ) in harmonizing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 tau PET images into a universal scale. Method We assessed 485 individuals across aging and AD spectrum scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, and a subset of 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. We generated tau PET SUVRs using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference with a common 8mm FWHM. We estimated Uniτ parameters on a training set ( n = 200) by fitting a smoothed hyperbolic tangent equation to the Meta‐Temporal ROI anchored in the mean SUVR of young participants and the 90th percentile from cognitively impaired individuals. We compared tau positivity on the Uniτ scale with classifications from SUVRs (mean + 3 SD from Youngs). We applied the same equation to all brain voxels to generate Uniτ 3D images. Then, we extracted mean Uniτ values for key ROIs and correlated them with ROI‐based Uniτ values to evaluate voxel‐wise estimates. Result Using tracer‐specific parameters, Uniτ harmonized Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 to the same scale, aligning values near the identity line and confirming its applicability across tau PET tracers (Figure 1). For Flortaucipir, Uniτ tau positivity matched original SUVR classifications (ground truth), with only one mismatch for MK6240 (Figure 1). Applying the Uniτ transformation to all brain voxels effectively harmonized 3D images to a common scale, reducing visual variabilities (Figure 2). Furthermore, ROI‐based estimates and those extracted from the 3D Uniτ images were identical (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate that tau PET tracers can be harmonized to a common scale using a large head‐to‐head dataset. The Uniτ scale can harmonize entire 3D tau PET images, suggesting that there is no need to use pre‐established ROIs, which would constrain the analysis to a few brain regions. Uniτ is freely accessible across platforms ( www.unitau.app ) for ROI and 3D tau PET harmonization.

Abstract Background Tau PET measures are inherently continuous and applying dichotomized thresholds introduces conceptual and analytical idiosyncrasies. Understanding the limitations in the transition from tau‐negative to tau‐positive classifications is crucial for the effective use of these thresholds. This study aims to determine the confidence levels of tau PET thresholds of abnormality for different tau PET tracers by characterizing their “gray zone” using the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ, www.unitau.app ). Method We evaluated 485 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with head‐to‐head scans for MK6240 and Flortaucipir. Uniτ estimates were derived from the Meta‐Temporal ROI. Tau positivity (T+) was defined as Uniτ values exceeding the mean plus 3 SD of individuals younger than 28 years ( n = 24). Two physicians independently performed a visual assessment of tau positivity for each tracer, with agreement indicating clear tau pathology (TVR+). Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of TVR+ across Uniτ values for each tracer ( n = 189, CU elderly Aβ‐ and CI Aβ+). Individuals were classified as negative, positive, or within a “gray zone” between the most liberal T+ threshold and varying TVR+ probability thresholds (50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 99%). Result The Uniτ gray zone, defined as a function of TVR+ probabilities, demonstrated consistency between the two tracers, with differences observed only in the decimal range. The most liberal Uniτ threshold for T+ was 11.0 for both MK6240 and Flortaucipir, closely matching the 50% TVR+ probability threshold (11.1 for MK6240 and 11.7 for Flortaucipir). Higher TVR+ probabilities corresponded to increased Uniτ values with MK6240 and Flortaucipir showing near‐identical values between the tracers: 14.2 and 14.8 for 75%, 17.3 and 17.9 for 90%, 19.4 and 19.9 for 95%, and 24.1 and 24.6 for 99%, respectively (Figure 1). In total, 26 participants fell within the gray zone for MK6240, compared to 47 participants for Flortaucipir. Conclusion These findings highlight the potential of Uniτ to provide a standardized approach for assessing tau positivity across tracers. By combining quantitative Uniτ measures with visual assessments, we enhance the understanding of tau positivity certainty, particularly in the transition between negative and positive classifications.