Petersen, R. C.

Abstract Background To promote equitable access to neurologic diagnostics, our team developed MASTERMIND—the Mobile Assessment of Speech To Evaluate, Recognize, and Monitor Indicators of Neurologic health and Disease. One subtest, the MASTERMIND Assessment of Naming, includes ten pictures randomly selected from a list of 45 words varying in frequency. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the feasibility of a remotely self‐administered naming test for patients with cognitive, linguistic, and/or communication difficulties and 2) assess the sensitivity and specificity of performance measures (accuracy, error type, and response time) for detecting aphasia and cognitive‐communication difficulties. Method The task was remotely administered to 138 controls, 26 cognitively impaired individuals, 15 with motor speech disorders, 8 with cognitive concerns, and 6 with aphasia. Participants named pictures displayed on‐screen, advancing through the task by clicking “Next.” Responses were processed using natural language processing (NLP). Audio was transcribed with Whisper Large‐v3, and responses were matched to stimuli within a 0.4‐second threshold. Errors were categorized by type (semantic, phonemic, or unclear source) through consensus between two raters. Performance metrics (accuracy, error type, response time) were analyzed using Kruskal‐Wallis and Pearson's Chi‐Square tests, with AUROC analysis evaluating diagnostic performance. Results Differences in accuracy, response time, and error type were observed across groups (Table 1). Controls and cognitively impaired participants performed similarly, with longer response times observed in patients with aphasia and motor speech disorders. Accuracy alone was a poor predictor of all patients versus controls (AUROC = 0.468) but prediction was better in distinguishing aphasia patients from 1) controls (AUROC = 0.698), 2) cognitively impaired participants (AUROC = 0.679), and 3) those with MSDs (AUROC = 0.670). Conclusions The MASTERMIND Assessment of Naming is a feasible, scalable, self‐administered diagnostic tool enhanced by automated NLP. It provides critical insights through response time, accuracy, and error analysis. Limitations include potential bias in error classification and fixed processing thresholds. The study highlights MASTERMIND's potential for patient triaging and screening. Future research will evaluate the sensitivity of combined performance metrics to disease progression, expand sample sizes and diversity, and refine usability based on participant feedback.

