Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

96 citation(s) found for "Zamora, D".

Expanding the phenotype of ASXL3‐related syndrome: A comprehensive description of 45 unpublished individuals with inherited and de novo pathogenic variants in ASXL3
Schirwani, Schaida , Albaba, Shadi , Carere, Deanna Alexis , Sacoto, María J. Guillen , Zamora, Francisca Milan, Si, Yue , Rabin, Rachel , Renaud, Deborah L. , Hauser, Natalie , Blanchet, Patricia, Foulds, Nichola, Dixit, Abhijit , Fisher, Richard, Armstrong, Ruth, Isidor, Bertrand , Demirdas, Serwet , Dykzeul, Natalie, Cohen, Julie S. , Grand, Katheryn , Swols, Dayna Morel , Albassam, Hessa F., Naik, Swati , Ragge, Nicola , Tedesco, Maria Giovanna , Harrison, Rachel , Bouman, Arjan , Palen, Emily, Challman, Thomas D. , Willemsen, Marjolein H. , Vogt, Julie , Cunniff, Christopher , Bergstrom, Katherine , Bruel, Ange‐Line , Kini, Usha , Alkuraya, Fowzan S. , Slegesky, Valerie, Meeks, Naomi, Girotto, Paula Natale , Johnson, Diana , Study, DDD, Newbury‐Ecob, Ruth , Lynch, Sally Ann , Graham, John M. , Balasubramanian, Meena , Hauser, Natalie , Schrier Vergano, Samantha , Bouman, Arjan , Cunniff, Christopher , Bergstrom, Katherine , Bruel, Ange-Line , Alkuraya, Fowzan S , Prontera, Paolo , Li, Dong , Graham, John M , Zamora, Francisca Millan, Pappas, John , Reid, Evan , Cogné, Benjamin , Vergano, Samantha A. Schrier , Slavotinek, Anne , Naik, Swati, Dean, John , Costa, Cinzia , Walia, Jagdeep Singh , Study, DDD, Ockeloen, Charlotte W. , Li, Dong , Pierson, Tyler Mark

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | August 26, 2021 | Volume: 185 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3446-3458

10.1002/ajmg.a.62465 | PMID 34436830 Get It

AbstractThe study aimed at widening the clinical and genetic spectrum of ASXL3‐related syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder, caused by truncating variants in the ASXL3 gene. In this international collaborative study, we have undertaken a detailed clinical and molecular analysis of 45 previously unpublished individuals with ASXL3‐related syndrome, as well as a review of all previously published individuals. We have reviewed the rather limited functional characterization of pathogenic variants in ASXL3 and discuss current understanding of the consequences of the different ASXL3 variants. In this comprehensive analysis of ASXL3‐related syndrome, we define its natural history and clinical evolution occurring with age. We report familial ASXL3 pathogenic variants, characterize the phenotype in mildly affected individuals and discuss nonpenetrance. We also discuss the role of missense variants in ASXL3. We delineate a variable but consistent phenotype. The most characteristic features are neurodevelopmental delay with consistently limited speech, significant neuro‐behavioral issues, hypotonia, and feeding difficulties. Distinctive features include downslanting palpebral fissures, hypertelorism, tubular nose with a prominent nasal bridge, and low‐hanging columella. The presented data will inform clinical management of individuals with ASXL3‐related syndrome and improve interpretation of new ASXL3 sequence variants.
Estimation of patient skin dose in fluoroscopy: summary of a joint report by AAPM TG357 and EFOMP
Andersson, Jonas , Bednarek, Daniel R. , Boltz, Thomas, Bosmans, Hilde , Gislason‐Lee, Amber J., Granberg, Christoffer, Hellström, Max , Kanal, Kalpana M. , McDonagh, Ed, Paden, Robert G., Pavlicek, William , Khodadadegan, Yasaman, Torresin, A. , Trianni, Annalisa , Zamora, D , Paden, Robert, Bolch, Wesley E.

Medical Physics | April 30, 2021 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/mp.14910 | PMID 33930183 Get It

BackgroundPhysicians use fixed C‐arm fluoroscopy equipment with many interventional radiological and cardiological procedures. The associated effective dose to a patient is generally considered low risk, as the benefit‐risk ratio is almost certainly highly favorable. However, X‐ray‐induced skin injuries may occur due to high absorbed patient skin doses from complex fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI). Suitable action levels for patient‐specific follow‐up could improve the clinical practice.There is a need for a refined metric regarding follow‐up of X‐ray‐induced patient injuries and the knowledge gap regarding skin dose‐related patient information from fluoroscopy devices must be filled. The most useful metric to indicate a risk of erythema, epilation or greater skin injury that also includes actionable information is the peak skin dose, that is, the largest dose to a region of skin.Materials and MethodsThe report is based on a comprehensive review of best practices and methods to estimate peak skin dose found in the scientific literature and situates the importance of the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard detailing pertinent information contained in the Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR) and DICOM image headers for FGI devices. Furthermore, the expertise of the task group members and consultants have been used to bridge and discuss different methods and associated available DICOM information for peak skin dose estimation.ResultsThe report contributes an extensive summary and discussion of the current state of the art in estimating peak skin dose with FGI procedures with regard to methodology and DICOM information. Improvements in skin dose estimation efforts with more refined DICOM information are suggested and discussed.ConclusionsThe endeavor of skin dose estimation is greatly aided by the continuing efforts of the scientific medical physics community, the numerous technology enhancements, the dose‐controlling features provided by the FGI device manufacturers, and the emergence and greater availability of the DICOM RDSR. Refined and new dosimetry systems continue to evolve and form the infrastructure for further improvements in accuracy. Dose‐related content and information systems capable of handling big data are emerging for patient dose monitoring and quality assurance tools for large‐scale multihospital enterprises.
Comparative connectivity correlates of dystonic and essential tremor deep brain stimulation
Tsuboi, Takashi , Wong, Joshua K. , Burns, Mathew R, Ramirez‐Zamora, Adolfo , Shukla, Aparna Wagle, Foote, Kelly D. , Okun, Michael S. , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Okromelidze, Lela , Okun, Michael S , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Wong, Joshua K , Tsuboi, Takashi , Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo , Eisinger, Robert Stephen , Almeida, Leonardo , Shukla, Aparna Wagle , Grewal, Sanjeet S.

