Wang, Xue

Abstract Background African Americans (AA) are twice as likely to develop dementia than non‐Hispanic Whites but remain underrepresented in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) research. Recent studies have identified AA specific risk factors for AD. Therefore, targeted biomarkers and/or therapies may be needed to effectively treat AD in AA. In this study, we aimed to determine if genetic variants that show association with AD‐risk, plasma transcript or protein levels in AA, may serve as accurate and accessible AD biomarkers. Method In 189 clinically diagnosed AA AD cases and 183 AA cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls, we performed targeted DNA sequencing of 10 AD‐associated loci. Genetic variants at these loci were tested for association with corresponding plasma transcripts and total tau protein levels previously measured in this cohort using a custom nanoString panel and Simoa assays, respectively. Utilizing phased haplotypes (SHAPEIT4) from target sequencing, we inferred local ancestry (RFMix v2) using five superpopulations from the 1000 Genomes Project as anchors. Subsequently, we tested the association of each ancestry specific allelic dosages with endophenotypes using Tractor. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the most significant e/pQTLs were added sequentially to a base model that included age and sex to identify e/pQTLs that improved the accuracy to correctly classify AD cases and CU controls. Result Of the 5,112 variants that were tested, 70 were nominally associated with AD‐risk and with plasma transcript or protein levels. Seven of these 70 variants also showed nominally significant associations of AD‐risk and transcript levels with either African or East Asian local ancestry. ROC analysis of age, sex, 33 e/pQTLs in APOE , SORL1 , TLR4 , EPHA1 , ABCA7 , CLU , and CR1 , and plasma levels of APP, ABCA7, AKAP9, CD14, CLU, and APOE ‐ɛ4 dosage achieved 88.2% area under the curve to discriminate AD vs. CU, a 30.4% improvement over the base model that only included age and sex. Conclusion Plasma transcript levels and e/pQTLs are promising diagnostic biomarkers for AD that may improve accessibility and reduce costs for a more accurate diagnosis of AD.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder with rapid progression to death. Multiple efforts to develop a disease‐modifying therapy for PSP have yet to succeed. We previously reported the discovery of three potential therapeutic targets for PSP. These three genes, DDR2, KANK2, and STOM, are consistently upregulated in the brains of PSP patients and mouse models of tauopathy. Reducing their expression in a drosophila model significantly rescued the tau‐induced eye degeneration and tau seeding activity. To translate these targets into the clinic, we are developing antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) as potential therapies. Method We screened candidate ASOs in neuroglioma cell line H4. ASO hits were validated for their potency and safety. We also used iPSC‐derived neurons from PSP patients to test the potency and potential toxicity of our ASOs. To investigate target engagement, therapeutic efficacy and preliminary pharmacodynamic properties, we treated iPSC‐derived midbrain organoids with the ASO leads. Lastly, we will assess the off‐target effects of the ASOs by investigating the levels of mRNA transcripts that share similar sequences as our targets using RNAseq. Result Our in vitro screening identified ASO leads that significantly reduce the target gene expressions at mRNA and protein levels in a dose‐dependent manner. The ASO hits also exhibit low cellular toxicity in the H4 cell line. Upon treating iPSC neurons with ASO hits, we were able to validate the dose‐dependent reduction of target mRNAs. Cell viability analysis indicated low toxicity, suggesting that these ASOs are potent and safe. In midbrain organoid model, DDR2‐targeting ASO showed time‐dependent target engagement and were prioritized for further development. Conclusion We developed candidate therapeutics for PSP using ASOs that silence novel therapeutic targets discovered in our systems based cross‐species screening. We showed that our ASOs have low toxicity and confirmed target engagement at both mRNA and protein levels in vitro. The results suggest a favorable preclinical profile of our ASO leads that warrants additional investigations. Importantly, PSP shares congruent pathophysiological changes with other tauopathies, such as Alzheimer’s disease. These common perturbed pathways indicate that our ASOs can be potentially repurposed for multiple neurodegenerative tauopathies.

