Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

748 citation(s) found for "Xi, Dan".

Reversing enhancer RNA–mediated IKBKE gene repression enables synthetic anticancer immunity in prostate cancer models
Li, Xiang, Sun, Rui, li, hao, Orme, Jacob J. , Zhang, Xu, Hou, Yu, Park, Sean S. , Zhang, Yu, He, Yi, Wang, Liguo , Domingo-Doménech, Josep, Ren, Shancheng, Xia, Dan, Jia, Zhankui, Zhang, Xu , Sun, Rui , Wang, Liguo , Park, Sean S , Zhang, Xu , Li, Xiang, Li, Hao, Zhang, Yu, Rodríguez-Bravo, Verónica , Domingo‐Domenech, Josep , Ren, Shancheng, Xia, Dan , Fu, Guanghou , Huang, Rui

Journal of Clinical Investigation | January 15, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci190928 | PMID 41542764 Get It

Immunotherapy has been effective in many cancer types but has failed in multiple clinical trials in prostate cancers, with the underlying mechanisms remaining largely unclear. Here, we demonstrate that androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) plus irradiation (IR) triggered robust anticancer immunity in prostate cancers in both patients and mice. We show that androgen-activated AR suppressed innate immune signaling by inducing inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon ( IKBKE ) gene repression through HDAC2 interaction with an IKBKE enhancer RNA ( IKBKE eRNA, or IKBKE-e ). ARPI treatment caused IKBKE derepression and enhanced an IR-induced innate immune response via action of RIG-I and MDA5 dsRNA sensors. IKBKE-e ablation largely enhanced innate immunity in prostate cancer cells in culture and anticancer immunity in mice. Our results revealed AR, HDAC2, and IKBKE eRNA as critical intrinsic immune suppressors in prostate cancer cells, suggesting that rejuvenating inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon (IKKε) signaling by targeting IKBKE-e is an actionable strategy to elicit synthetic anticancer immunity in immunologically “cold” cancers such as prostate cancer.
P-1228. Posaconazole Oral Suspension vs. Crushed Delayed-Release Tablets: Probability of Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment with Enteral Tube Administration
Bhattarai, Nirjan , O’Connell, Casey, Robinson, John, Cole, Kristin, Johnson, Tanner M , Stevens, Ryan W W, Wieruszewski, Patrick M. , Ilges, Dan , Stevens, Ryan W.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | January 12, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1420 Get It

Abstract Background Posaconazole immediate release (IR) suspension is the standard product for enteral feeding tube (EFT) administration but has erratic pharmacokinetic behavior and results in sub satisfactory concentrations. Limited evidence suggests that the posaconazole oral delayed-release (DR) tablets may be crushed. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who received EFT administration of posaconazole IR suspension or crushed DR tablets between 2018 and 2024. Patients were eligible if they had at least one serum concentration drawn ≥5 days after posaconazole initiation. The primary outcome was the attainment of therapeutic (≥700ng/mL for prophylaxis, ≥1,000ng/mL for treatment) serum concentration within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included time to therapeutic serum concentration, adverse drug effects, and frequency of clogged EFT. Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the relationship between posaconazole formulation and attainment of therapeutic concentrations while adjusting for confounding variables. Results Of the included patients, 100 received DR tablets and 48 received IR suspension. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or severity of illness. Among DR tablet and IR suspension recipients, 59% and 23% achieved therapeutic concentrations, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, drug interactions, posaconazole indication, malabsorptive gastrointestinal conditions, IR suspension was significantly less likely than crushed DR tablets to achieve therapeutic posaconazole concentrations within 30-days (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.71; p < 0.003). The crushed DR tablet group required less total daily posaconazole to achieve therapeutic concentrations (400 vs 600 mg/day, p = 0.003). Clogged EFTs were more frequent in the crushed DR tablet group (27% vs 10%, p = 0.022), while no differences were observed in the occurrence of hepatotoxicity or hypokalemia. Conclusion Administration of crushed posaconazole DR tablets via EFT is more likely to attain therapeutic concentrations compared to IR suspension. The optimal technique for administering crushed DR tablets to prevent EFT complications warrants investigation. Disclosures Patrick M. Wieruszewski, PharmD, FCCM, Wolters Kluwer/UpToDate: Advisor/Consultant
P-961. Let’s Shake on It: Evaluation of Weekly Handshake Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds with Hospital Internal Medicine Providers
Shubeilat, Jamilah , Seville, Maria Teresa , Dickinson, Drew T. , Ilges, Dan , Nagarakanti, Sandhya