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers have been used to monitor the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, different tracers present distinct patterns of binding throughout the brain, challenging the harmonization of their findings. Leveraging the HEAD Study, the largest head‐to‐head study of tau‐PET tracers, we recently developed the Uniτ scale, which cross‐sectionally harmonizes Flortaucipir and MK6240 onto a universal tau‐PET measurement. Here, we provide a preliminary evaluation of the Uniτ scale's longitudinal performance in HEAD and two independent cohorts. Methods We assessed 422 individuals across the AD spectrum with longitudinal tau‐PET from three cohorts: HEAD [13 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 9 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240], ADNI [74 CU, 208 CI, tracer: Flortaucipir], and TRIAD [72 CU, 46 CI, tracer: MK6240]. Standardized uptake ratios (SUVRs) were harmonized to Uniτ using the Uniτ Ecosystem ( unitau.app ). Braak I‐II and the Meta‐Temporal regions were used as regions of interest. Annual tau‐PET uptake change was calculated, and the effect size was defined as the mean annual change divided by its standard deviation. Results In HEAD, annual change in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II across CU and CI was only detectable in MK6240 (Figure 1A). However, both tracers detected significant annual changes in the Meta‐Temporal ROI for CI (Figure 1B). In both ADNI (Flortaucipir) and TRIAD (MK6240), changes in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II regions were not significant (Figures 2‐3A). However, across all cohorts, the Meta‐Temporal ROI consistently showed detectable annual tau‐PET increases—most pronounced among CI—leading to larger effect sizes than in Braak I‐II (Figures 1‐3B). The Uniτ harmonization did not fundamentally alter the pattern of the findings. However, in ADNI (Flortaucipir), Uniτ yielded a slightly higher effect size than SUVR in CU for both Braak I‐II and Meta‐Temporal regions. Conclusion In this large longitudinal sample, our findings confirm that Flortaucipir and MK6240 can detect tau PET changes over time likely associated with the progression of tau tangle pathology. While MK6240 appears to show greater progression in CU, both tracers progress similarly in CI. Our data also suggested that Uniτ harmonized tau PET measurements maintain the longitudinal characteristics of each tau PET tracer for use in clinical trials.

Abstract Background HEAD is a longitudinal, multi‐site, non‐randomized study aiming to harmonize different tau PET tracers onto a common scale for enrichment and monitoring of anti‐tau clinical trials. To achieve this, the Uniτ scale is being developed using data from participants scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, with a subset also scanned with PI2620 and RO948. However, access to the Uniτ scale has been limited to the study community and collaborators. To address this limitation, we have developed the Uniτ Ecosystem – a set of tools for tau PET harmonization designed to support research and clinical trials ( www.unitau.app ). Method The Uniτ Ecosystem was developed for multiple operating systems (Web/macOS/Windows/Ubuntu) (Figure 1) and currently include four tools. The Uniτ harmonization is an online ROI harmonization module that allows the user to harmonize SUVRs from spreadsheets. The Uniτ packages (R, Python and MATLAB) facilitates the transformation of SUVR values to the Uniτ scale using the most used programming languages in research settings. The Uniτ calculator app allows rapid and convenient harmonization. The Uniτ desktop app is a 3D harmonization module for voxel‐wise harmonization. The Uniτ parameters were calculated using a training set of 200 participants with head‐to‐head MK6240 and Flortaucipir, and 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. Researchers can use their own datasets and convert tau PET data to the Uniτ scale. Result The online ROI harmonization module allows users to harmonize tau PET SUVRs uploaded from spreadsheets and offers interactive visualizations such as scatter plots and histograms for tau positivity thresholds (Figure 2). The calculator app enables users to harmonize single SUVR values effortlessly. The desktop application for 3D tau PET harmonization leverages the functionalities of the previous modules to harmonize entire 3D images, eliminating the need for predefined ROIs. Additionally, this module provides visualization tools for the parametric Uniτ images in 2D and 3D (Figure 3). Uniτ tools never store any data on any external servers. Conclusion The Uniτ Ecosystem represents a significant advance in tau PET harmonization, providing a user‐friendly platform to harmonize and visualize tau PET data for research and clinical trials.

