Dickinson, Drew T.

Abstract Background At hospice enrollment, patients are asked preferences regarding antibiotic use. Limited evidence on how these medications impact survival makes it difficult for clinicians to offer clear guidance. To support decision-making and antimicrobial stewardship, we assessed the association between antibiotic use and survival in outpatient hospice patients. Methods The association between antibiotic use and survival was evaluated using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and hospice-qualifying conditions (HQCs). The cohort included patients enrolled in a large health system’s outpatient hospice program between June 20, 2017, and January 1, 2023. Results Among 6169 patients with an HQC, 1233 received at least one antimicrobial prescription during the study period. The median time from hospice enrollment to first prescription was 16 days (IQR 3-83). Antimicrobial prescribing patterns varied by HQC category. In time-dependent Cox models, antibiotic use was associated with increased hazard of death (aHR 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.57).Stratified analyses showed the strongest association with increased mortality in patients with cancer HQCs (aHR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.50–1.87) and a survival benefit in those with infectious HQCs (aHR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89). Discussion Physicians, patients, and families often overestimate the benefits of antibiotics near the end of life. The observed increase in mortality shortly after antibiotic initiation suggests that symptoms prompting antibiotic use may reflect the dying process rather than treatable infection. Knowledge of the limited role of antibiotics in prolonging life in hospice settings may improve decision-making and enhance the quality of end-of-life care.

Background: Handshake antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), characterized by regular, face-to-face interactions with antimicrobial prescribers with broad review of all active antimicrobials, is considered an AMS best practice. This approach fosters relationship building and increases opportunities for targeted education compared to traditional AMS activities. Reports of handshake AMS within surgical services are limited. We evaluated the impact of once-weekly handshake AMS rounds among general surgery teams in a 368-bed academic medical center. Methods: An infectious diseases physician and pharmacist conducted weekly rounds in general surgery offices with surgical residents, chief residents, advanced practice providers (APPs), medical students, and occasionally attending surgeons. All patients on antimicrobials and without an active ID consult were reviewed and recommendations with targeted education were provided. The number, type, and acceptance rate of recommendations were collected prospectively. Antimicrobial utilization within general surgery was reviewed pre- (1/1/2024-12/31/2024) and post-implementation (1/1/2025-12/31/2025) of handshake AMS rounds. Antimicrobial use data are presented as days of therapy (DOT)/1000 days present (DP). Results: From January 7, 2025, through January 6, 2026, 47 handshake AMS sessions were performed. Over this period, 215 recommendations were provided, and 173 recommendations were implemented, yielding a recommendation implementation rate of 80.5% and an average of 4.6 recommendations/session. The most common accepted recommendation types were duration modification (n=42, 24.3%), antibiotic stop (n=38, 22.0%), and de-escalation (n=33, 19.1%). Average DOT/1000 DP on general surgery teams for all agents dropped from 481.3 pre- to 462.8 post-implementation (3.8% relative reduction, p=0.578). Broad-spectrum antibiotic use dropped by 17.5%, from 369.2 pre- to 304.6 post-implementation (p=0.055). Anti-MRSA agent utilization remained stably low, with an average of 45.4 pre- vs 49.0 DOT/1000 DP post-implementation. The use of enteral metronidazole increased, from 4.9% pre- to 18.2% enteral/IV DOT post-implementation. Surgical providers consistently expressed appreciation for the practice-changing education provided during handshake AMS rounds and the resulting enhancements in antimicrobial decision-making and patient care. Conclusion: Targeted, once-weekly handshake AMS rounds with general surgery resulted in high-yield interventions with a high acceptance rate. Handshake AMS rounds could be an effective stewardship intervention in surgical practices and is doable despite the challenges of unpredictable operating room/provider schedules.