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | January 12, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1163 Get It

Abstract Background Handshake antimicrobial stewardship (HAS) is an effective stewardship approach characterized by regular, face-to-face interactions with antimicrobial prescribers and broad review of all active antimicrobials. Benefits of this approach include enhanced relationship building and opportunities for targeted education. We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate the impact of once-weekly HAS rounds among Hospital Internal Medicine (HIM) teams in an academic medical center. Methods An infectious diseases (ID) physician and pharmacist conducted weekly table rounds with a HIM teaching team consisting of a hospitalist, advanced practice providers (APPs), APP fellow(s), and sometimes medical students. All patients on antimicrobials and without an active ID consult were reviewed and recommendations were provided. Thereafter, the stewardship team solicited ad hoc questions from other HIM teams via walking rounds in their offices. The number, type, and acceptance rate of recommendations were collected prospectively. A survey was sent to all HIM providers to obtain feedback on HAS rounds. Results HAS rounds were conducted weekly from February 7, 2024, to February 19, 2025, with a total of 52 sessions. Over the study period, 340 recommendations were provided, and 314 recommendations were implemented, yielding a recommendation implementation rate of 92.4%. The most common recommendation types were antimicrobial discontinuation (n=76, 22.4%), duration modification (n=63, 18.5%), and de-escalation (n=39, 11.5%). The survey was sent to 102 HIM providers and completed by 19 for a response rate of 18.6%. All respondents stated HAS added value or greatly added value to their practice. Antimicrobial selection (n=16, 84.2%), de-escalation (n=12, 63.2%), and pharmacy expertise (n=6, 31.6%) were areas in which providers saw the greatest benefit. Eighteen providers (94.7%) recommended expansion of HAS to non-HIM services. Conclusion Targeted, once-weekly HAS rounds resulted in high-yield interventions that were frequently accepted and perceived as highly valuable by HIM providers. Once-weekly or intermittent HAS practices might be considered in practice settings where resources or logistical constraints limit broader, hospital-wide handshake stewardship practices. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
P-945. Assessment of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions by Generalist Pharmacists Within a Large Academic Healthcare System
Otto, Ashley, Ausman, Sara , Cole, Kristin, Seo, Heather, Otto, Ashley , Ausman, Sara E , Ilges, Dan , Rivera, Christina G.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | January 12, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1148 Get It

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) commonly employ formulary restriction and prospective audit with feedback; however, frontline prescribers and other unit-based clinicians may enhance core ASP tactics as ASP extenders. We hypothesized that unit-based pharmacists act as ASP extenders and sought to characterize ASP interventions in their routine work.Top individual antimicrobial classes intervened on by unit-based pharmacistsUnit-based pharmacist antimicrobial intervention types Methods Retrospective, observational study of ASP interventions by unit-based pharmacists from July 2017 - April 2025 across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise. ASP interventions recorded using a standardized pharmacist documentation tool (Epic iVents [Software]) were collected retrospectively. Interventions on hospitalized, adult patients categorized as ‘ASP’ or linked with an antimicrobial were included; interventions by ASP dedicated staff were excluded. Secondary outcomes included: intervention subtypes and outcomes, location, and associated antimicrobial(s). Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize categorical data. Results A total of 104,055 interventions were included from 59,106 unique patients at 26 hospitals with the majority performed at the three destination sites. On average, 1,107 interventions were completed monthly by unit-based pharmacists. Frequently targeted antimicrobial classes were vancomycin and derivatives, penicillins, and 3rd/4th-generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone and cefepime) (Figure 1); 20,111 (19.3%) interventions were on ≥ 1 antimicrobial. Of the 66,827 interventions with a documented subtype, ASP was the most common (77.8%), with the remainder classified as dose (17.3%), medication (3%), or duration changes (1%) (Figure 2). A minority (2.2%) were documented as conducted under pharmacist collaborative practice agreements. Documented prescriber intervention rejections were uncommon (6.6%). Reported outcomes, when available, included therapy optimization, cost savings and avoidance of adverse drug events. Conclusion Unit-based pharmacists acted frequently as ASP extenders. These findings support unit-based pharmacist and ASP collaborative efforts. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
P-68. Effect of hypoalbuminemia on blood culture clearance and outcomes in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia managed with antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin
Stevens, Ryan W W, Baddour, L.M., Cole, Kristin, Kooda, Kirstin , Robinson, John, Stevens, Ryan W. , DeSimone, Daniel C. , Ilges, Dan