Abstract Background HEAD is a longitudinal, multi‐site, non‐randomized study aiming to harmonize different tau PET tracers onto a common scale for enrichment and monitoring of anti‐tau clinical trials. To achieve this, the Uniτ scale is being developed using data from participants scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, with a subset also scanned with PI2620 and RO948. However, access to the Uniτ scale has been limited to the study community and collaborators. To address this limitation, we have developed the Uniτ Ecosystem – a set of tools for tau PET harmonization designed to support research and clinical trials ( www.unitau.app ). Method The Uniτ Ecosystem was developed for multiple operating systems (Web/macOS/Windows/Ubuntu) (Figure 1) and currently include four tools. The Uniτ harmonization is an online ROI harmonization module that allows the user to harmonize SUVRs from spreadsheets. The Uniτ packages (R, Python and MATLAB) facilitates the transformation of SUVR values to the Uniτ scale using the most used programming languages in research settings. The Uniτ calculator app allows rapid and convenient harmonization. The Uniτ desktop app is a 3D harmonization module for voxel‐wise harmonization. The Uniτ parameters were calculated using a training set of 200 participants with head‐to‐head MK6240 and Flortaucipir, and 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. Researchers can use their own datasets and convert tau PET data to the Uniτ scale. Result The online ROI harmonization module allows users to harmonize tau PET SUVRs uploaded from spreadsheets and offers interactive visualizations such as scatter plots and histograms for tau positivity thresholds (Figure 2). The calculator app enables users to harmonize single SUVR values effortlessly. The desktop application for 3D tau PET harmonization leverages the functionalities of the previous modules to harmonize entire 3D images, eliminating the need for predefined ROIs. Additionally, this module provides visualization tools for the parametric Uniτ images in 2D and 3D (Figure 3). Uniτ tools never store any data on any external servers. Conclusion The Uniτ Ecosystem represents a significant advance in tau PET harmonization, providing a user‐friendly platform to harmonize and visualize tau PET data for research and clinical trials.

Abstract Background Precise cross‐tracer harmonization of tau PET imaging is essential for comparing tau burden across different tracers and studies. Here, we evaluated the performance of the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ) in harmonizing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 tau PET images into a universal scale. Method We assessed 485 individuals across aging and AD spectrum scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, and a subset of 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. We generated tau PET SUVRs using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference with a common 8mm FWHM. We estimated Uniτ parameters on a training set ( n = 200) by fitting a smoothed hyperbolic tangent equation to the Meta‐Temporal ROI anchored in the mean SUVR of young participants and the 90th percentile from cognitively impaired individuals. We compared tau positivity on the Uniτ scale with classifications from SUVRs (mean + 3 SD from Youngs). We applied the same equation to all brain voxels to generate Uniτ 3D images. Then, we extracted mean Uniτ values for key ROIs and correlated them with ROI‐based Uniτ values to evaluate voxel‐wise estimates. Result Using tracer‐specific parameters, Uniτ harmonized Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 to the same scale, aligning values near the identity line and confirming its applicability across tau PET tracers (Figure 1). For Flortaucipir, Uniτ tau positivity matched original SUVR classifications (ground truth), with only one mismatch for MK6240 (Figure 1). Applying the Uniτ transformation to all brain voxels effectively harmonized 3D images to a common scale, reducing visual variabilities (Figure 2). Furthermore, ROI‐based estimates and those extracted from the 3D Uniτ images were identical (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate that tau PET tracers can be harmonized to a common scale using a large head‐to‐head dataset. The Uniτ scale can harmonize entire 3D tau PET images, suggesting that there is no need to use pre‐established ROIs, which would constrain the analysis to a few brain regions. Uniτ is freely accessible across platforms ( www.unitau.app ) for ROI and 3D tau PET harmonization.