Brain | February 26, 2021 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1774-1786

10.1093/brain/awab074 | PMID 33889943 Get It

AbstractThe pathophysiology of dystonic tremor and essential tremor remains partially understood. In patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor or essential tremor, deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the thalamus or posterior subthalamic area has evolved into a promising treatment option. However, the optimal DBS targets for these disorders remains unknown. This retrospective study explored the optimal targets for DBS in essential tremor and dystonic tremor using a combination of volumes of tissue activated estimation and functional and structural connectivity analyses. We included 20 patients with dystonic tremor who underwent unilateral thalamic DBS, along with a matched cohort of 20 patients with essential tremor DBS. Tremor severity was assessed preoperatively and approximately 6 months after DBS implantation using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The tremor-suppressing effects of DBS were estimated using the percentage improvement in the unilateral tremor-rating scale score contralateral to the side of implantation. The optimal stimulation region, based on the cluster centre of gravity for peak contralateral motor score improvement, for essential tremor was located in the ventral intermediate nucleus region and for dystonic tremor in the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region along the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border (4 mm anterior and 3 mm superior to that for essential tremor). Both disorders showed similar functional connectivity patterns: a positive correlation between tremor improvement and involvement of the primary sensorimotor, secondary motor and associative prefrontal regions. Tremor improvement, however, was tightly correlated with the primary sensorimotor regions in essential tremor, whereas in dystonic tremor, the correlation was tighter with the premotor and prefrontal regions. The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract, comprising the decussating and non-decussating fibres, significantly correlated with tremor improvement in both dystonic and essential tremor. In contrast, the pallidothalamic tracts, which primarily project to the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region, significantly correlated with tremor improvement only in dystonic tremor. Our findings support the hypothesis that the pathophysiology underpinning dystonic tremor involves both the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network. Further our data suggest that the pathophysiology of essential tremor is primarily attributable to the abnormalities within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. We conclude that the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border and ventral intermediate nucleus region may be a reasonable DBS target for patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor and essential tremor, respectively. Uncovering the pathophysiology of these disorders may in the future aid in further improving DBS outcomes.
A Randomized Phase IIb Study of Low-dose Tamoxifen in Chest-irradiated Cancer Survivors at Risk for Breast Cancer
Palomares, Melanie R. , Hageman, Lindsey , Chen, Yanjun , Landier, Wendy , Smith, Kandice, Umphrey, Heidi , Reich, Caroline A., Zamora, Kathryn , Armenian, Saro H. , Bevers, Therese B. , Henderson, Tara O. , Korde, Larissa A. , Melin, Susan A., Merajver, Sofía D. , Overholser, Linda , Pruthi, Sandhya , Wong, F. Lennie , Landier, Wendy , Smith, Kandice , Zamora, Kathryn W , Armenian, Saro H , Hudson, Melissa M , Garber, J. E. , Bhatia, Smita , Blaes, Anne , Hodgson, David , Hudson, Melissa M. , Garber, Judy E.

Clinical Cancer Research | December 3, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 967-974