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | January 12, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.297 Get It

Abstract Background Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MS-SAB) is treated with antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASP) or cefazolin. Altered pharmacokinetics in the setting of hypoalbuminemia may reduce the likelihood of therapeutic success in patients receiving highly protein bound beta-lactams. ASPs and cefazolin are 94% and 80% protein bound, respectively. We assessed the impact of hypoalbuminemia (≤2.5 g/dL) on clinical outcomes in patients with MS-SAB treated with ASPs or cefazolin.Table 1:Unweighted and weighted analysis of full cohort by albumin statusTable 2:Weighted analysis of cefazolin and ASP cohorts by albumin status Methods This single center, retrospective study included adults (≥18 years) admitted with community-acquired MS-SAB between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2019 who received ASPs or cefazolin and had a serum albumin obtained between the date of first culture positivity and 72 hours of definitive therapy. Exclusion criteria included receipt of ≥5 days of MSSA active empiric therapy prior to definitive, polymicrobial bacteremia, antibiotics for an indication other than MS-SAB, or central nervous system infection. The primary outcome was failure to clear blood cultures within 72 hours of definitive therapy initiation. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between cohorts. Results 160 patients were included with 61 (38.1%) being hypoalbuminemic (Table 1). In the propensity score weighted analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 37% of patients with an albumin ≤2.5 g/dL vs. 10.2% with an albumin >2.5 g/dL (p< 0.001). This finding was consistent in both ASP and cefazolin subgroups (Table 2). Hospital length of stay was longer in hypoalbuminemic patients but did not represent a statistically significant difference in the weighted overall analysis (15.9 vs. 11.6 days, p=0.8). There was no difference in inpatient mortality in any of the cohorts analyzed. 90-day all-cause mortality was higher in hypoalbuminemic patients only in the cefazolin subgroup analysis (20.7% vs 4.9%, p=0.019). Conclusion The presence of hypoalbuminemia was associated with failure to clear blood cultures within 72 hours of definitive therapy initiation in patients with MS-SAB. While no significant difference in mortality was observed overall, the higher mortality in the cefazolin subgroup warrants further research on the impact of hypoalbuminemia on clinical outcomes in patients with MS-SAB. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, MD, UpToDate, Inc.: Royalty payments (authorship duties).
Cross-National Disparities in End-of-Life Outcomes and Care Strategies for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of China and the United States
Lin, Wei, Yang, Likun , Wu, Yan, Wang, Dan, Lin, Wei, Yang, Likun, Wang, Dan

No container title available | January 12, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-8124753/v1 Get It

