Tutor‐New, Frederick Q

Abstract Background More than 85% of Alzheimer's disease (AD) donor brains exhibit some degree of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which is characterized predominantly by Aβ40 deposits in the brain vasculature and can cause blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage. CAA is associated with risk of infarcts, cerebral hemorrhages, and cognitive decline. Brain cell type‐specific mechanisms that influence CAA pathology, as well as related measures such as Aβ40 biochemical measures and tight junction proteins, an indicator of BBB integrity, are still elusive. Method We performed single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue from 79 AD donors, with varying levels of CAA co‐pathology. Measurements of soluble, insoluble and membrane‐associated fractions of brain Aβ40 and tight junction protein (claudin‐5, occludin) levels were available for these donors. We correlated these measures with cell proportions. We also conducted differential gene expression and analyses for intercellular communications and regulatory networks. Result We identified 25 clusters and annotated them with major brain cell types. There were 3 oligodendrocyte, 7 excitatory and 7 inhibitory neuronal, 2 microglial, 2 astrocytic, and 1 each for endothelial, pericytic, fibroblast, and oligodendrocyte precursor cell clusters. We found that higher CAA and Aβ40 levels correlate with reduced neuronal and increased microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Increased tight junction proteins correlate with increased inhibitory neuronal and reduced microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Among all clusters, one microglial, both astrocytic and the pericytic clusters have greater number of genes significantly associated with CAA, Aβ40 and tight junction protein levels. Most significant genes have negative associations with CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and positive with tight junction protein measures. Using these genes as input for intercellular communications analysis, we prioritized ligand‐target interactions from microglia or astrocytes to pericytes. Some of the prioritized targets are transcription factors in pericytes. Using regulon analysis, we identified genes downstream of these transcription factors that are also significantly associated with lower CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and higher tight junction protein levels. Conclusion We revealed glia‐to‐pericytes intercellular interactions and pericytic gene regulatory networks that are potentially perturbed by CAA and BBB breakdown. Future directions include analyzing external snRNAseq datasets and performing functional validations.

Abstract Background Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid‐beta in the cerebrovasculature, affects blood vessel integrity leading to brain hemorrhages and an accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients. Our previous genome‐wide association study (GWAS) identified a LINC‐PINT splice variant associated with lower CAA levels in individuals without the APOE e4 allele and higher levels of LINC‐PINT expression in the brain of AD donors. In this study, we expand our GWAS to include additional donors with AD and those lacking significant AD neuropathology (non‐AD), with available CAA scores. Method In our prior study we assessed 853 AD donors. We expanded this by addition of genetic data from 550 AD and 502 non‐AD donors from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, scored for CAA. We performed QC and imputation (TOPMED) of all datasets. We conducted GWAS in AD only ( N = 1,363), non‐AD only, and all donors ( N = 1,865) by testing imputed variant dosages for association with square root transformed CAA using linear regression, adjusting for relevant covariates. To assess associations in the context of major CAA risk factors, we performed interaction analysis with APOEe4 presence and sex; and pursued stratified analyses. Result Variants at the APOE locus were identified as the most significant in our study. In addition, several other variants approached genome‐wide significance after adjusting for AD neuropathology (Braak stage and Thal phase). The LINC‐PINT splice variant remained associated with lower CAA scores in AD donors without the APOEe4 risk allele . To enhance the robustness of our findings, we are pursuing further expansion of our study cohort to include other available datasets. To explore putative functional consequences of key variants we are collecting peripheral gene expression measures in participants from Mayo Clinic with neuroimaging measures including microhemorrhages. Conclusion We expect this study will provide further insights into the genetic architecture underlying risk for CAA, both in the context of significant AD pathology, and without. Characterization of genetic variants and their functional outcomes may lead to new avenues of research aimed at identifying biomarkers and therapies to treat CAA, a common co‐pathology in those with and without AD.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2, respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2 , respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid‐beta in the cerebrovasculature, affects blood vessel integrity leading to brain hemorrhages and an accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patients. Our previous genome‐wide association study (GWAS) identified a LINC‐PINT splice variant associated with lower CAA levels in individuals without the APOE e4 allele and higher levels of LINC‐PINT expression in the brain of AD donors. In this study, we expand our GWAS to include additional donors with AD and those lacking significant AD neuropathology (non‐AD), with available CAA scores. Method In our prior study we assessed 853 AD donors. We expanded this by addition of genetic data from 550 AD and 502 non‐AD donors from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, scored for CAA. We performed QC and imputation (TOPMED) of all datasets. We conducted GWAS in AD only ( N = 1,363), non‐AD only, and all donors ( N = 1,865) by testing imputed variant dosages for association with square root transformed CAA using linear regression, adjusting for relevant covariates. To assess associations in the context of major CAA risk factors, we performed interaction analysis with APOEe4 presence and sex; and pursued stratified analyses. Result Variants at the APOE locus were identified as the most significant in our study. In addition, several other variants approached genome‐wide significance after adjusting for AD neuropathology (Braak stage and Thal phase). T he LINC‐PINT splice variant remained associated with lower CAA scores in AD donors without the APOEe4 risk allele. To enhance the robustness of our findings, we are pursuing further expansion of our study cohort to include other available datasets. To explore putative functional consequences of key variants we are collecting peripheral gene expression measures in participants from Mayo Clinic with neuroimaging measures including microhemorrhages. Conclusion We expect this study will provide further insights into the genetic architecture underlying risk for CAA, both in the context of significant AD pathology, and without. Characterization of genetic variants and their functional outcomes may lead to new avenues of research aimed at identifying biomarkers and therapies to treat CAA, a common co‐pathology in those with and without AD.

