Perlmutter, Jane

Abstract Introduction Cancer clinical trials have historically faced challenges in achieving fully representative trial population, particularly in terms of including patients from diverse ethnic and racial groups, those with low socioeconomic status, and those living in rural regions. This has contributed to inequities in access to novel therapeutic options. Background The I-SPY adaptive platform trials have prioritized diversity since inception, consistently enrolling in >10% of trial patients being Black and/or Hispanic individuals. The majority of participating institutions in the I-SPY 2.2 study are academic or large well-resourced health systems. In 2023, the I-SPY ACCESS (Achieving Cancer Clinical Trial Equity in Socioeconomically Diverse Sites) Initiative was launched to enhance representation by engaging and involving nontraditional trial sites- such as safety-net hospitals, community cancer centers, and rural cancer centers- that serve historically excluded patient populations. Methods The I-SPY ACCESS Initiative offers customized and personalized tailored support to under-resourced sites. This includes comprehensive feasibility and readiness assessments, onboarding guidance, enhanced site-specific training, centralized institutional review board (IRB) navigation, site peer mentorship, and educational materials for both patient and provider. Additionally, patients gain access to I-SPY advocate peer trial navigators. Sites are provided culturally responsive patient education tools- including multilingual brochures, a dedicated patient website, and content co-developed with community partners. A Clinical Trial Navigator supports both patients and sites, helping to locate logistical, social, and trial specific resources.Tools such as virtual Clinical Research Coordinators (vCRC's) and OneSource technology are deployed strategically based on assessed site need and resource availability. OneSource is an innovative platform that enables direct extraction of clinical data from electronic health records into trial databases, reducing site workload and improving data quality. Funding models are currently being explored to extend OneSource and vCRC services across more ACCESS sites. In the future, there are plans to pilot financial navigation services and integrative care resources for all patients enrolled in I-SPY with particular focus on those enrolled at ACCESS sites. Results and Progress As of June 2025, seven sites have been assessed as ACCESS sites for I-SPY 2.2, with two sites having successfully completed activation and currently enrolling participants. Beginning in mid-2024, one DCIS RECAST ACCESS site has been activated and 11 additional sites are in the onboarding process. The modest pace of I-SPY 2.2 activation reflects the complexity and operational demands associated with resource-intensive platform trial. In contrast, the DCIS RECAST protocol was designed with a lower burden, facilitating easier implementation by under-resourced sites, reflected by increased interest in the study among ACCESS sites. The ACCESS framework is being explored for potential future application in the Pre I-SPY Phase 1 platform trial, particularly considering the historical underrepresentation of such sites in the early-phase clinical research. Conclusion and Future Goals The I-SPY ACCESS initiative demonstrates that investing in thoughtful, innovative, and effective means for trial delivery, as well as incorporating community-based support, can strengthen representation in complex, adaptive breast cancer trials. The initiative offers a flexible, equity-driven framework that is impactful now and scalable for future innovation in oncology research. Citation Format: S. L. Horton, D. A. Idossa, K. C. Hewitt, J. Perlmutter, L. Van't Veer, N. Hylton, A. Borowsky, F. Symmans, D. Yee, C. Yau, P. Pohlmann, J. Boughey, L. Esserman. Expanding Diversity through Innovation: Development of the I-SPY ACCESS Initiative for the I-SPY2.2 and DCIS RECAST Clinical Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-09-08.