Abstract Background Parkinson's disease (PD) represents a growing global health challenge, with prevalence doubling from 2.5 million cases in 1990 to 6.1 million in 2016, and projections suggesting it will exceed 12 million by 2040. This exponential growth has been termed the "Parkinson's pandemic." China and the United States, which together account for nearly half of the global PD population, have developed markedly different approaches to end-of-life (EOL) care, shaped by their distinct healthcare systems and cultural contexts. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing effective global strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis comprehensively compares advanced-stage PD care between these two nations to quantify disparities and inform evidence-based policy interventions. Methods We conducted a rigorous systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang) from January 2015 to October 2025. The timeframe was selected to capture contemporary care patterns following major healthcare reforms in both countries (Affordable Care Act implementation in the US; Healthy China 2030 initiative). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies reporting on advanced PD (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≥ 3) with outcome measures including survival, quality of life (QoL), palliative care access, caregiver burden, rehabilitation utilization, or healthcare costs. The sample size threshold (n ≥ 100) balanced statistical power with inclusivity. Two independent reviewers screened 3,847 records with excellent agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.82–0.89). Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS ≥ 8 indicating high quality) and ROBINS-I for observational studies, with GRADE criteria determining evidence certainty. Meta-analyses utilized random-effects models with comprehensive heterogeneity assessment (I² statistics, meta-regression) and publication bias evaluation (Egger's test, trim-and-fill analysis). Sensitivity analyses included high-quality studies only and examined the influence of large database studies. Results Our analysis of 42 high-quality studies encompassing over 125,000 patients revealed profound and systematic cross-national disparities across multiple domains. In terms of care access, US patients demonstrated significantly higher hospice enrollment rates (28–35% vs. <1% in China, p < 0.001; HIGH certainty evidence) and greater access to specialized neuropalliative programs (15% of US centers vs. <1% in China). These differences translated into measurable quality of life disparities, with Chinese patients scoring 17.6 points worse on the PDQ-39 scale (95% CI 14.2–21.0; MODERATE certainty, I²=68%), a difference exceeding the minimal clinically important difference nearly four-fold. The burden on families showed equally striking patterns: Chinese families provided 94% of EOL care compared to 61% in the US, resulting in significantly higher caregiver depression rates (47% vs. 32%, OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.45–2.47) and burden scores (Zarit difference: 10.2 points, 95% CI 7.8–12.6). Access to interventions revealed additional gaps, with only 9.2% of Chinese patients receiving physical therapy versus 14.4% in the US (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.49–0.76), and a 5.25-fold disparity in deep brain stimulation access (4.2% vs. 0.8%). Economic analysis demonstrated substantial out-of-pocket burden differences: Chinese families paid 58% of total costs ($4,200 annually) versus 12% for US families ($2,800). Meta-regression identified healthcare system characteristics as the primary driver of these disparities (R²=0.42, p < 0.001). Conclusions This comprehensive analysis reveals that systematic differences in healthcare infrastructure, insurance coverage, and cultural care models produce markedly divergent EOL experiences for PD patients in China versus the United States. These findings have immediate policy implications. For China, we recommend: (1) establishing pilot neuropalliative programs in tertiary centers with phased national expansion; (2) developing caregiver support infrastructure including respite care and training programs; (3) leveraging telemedicine platforms to address urban-rural disparities. For the United States, priorities include: (1) addressing racial disparities in rehabilitation access through culturally competent outreach; (2) expanding Medicare coverage for maintenance therapy; (3) earlier integration of neuropalliative care. Implementation science research is urgently needed to test culturally adapted interventions. As global PD prevalence accelerates, lessons from this bilateral comparison provide a framework for other nations confronting similar challenges in neurological care delivery.
Multiple Myeloma, Version 5.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Kumar, Shaji K., Adekola, Kehinde , Anderson, Larry , Costello, C. L., D’Angelo, Christopher R. , Elsedawy, Noura, Godara, Amandeep , Godby, Kelly, Hillengass, J, Holmberg, Leona, Htut, Myo , Huff, Carol Ann , Hultcrantz, Malin , Kang, Yubin , Larson, Sarah, Lee, Hans Chulhee, Liedtke, Michaela , Martin, Thomas, Omel, James, Robinson, Timothy J., Rosenberg, Aaron, Sherbenou, Daniel, Suvannasankha, Attaya, Valent, Jason , Varshavsky‐Yanovsky, Asya, Ye, J Christine, Kovach, Emily, Kumar, Rashmi , Kumar, Shaji , Callander, Natalie S. , Baljević, Muhamed , Baz, Rachid , Campagnaro, Erica , Costello, Caitlin , Derman, Benjamin A. , Devarakonda, Srinivas , Hillengass, Jens, Holmberg, Leona , Kang, Yubin , Larson, Sarah, Lee, Hans C. , Rosenberg, Aaron , Sarosiek, Shayna , Schroeder, Mark A. , Sherbenou, Daniel W , Suvannasankha, Attaya , Valent, Jason Neil , Vogl, Dan T. , Kovách, E

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | January 8, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0001 | PMID 41671464 Get It

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving rapidly and includes several new options. The management must be tailored to the individual. The NCCN Guidelines for MM provide a framework to base decisions regarding diagnosis, workup, treatment, and follow-up of both newly diagnosed and previously treated relapsed/refractory MM. This manuscript outlines the recommendations from NCCN Guidelines for MM specific to newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).
Z-coded social determinants of health and cardiovascular risk among patients receiving dialysis
Alhammouri, Hashim, Ibrahim, Ramzi , AlAsmar, Rahmeh, Dreher, Luke, Almakadma, Abdul Hakim , Pham, Hoang Nhat, Mahmoud, Ahmed K, Awad, K, Abdelnabi, Mahmoud, Salih, Mohammed, Agarwal, Siddharth, Al‐Kindi, Sadeer , Sorajja, Dan , Scott, Luis R, Ayoub, C A, Arsanjani, R A, Awad, Kamal , Al-Kindi, Sadeer , Sorajja, Dan , Ayoub, Chadi , Ibrahim, Ramzi , Al-Asmar, Rahmeh , Dreher, Luke , Pham, Hoang Nhat , Awad, Kamal , Abdelnabi, Mahmoud , Agarwal, Siddharth , Hommos, Musab S. , Arsanjani, Reza