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3609 | PMID 33272980 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Low-dose tamoxifen reduces breast cancer risk, but remains untested in chest-irradiated cancer survivors—a population with breast cancer risk comparable with BRCA mutation carriers. We hypothesized that low-dose tamoxifen would be safe and efficacious in reducing radiation-related breast cancer risk. Patients and Methods: We conducted an investigator-initiated, randomized, phase IIb, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (FDA IND107367) between 2010 and 2016 at 15 U.S. sites. Eligibility included ≥12 Gy of chest radiation by age 40 years and age at enrollment ≥25 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 to low-dose tamoxifen (5 mg/day) or identical placebo tablets for 2 years. The primary endpoint was mammographic dense area at baseline, 1 and 2 years. IGF-1 plays a role in breast carcinogenesis; circulating IGF-1 and IGF-BP3 levels at baseline, 1 and 2 years served as secondary endpoints. Results: Seventy-two participants (low-dose tamoxifen: n = 34, placebo: n = 38) enrolled at a median age of 43.8 years (35–49) were evaluable. They had received chest radiation at a median dose of 30.3 Gy. Compared with the placebo arm, the low-dose tamoxifen arm participants had significantly lower mammographic dense area (P = 0.02) and IGF1 levels (P < 0.0001), and higher IGFBP-3 levels (P = 0.02). There was no difference in toxicity biomarkers (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, lipids, and antithrombin III; urine N-telopeptide cross-links) between the treatment arms. We did not identify any grade 3–4 adverse events related to low-dose tamoxifen. Conclusions: In this randomized trial in chest-irradiated cancer survivors, we find that low-dose tamoxifen is effective in reducing established biomarkers of breast cancer risk and could serve as a risk-reduction strategy.
Pallidal Connectivity Profiling of Stimulation‐Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease
Tsuboi, Takashi , Charbel, Marc , Peterside, David T., Rana, Mohit , Elkouzi, Ahmad , Deeb, Wissam , Ramirez‐Zamora, Adolfo , Lopes, Janine Lemos Melo Lobo Jofili, Zeilman, Pamela , Foote, Kelly D. , Okun, Michael S. , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Okromelidze, Lela , Okun, Michael S , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Tsuboi, Takashi , Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo , Almeida, Leonardo , Eisinger, Robert Stephen , Grewal, Sanjeet S.

Movement Disorders | October 1, 2020 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 380-388

10.1002/mds.28324 | PMID 33002233 Get It

ABSTRACTObjectivesThe aim of this study is to identify anatomical regions related to stimulation‐induced dyskinesia (SID) after pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and to analyze connectivity associated with SID.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed the clinical and imaging data of PD patients who experienced SID during the monopolar review after pallidal DBS. We analyzed structural and functional connectivity using normative connectivity data with the volume of tissue activated (VTA) modeling. Each contact was assigned to either that producing SID (SID VTA) or that without SID (non‐SID VTA). Structural and functional connectivity was compared between SID and non‐SID VTAs. “Optimized VTAs” were also estimated using the DBS settings at 6 months after implantation.ResultsOf the 68 consecutive PD patients who underwent pallidal implantation, 20 patients (29%) experienced SID. SID VTAs were located more dorsally and anteriorly compared with non‐SID and optimized VTAs and were primarily in the dorsal globus pallidus internus (GPi) and dorsal globus pallidus externus (GPe). SID VTAs showed significantly higher structural connectivity than non‐SID VTAs to the associative cortex and supplementary motor area/premotor cortex (P < 0.0001). Simultaneously, non‐SID VTAs showed greater connectivity to the primary sensory cortex, cerebellum, subthalamic nucleus, and motor thalamus (all P < 0.0004). Functional connectivity analysis showed significant differences between SID and non‐SID VTAs in multiple regions, including the primary motor, premotor, and prefrontal cortices and cerebellum.ConclusionSID VTAs were primarily in the dorsal GPi/GPe. The connectivity difference between the motor‐related cortices and subcortical regions may explain the presence and absence of SID. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
How to Restart the Interventional Activity in the COVID‐19 Era: The Experience of a Private Pain Unit in Spain
Abejón, David , Monzón, Eva , Deer, Timothy R. , Hagedorn, Jonathan M. , Araujo, Ricardo , Abad, Cristina , Rios, Alberto , Zamora, Alejandro , Monzón, Eva M , Deer, Tim , Hagedorn, Jonathan M , Araujo, Ricardo , Vallejo, Ricardo

Pain Practice | September 24, 2020 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 820-828

10.1111/papr.12951 | PMID 32969188 Get It

AbstractIntroductionThe situation generated in the health system by the COVID‐19 pandemic has provoked a crisis involving the necessity to cancel non‐urgent and oncologic activity in the operating room and in day‐to‐day practice. As the situation continues, the need to reinstate attention for patients with chronic pain grows. The restoration of this activity has to begin with on‐site appointments and possible surgical procedures. On‐site clinical activity has to guarantee the safety of patients and health workers.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to evaluate how to manage activity in pain units, considering the scenario generated by the pandemic and the implications of chronic pain on the immune system and proposed pharmacological and interventional therapies.MethodsBesides the established general recommendations (physical distance, surgical masks, gloves, etc.), we established specific recommendations that will allow patient treatment and relieve the disruption of the immune response. It is important to highlight the use of opioids with the least influence in the immune system. Further, individualized corticoid use, risk assessment, reduced immune suppression, and dose adjustment should take patient needs into account. In this scenario, we highlight the use of radiofrequency and neuromodulation therapies, techniques that do not interfere with the immune response.ConclusionsWe describe procedures to implement these recommendations for individual clinical situations, the therapeutic possibilities and safety guidelines for each center, and government recommendations during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Abstract PD9-04: Breast cancer subtype specific association of pCR with MRI assessed tumor volume progression during NAC in the I-SPY 2 trial
Newitt, David C. , Gibbs, Jessica , Wilmes, Lisa J., Jones, Ella F. , Joe, Bonnie N. , Sit, Laura , Chien, A. Jo , Price, Elissa R. , Albain, Kathy S. , Kuritza, Theresa , Morley, Kevin , Brandt, Kathy R., Choudhery, Sadia, Clark, Amy S. , Rosen, Mark, Wolverton, Dulcy , Fountain, Kelly , Euhus, David , Han, Heather, Niell, Bethany L. , Drukteinis, Jennifer S. , Lu, Janice , Mitri, Zaha, Nanda, Rita , Northfelt, Donald W. , Sanft, Tara, Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Viscusi, Rebecca K., Yung, Rachel L. , Asare, Smita , Melisko, Michelle , Perlmutter, Jane , Schwab, Richard B. , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Berry, Donald A. , Abé, Hiroyuki , Sheth, Deepa , Edmiston, Kirsten K., Ellis, Erin D. , Ha, Richard , Wynn, Ralph, Crane, Erin P., Dillis, Charlotte, Nelson, Michael T. , Church, An , Khan, Qamar J. , Oh, Karen Y. , Jafarian, Neda, Bang, Dae Hee , Mullins, Christiane, Woodard, Stefanie , Ojeda-Fornier, Haydee, Sheth, Pulin , Hovanessian‐Larsen, Linda , Eghtedari, Mohammad , Spektor, Michael , Giurescu, Marina E., Newell, Mary S. , Cohen, Michael A. , Berman, Elise, Smith, William P. , Fitzpatrick, Kim, Borders, Marisa H. , Yang, Wei , Goudreau, Sally , Brown, Thelma, Li, Wen , Onishi, Natsuko , Yau, Christina , Boughey, Judy C. , McDonald, Elizabeth S. , Elias, Anthony , Lang, Julie E. , Meisel, Jane Lowe , Sanft, Tara , Wallace, Anne M. , Yee, Douglas , Rugo, Hope S. , Symmans, W. Fraser , DeMichele, Angela , Isaacs, Claudine , Zamora, Kathryn , Lehman, Constance Dobbins , Dogan, Basak E , Esserman, Laura J. , Hylton, Nola M.