Abstract Background The last several decades have seen intense research into Alzheimer’s disease (AD) resulting in several current and emerging disease modifying treatments that target hallmarks of the AD pathology. Previous evidence has indicated that neurologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) frequently lack knowledge of the most recent findings pertaining to the use of biomarkers and antibody‐based therapies in AD. An online CME program was developed to educate neurologists and PCPs on biomarker and therapeutic data in AD from a 2024 dementia conference. Method The online CME activity consisted of a chapterized 30‐minute video presentation featuring dementia specialists who reviewed data from a 2024 dementia conference on biomarkers or therapeutics. Educational effect was assessed by comparing a matched sample of responses to four identical questions presented before and directly after exposure to the intervention. A paired samples t‐test assessed the number of correct responses and for confidence rating; McNemar’s test was used to identify significant differences between pre‐ and post‐assessment question responses. Cohen’s d was used to calculate the effect size of the online education. Data were collected between August 2024 and October 2024. Result A moderate educational effect was observed for both neurologist ( n =88; d =.77, p <0.001) and PCP ( n =141; d =.75, p <.001) learners. Both physician groups demonstrated significant (P <.05) pre‐ vs post‐educational improvements on the following: clinical data on AD diagnostic accuracy comparing blood‐based biomarker testing to a clinical diagnosis made by a physician and risk factors for amyloid‐relating imaging abnormalities associated with an approved anti‐amyloid therapy (AAT). PCPs, but not neurologists, demonstrated a pre‐post educational improvement on a question about outcomes from an open‐label extension study of an approved ATT. Participation in the activity resulted in 44% of neurologists and 48% of PCPs reporting an increase in confidence regarding their ability to apply the latest clinical data on approved AATs in clinical practice. Conclusion The results indicated that a CME‐certified 30‐minute video program was effective at improving knowledge among a diversity of physician learners regarding emerging data from a recent medical conference. Future CME should continue to highlight impactful new data released at medical conferences.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Self‐administered and remote digital cognitive assessments provide a scalable method for screening and longitudinal cognitive monitoring. Mayo Test Drive (MTD) is one such assessment with previously demonstrated usability, reliability, validity and multi‐device compatibility. MTD includes a computer‐adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span) and a measure of processing speed/executive functioning (Symbols Test) that combine to provide an MTD Composite. This study aimed to develop a conditional normative model predicting longitudinal cognitive change for MTD, and to validate the model in two independent samples of cognitively unimpaired (CU) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia (DEM) participants. Method 1355 CU participants at initial MTD assessment with 2‐4 consecutive MTD assessments every 7.5 months comprised the development dataset. Linear mixed effects models were used to construct a conditional normative model for MTD assessments 2‐4. The baseline model was chosen a priori , consisting of age, sex, education, baseline score, number of assessments, and time. Device type, race, and baseline score by time interactions were also considered. Variables were only added if a >1% increment in r‐squared was observed. The models were externally validated in 113 CU and 51 MCI/DEM patients. Following model development, the data were updated and additional follow‐up MTD assessments were added for many participants, including the addition of additional CU validation data at test 3 ( N = 126) and 4 ( N = 279). T‐tests compared observed and predicted differences and residual z‐scores between development and validation at each follow‐up assessment. Result Table 1 presents demographic variables. No additional variables increased the r‐squared by >1%. The final models are presented in Table 2. Age, baseline score, sex, and education were significant. Residual z‐scores were not significantly different between CU development and CU validation cohorts, indicating observed scores were in line with model predicted scores. Residual z‐scores were significantly worse among MCI/DEM compared to CU development in 11/12 comparisons (Figure 1), indicating observed scores were below model predicted expectations and implying sensitivity to longitudinal cognitive decline. Conclusion These longitudinal normative models can be used to identify individuals with follow‐up scores outside of expected predicted ranges, signifying abnormal longitudinal cognitive decline.

Abstract Background In addition to visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, most PCA patients also report deficits in visual attention, episodic memory, and working memory. The dorsal attention network is known to play a critical role in modulating these clinical functions. However, little is known about the relationship of the dorsal attention network with other core networks and relationships to volume loss and memory functions in PCA. Method Fifty‐seven PCA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group, Mayo Clinic, and compared to 60 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. The CONN functional connectivity toolbox was used to calculate within‐ and between‐network connectivity. Functional connectivity within the key regions (i.e., inter‐hemisphere connectivity) of the dorsal attention network, namely frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the entire network was generated. Functional connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the frontoparietal, visual, and default mode networks (DMN) were also generated using CONN's network parcellation atlas. Multivariate linear regression models were fit i) to compare within‐ and between‐network connectivity between both groups and ii) to assess relationships between within‐network connectivity and both gray matter volumes and clinical test scores. Result PCA showed reduced within‐network connectivity in the dorsal attention network, specifically within the IPS and the entire network compared to CU. An increase in between‐network connectivity between the frontoparietal network and both FEF and the entire dorsal attention network was noted in PCA compared to CU (Figure 1). Lower dorsal attention within‐network connectivity was associated with a trend for lower volumes in the entire network (Figure 2) and significantly lower scores on the auditory verbal learning test‐recognition percent correct (AVLT‐RCP) and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) III‐digit span backward in PCA (Figure 3). Conclusion These findings suggest that within‐ and between‐network connectivity of the dorsal attention network, both within key regions and the entire network, was disrupted in PCA patients. However, this network did not show disrupted connectivity with the core PCA networks. Within‐network connectivity disruptions in the dorsal attention network are associated with aspects of memory function, and to some extent, with volume loss.