Journal of Nephrology | January 6, 2026 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 528-535

10.1093/joneph/aajaf060 | PMID 42189835 Get It

Abstract Introduction Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among patients with kidney failure on dialysis. Social determinants of health may worsen this risk but are seldom incorporated into prognostic models. ICD-10 Z-codes provide standardized documentation of social determinants of health, yet their prognostic value in dialysis populations remains uncertain. This study examined whether Z-coded social determinants of health are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality among patients receiving dialysis for kidney failure. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network (2010–2024), encompassing de-identified data from 103 institutions. Adults with kidney failure on chronic dialysis were stratified by the presence of ICD-10 Z-codes (Z55–Z65). Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and hospitalization; secondary outcomes included acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest, bradyarrhythmias, and ventricular tachycardia. Results After matching, mean age was 62 years, and 42.4% were female in the Z-code cohort versus 41.2% in controls. Over one year, mortality occurred in 12.5% versus 10.9% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.29) and all-cause hospitalizations in 57.3% versus 53.1% (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.19–1.26). Cardiovascular complications were consistently higher in Z-coded patients, including heart failure (24.3% vs 20.5%; HR, 1.29), myocardial infarction (8.0% vs 7.1%; HR, 1.19), stroke (6.6% vs 6.2%; HR, 1.13), cardiac arrest (3.8% vs 3.1%; HR, 1.29), and bradyarrhythmias (6.9% vs 5.5%; HR, 1.33). Discussion Among patients with kidney failure, documented Z-coded social risk factors were associated with greater mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Incorporating social determinants of health documentation into nephrology care may improve risk stratification and inform targeted interventions.
Performance of multiple multi-cancer detection tests using a large independent reference set (Alliance A212102)
Wood, Marie , Pinsky, Paul F. , Novotny, Paul J. , Leevan, Elyse , Weiss, Matthias , Edelman, Dan, Watson, Mark A. , Patriotis, Christos , Merker, Jason D. , Prorok, Philip C. , Wen, Yujia , Rubinstein, Wendy S. , Dragnev, Konstantin H. , Katki, Hormuzd A. , Chow, Selina , Kemeny, Margaret, Gautam, Umang, Reddy, Aswanth , Burak, William E. , Piantadosi, Steven , Minasian, Lori M. , Wood, Marie E , Edelman, Dan C , Watson, Mark , Dragnev, Konstantin , Skarlupka, Amanda L , Katki, Hormuzd A , Chow, Selina , Kemeny, Margaret , Piantadosi, Steven , Weiss, Matthias

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | January 5, 2026 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 730-736