Cancer Research | March 26, 2020 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD9-04-PD9-04

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-pd9-04 Get It

Abstract Background: In an adaptive randomized trial, when new treatment combinations are being tested, it is important to be able to identify patients who are progressing on treatment so that they can be changed to a different therapeutic regimen. We know that even within the molecularly high risk patients in I-SPY 2, there is considerable variation in biology. In this study, we will present results of using MRI-calculated functional tumor volume (FTV) to identify tumor progression for each breast cancer subtype. Methods: Patients (n=990) enrolled in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL who were randomized to the graduated experimental drug arms or controls from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed. Four MRI exams were performed for each patient: pre-NAC (T0), after 3 weeks of NAC (T1), between regimens (T2), and post-NAC (T3). Functional tumor volume (FTV) was calculated at each exam by summing voxels meeting enhancement thresholds. Tumor progression at T1, T2 or T3 was identified by a positive FTV change relative to T0. Visual inspection was used to exclude false progression due to strong background parenchymal enhancement post-contrast, prominent vessels, motion, or insufficient image quality. pCR was defined as no invasive disease in the breast and lymph nodes. Negative predictive value for pCR was defined as:NPV=number of true non-pCRs / number of patients with MRI assessed tumor progressions, where “true non-pCRs” referred to patients who were non-pCRs at surgery and were assessed as progressors by MRI. The analysis was performed in the full cohort and in sub-cohorts defined by HR and HER2 statuses. Results: Out of 990 patients, 878 had pCR outcome data (pCR or non-pCR, pCR rate = 35%). Total and non-pCR numbers for each subtype, number of patients with tumor progression assessed by MRI at T1, T2, and T3, and NPVs, are shown in Table 1. In the full cohort, the NPV increased consistently over treatment, from T1 (NPV=83%) to T2 (93%), and to T3 (100%). The HER2+ cancer subtypes showed fewer MRI-assessed tumor progressions than HER2- subtypes: e.g. 10/209 (5%) vs. 108/669 (16%) at T1. NPV was 100% for HER2+ subtypes at T1 and T2 except for a single misclassification of a HR- tumor at T1. Only 6 tumor progressors, all HER2- were identified at T3, and all were confirmed at surgery as non-pCRs (NPV=100%). For HR+/HER2-, the NPV increased slightly from 89% at T1 to 91% at T2, while triple negative subtype had a more substantial increase, from 78% to 92%. Conclusions: Our study showed strong association between tumor progressors assessed by MRI with true non-pCRs after NAC. For HER2+ tumors, although MRI progressors are rare, they strongly indicate non-pCR at all treatment time points, while HER2- subtypes show more accurate results later in treatment. We are evaluating MRI change at 6 weeks to determine if that time point is sufficient to predict progressors. Table 1 MRI assessed tumor progression at different treatment time pointN/non-pCRs/%non-pCRMRI assessed tumor progressionT1 (after 3 weeks)T2 (inter-regimen)T3 (post-NAC)NNPV (%)NNPV (%)NNPV (%)Full cohort878/572/65%11883.14192.76100%HR+/HER2-344/280/81%4588.91190.93100%HR+/HER2+134/85/63%610021000N/AHR-/HER2+75/23/31%47521000N/Atriple negative325/184/57%6377.82692.33100% Citation Format: Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, David C Newitt, Jessica Gibbs, Lisa J Wilmes, Ella F Jones, Bonnie N Joe, Laura S Sit, Christina Yau, A. Jo Chien, Elissa Price, Kathy S Albain, Theresa Kuritza, Kevin Morley, Judy C Boughey, Kathy Brandt, Sadia Choudhery, Amy S Clark, Mark Rosen, Elizabeth S McDonald, Anthony D Elias, Dulcy Wolverton, Kelly Fountain, David M Euhus, Heather S Han, Bethany Niell, Jennifer Drukteinis, Julie E Lang, Janice Lu, Jane L Meisel, Zaha Mitri, Rita Nanda, Donald W Northfelt, Tara Sanft, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca K Viscusi, Anne M Wallace, Douglas Yee, Rachel Yung, Smita M Asare, Michelle E Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, Richard Schwab, W. Fraser Symmans, Laura J van't Veer, Donald A Berry, Angela DeMichele, Hiroyuki Abe, Deepa Sheth, Kirsten K Edmiston, Erin D Ellis, Richard Ha, Ralph Wynn, Erin P Crane, Charlotte Dillis, Michael Nelson, An Church, Claudine Isaacs, Qamar J Khan, Karen Y Oh, Neda Jafarian, Dae Hee Bang, Christiane Mullins, Stefanie Woodard, Kathryn W Zamora, Haydee Ojeda-Fornier, Pulin Sheth, Linda Hovanessian-Larsen, Mohammad Eghtedari, Michael Spektor, Marina Giurescu, Mary S Newell, Michael A Cohen, Elise Berman, Constance Lehman, William Smith, Kim Fitzpatrick, Marisa H Borders, Wei Yang, Basak Dogan, Sally Goudreau, Thelma Brown, Laura J Esserman, Nola M Hylton. Breast cancer subtype specific association of pCR with MRI assessed tumor volume progression during NAC in the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-04.
Abstract P6-02-01: The effect of background parenchymal enhancement on the predictive performance of functional tumor volume measured in MRI
Li, Wen , Newitt, David C. , Harnish, Roy, Jones, Ella F. , Wilmes, Lisa J., Gibbs, Jessica , Price, Elissa R. , Joe, Bonnie N. , Chien, A. Jo , Berry, Donald A. , Albain, Kathy S. , Clark, Amy S. , Edmiston, Kirsten K., Ellis, Erin D. , Euhus, David , Han, Heather, Khan, Qamar J. , Lu, Janice , Mitri, Zaha, Nanda, Rita , Northfelt, Donald W. , Sanft, Tara, Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Viscusi, Rebecca K., Yung, Rachel L. , Melisko, Michelle , Perlmutter, Jane , Schwab, Richard J. , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Asare, Smita , Goudreau, Sally , Abé, Hiroyuki , Sheth, Deepa , Wolverton, Dulcy , Fountain, Kelly , Ha, Richard , Wynn, Ralph, Crane, Erin P., Dillis, Charlotte, Kuritza, Theresa , Morley, Kevin , Nelson, Michael T. , Church, An , Niell, Bethany L. , Drukteinis, Jennifer S. , Oh, Karen Y. , Jafarian, Neda, Brandt, Kathy R., Choudhery, Sadia, Bang, Dae Hee , Mullins, Christiane, Woodard, Stefanie , Ojeda-Fornier, Haydee, Eghedari, Mohammad, Sheth, Pulin , Hovanessian‐Larsen, Linda , Rosen, Mark, Spektor, Michael , Giurescu, Marina E., Newell, Mary S. , Cohen, Michael A. , Berman, Elise, Smith, William P. , Fitzpatrick, Kim, Borders, Marisa H. , Yang, Wei , Onishi, Natsuko , Boughey, Judy C. , Elias, Anthony , Isaacs, Claudine , Lang, Julie E. , Meisel, Jane Lowe , Sanft, Tara , Wallace, Anne M. , Yee, Douglas , Rugo, Hope S. , Schwab, Richard, Symmans, W. Fraser , Yau, Christina , DeMichele, Angela , Zamora, Kathryn , McDonald, Elizabeth S. , Lehman, Constance Dobbins , Dogan, Basak E , Esserman, Laura J. , Hylton, Nola M.

Cancer Research | March 26, 2020 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P6-02-01-P6-02-01