ABSTRACT Vancomycin is broadly used to treat gram-positive infections in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use is primarily for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is a common cause of pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, and bloodstream infections. Vancomycin therapy requires close clinical monitoring to maintain therapeutic efficacy and, importantly, patient safety. Vancomycin use is associated with acute kidney injury in up to 20% of cases, a number that can be driven down by pharmacokinetic dosing protocols. However, the best mitigation against adverse outcomes associated with vancomycin is to ensure it is only used when needed and rapidly de-escalated when not. As such, many stewardship programs, who are tasked with the safe and effective use of antimicrobial agents, have focused on optimizing vancomycin use. There is a strong correlation with MRSA colonization and infection, and a negative MRSA nares screen has a good negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia (although this association is less well documented for other infections). As such, detection of MRSA in nares swabs, by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) or culture, is a logical tool for stewarding vancomycin. However, the application of MRSA screening tests as MRSA diagnostics is complex, as these tests are cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the detection of MRSA colonization, and not for therapeutic decision making. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, the issue of MRSA nares tests is debated by a clinical pharmacy team and the laboratory. The authors review the clinical evidence and regulatory background in which an MRSA nares NAAT may be used to inform treatment decisions.

Abstract Background Handshake antimicrobial stewardship (HAS) is an effective stewardship approach characterized by regular, face-to-face interactions with antimicrobial prescribers and broad review of all active antimicrobials. Benefits of this approach include enhanced relationship building and opportunities for targeted education. We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate the impact of once-weekly HAS rounds among Hospital Internal Medicine (HIM) teams in an academic medical center. Methods An infectious diseases (ID) physician and pharmacist conducted weekly table rounds with a HIM teaching team consisting of a hospitalist, advanced practice providers (APPs), APP fellow(s), and sometimes medical students. All patients on antimicrobials and without an active ID consult were reviewed and recommendations were provided. Thereafter, the stewardship team solicited ad hoc questions from other HIM teams via walking rounds in their offices. The number, type, and acceptance rate of recommendations were collected prospectively. A survey was sent to all HIM providers to obtain feedback on HAS rounds. Results HAS rounds were conducted weekly from February 7, 2024, to February 19, 2025, with a total of 52 sessions. Over the study period, 340 recommendations were provided, and 314 recommendations were implemented, yielding a recommendation implementation rate of 92.4%. The most common recommendation types were antimicrobial discontinuation (n=76, 22.4%), duration modification (n=63, 18.5%), and de-escalation (n=39, 11.5%). The survey was sent to 102 HIM providers and completed by 19 for a response rate of 18.6%. All respondents stated HAS added value or greatly added value to their practice. Antimicrobial selection (n=16, 84.2%), de-escalation (n=12, 63.2%), and pharmacy expertise (n=6, 31.6%) were areas in which providers saw the greatest benefit. Eighteen providers (94.7%) recommended expansion of HAS to non-HIM services. Conclusion Targeted, once-weekly HAS rounds resulted in high-yield interventions that were frequently accepted and perceived as highly valuable by HIM providers. Once-weekly or intermittent HAS practices might be considered in practice settings where resources or logistical constraints limit broader, hospital-wide handshake stewardship practices. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Antimicrobial use among hospital-at-home (HaH) patients across three Mayo Clinic sites was evaluated from 2023 to 2024. Nearly three-quarters of patients were administered an antibiotic during HaH admission. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly used antibiotic and respiratory infections were the most common antimicrobial indication. Further investigation into stewardship opportunities is warranted.

ABSTRACT Carbapenem‐resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are difficult‐to‐treat pathogens that primarily cause health care‐associated infections. Sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL/DUR) is a novel antibiotic combination that is uniquely formulated to target CRAB isolates. However, investigations of SUL/DUR's pharmacokinetics in obese patients are limited. Here, we report on the successful treatment of CRAB bacteremia in a patient with acute renal failure and severe obesity (weight 273 kg, body mass index 103 kg/m 2 ) with SUL/DUR and meropenem combination therapy. The patient had a calculated creatinine clearance of 25 mL/min and received therapy with intravenous SUL/DUR 1 g/1 g every 8 h over 3 h in combination with intravenous meropenem 500 mg every 8 h to complete 14 days of therapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed target attainment with prolonged half‐life ( T 1/2 ) and volume of distribution (Vd) of 35.3 h and 81.3 L for sulbactam and 30.5 h and 169.1 L for durlobactam, respectively. Susceptibility testing using the broth disk elution test did not show synergy between SUL/DUR and meropenem. No adverse effects were observed, and the patient achieved clinical cure without recurrence of A. baumannii infection.