10.1093/jnci/djag001 | PMID 41499420 Get It

Abstract Background Reference sets are needed to evaluate performance of multi-cancer detection (MCD) assays. The National Cancer Institute funded the Alliance reference set study to assess MCDs for use in future trials. Methods Individuals with cancer and controls were recruited; blood specimens were collected prior to cancer treatment. A performance evaluation study was designed utilizing reference set samples. Companies (n = 6) were selected to participate based on review of performance data and ability to utilize the blood collection tube. Companies received samples from cancer types their assay was designed to detect (“targeted”), plus additional “non-targeted” and control samples. Companies reported positive/negative calls, risk scores, and tissue-of-origin (TOO) predictions. Sensitivity was computed for early (I-II) and late (III-IV) stage cases, based on positive/negative calls (SEPN) and at fixed 98% specificity (SE98). Specificity and TOO accuracy were computed. Results Five hundred and forty nine cases (encompassing 13 cancer types) and 413 controls from the reference set were included in the study. Companies assessed samples from median 6 (range 5-9) targeted cancer types and median 8 (range: 7-11) overall cancer types. Median (range) specificity was 92.3% (76.5%-98.5%). Median (range) SEPN was 32% (25%-42%) for early stage and 73% (48%-89%) for late stage; while median (range) SE98 was 19% (8%-35%) for early stage and 66% (13%-79%) for late stage. Median sensitivity for non-targeted types was 40% (early stage) and 52% (late stage). Median (range) TOO accuracy (primary predicted site) was 75% (64%-78%). Conclusions Sensitivity and specificity varied widely across assays with early-stage sensitivity substantially lower than late-stage sensitivity. Clinical Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05334069.
Automated Insulin Delivery Is Beneficial in Adults With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes With and Without GAD65 Antibodies
Beck, Roy W. , Hirsch, Irl B., Raghinaru, Dan, Lum, John W. , Pinsker, Jordan E. , Kudva, Yogish C. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Desjardins, Donna, Kurek, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Rizvi, Shafaq , Graham, Timothy E., Terry, Adrienne, Luker, Ryan, Mellenthin, Melanie, Rezac, Stephanie, Liljenquist, David R., Rogers, Justin, Williams, Jonathan, Christensen, Rochelle, Lee, In‐Kyoung, Malone, Joann, Spanakis, Elias K. , Singh, Lakshmi G., Churchill, Jade, Comen, Kathleen, Scott, William H., Davis, Georgia M. , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Oladejo, Omolade , Usman, Sabeena, Ahmann, Andrew , Schmid, Caleb, Dean, Ariel, Branigan, Deborah , Caswell, Brittany, Heyerman, Tess, Tessman, Brian, Vanderheide, Jnh, Dennis, Brittany , Hendricks, Lisa, Reyes-Rodriguez, Clemente, Wolf, Valerie, Coyne, Kasey, Kravarusic, Jelena, Fronczyk, Evelyn, Herrmann, Stefanie, Penn, Samsam C., Blevins, Thomas , Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Stewart, Ana, Assir, Courtney, Fields, Cory, Kruger, Davida , Estrada, Kathleen, Jones, J. Kimberly, Mukhashen, Shereen, Corker, Natalie, Hunter, Heather, Layton, Paula, Brown, Sue A. , Afreen, Samina , Dhillon, Jasmeen, Emory, Emma, Fulkerson, David, Fuller, Morgan, Holmes, Viola, Kollar, Laura, Toole, Elyse, Levister, Camilla, O’Malley, Grenye , Ipek, Aslihan, Alabi, Denise, Ellis, Emily, Hassan, Shaziah, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Tamarez, Denisa, Weinstock, Ruth S. , Stone, Sheri , Bzdick, Suzan, Agostini, Lynn, Bulger, Jane , Wolpert, Howard , Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Sullivan, Asya, Aia, Corinne, Brouillard, Elizabeth, Driscoll, Marsha, Lapier, Heather, Payra, Sherryl, Vancer, Louise, Averkiou, Xenia, Baran, Jesica, Holod, Rosanna, Litvicov, Patrisia, Mandava, Patali, Swinton, Sydney, Khakpour, Dori , Broyles, Frances E. , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Hairston, Babette, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Kamimoto, Jorge Jo, Peleckis, Amy J. , Sultan, Rahaf , Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia, Bourne, Patricia, Haidar, Ahmad, Pasqua, Melissa, Tardio, Vanessa , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Raskin, Philip, Jordan, L.F., Shao, Baomei, DoNguyen, Trang, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael , Lesniak, Amanda, Becerra, Mario, Bellini, Natalie J. , Denallo, Erica, Lewis, Claudia , Tribout, Jerry, Tribout, Megan, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Phillips, Kylie, Raghinaru, Dan, Campos, Tiffany, Morrell, Beth, Oduah, Vanessa, Cardenas-Villamil, Gabriela, Morales, Amanda, Murphy, Carlos, Strayer, Heidi, Spanbauer, Charles , Kollman, Craig, Sasson-Katchalski, Ravid, Piquette, Nicole, Wheatcroft, Alex, WHITE, KIRSTIN N., Carmelo, KC, Janicek, Robert, Gabrielson, Deanna, Mercado, Kevin, Beck, Roy W , Group*, 2IQP Study, Smith, Joshua W. , Christensen, Rochelle, Malone, Joann, Pasquel, Francisco J. , Tajrishi, Farbod Zahedi , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Dean, Ariel, Howard, Matthew, Vander-Heide, Jesse, Ahn, David , Aleppo, Grazia , Fields, Cory, Layton, Paula, Oliveri, Mary Clancy , Levy, Carol J. , Agostini, Lynn, Steenkamp, Devin W , Spaic, Tamara , Liu, Selina , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R. , Bourne, Patricia, Tsoukas, Michael A. , Pasqua, Melissa-Rosina , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael, Hatipoğlu, Betül , Lesniak, Amanda, Howard, Quiana , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Raghinaru, Dan, Morrell, Beth, Morales, Amanda, Kanapka, Lauren , Le, Van

Diabetes Care | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e18-e20

10.2337/dc25-2059 | PMID 41348329 Get It