Abstract Background: Advances in oncology, particularly the adoption of immunotherapies and antibody-drug conjugates, are transforming the nature and frequency of adverse events (AEs). These AEs come with both short and long-term symptoms that significantly impact patient quality of life. Monitoring for early onset of symptoms could optimize personalized therapy, maximizing potential efficacy while mitigating toxicity. It is also possible that some toxicities are directly associated with drug sensitivity. We sought to identify symptoms associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early-stage high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods: Our study population included 288 stage II/III high-risk breast cancer patients enrolled on the I-SPY2 trial from 2021-2024, who received IO and ADC neoadjuvant therapies ± standard paclitaxel. pCR was defined as tumor absent in breast and nodes at surgery following neoadjuvant treatment. Patients (n = 288) were sent electronic PROs. 33 patient-reported AEs were measured using NCI's Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Each symptom was evaluated using severity, frequency, and interference on a Likert Scale. Presence of early PRO symptoms (cycles 1-3 of treatment) were categorized (at least one of moderate or greater), and odds ratios were computed with pCR as outcome. To assess whether higher grade AEs were enriched in patients that achieved a pCR, we also performed the Wilcoxan Rank Sum test using maximum (worst) symptom severity. Breast tumor volume was measured by MRI at baseline and again at cycle 3 (∼day 21 from treatment start). Functional tumor volume (FTV) was computed from MR images by using enhancement thresholds. and percent change from baseline (ΔFTV) was calculated. Reduction in FTV was defined as a positive change. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: Of 288 patients included in our analysis (median age = 48 years, range = 20-78, pCR rate = 29%), 203 (70.5%) were White, 17 (5.9%) were Asian, 33 (11.5%) were Black or African American, and 35 (12.2%) were Hispanic and 89% were administered immunotherapy, 11% ADC. The pCR rate was 29%. PRO analysis revealed that patients that had moderate to severe muscle pain (27% vs 10% OR = 3.15, P < 0.05), joint pain (22% vs 8% OR = 3.23, P < 0.05), headache (27% vs 12.5% OR = 2.59, P < 0.05), or mouth/throat sores (16% vs 5% OR = 3.56, p < 0.05) within weeks 1-3 had higher odds of achieving a pCR. Maximum severity between weeks 1-3 was associated with pCR. Patients that achieved a PCR had higher grade muscle pain (P < 0.05), heart rates of palpitations (P < 0.05), and significantly lower grade numbness and tingling (p = 0.002). Additionally, of the symptoms assessed, frequency, interference, and severity of arm or leg swelling was significantly correlated with reduction in tumor volume (FTV) during weeks 1-3 treatment (Bonferroni corrected P<0.01). Beyond 6 weeks, associations were weak or insignificant. Conclusion: Our study utilizes a computational framework that defined sentinel symptoms such as muscle and joint pain, mouth/throat sores, headache, and swelling, as early as weeks 1-3 that were associated with a favorable tumor response. This may suggest an early immune reaction in patients that eventually respond favorably to treatment, and prioritization to continue these patients on treatment may be warranted. Our work can help provide earlier proactive monitoring to mitigate toxicities, to enhance treatment response, and a potential symptom-based early understanding to personalize treatment efficacy. Citation Format: A. Basu, S. Umashankar, C. Yau, K. J. Ruddy, A. H. Blaes, D. M. Wolf, A. DeMichele, J. Perlmutter, D. Yee, A. B. Olshen, L. J. van't Veer, R. A. Shatsky, C. Isaacs, R. Nanda, H. S. Rugo, M. E. Melisko, N. Hylton, L. J. Esserman, D. L. Hershman, I-SPY Trial Investigators and Patient Advocates.. Early Adverse Symptoms Predict Response to Treatment Among Patients in the I-SPY Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF1-04.

Abstract Background: Combinations of antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and rilvegostomig (rilve), respectively, offer promising efficacy but are associated with a heightened risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis. Early detection and management are critical for optimizing patient safety, yet there are no standard protocols for real-time evaluation. We hypothesized that vigilant monitoring would enable early detection, prevent symptoms, and minimize the chance of treatment delays while testing novel therapeutic combinations that have a potential risk of ILD. Methods: We tested the combination of T-DXd and rilve administered every 3 weeks in the I-SPY2.2 phase 2 platform trial (NCT01042379), which enrolls patients with clinical stage II/III breast cancer commencing neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Given the potential risk of overlapping pulmonary toxicity of these two agents, we added rigorous monitoring with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), six-minute walk test (6MWT), and high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) scanning pretreatment and every 6 weeks thereafter. A real-time safety workflow was implemented, with pre-specified criteria for halting treatment and escalation to the next block of treatment. All abnormal findings reported on chest CT by site radiologist were centrally reviewed in real time by the study pulmonologist (T.K.) and cases of suspected ILD were adjudicated promptly by a safety committee consisting of the pulmonologist and several medical oncologists, enabling early study drug interruption and therapeutic interventions. Toxicity data were evaluated in the first 51 patients treated with T-DXd plus rilve, and a preplanned hold was initiated until safety was ascertained by the data and safety monitoring board. Results: Safety data were evaluated in the first 51 patients receiving T-DXd plus rilve. Eight ILD events were confirmed (15.68% incidence): 5 grade 1, 2 grade 2, and 1 grade 3. One patient had an early chest CT scan because of dyspnea. All cases were identified by HRCT scans; PFTs and 6MWT did not enhance early detection and were subsequently dropped from the monitoring protocol. No patient was symptomatic for more than 24 hours. Radiographic findings resolved within 14-55 days. Patients with grade 2 & 3 ILD were treated with corticosteroids. No cases of ILD required intensive care or escalated therapy beyond steroids. Early treatment escalation to the subsequent block of therapy occurred in 3 patients; all 3 patients were subsequently able to receive appropriate therapy. At the meeting, safety data from all 100 patients treated with this combination will be reported. Conclusion: Real-time, centralized monitoring and adjudication allowed for early detection and prompt management of ILD, which both mitigated severity and supported timely therapeutic management. Among the monitoring tools studied, HRCT scanning performed every 6 weeks proved most effective for early ILD identification; PFT and 6MWT did not enhance early detection. This approach offers a potential framework for future studies assessing pulmonary safety in regimens combining agents that have a known risk for inducing ILD. Citation Format: T. Kulkarni, R. Nanda, H. S. Rugo, C. C. OSullivan, K. M. Kalinsky, J. C. Boughey, P. R. Pohlmann, J. Perlmutter, D. Yee, A. Borowsky, F. Symmans, N. Hylton, L. Van ‘t Veer, C. Yau, L. Esserman. Real-time monitoring for drug-induced interstitial lung disease with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Rilvegostomig combination therapy prevents persistent, symptomatic disease: Safety insights from the I-SPY2.2 platform trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-01-09.

Abstract Introduction: AC plus a taxane is standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early breast cancer, but AC may be unnecessary for pathologic complete response (pCR) in many patients. I-SPY2 is a phase 2 trial evaluating the use of 12 weeks of paclitaxel +/- an investigational drug followed by AC. Serial measurements of Functional Tumor Volume (FTV) by MRI, inter-regimen biopsies and pathology from surgery were used to determine the contribution of AC to reduction in FTV or pCR. Methods: 1187 patients enrolled between 2010-2022 had serial measurements of FTV. 150 patients received an inter-regimen biopsy. The primary endpoint of I-SPY2 is pCR. To determine how much AC contributed to the reduction in FTV, we calculated the total FTV decrease between pre-treatment and pre-surgery, and then computed the percentage (%) of the total FTV decrease seen after 12 weeks of paclitaxel regimen. We attributed pCRs observed among patients for whom taxane contributed <90% FTV reduction to AC and estimated the % patients achieving pCR from AC. For the subset with inter-regimen biopsy, we estimated the percentage achieving pCR from those patients with invasive cancer present at inter-regimen biopsy. Results: We found that by week 12 (end of taxane), 64% (763/1187) of patients had achieved ≥90% of their total FTV reduction. In 424/1187 (36%) patients had with taxane <90% response, and subsequent AC contributed to more than 10% of the total decrease in FTV. 90 pCRs (21%) were observed among these 424 patients or, overall, approximately 8% of patients achieved pCR from AC after taxane. Of note, 54/1187 (4.5%) patients had no response to a taxane regimen and had decreased in FTV due to AC alone. Of the 54/1187 responding to AC only, there were 11 pCRs. These results varied by response predictive subtypes as shown. When the subpopulation with post-paclitaxel biopsy was examined, 63/150 (42%) patients had invasive cancer at this timepoint. 47 patients received AC and 4/47 (8.5%) achieved a pCR after AC. 13/47 (28%) achieved RCB 0/1. Conclusions: Serial measurements of FTV identifies patients who had a favorable response to a taxane regimen. For those with a suboptimal response, AC provided some contribution to further decrease in tumor volume. However, only a small fraction achieved a complete response. Immune positive and HER2+ (non-luminal) had the biggest benefit, with only 3-6% of other subtypes achieved pCR. Thus, AC can be reserved for those patients with suboptimal response to the initial taxane therapy. I-SPY2.2 utilizes these data to avoid AC by allowing patients to proceed to surgery after serial MRI and biopsy predict a pCR at an early timepoint. While AC remains the standard of care in many neoadjuvant regimens, the low response rates seen in I-SPY2 suggests that more active regimens need to be developed for patients with disease resistant to a taxane based therapy. Citation Format: D. Yee, C. Yau, P. Norwood, D. M. Wolf, P. R. Pohlmann, N. Onishi, L. van 't Veer, A. Borowsky, W. F. Symmans, J. Perlmutter, J. C. Boughey, E. Price, W. Li, I-SPY Investigators, N. Hylton, L. J. Esserman. Quantifying the Contribution of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) to Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Taxane Therapy: Analysis of the I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-09.