Abstract Background More than 85% of Alzheimer's disease (AD) donor brains exhibit some degree of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which is characterized predominantly by Aβ40 deposits in the brain vasculature and can cause blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage. CAA is associated with risk of infarcts, cerebral hemorrhages, and cognitive decline. Brain cell type‐specific mechanisms that influence CAA pathology, as well as related measures such as Aβ40 biochemical measures and tight junction proteins, an indicator of BBB integrity, are still elusive. Method We performed single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue from 79 AD donors, with varying levels of CAA co‐pathology. Measurements of soluble, insoluble and membrane‐associated fractions of brain Aβ40 and tight junction protein (claudin‐5, occludin) levels were available for these donors. We correlated these measures with cell proportions. We also conducted differential gene expression and analyses for intercellular communications and regulatory networks. Result We identified 25 clusters and annotated them with major brain cell types. There were 3 oligodendrocyte, 7 excitatory and 7 inhibitory neuronal, 2 microglial, 2 astrocytic, and 1 each for endothelial, pericytic, fibroblast, and oligodendrocyte precursor cell clusters. We found that higher CAA and Aβ40 levels correlate with reduced neuronal and increased microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Increased tight junction proteins correlate with increased inhibitory neuronal and reduced microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Among all clusters, one microglial, both astrocytic and the pericytic clusters have greater number of genes significantly associated with CAA, Aβ40 and tight junction protein levels. Most significant genes have negative associations with CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and positive with tight junction protein measures. Using these genes as input for intercellular communications analysis, we prioritized ligand‐target interactions from microglia or astrocytes to pericytes. Some of the prioritized targets are transcription factors in pericytes. Using regulon analysis, we identified genes downstream of these transcription factors that are also significantly associated with lower CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and higher tight junction protein levels. Conclusion We revealed glia‐to‐pericytes intercellular interactions and pericytic gene regulatory networks that are potentially perturbed by CAA and BBB breakdown. Future directions include analyzing external snRNAseq datasets and performing functional validations.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2, respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Individual environmental exposures, the exposome, can play an influential role in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD. The protein components of the main AD neuropathologies, amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), can be measured using immunohistochemical and biochemical approaches. The main genetic risk factor for AD is the APOE e4 allele. APOE levels can also be measured in the brain. We hypothesize that social determinants of health, specifically alcohol and tobacco consumption, and the area deprivation index (ADI), could play a considerable role in severity of neuropathology and brain biochemical phenotypes of AD. Method We evaluated 478 neuropathologically characterized AD donors, from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank. 469 samples had available biochemical measures (APOE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and phospho‐tau (Thr231)), collected across three isolated fractions (soluble (TBS), membrane‐bound (TX), and insoluble (FA)) of the superior temporal gyrus. Exposome variables were extracted from the available records. ADI from the Neighborhood Atlas® version from the year 2015 was obtained from de‐identified addresses. ADI, smoking and alcohol were available for 263 of these donors and were examined for association with biochemical measures using linear regression adjusting for age at death and sex. Result Higher ADI levels representing neighborhoods with increased deprivation, were nominally associated (β=0.006, p =0.01) with soluble levels of APOE. Alcohol consumption was associated with lower levels of membrane bound APOE (β=‐0.23, p =0.04). Analysis with neuropathological variables including CAA ( N =454), Braak ( N =454), Thal ( N =454), Hippocampal sclerosis ( N =453), Lewy bodies ( N =455) will also be performed. Conclusion Different components of the social exposome may impact levels of core AD proteins. Additional analyses in expanded cohorts to further explore the associations with neuropathology are ongoing. We expect that understanding how the social exposome impacts specific aspects of neurodegenerative diseases will provide key insights into underlying, potentially modifiable, mechanisms of disease.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2 , respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is pathologically characterized by the presence of extracellular amyloid beta plaques and intracellular tau tangles. Related disorders share aspects of AD pathology including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a tauopathy, and pathologic aging (PA) defined by presence of amyloid but not tau. We hypothesize that there are shared, and distinct, brain molecular changes associated with amyloid and tau protein levels in AD and related disorders and that identifying these will provide novel insights into disease pathogenesis. Methods We collected brain multiomics measures (genetic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, proteomic and metabolomic) from donors diagnosed with AD, PSP, PA and controls. Following quality control and normalization, omics measures were tested for association with disease diagnosis and amyloid and tau neuropathology using regression models adjusting for relevant covariates. Association with biochemical measures of core AD proteins were also assessed in a subset of AD cases. Gene sets were evaluated for enrichment of cellular pathways and cell type signatures. Results We found remarkably conserved transcriptomic changes associated with AD and PSP, and downregulation of myelination pathway genes in both diseases. Among PSP cases, we found divergent patterns of transcriptional associations with distinct tau lesions. In a cohort of AD cases, we found broad transcriptional and epigenetic dysregulation associated with levels of tau protein, but not amyloid beta. Conversely a genetic analysis implicated more variants associated with amyloid levels than tau. Conclusion Multi‐omics studies across various proteinopathies can identify convergent and divergent molecular signatures that are candidates for shared therapeutic targets and disease differentiating biomarkers.