Abstract Introduction: Representing 10% of hematologic malignancies, multiple myeloma (MM) is typified by clonal plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow (BM) and may progress to therapy-resistant plasma cell leukemia (PCL). Despite many novel therapies, relapse rates remain high as a result of malignant regeneration (self-renewal) of MM cells in inflammatory microenvironments. In addition to recurrent DNA mutations and epigenetic deregulation, inflammatory cytokine-responsive adenosine deaminase associated with RNA (ADAR1)-mediated adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing has emerged as a key driver of cancer relapse and progression. In MM, copy number amplification of chromosome 1q21, which contains both ADAR1 and interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) gene loci, portends a poor prognosis. Thus, we hypothesized that ADAR1 copy number amplification combined with inflammatory cytokine activation of ADAR1 stimulates malignant regeneration of MM and therapeutic resistance. Methods and Results: Analysis of MMRF CoMMpass RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data revealed that high ADAR1 expression (n=162 patients) correlated with significantly reduced progression-free and overall survival compared with a low ADAR1 subset (n=159 patients). In contrast to lentiviral ADAR1 shRNA knockdown and overexpression of an editase defective ADAR1 mutant (ADAR1E912A), lentiviral wild-type ADAR1 overexpression enhanced editing of GLI1, a Hedgehog (Hh) pathway transcriptional activator and self-renewal agonist. Editing of GLI1 transcripts enhanced GLI transcriptional activity in luciferase reporter assays, and promoted lenalidomide resistance in vitro. Finally, lentiviral shRNA ADAR1 knockdown reduced regeneration of high-risk MM in humanized serial transplantation mouse models, indicative of reduced malignant self-renewal capacity. Whole-transcriptome RNA-sequencing of primary samples after lentiviral shRNA knockdown of ADAR1 revealed specific modulation of extracellular and immune response genes, while overexpression of wild-type versus edited GLI1 elicited distinct gene expression changes in human myeloma cells analyzed using NanoString nCounter assays. These data demonstrate that ADAR1 promotes malignant self-renewal of MM and, if selectively inhibited, may prevent progression and relapse through modulation of extracellular and immune response genes. Conclusions: Deregulated RNA editing, driven by aberrant ADAR1 activation, represents a unique source of transcriptomic and proteomic diversity, resulting in self-renewal of MM cells in inflammatory microenvironments. In summary, both genetic (1q21 amplification) and microenvironmental factors (inflammatory cytokines, IMiDs) combine to drive GLI1-dependent malignant regeneration in MM. Thus, ADAR1 represents both a vital prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in MM. Citation Format: Leslie A. Crews, Elisa Lazzari, Phoebe K. Mondala, Nathaniel Delos Santos, Amber Miller, Gabriel Pineda, Qingfei Jiang, Anusha-Preethi Ganesan, Christina Wu, Caitlin Costello, Mark Minden, Raffaella Chiaramonte, A. Keith Stewart, Catriona H. M. Jamieson. