Josephs, Keith A.

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with right anterior temporal lobe (RATL) predominant atrophy is an emerging area of interest. Recent findings by the International Working Group (IWG) have identified this subtype as having a distinct clinical profile within the FTD spectrum (Ulugut et al., 2024, A&D). However, its genetic and pathological underpinnings remain unexplored in large, multicultural cohorts. Methods Retrospective analyses encompassing clinical, genetic, pathological, and neuroimaging data from 23 IWG sites across 13 countries in Asia, Middle East, Europe, North and South America were conducted. The study included 444 patients with FTD exhibiting predominant RATL atrophy. Results Genetic screening was performed on 51% ( n = 225) of the cohort for at least the major frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) mutations including microtubule‐associated protein tau ( MAPT ), progranulin ( GRN ), and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 ( C9orf72 ), or dementia panels encompassing extended sets of genes. Of these, 81% were sporadic, showing negative results for the screened genes and a modified Goldman Score of ≥ 3, indicating a negative family history for dementia. The MAPT mutation was the most common genetic variant, identified in 7% of the screened cases (Figure 1). Pathological confirmation was available for 63 patients. Among the sporadic cases, transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 type C (TDP‐C) pathology was most prevalent (60%, n = 32), while tau‐MAPT pathology was most common in the genetic cases (38%, n = 16). Fifteen cases did not fit neatly into genetic or sporadic categories, displaying heterogeneous pathologies (Figure 2). At the initial visit, compared to genetic cases, patients with TDP‐C pathology were older, and more frequently exhibited semantic deficits, with less frequent attention difficulties and executive dysfunction. No differences were observed in sex distribution, symptom duration or disease severity between genetic and sporadic TDP‐C cases. However, left handedness was more common in TDP‐C cases (14%) compared to genetic cases (5%). Conclusion While FTD with RATL atrophy primarily appears sporadic, a significant proportion of cases exhibit genetic variants. These sporadic and genetic subtypes display distinct neuropathological features and clinical manifestations. Given the implications for therapeutic strategies, precise clinical and molecular subtyping is critical for enhancing patient management and ensuring appropriate enrollment in clinical trials.

Abstract Background Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can detect iron deposition or myelin loss in the brain by estimating magnetic susceptibility properties. Iron is an important component in neurofibrillary tangles and is known to co‐localize in regions with tangle burden in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Abnormal magnetic susceptibility measured on QSM has been observed in atypical AD, although it is unclear if susceptibility is regionally related to AV‐1451‐PET uptake in atypical AD. Method Forty atypical AD patients (visual variant=24, language variant=7, others=9) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group from the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. They underwent a 3T MRI scan with a five‐echo gradient echo sequence for calculation of QSM ( n = 80), Aβ (Pittsburgh Compound‐B) and a 18 F‐ AV‐1451 PET scan ( n = 73). All patients showed evidence of Aβ positivity on PET. To assess the relationship between QSM and AV‐1451‐PET, two approaches were used i) Voxel‐based regression analysis using VoxelStats for the whole brain, and ii) region‐of‐interest (ROI)‐based Spearman's correlation analyses using cortical and subcortical ROIs. All models were adjusted for age and sex as covariates and were corrected for multiple comparisons, specifically the VoxelStats regression maps were corrected using random field theory and the ROI‐based correlation plots were corrected using false discovery rate. Result At the voxel‐level, positive correlations between AV‐1451‐PET and QSM were only observed in the left caudate (Figure 1). At the ROI‐level, no significant associations were found, although uncorrected data showed a positive association in the occipital lobe (red circle) and a negative association between substantia nigra susceptibility and occipital AV‐1451 uptake (blue circle) (Figure 2). Since these findings did not survive corrections, they should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusion Our data provides little evidence that regional AV‐1451 PET uptake is related to susceptibility changes in patients with atypical AD, suggesting that iron deposition may not be associated with regional tau accumulation in AD.

Abstract Background In addition to visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, most PCA patients also report deficits in visual attention, episodic memory, and working memory. The dorsal attention network is known to play a critical role in modulating these clinical functions. However, little is known about the relationship of the dorsal attention network with other core networks and relationships to volume loss and memory functions in PCA. Method Fifty‐seven PCA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group, Mayo Clinic, and compared to 60 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. The CONN functional connectivity toolbox was used to calculate within‐ and between‐network connectivity. Functional connectivity within the key regions (i.e., inter‐hemisphere connectivity) of the dorsal attention network, namely frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the entire network was generated. Functional connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the frontoparietal, visual, and default mode networks (DMN) were also generated using CONN's network parcellation atlas. Multivariate linear regression models were fit i) to compare within‐ and between‐network connectivity between both groups and ii) to assess relationships between within‐network connectivity and both gray matter volumes and clinical test scores. Result PCA showed reduced within‐network connectivity in the dorsal attention network, specifically within the IPS and the entire network compared to CU. An increase in between‐network connectivity between the frontoparietal network and both FEF and the entire dorsal attention network was noted in PCA compared to CU (Figure 1). Lower dorsal attention within‐network connectivity was associated with a trend for lower volumes in the entire network (Figure 2) and significantly lower scores on the auditory verbal learning test‐recognition percent correct (AVLT‐RCP) and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) III‐digit span backward in PCA (Figure 3). Conclusion These findings suggest that within‐ and between‐network connectivity of the dorsal attention network, both within key regions and the entire network, was disrupted in PCA patients. However, this network did not show disrupted connectivity with the core PCA networks. Within‐network connectivity disruptions in the dorsal attention network are associated with aspects of memory function, and to some extent, with volume loss.