AbstractBackgroundA complex, multicellular disease with genetic and immunological elements, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects millions worldwide. There has been previous research linking AD to the missense variants ABI3‐rs616338‐T and PLCG2‐rs72824905‐G, and the altered expression of these genes has been shown to disrupt microglial function. In our understanding of AD risk and resilience, limited research has been conducted on how these variants affect microglial subtypes and states in AD.MethodsWe previously identified DOCK8 protein as a target for fluorescent activated nuclei sorting (FANS) to enrich microglia nuclei from frozen human brains. Using this enrichment strategy, we generated microglia enriched snRNAseq data from temporal cortex tissue of 30 donors harboring ABI3 or PLCG2 missense mutations, or neither mutation. We introduced PLCG2 variant in either homozygote, and heterozygote forms into an AD patient derived iPSC through CRISPR/Cas9 approach, differentiated these cells into microglia cells (IMGLs) following established protocols, and generated scRNAseq data after treatment with Amyloidβ. We applied standard alignment and quality control pipelines to the snRNAseq and scRNAseq datasets in parallel. Established markers of microglia states and subtypes were utilized to annotate the clusters; analyzed for their hub gene expression using comparisons between cluster differential profiling to determine signature pathways. Differential gene expression was assessed using pseudo bulk and MAST approaches.ResultsWe obtained single nuclei transcriptome profiles of 54,000 frozen human brain nuclei, of which 35,000 are microglia, through snRNAseq, and single cell profiles of 63,000 iMGLs through scRNAseq, using our standard alignment and quality control procedures. Our differential gene expression analysis identified novel genes and pathways which were identified as part of resilience or AD risk networks in microglia subtypes and states. These alterations were validated using orthogonal experimental methods and further explored for their conservation using in vivo external datasets. Pseudotime inference will be completed to probe microglia marker gene expression dynamics, treatment conditions, along with continuous cell‐state changes.ConclusionOur study uncovers microglia subtype specific resilience and risk factors provided by AD related genetic variants using snRNAseq from frozen human brain and scRNAseq from IPSC derived microglia cells. These findings nominate novel targets and pathways with therapeutic potential.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, and maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties. The breakdown of BBB in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is well‐established, but precise underlying molecular changes remain unclear. Additionally, whether GVU molecular alterations observed in AD brains are also detected in blood from living patients is unknown. Further, these GVU molecular perturbations require further investigation in different model systems to identify both human brain‐specific and cross‐species conserved alterations. In this study, we investigated prioritized GVU molecules altered in AD brains for their conservation in blood and cross‐species model systems.MethodsWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in AD and control brains. We analyzed this data to detect cell‐specific GVU molecular perturbations and their interactions. We investigated molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the major cell types of the GVU of the BBB. To determine whether GVU transcriptional alterations detected in the brain are preserved in the blood, existing blood expression, genetic, and neuroimaging data from two longitudinal antemortem cohorts were analyzed. Using model systems, including mouse, drosophila, and zebrafish, we evaluated the cross‐species conservation of the top GVU alterations detected in AD brains.ResultsBrain snRNAseq revealed transcriptional profiles of 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as pericytes, endothelia and perivascular fibroblasts. We identified differentially expressed genes and their enriched pathways within these clusters and observed the highest levels of transcriptional changes within pericytes. Vascular targets that interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in cell signaling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism, and cytoskeletal architecture. We discovered that genetic variants influencing blood expression levels of some of the prioritized GVU genes were associated with neuroimaging burden of cerebrovascular disease in living human cohorts. Our ongoing studies in model systems revealed conservation of some of the top prioritized molecular perturbations across species.ConclusionOur findings prioritized by multiscale, cross‐tissue human data revealed GVU perturbations within interacting pericyte and astrocyte molecules, which are conserved across multiple cross‐species models. These results nominate new molecular targets and mechanistic insights for BBB disruptions in AD.

AbstractBackgroundCerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid‐beta in the cerebrovasculature, effects blood vessel integrity leading to brain hemorrhages and an accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. In a previous genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of 853 neuropathologically confirmed AD cases, we identified a LINC‐PINT splice variant that associated with lower CAA levels amongst individuals that did not have a copy of the APOEe4 AD risk allele (Reddy. J et al 2021). In this study, we perform GWAS to identify further genetic risk factors for CAA and AD neuropathology (Braak stage, Thal phase) in additional AD cases, and participants lacking significant AD pathology (non‐AD).MethodWe expanded the original AD cohort (N = 853) with 400 additional AD cases genotyped using the Infinium Omni2.5+Exome array. We also identified 110 AD and 502 non‐AD donors from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, with existing CAA scores and genome‐wide genotypes. We performed QC and imputation of these genotypes to TOPMed. We will conduct GWAS in AD only (N = 1,363), non‐AD only, as well as the combined cohort (N = 1,865). We will test imputed variant dosages for association with square root transformed CAA, Braak and Thal, using linear regression in PLINK, adjusting for relevant covariates. We will perform interaction analysis of CAA‐associated variants with APOEe4 and sex; and pursue stratified analyses. Summary statistics will be utilized to perform SNP‐based gene set enrichment analysis to identify biological pathways implicated in CAA.ResultWe expect that the increased power of this expanded dataset will lead to the identification of additional novel genetic risk factors for CAA and AD neuropathology. Genetic interaction analysis with sex and APOEe4 may further elucidate the role of these risk factors. The addition of 1,102 participants will enable assessment of the LINC‐PINT locus for association with CAA in an independent dataset.ConclusionWe expect this study will provide further insights into the genetic architecture underlying risk for CAA, both in the context of significant AD pathology, and without. Characterization of genetic variants in the context of neuropathology may lead to new avenues of research aimed at identifying biomarkers and therapies to treat CAA, and AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex, multicellular disease with immunological and genetic components. Previous studies demonstrated associations between AD and the missense variants ABI3‐rs616338‐T and PLCG2‐rs72824905‐G. The perturbed expression of these genes has been demonstrated to disrupt microglial function. To date, the transcriptomic profiles of variant carriers in the context of microglial subtype and state have not been explored in human brain. This represents a knowledge gap in our understanding of AD risk and resilience. We have developed and optimized a single nucleus RNAseq (snRNAseq) approach to study the impact of ABI3 and PLCG2 variants on microglial enriched nuclei from frozen human brain.MethodDOCK8 was identified as a nuclear microglial marker based on previous brain snRNAseq data. DOCK8 based microglial enrichment using fluorescent activated nuclei sorting (FANS) was validated using RT‐qPCR and snRNAseq in human cerebellum and temporal cortex (TCX), respectively. We are applying this enrichment and snRNAseq approach to TCX tissue from a cohort of 30 donors harboring ABI3 or PLCG2 missense mutations, or neither. Standard snRNAseq alignment and quality control pipelines will be applied, and nuclei annotated based on putative microglial markers. Differential gene expression will be assessed using pseudo bulk and MAST approaches, for association with ABI3 and PLCG2 genotype, diagnosis groups, risk factors, and pathology scores.ResultDOCK8 has several commercially available antibodies, making it an ideal microglia‐selection marker. Using RT‐qPCR in microglia enriched nuclei, we demonstrated an enrichment of microglia marker genes and depletion of other brain cell type markers. This is further supported by snRNA‐seq data from DOCK8‐sorted TCX tissue that yielded a 5x increase in microglia proportion (56% vs. 11% in unselected nuclei), enabling analyses of microglia sub‐populations. Leveraging this approach, we will investigate affected genes and pathways and uncover the resilience and risk mechanisms within microglia sub‐populations in ABI3 and PLCG2 variant‐carriers.ConclusionOur study presents a novel method for enriching microglial nuclei from frozen human brains and enables transcriptomic profiling of microglial subpopulations in ABI3 and PLCG2 missense variant‐carriers. We expect these insights will reveal novel genes and pathways that may play a key role in microglial function in AD.