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors can result in serious, long-lasting immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Early identification of symptoms predictive of irAEs could enhance monitoring and timely intervention. This study assessed whether symptoms within the first 8 weeks of treatment could predict subsequent development of immune-related adrenal insufficiency(AI) or hypothyroidism. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from the I-SPY2 trial, a phase 2 platform trial for high-risk stage II/III breast cancer across 30 U.S. sites. The cohort included 482 women treated with experimental immunotherapy agents concurrent with weekly paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were grade ≥ 1 hypothyroidism or AI, adjudicated by an independent safety group, up to 1-year post-treatment. Symptoms and irAEs were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Symptom burden was quantified as area under the curve (AUC) based on symptom grade and duration. Predictive modeling was performed using logistic regression and ROC analysis; symptom enrichment between cases and controls was evaluated using Fisher’s exact tests. Results Among 482 participants, 107 (22.2%) developed irAEs, with hypothyroidism (n = 61, 12.7%) occurring more frequently than AI (n = 38, 7.9%) at medians of 99 and 105 days from treatment initiation, respectively. Symptom enrichment analysis identified early predictive symptoms. Fatigue (17.2% vs 6.8%, p = 0.011) and rash (20.7% vs 7.8%, p = 0.0037) were predictive of hypothyroidism, while diarrhea (45.9% vs 31%, p = 0.048), constipation (5.4% vs 0.2%, p = 0.018), and taste changes (5.4% vs 0.5%, p = 0.034) were associated with AI. A predictive model demonstrated moderate performance (AUC 0.65 for AI, p < 0.0001; AUC 0.61 for hypothyroidism, p = 0.012). Model accuracy in an external validation cohort was 72.8% for AI and 74.7% for hypothyroidism. Conclusions This study presents a predictive framework to identify patients at risk for adrenal insufficiency and hypothyroidism as irAEs, enabling personalized care and proactive intervention to improve treatment outcomes and safety.

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become the standard of care for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not yet for other subtypes. We previously developed a clinical-grade mRNA-based immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the response predictive subtypes. We report the performance of ImPrint in hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+HER2–) patients from five IO arms. METHODS A total of 204 HR+HER2– (MammaPrint high-risk) patients from five IO arms (anti–PD-1, anti–PD-L1/poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor combination, anti–PD-1/toll-like receptor 9 dual-IO combination, and anti–PD-1 ± lymphocyte activation gene 3 dual-IO combination) and 191 patients from the chemotherapy-only control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) versus ImPrint– (likely resistant), using pretreatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to IO-containing arms was characterized and compared with tumor grade (III), MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2), and estrogen receptor (ER)-low (ER ≤ 10%). RESULTS Overall, the pCR rate across the five IO arms was 33%. 26% of HR+HER2– patients were ImPrint+, and pCR rates with IO were 75% in ImPrint+ versus 17% in ImPrint–, with the highest pCR rate >90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint–. Tumor grade (III), MP2, and ER-low showed pCR rates in IO of 45%, 56%, and 63%, respectively, with lower pCR odds ratios (OR < 7.5) compared with ImPrint (OR = 14.5). CONCLUSION Using an accurate selection strategy, HR+HER2– patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (ie, pCR rate >65%-70%). ImPrint, an Food and Drug Administration IDE-enabled assay, may represent a way to identify HR+HER2– patients for IO that best balances likely benefit versus risk of serious immune-related adverse events.