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-02-01 Get It

Abstract Background: Strong background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) may cause overestimation in tumor volume measured from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, which may adversely affect the ability of MR tumor volume to predict treatment outcome for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Specifically, an overestimation of tumor volume can result in misclassification of patients with complete pathologic response (pCR) as non-responders, leading to less confidence in MRI prediction. As well, overestimation of extent of disease might lead to more aggressive surgical therapy than necessary. This study investigated whether high BPE in the contralateral breast influences the predictive performance of MRI-measured functional tumor volume (FTV) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing NAC. Methods: patients (n=990) enrolled in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL who were randomized to the graduated experimental drug arms or controls from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed. Each patient had 4 MRI exams: pre-NAC (T0), after 3 weeks of NAC (T1), between NAC regimens (T2), and post-NAC (T3). FTV was calculated at each MRI exam by summing voxels meeting enhancement thresholds. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in the contralateral breast was calculated automatically as mean percentage enhancement on the early (nominal 150sec post-contrast) image in the fibroglandular tissue segmented from 5 continuous axial slices centered in the inferior-to-superior stack. For each treatment time point, patients having both FTV and BPE measurements were included in the analysis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was estimated as the association between FTV and pCR at T1, T2, and T3. The analysis was conducted in the full patient cohort and in sub-cohorts defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status. In each patient cohort, a cut-off BPE value was selected to classify patients with high vs. low BPE by testing AUCs estimated with low-BPE patients reached maximum when the cut-off value varied from median to maximum in steps of 10%. Results: Out of 990 patients, 878 had pCR outcome data (pCR or non-pCR, pCR rate = 35%). Table 1 shows the number of patients, pCR rate, and AUC of FTV for predicting pCR using all patients available vs. a subset patients with low BPE (&lt; BPE cut-off). In the full cohort, AUC increased slightly across all time points after patients with high BPE were removed. In the HR+/HER2- subtype, AUC increased at T1 after removal of cases with high BPE (0.65 vs. 0.71). For HR-/HER2+, AUC increased substantially after removal of high BPE cases (0.65 to 0.86 at T1, 0.71 to 0.87 at T2, and 0.71 to 0.89 at T3), with greater improvement at the early time point (T1) compared to later time points (T2 and T3). Only a slight improvement in the AUC was observed in the HR+/HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subtypes across all time points. Conclusions: High background parenchymal enhancement adversely affected the predictive performance of functional tumor volume measured by DCE-MRI, at early treatment time point for HR+/HER2- and across all time points for HR-/HER2+ cancer subtype. The adverse effect might be offset using subtype-optimized enhancement threshold in calculating functional tumor volume. Table 1 Effect of BPE on the prediction of pCR using FTV at various treatment time pointsT1T2T3npCR rateAUCBPE cut-offnpCR rateAUCBPE cut-offnpCR rateAUCBPE cut-offFullAll64734%0.662762334%0.701761134%0.6925Subset45334%0.6831133%0.7230534%0.72HR+/HER2-All26218%0.651924918%0.718225518%0.7519Subset13118%0.7124818%0.7120419%0.76HR+/HER2+All10636%0.642110538%0.62269634%0.7120Subset5332%0.668438%0.665740%0.73HR-/HER2+All5175%0.65204774%0.71204973%0.7116Subset3073%0.862871%0.872475%0.89HR-/HER2-All22842%0.682822243%0.751821143%0.6916Subset15940%0.7111137%0.7810540%0.75 Citation Format: Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, David C Newitt, Roy Harnish, Ella F Jones, Lisa J Wilmes, Jessica Gibbs, Elissa Price, Bonnie N Joe, A. Jo Chien, Donald A Berry, Judy C Boughey, Kathy S Albain, Amy S Clark, Kirsten K Edmiston, Anthony D Elias, Erin D Ellis, David M Euhus, Heather S Han, Claudine Isaacs, Qamar J Khan, Julie E Lang, Janice Lu, Jane L Meisel, Zaha Mitri, Rita Nanda, Donald W Northfelt, Tara Sanft, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca K Viscusi, Anne M Wallace, Douglas Yee, Rachel Yung, Michelle E Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, Richard Schwab, W. Fraser Symmans, Laura J van't Veer, Christina Yau, Smita M Asare, Angela DeMichele, Sally Goudreau, Hiroyuki Abe, Deepa Sheth, Dulcy Wolverton, Kelly Fountain, Richard Ha, Ralph Wynn, Erin P Crane, Charlotte Dillis, Theresa Kuritza, Kevin Morley, Michael Nelson, An Church, Bethany Niell, Jennifer Drukteinis, Karen Y Oh, Neda Jafarian, Kathy Brandt, Sadia Choudhery, Dae Hee Bang, Christiane Mullins, Stefanie Woodard, Kathryn W Zamora, Haydee Ojeda-Fornier, Mohammad Eghedari, Pulin Sheth, Linda Hovanessian-Larsen, Mark Rosen, Elizabeth S McDonald, Michael Spektor, Marina Giurescu, Mary S Newell, Michael A Cohen, Elise Berman, Constance Lehman, William Smith, Kim Fitzpatrick, Marisa H Borders, Wei Yang, Basak Dogan, Laura J Esserman, Nola M Hylton. The effect of background parenchymal enhancement on the predictive performance of functional tumor volume measured in MRI [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-01.
Burden of injury along the development spectrum: associations between the Socio-demographic Index and disability-adjusted life year estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
Haagsma, Juanita A. , James, Spencer L , Castle, Chris D, Dingels, Zachary V, Fox, Jack T, Hamilton, Erin B, Lucchesi, Lydia R , Sylte, Dillon O , Adebayo, Oladimeji , Ahmadi, Alireza , Aichour, Miloud Taki Eddine, Alahdab, Fares , Al‐Raddadi, Rajaa , Alsharif, Ubai , Altirkawi, Khalid A , Anjomshoa, Mina, Appiah, Seth Christopher Yaw , Aremu, Olatunde , Arora, Amit , Assadi, Reza , Awasthi, Ashish , Quintanilla, Beatriz Paulina Ayala , Balalla, Shivanthi , Banstola, Amrit , Barker‐Collo, Suzanne , Bärnighausen, Till , Behzadifar, Meysam, Bennett, Derrick , Bhaumik, Soumyadeep , Bhutta, Zulfiqar A , Bijani, Ali , Borges, Guilherme , Borschmann, Rohan , Bose, Dipan, Bražinová, Alexandra, Campuzano, Julio César , Cárdenas, Rosario , Carvalho, Félix , Castañeda-Orjuela, Carlos A , Catalá-López, Ferrán , Choi, Jee-Young Jasmine , Christopher, Devasahayam Jesudas , Crowe, Christopher S. , Dalal, Koustuv , Leo, Diego De, Neve, Jan‐Walter De , Deribe, Kebede , Dessie, Getenet , deVeber, Gabrielle , Dharmaratne, Samath Dhamminda , Doan, Linh Phuong , Driscoll, Tim , El‐Khatib, Ziad , Ellingsen, Christian Lycke , Endries, Aman Yesuf , Faro, André , Fereshtehnejad, Seyed‐Mohammad , Fernandes, Eduarda , Fischer, Florian , Franklin, Richard C. , Fukumoto, Takeshi , Gezae, Kebede Embaye , Gill, Tiffany K, Goulart, Alessandra C. , Grada, Ayman , Guo, Yuming , Haghparast‐Bidgoli, Hassan , Haj‐Mirzaian, Arvin , Haj‐Mirzaian, Arya , Hamadeh, Randah R , Hassen, Hamid Yimam , Havmoeller, Rasmus, Henok, Andualem , Hı́jar, Martha, Hole, Michael K., Rad, Enayatollah Homaie , Hossain, Naznin , Hostiuc, Sorin , Igumbor, Ehimario , Irvani, Seyed Sina Naghibi , Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful , Ivers, Rebecca , Jacobsen, Kathryn H. , Jahanmehr, Nader , Jakovljević, Mihajlo , Jha, Ravi Prakash , Shushtari, Zahra Jorjoran , Jozwiak, Jacek Jerzy , Jürisson, Mikk , Kalani, Rizwan, Kasaeian, Amir , Kelbore, Abraham Getachew , Kengne, André Pascal , Khader, Yousef , Khafaie, Morteza Abdullatif , Khalid, Nauman , Khan, Ejaz Ahmad , Kiadaliri, Ali , Kim, Yun Jin , Kısa, Adnan , Defo, Barthélémy Kuate , Biçer, Burcu Küçük , Kumar, Manasi , Lalloo, Ratilal , Lam, Hilton Y. , Lami, Faris , Leasher, Janet L , Li, Shanshan , Linn, Shai , Lunevičius, Raimundas , Machado, Flávia Ribeiro , Razek, Hassan Magdy Abd El , Razek, Muhammed Magdy Abd El, Mahotra, Narayan Bahadur , Majdán, Marek , Majeed, Azeem , Malekzadeh, Reza, Malik, Manzoor Ahmad , Manda, Ana-Laura, Massenburg, Benjamin B. , Maulik, Pallab K , Meheretu, Hailemariam Abiy Alemu , Mehndiratta, Man Mohan, Mendoza, Walter, Mengesha, Melkamu Merid , Meretoja, Tuomo J , Meretoja, Atte , Miazgowski, Tomasz , Miller, Ted R. , Mini, GK , Мirrakhimov, Erkin М , Moazen, Babak , Mezerji, Naser Mohammad Gholi, Mohammadibakhsh, Roghayeh , Mohammed, Shafiu , Molokhia, Mariam , Monasta, Lorenzo , Mondello, Stefania , Montero-Zamora, Pablo A. , Moodley, Yoshan , Moosazadeh, Mahmood , Moradi, Ghobad , Morawska, Lídia , Velásquez, Ilais Moreno , Moschos, Marilita M. , Mousavi, Seyyed Meysam , Murthy, Srinivas , Musa, Kamarul Imran , Naik, Gurudatta , Nangia, Vinay, Nascimento, Bruno Ramos , Ndwandwe, Duduzile , Negoi, Ionuţ , Nguyen, Son Hoang , Nguyen, Long Hoang , Ningrum, Dina Nur Anggraini , Nirayo, Yirga Legesse, Ofori‐Asenso, Richard , Ogbo, Felix Akpojene , Oladimeji, Olanrewaju , Olagunju, Andrew T , Olagunju, Tinuke O , Orpana, Heather , Otstavnov, Stanislav S , Mahesh, P A , Pakhalé, Smita , Park, Eun‐Kee , Pesudovs, Konrad , Polinder, Suzanne , Prakash, Swayam , Rafay, Anwar, Rafiei, Alireza , Rahimi, Siavash , Rahimi‐Movaghar, Vafa , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Kumar, Rajesh , Ramezanzadeh, Kiana, Rawaf, David Laith , Renzaho, André M. N. , Resnikoff, Serge , Roever, Leonardo , Sabde, Yogesh , Saddik, Basema , Salamati, Payman , Salimi, Yahya , Salz, Inbal, Samy, Abdallah M , Sanabria, Juan , Sànchez-Riera, Lídia , Santric-Milicevic, Milena M , Satpathy, Maheswar , Sawhney, Monika, Sawyer, Susan M. , Şaylan, Mete , Schwebel, David C. , Seedat, Soraya , Shaikh, Masood Ali, Shams-Beyranvand, Mehran , Shamsizadeh, Morteza , Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi , Sheikh, Aziz , Shigematsu, Mika, Shiri, Rahman , Shiue, Ivy , Silva, João Pedro , Sinha, Dhirendra Narain , Filho, Adauto Martins Soares , Soriano, Joan B. , Soshnikov, Sergey , Soyiri, Ireneous N , Starodubov, Vladimir I., Stein, Dan J. , Sufiyan, Mu’awiyyah Babale , Sunshine, Jacob E. , Sykes, Bryan L. , Tabarés‐Seisdedos, Rafael , Tabb, Karen M. , Tessema, Gizachew Assefa , Thakur, Jarnail Singh , Car, Lorainne Tudor , Uzochukwu, Benjamin, Valdéz, Pascual , Varavikova, Elena A. , Vasconcelos, Ana Maria Nogales , Violante, Francesco Saverio , Waheed, Yasir , Wang, Yuan‐Pang , Wijeratne, Tissa , Yadav, Priyanka , Yano, Yuichiro , Yenesew, Muluken Azage, Yisma, Engida , Younis, Mustafa Z , Zafar, Shamsa , Zaman, Sojib Bin , Zodpey, Sanjay , Hay, Simon I , Mokdad, Ali H. , Vos, Theo , Khubchandani, Jagdish , Padrón‐Monedero, Alicia , Wijeratne, T , Stein, Dan J , Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful , Assadi, Reza , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Liu, Zichen, Roberts, Nicholas L S , Ahmed, Muktar Beshir , Alghnam, Suliman Abdullah , Aljunid, Syed Mohamed , Antonio, Carl Abelardo T. , Asayesh, Hamid , Bazargan‐Hejazi, Shahrzad , Bedi, Neeraj , Behzadifar, Masoud , Behzadifar, Meysam, Benjet, Corina L. , Benseñor, Isabela M. , Boufous, Soufiane , Carrero, Juan Jesús , Daryani, Ahmad , Daviţoiu, Dragoş Virgil , Degenhardt, Louisa J , Dolan, Kate A , Dubey, Manisha , Zaki, Maysaa El Sayed , Eskandarieh, Sharareh , Filip, Irina , Gill, Tiffany K. , Gupta, Rahul, Hamidi, Samer , Haro, Josep María , Hassankhani, Hadi , Hendrie, Delia V. , Hı́jar, Martha , Hu, Guoqing , Ilesanmi, Olayinka Stephen , Jayatilleke, Achala Upendra , Jonas, Jost B , Kabir, Ali , Kalani, Rizwan, Khoja, Abdullah T , Kim, Young‐Eun , Kim, Daniel , Koyanagi, Ai , Lansingh, Van Charles , Malta, Déborah Carvalho , Mansournia, Mohammad Alì , Melese, Addisu Dagnaw , Meštrović, Tomislav , Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar , Morrison, Shane D. , Najafi, Farid , Nguyen, Trang Huyen , Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi , Oh, In‐Hwan , Olivares, Pedro Rufino , Patton, George , Phillips, Michael , Radfar, Amir , Rawaf, Salman , Rezaeian, Shahab , Ronfani, Luca , Roshandel, Gholamreza , Saxena, Sonia , Schneider, Ione Jayce Ceola , Sepanlou, Sadaf Ghajarieh , Shen, Jiabin , Singh, Jasvinder A. , Стародубов, В. И. , Stokes, Mark Andrew , Tehrani‐Banihashemi, Arash , Tran, Khanh Bao , Tran, Bach Xuan , Uthman, Olalekan Abdulrahman , Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy , Vlassov, Vasily , Winkler, Andrea Sylvia , Azage, Muluken , YIP, PAUL S. F. , Yonemoto, Naohiro , Yu, Chuanhua , Zaidi, Zoubida , Zamani, Mohammad , Zhao, Yong , Lopez, Alan D , Olagunju, Andrew T , Alahdab, Fares

