Hultcrantz, Malin

Abstract Studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the contribution of germline variants or somatic genomic drivers to racial disparities in multiple myeloma. To comprehensively investigate somatic drivers in relation to inherited genetics in multiple myeloma, we combined newly sequenced whole-genome sequencing data with publicly available datasets (total n = 1,286). Overall, we did not identify germline or somatic genomic differences that explain the different risk of developing multiple myeloma between patients with genetic similarity to African (AFR) or European (EUR) reference populations. A difference in the detectability and timing of APOBEC-associated and germinal center mutational activity was observed. Integrating epidemiologic data and mutational signature-based temporal estimates, we challenge the assumption that individuals in the AFR group develop multiple myeloma at a younger age. Finally, we demonstrate that, with equal access to efficacious therapies, patients in the AFR and EUR groups have equivalent clinical outcomes. Significance: Multiple myeloma is reported to occur at higher rates in individuals who self-identify as non-Hispanic Black. In this large dataset, genomic drivers occur at the same rate among ancestry groups, except for APOBEC mutagenesis. With equivalent therapy, clinical outcomes did not differ for patients grouped by genetic ancestry similarity.

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving rapidly and includes several new options. The management must be tailored to the individual. The NCCN Guidelines for MM provide a framework to base decisions regarding diagnosis, workup, treatment, and follow-up of both newly diagnosed and previously treated relapsed/refractory MM. This manuscript outlines the recommendations from NCCN Guidelines for MM specific to newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).

Abstract Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are inherently at increased risk of both thrombotic and bleeding events due to the nature of the condition. Disease management often includes anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and/or cytoreductive therapy to mitigate these risks. On the contrary, these therapies can also increase the risk of bleeding, presenting a clinical challenge in balancing the prevention of thrombosis with the management of bleeding complications. The relationship between treatment type, thrombotic events, and bleeding risk remains underexplored in large, real-world populations. This Swedish population-based study aimed to describe how the risk of bleeding in patients living with MPN differs by treatment strategy, and how timing of thrombotic events influences this risk. A total of 15,495 patients diagnosed with MPN between 2006 and 2021, aged 18–90, were identified through the Swedish Cancer Register and the Swedish Patient Register. Bleeding rates were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with time-split survival data. Treatment categories were defined as follows: no therapy, anticoagulant monotherapy (e.g., warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]); antiplatelet monotherapy (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel); cytoreductive monotherapy (e.g., hydroxyurea, interferon); and combination therapy, defined as any combination of at least two of the three aforementioned therapies. All treatment categories were compared to anticoagulant monotherapy. Both treatment exposure and thrombotic status were modelled as time-varying covariates, allowing individuals to contribute across multiple thrombosis and treatment combinations over time. Models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, and MPN subtype. The cohort was 52% female, with a median age at diagnosis of 71 years (IQR 60–79). The most common MPN subtypes were polycythemia vera (39%) and essential thrombocythemia (38%), followed by MPN-unclassifiable (16%) and primary myelofibrosis (7%). A history of thrombosis at MPN diagnosis was present in 22% of patients, and 19% had a history of bleeding. Among the 10,487 patients receiving combination therapy, the majority included antiplatelet agents: 57% received antiplatelet + cytoreductive therapy, 12% received antiplatelet + anticoagulant therapy, and 22% received all three therapies. Only 8% received anticoagulant + cytoreductive therapy without antiplatelet agents. Patients receiving no therapy had the lowest bleeding rate overall (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53–0.75), likely reflecting individuals with less severe disease or contraindications to treatment. Among patients with no thrombotic event, those receiving antiplatelet monotherapy had a 35% lower rate of bleeding compared to those on anticoagulant monotherapy (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56–0.76). Combination therapy was associated with a reduced rate of similar magnitude (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59–0.78), while cytoreductive monotherapy showed no significant difference (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.21). In patients with a prior thrombotic event, antiplatelet monotherapy remained protective (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.79), and combination therapy was associated with a slightly lower bleeding rate compared to anticoagulant monotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61–0.99). The estimate for cytoreductive monotherapy in this group (HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.89–4.68) was based on a small number of patients and had wide confidence intervals, limiting interpretability. These findings suggest that bleeding risk in MPN patients is influenced by both treatment type and thrombotic history. Antiplatelet monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with lower bleeding rates than anticoagulant monotherapy, both in patients with and without prior thrombosis, though the effect was more pronounced in those without prior thrombosis. By accounting for the complete patient pathway and modelling treatment and thrombotic status as time-varying exposures, a more accurate representation of real-world treatment dynamics is presented here. Given that the majority of combination therapy regimens included antiplatelet agents, these results underscore the potential protective role of antiplatelet therapy in managing bleeding risk. These insights may support clinical decision-making, and guide personalized treatment strategies and risk assessment in patients diagnosed with MPN.

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is always preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). While these precursor conditions are asymptomatic, they are not entirely benign and carry a lifelong risk of progression to MM. Unlike other cancers defined by pathology, malignant transformation from MGUS or SMM to MM has so far relied on demonstration of clinical end-organ damage or high tumor cell burden (i.e. SLiM criteria, SV Rajkumar Lancet Onc 2014), as morphology and cytogenetics cannot reliably distinguish them. Methods: To identify genomic features underlying clinical behavior in MGUS and SMM, a total of 374 patients with SMM (n= 290) or MGUS (n=84) with available whole exome (whole exome sequencing, WES, n=190) or whole genome sequencing (whole genome sequencing WGS, n=184) were included in the study. Overall, none of the patients had evidence of SLiM or CRAB criteria at the time of the biopsy. Based on the center of origin and availability of WES and WGS, 227 and 97 patients were used to form our study training and validation set. The study was designed in two parts: 1) defining a new classification for MM precursor conditions; 2) integrating genomics to existing prognostic score to improve accuracy in identifying patients at imminent risk of progression. Overall, 68 patients in the training set were either lost to follow-up or enrolled in a clinical trial and they were only included in the classification part of the study. Results: By leveraging the distribution of established MM-defining genomic events (Maura et al. JCO 2024) in the training set, we developed a workflow that differentiates MGUS and SMM into two genomically distinct entities: one with evidence of neoplastic transformation (i.e., genomic MM) and one without (i.e., genomic MGUS). Overall, 39% of MGUS and 91% of SMM cases had genomic evidence of neoplastic transformation in the training set (i.e., genomic MM). When we applied the same workflow and classification to the validation set, 46% and 83% of MGUS and SMM had evidence of neoplastic transformation, respectively. Importantly, none of the patients classified as genomic-MGUS progressed to MM in either the training or validation cohorts, with a median follow-up of 40 and 61 months, respectively. Moreover, all patients with IMWG 2/20/20 high risk SMM were classified as genomic MM in both the training and validation set. Interestingly, 5 out of 62 (8%) patients enrolled in early intervention trials for high risk SMM were genomically classified as genomic-MGUS. Overall, these data demonstrated that the MM genomic background and neoplastic transformation can be acquired very early in time, even before the SMM phase, in line with what observed in solid tumors. To avoid overestimating the prognostic impact of myeloma-defining genomic events—which are, by definition, enriched in the genomic-MM group compared to genomic-MGUS—we restricted our prognostic analysis to patients in whom transformation has already occurred (genomic-MM). In fact, distinct genomic drivers may predict malignant transformation but not necessarily the risk of imminent progression to MM once transformation has occurred. After running 5-fold cross validations corrected for IMWG 2/20/20, only presence of RAS mutations, genomic events involving MYC, presence of neoplastic copy number variant (CNV) signatures and APOBEC mutagenesis were predictive of early progression in the training set. Adding the presence of high-risk myeloma-defining genomic events to the IMWG 2/20/20 model (i.e., genomic-IMWG) significantly improves the accuracy of predicting MM progression in both the training (c-index 0.69 vs. 0.74) and validation sets (c-index 0.74 vs. 0.79), compared to the IMWG 2/20/20 alone. Conclusion: By leveraging comprehensive genomic profiling integrated with the clinical IMWG 2/20/20 risk score, we propose a novel classification and prognostication system for MM precursor conditions, which will better define patients who may benefit from early therapeutic intervention versus watch-and-wait monitoring.

Abstract Consumption of a Western diet and high body mass index (BMI) are risk factors for progression from premalignant phenotypes to multiple myeloma, a hematologic cancer. In the NUTRIVENTION trial (NCT04920084), we administered a high-fiber, plant-based diet (HFPBD; meals for 12 weeks, coaching for 24 weeks) to 23 participants with myeloma precursor states and elevated BMI. The intervention was feasible and improved quality of life and modifiable risk factors: metabolic (BMI, insulin resistance), microbiome (diversity, composition), and immune (inflammation, monocyte subsets). Disease progression trajectory improved (n = 2) or was stable. Findings were translated to Vk*MYC mice modeling the myeloma precursor state, in which a high-fiber diet (HFD) delayed disease progression through improved metabolism and microbiome composition, leading to increased short-chain fatty acid production that reinvigorated antitumor immunity and inhibited tumor growth. These effects from fiber consumption were independent of calorie restriction and weight loss. A HFD is a low-risk intervention that may delay progression to myeloma. Significance: A HFPBD in participants with precursor plasma cell disorders and an elevated BMI improved metabolic, microbiome, and immune biomarkers of disease. In a subset, it may delay progression to myeloma. In mouse models, a HFD delayed progression to myeloma independent of calorie restriction. See related commentary by Fairfield and Reagan, p. 623