610 Background: The adverse event (AE) landscape in oncology is changing due to the introduction of immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates. These AEs come with both short and long-term symptoms that significantly impact patient quality of life. Monitoring for early onset of symptoms could optimize therapy for a particular patient, maximizing potential efficacy while mitigating toxicity. It is also possible that some toxicities are directly associated with drug sensitivity. We sought to identify symptoms associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early-stage high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods: Our study population included 288 stage II/III high-risk breast cancer patients enrolled on the I-SPY2 trial from 2021-2024, who received novel neoadjuvant therapies ± standard paclitaxel. pCR was assigned if tumor was absent in breast and nodes at surgery following neoadjuvant treatment. Patients (n = 288, pCR rate = 29%, 89% administered immunotherapy) were sent electronic PROs. 33 patient-reported AEs were measured using NCI's Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Each symptom was evaluated using severity, frequency, and interference on a Likert Scale. Presence of early PRO symptoms (cycles 1-3 of treatment) were binarized (at least one of moderate or greater), and odds ratios were computed with pCR as outcome. To assess whether higher grade AEs were enriched in patients that achieved a pCR, we also performed the Wilcoxan rank sum test using maximum (worst) symptom severity. Results: Of 288 patients included in our analysis (median age = 48 years, range = 20-78), 203 (70.5%) were White, 17 (5.9%) were Asian, 33 (11.5%) were Black or African American, and 35 (12.2%) were Hispanic. PRO analysis revealed that patients that had moderate to severe muscle pain (27% vs 10% OR = 3.15, p < 0.05), joint pain (22% vs 8% OR = 3.23, p < 0.05), headache (27% vs 12.5% OR = 2.59, p < 0.05), or mouth/throat sores (16% vs 5% OR = 3.56, p < 0.05) within weeks 1-3 had higher odds of achieving a pCR. When we looked at maximum severity between weeks 1-3, patients that achieved a PCR had higher grade muscle pain (p = 0.04), heart palpitations (p = 0.035), and significantly lower grade numbness and tingling (p = 0.002). Beyond 6 weeks, associations were weaker or insignificant. Conclusions: Our study utilizes an analysis framework that was able to determine sentinel symptoms such as muscle and joint pain, mouth/throat sores and palpitations as early as weeks 1-3 associated with increased efficacy. This may suggest an early immune reaction in patients that eventually respond favorably to treatment. Our work can help provide earlier proactive monitoring to mitigate toxicities, treatment redirection if needed, and a potential symptom-based early understanding to personalize treatment efficacy. A similar analysis is underway to predict immune related AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 .

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become standard of care for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). I-SPY2 was the first randomized trial to examine the efficacy of IO therapy in high-risk HR+HER2- breast cancer, where most IO arms showed improved efficacy relative to control. We also previously showed immune-gene expression signatures associate with pathologic complete response (pCR) in HR+HER2- treated with IO; and developed a clinically applicable Immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the Response Predictive Subtypes. Here we report the performance of ImPrint in HR+HER2- patients from 5 IO arms. Methods: 204 HR+HER2- (MammaPrint high risk) patients from 5 IO arms (anti-PD1, anti-PDL1/PARPi, anti-PD1/TLR9 dual-IO, and anti-PD1 +/- LAG3 dual-IO) and 191 patients from the control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) vs. ImPrint- (likely resistant), by Agendia, Inc, using pre-treatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pCR to IO was characterized and compared to that of MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2) and tumor grade (III). Based on the DRFS of pCR vs. non-pCR HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients (median follow up ~4.5yr), we predicted the DRFS in the IO vs. control arms using an exponential model as a function of the pCR rates. Results: Overall, the pCR rate over the 5 IO arms was 33%. 28% of HR+HER2- patients were ImPrint+; and pCR rates with IO were 76% in ImPrint+ vs. 16% in ImPrint-, with the highest pCR rate &gt;90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint-. Based on the pCR rates in the IO vs. control (76% vs. 33%), the predicted DRFS of HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients are 91% vs 80% at 5 years, respectively. This translates to a risk reduction of 52% for the IO arm relative to standard chemotherapy in HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients. We also compared MP2 and tumor grade (III) to ImPrint+ as pCR predictors, as these markers have been used or proposed as selection markers for neoadjuvant IO trials in HR+HER2-. The pCR rates for MP2, Grade III, at 56%, 45%, respectively, are much smaller than that for ImPrint+ at 75% pCR; thus ImPrint appears to be a more precise predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant IO therapy in the HR+HER2- breast cancers. Conclusion: These results suggest that a subset of high risk HR+HER2- breast cancers is highly sensitive to immunotherapy, and by using a specific and sensitive selection strategy patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (i.e., pCR rate &gt; 65-70%). ImPrint, an FDA IDE-enabled assay currently being further evaluated in I-SPY2, may represent the way to identify patients for IO that best balances likely benefit vs risk of serious immune-related adverse events. Citation Format: Denise M. Wolf, Christina Yau, Lajos Pusztai, Rita Nanda, Jo Chien, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca Shatsky, Claudine Isaacs, MInetta Liu, Hyo Han, Hatem Soliman, Michael Campbell, Annuska Glas, Andrei Barcaru, Lorenza Mittempergher, Midas Kuilman, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Gillian Hirst, Hongmei Yu, Philip Beineke, Amrita Basu, I-SPY2 Investigators, Douglas Yee, W. Fraser Symmans, Angela DeMichele, Jane Perlmutter, Amy Delson, Laura Huppert, Hope Rugo, Amy Clark, Nola Hylton, Paula Pohlmann, Laura Esserman, Laura van 't Veer. Immune subtyping identifies a subset of HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer patients with a very high likelihood of response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO): Results from 5 IO arms of the I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1207.

Abstract Purpose: The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. Patients and Methods: I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy “graduates” if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%–99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. Conclusions: The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority &gt;90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.

Importance Patient withdrawal of consent from a cancer clinical trial is defined as a patient’s volitional cessation of participation in all matters related to a trial. It can undermine the trial’s purpose, make the original sample size and power calculations irrelevant, introduce bias between trial arms, and prolong the time to trial completion. Objective To report rates of and baseline factors associated with withdrawal of consent among patients in cancer clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants This multisite observational cohort study was conducted through the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Patient withdrawal was defined as a patient’s voluntary termination of consent to participate anytime during trial conduct. Baseline patient- and trial-based factors were investigated for their associations with patient withdrawal within the first 2 years using logistic regression models. All patients who participated in cancer therapeutic clinical trials conducted within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology from 2013 through 2019 were included. The data lock date was January 23, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures The percentage of patients who withdrew consent in 2 years and factors associated with withdrawal of consent. Results A total of 11 993 patients (median age, 62 years; 67% female) from 58 trials were included. Within 2 years, 1060 patients (9%) withdrew from their respective trials. Two-year rates of withdrawal were 5.7%, 7.6%, 8.5%, 7.8%, 8.4%, 9.5%, and 9.8% for each of the respective years from 2013 through 2019. In multivariable analyses, Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.30-2.15; P &amp;lt; .001), randomized design with placebo (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.38-1.94; P &amp;lt; .001), and patient age 75 years and older (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72; P = .003) were associated with higher likelihood of withdrawal by 2 years. Use of radiation was associated with patient retention (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, rates of withdrawal of consent were less than 10% and appeared consistent over time. Factors that are associated with withdrawal of consent should be considered when designing trials and should be further studied to learn how they can be favorably modified.