Injury Prevention | January 9, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Suppl 2 | Pages: i12-i26

10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043296 | PMID 31915273 Get It

Background The epidemiological transition of non-communicable diseases replacing infectious diseases as the main contributors to disease burden has been well documented in global health literature. Less focus, however, has been given to the relationship between sociodemographic changes and injury. The aim of this study was to examine the association between disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from injury for 195 countries and territories at different levels along the development spectrum between 1990 and 2017 based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates. Methods Injury mortality was estimated using the GBD mortality database, corrections for garbage coding and CODEm—the cause of death ensemble modelling tool. Morbidity estimation was based on surveys and inpatient and outpatient data sets for 30 cause-of-injury with 47 nature-of-injury categories each. The Socio-demographic Index (SDI) is a composite indicator that includes lagged income per capita, average educational attainment over age 15 years and total fertility rate. Results For many causes of injury, age-standardised DALY rates declined with increasing SDI, although road injury, interpersonal violence and self-harm did not follow this pattern. Particularly for self-harm opposing patterns were observed in regions with similar SDI levels. For road injuries, this effect was less pronounced. Conclusions The overall global pattern is that of declining injury burden with increasing SDI. However, not all injuries follow this pattern, which suggests multiple underlying mechanisms influencing injury DALYs. There is a need for a detailed understanding of these patterns to help to inform national and global efforts to address injury-related health outcomes across the development spectrum.