Abstract Background Tau PET measures are inherently continuous and applying dichotomized thresholds introduces conceptual and analytical idiosyncrasies. Understanding the limitations in the transition from tau‐negative to tau‐positive classifications is crucial for the effective use of these thresholds. This study aims to determine the confidence levels of tau PET thresholds of abnormality for different tau PET tracers by characterizing their "gray zone" using the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ, www.unitau.app ). Method We evaluated 485 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with head‐to‐head scans for MK6240 and Flortaucipir. Uniτ estimates were derived from the Meta‐Temporal ROI. Tau positivity (T+) was defined as Uniτ values exceeding the mean plus 3 SD of individuals younger than 28 years ( n = 24). Two physicians independently performed a visual assessment of tau positivity for each tracer, with agreement indicating clear tau pathology (TVR+). Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of TVR+ across Uniτ values for each tracer ( n = 189, CU elderly Aβ‐ and CI Aβ+). Individuals were classified as negative, positive, or within a "gray zone" between the most liberal T+ threshold and varying TVR+ probability thresholds (50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 99%). Result The Uniτ gray zone, defined as a function of TVR+ probabilities, demonstrated consistency between the two tracers, with differences observed only in the decimal range. The most liberal Uniτ threshold for T+ was 11.0 for both MK6240 and Flortaucipir, closely matching the 50% TVR+ probability threshold (11.1 for MK6240 and 11.7 for Flortaucipir). Higher TVR+ probabilities corresponded to increased Uniτ values with MK6240 and Flortaucipir showing near‐identical values between the tracers: 14.2 and 14.8 for 75%, 17.3 and 17.9 for 90%, 19.4 and 19.9 for 95%, and 24.1 and 24.6 for 99%, respectively (Figure 1). In total, 26 participants fell within the gray zone for MK6240, compared to 47 participants for Flortaucipir. Conclusion These findings highlight the potential of Uniτ to provide a standardized approach for assessing tau positivity across tracers. By combining quantitative Uniτ measures with visual assessments, we enhance the understanding of tau positivity certainty, particularly in the transition between negative and positive classifications.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers have been used to monitor the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, different tracers present distinct patterns of binding throughout the brain, challenging the harmonization of their findings. Leveraging the HEAD Study, the largest head‐to‐head study of tau‐PET tracers, we recently developed the Uniτ scale, which cross‐sectionally harmonizes Flortaucipir and MK6240 onto a universal tau‐PET measurement. Here, we provide a preliminary evaluation of the Uniτ scale’s longitudinal performance in HEAD and two independent cohorts. Methods We assessed 422 individuals across the AD spectrum with longitudinal tau‐PET from three cohorts: HEAD [13 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 9 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240], ADNI [74 CU, 208 CI, tracer: Flortaucipir], and TRIAD [72 CU, 46 CI, tracer: MK6240]. Standardized uptake ratios (SUVRs) were harmonized to Uniτ using the Uniτ Ecosystem ( unitau.app ). Braak I‐II and the Meta‐Temporal regions were used as regions of interest. Annual tau‐PET uptake change was calculated, and the effect size was defined as the mean annual change divided by its standard deviation. Results In HEAD, annual change in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II across CU and CI was only detectable in MK6240 (Figure 1A). However, both tracers detected significant annual changes in the Meta‐Temporal ROI for CI (Figure 1B). In both ADNI (Flortaucipir) and TRIAD (MK6240), changes in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II regions were not significant (Figures 2‐3A). However, across all cohorts, the Meta‐Temporal ROI consistently showed detectable annual tau‐PET increases—most pronounced among CI—leading to larger effect sizes than in Braak I‐II (Figures 1‐3B). The Uniτ harmonization did not fundamentally alter the pattern of the findings. However, in ADNI (Flortaucipir), Uniτ yielded a slightly higher effect size than SUVR in CU for both Braak I‐II and Meta‐Temporal regions. Conclusion In this large longitudinal sample, our findings confirm that Flortaucipir and MK6240 can detect tau PET changes over time likely associated with the progression of tau tangle pathology. While MK6240 appears to show greater progression in CU, both tracers progress similarly in CI. Our data also suggested that Uniτ harmonized tau PET measurements maintain