Abstract Background Aging and dementia are generally associated with lower metabolism in gray matter on FDG‐PET and have been widely studied. However, white matter (WM) metabolic changes remain understudied. We investigated the metabolic changes in WM associated with aging and dementia and their relationships with established Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers and cognitive outcomes. Method We analyzed data from 3,169 participants (72 ± 9 years; 53% male; 65% cognitively unimpaired) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). All participants underwent baseline MRI, amyloid‐PET, and FDG‐PET scans, as well as neuropsychological evaluations, with at least one clinical follow‐up. Voxel‐wise multiple regression analysis identified WM metabolic changes associated with global cognition in cognitively unimpaired MCSA participants ( n = 1,754). Univariate analyses and structural equation models were applied to elucidate the driving factors underlying the WM metabolic changes in MCSA data. Multiple regression and linear mixed‐effects models evaluated the explanatory utility of WM metabolism for baseline global cognition and cognitive decline in both cohorts. In a subset of MCSA participants, we evaluated neurite density index from diffusion MRI as a surrogate of WM health and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a surrogate of neuroinflammation to understand underlying mechanisms. Result We identified an atypical WM signature (AWM‐Signature) in the anterior and superior corona radiata, where glucose metabolism increased as cognitive performance worsened (Figure 1). Hypermetabolism in AWM‐Signature was related to increased age, amyloidosis, vascular disease, and neuroinflammation, as well as decreasing WM neurite density in the same regions (Figure 2). Hypermetabolism in AWM‐Signature regions predicted faster future cognitive decline, even after accounting for demographics, amyloid, and vascular disease metrics. The results observed in the AWM‐Signature regions were consistently in the opposite direction of the associations seen with gray matter and typical WM regions. Conclusion We found unexpected metabolism increases in corona radiata, a hub that carries significant portion of the brain's neural traffic, with aging and disease which likely indicates a compensatory response. These changes may be useful cognitive resilience measures and require further investigation to understand their role in maintaining cognitive function.

Abstract Background Chronic disease conditions lead to brain changes elevating dementia risk. We hypothesized that tissue microstructural changes caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension could be effectively captured using an advanced diffusion MRI technique, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI). Our goal was to evaluate the usefulness of composite NODDI scores, customized for increased hemoglobin (Hb) A1c and systolic blood pressure as predictors of cognition and compare their performance to other measures typically used to assess dementia risk. Method We collected multi‐shell diffusion MR on 1024 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants. NODDI measures (neurite density index (NDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI), and free water fraction (FWF)) in gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) regions were estimated. To identify brain regions susceptible to both conditions, a multiple linear regression model was fitted for each NODDI metric, using hemoglobin (Hb) A1c (in N = 305 participants) or systolic blood pressure ( N = 906) as predictor, with age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) as covariates. Event‐based modeling was performed with the identified NODDI metrics to investigate the chronological pattern along the course of chronic condition development from this cross‐sectional dataset. Composite metrics were created as a weighted sum of susceptible NODDI metrics. We evaluated the impact of both conditions on cognition using gradient boosting models incorporating composite metrics, additional brain measurements, and demographics. Result Increased HbA1c impacts both GM and WM NODDI relatively evenly, whereas increased systolic blood pressure related NODDI changes were mainly seen in WM (data not shown). With increased HbA1c, the earliest changes were observed in GM ODI, followed by changes in the pons and cortical FWF (Figure 1A). With increased systolic blood pressure, the earliest changes occurred in association fibers and middle cerebellar peduncle, followed by FWF change in lobar and projection WM fibers (Figure 1B). Average feature importance from 100 gradient boosting models for cognition prediction suggests that diabetes‐induced GM changes play a moderately important role in cognitive decline (Figure 2). Conclusion Chronic medical conditions, especially T2DM, result in brain changes that are captured by NODDI and contribute moderately to cognitive performance.