Multiple myeloma (MM) is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). While these precursor conditions are asymptomatic, they are not entirely benign and carry a lifelong risk of progression to MM. Unlike other cancers defined by pathology, malignant transformation from MGUS or SMM to MM has so far relied on demonstration of clinical end-organ damage as morphology and cytogenetics cannot reliably distinguish them. In this study, using genomic data from 374 patients with MGUS or SMM (277 training, 97 validation), to our knowledge, we demonstrate for the first time the ability to identify malignant transformation in MGUS and SMM. We introduce the concept of genomic MM and genomic MGUS to differentiate the subsets of MGUS and SMM that are biologically malignant with genomic features indistinguishable from MM from the subset that is premalignant and unlikely to progress to malignancy. Importantly, we find that most SMM has biological features of malignant transformation indistinguishable from MM. As expected, this subset that we consider having genomic MM is associated with a high risk of progression to MM although some patients remained progression-free beyond 5 years. Conversely, 60% of MGUS and 10% of SMM have no evidence of malignant transformation (genomic MGUS), with no progression during follow-up. Integration of genomic features with the 2/20/20 International Myeloma Working Group model significantly improved the prediction of progression among genomic MM. These findings support the use of genomic criteria to refine the classification and the risk stratification in myeloma precursor conditions.

The NCCN Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma (MM) provide recommendations for diagnosis, initial workup, treatment, follow-up, and supportive care for patients with MM. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the important updates and changes specific to systemic therapy for patients with newly diagnosed as well as previously treated MM included in Version 1.2025 of the NCCN Guidelines for MM.

Introduction Poor diet quality, elevated body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, microbiome dysbiosis, inflammation as well as immune dysfunction have all been implicated in progression from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to multiple myeloma (MM). Plant-based diets have been associated with reduced risk of MGUS and MM in epidemiological studies. Whether a dietary intervention can impact these modifiable risk factors and delay disease progression has not been investigated. Methods We conducted a pilot, single-arm trial providing controlled high fiber plant based dietary (HFPBD) intervention for 12 weeks and health coaching for 24 weeks in 20 patients with MGUS/SMM with BMI≥25 (NCT04920084). The primary endpoint was feasibility (adherence and BMI reduction). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included quality of life, metabolic markers (insulin, adiponectin, leptin, LDL cholesterol), microbiome (diversity and composition by 16S and shotgun sequencing) and immune profiling in peripheral blood (flow cytometry and Olink inflammation panel) and bone marrow (scRNAseq and ATACseq). We also conducted an in vivo study in transgenic Vk*MYC mice fed a high fiber or control diet at the phase of mouse(m)SMM. The mice were monitored for the progression to active mMM. Differences in microbiome and immune response profiles between high fiber- and control-treated mice were assessed via microbiome 16S sequencing and flow cytometry. Results The HFPBD intervention was safe, feasible, improved quality of life and addressed modifiable risk factors - metabolic profile (improved BMI, insulin resistance, adiponectin leptin ratio), microbiome profile (increased alpha-diversity and butyrate producers) and immune (decreased inflammation and increased anti-inflammatory classical monocyte) subsets. A reduction in long-term progression trajectory was observed in 2 patients. Consistently, the high fiber diet delayed progression from mSMM to mMM in Vk*MYC mice increasing median progression-free survival from 12 weeks in the control arm to 30 weeks in the high fiber diet intervention arm. Additionally, in the intervention arm 40% of mice did not progress to mMM during the study period whereas all mice in the control arm progressed. Both human and mouse data showed that HFPBD modulated gut microbiota composition favoring the expansion of butyrate-producing bacteria. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were increased in the feces of mice fed a high fiber diet. Integrated analysis from human bone marrow and peripheral blood analysis indicated that the dietary intervention reduced inflammatory biomarkers and skewed the immune response towards T helper and CD14+ monocytes. Consistently, the bone marrow of Vk*MYC mice fed high fiber diet was more infiltrated by IFNg-producing T lymphocytes while displaying less exhausted T cells and immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Conclusion This is the first interventional clinical trial and in vivo study to show that a HFPBD intervention may delay progression from MGUS/SMM to MM. To our knowledge there has been no similar dietary interventional study in hematological cancers or solid tumors. Together our in vivo and clinical data support the beneficial anti-inflammatory role of a HFPBD providing a link between diet, microbiota, and immune modulation to delay disease progression in MGUS/SMM.

The treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) has evolved to include several new options. The NCCN Guidelines for WM/LPL provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding diagnosis, treatment, assessment of response to treatment, and follow-up of both newly diagnosed and previously treated WM/LPL.