the longitudinal characteristics of each tau PET tracer for use in clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundThe HEAD study focuses on collecting an extensive dataset from various tau‐PET tracers, aiming to establish robust anchor values, which are essential for harmonizing tau‐PET measurements. Here, we aim to showcase the capability of converting 3D tau‐PET images into a common scale using the Universal Tau‐PET Scale, Uniτ (tau), and to use these 3D images to subsequently obtain ROIs as needed.MethodsWe assessed 185 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET tracers. Tau‐PET SUVR images were standardized to a common 8mm FWHM, using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. We generated Uniτ Tau‐PET 3D images using a single formula based on Meta‐temporal parameters in two steps: first, within‐tracer anchoring based on young (<25 years) and cognitively impaired individuals; second, between‐tracer anchoring using a piecewise transformation from [18F]Flortaucipir to [18F]MK‐6240, with smoothing at the piecewise inflection point. Subsequently, we extracted mean Uniτ values from these 3D images for key ROIs, including meta‐temporal, mesial, temporo‐parietal, frontal, and Braak stages III‐VI. Finally, we correlated Uniτ values across ROIs between the two tracers to evaluate the accuracy of estimates from the voxel‐wise transformation.ResultsThe original SUVR images present large differences between the two tau‐PET tracers (Figure 1). However, upon applying the Uniτ piecewise transformation with smoothing to all brain voxels, we were able to reasonably harmonize these images to the Uniτ scale, substantially reducing visual variability. Notably, the mean Uniτ values for the ROIs extracted from these harmonized 3D tau‐PET brain images demonstrated a high level of association between the two tracers (Figure 2). Furthermore, estimates generated from ROIs or extracted from our 3D parametric Uniτ model yielded identical estimates (Figure 3).ConclusionThe strong associations between tracers after directly harmonizing 3D images to Uniτ scale using the piecewise transformation with smoothing, underscore the effectiveness of the proposed method. This approach provides a reliable and standardized way to compare tau‐PET data across different tracers. Our results indicate the feasibility of harmonizing 3D tau‐PET images without relying on pre‐established ROIs, overcoming the limitation of restricting the analysis to only few brain regions.

AbstractBackgroundHarmonization of the two most commonly used Tau PET tracers, 18F‐Flortaucipir and 18F‐MK6240 has proven to be complex. Unlike the centiloid scale for amyloid tracers, Tau PET SUVRs of the two tracers are not linearly comparable and vary markedly in dynamic range and sensitivity.MethodTau PET SUVRs for Braak stage (1‐6) in 18F‐MK6240 and 18F‐Flortaucipir were obtained from the Longitudinal multicenter head‐to‐head harmonization of tau‐PET tracers (HEAD) project. For training, we used 13 amyloid confirmed AD, 24 amyloid confirmed MCI and 66 amyloid negative controls. To assess linearity and correlations with neuropsychological tests, we included the training data as well as 74 subjects of unknown or inconsistent amyloid status. Two methods of generating outcome measures were used. (1) As a stand‐in for Tau load, similar to the centiloid scale, a score of 100, 50 or 0 was given to participants of the training set by multiplying CDR score by 100. Hierarchical and ridge regression were performed for each tracer using PET‐Braak SUVRs as predictive variables. Regression coefficients were used to calculate an outcome measure for all participants. (2) Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied for each tracer to the vectors of PET‐Braak regional SUVR of the training subset. Projections along the principal axis were calculated for both modalitiesResultHierarchical, ridge regression and PCA all yielded composite measures with good linear dependence between the two tracers (r2 for hierarchical, ridge and PCA were 0.84, 0.80, 0.80, respectively). Regions remaining in the hierarchical regression analyses varied between tracers: predictive regions for 18F‐MK6240 were PET‐Braak 1, 4 and 5, while 18F‐Flortaucipir used only PET‐Braak 1 and 5. Composite measures correlated well with MMSE and total MOCA score with all composite measures r < ‐0.61.ConclusionWhile both tracers may have different sensitivities to regional Tau distributions and disease stages, weighting multiple regions differently for each tracer gives a composite score linearly comparable across tracers that correlates with neuropsychological measures. This study is limited by the low total tau load and impairment level of all participants and would benefit from the inclusion of patients with more disease progression.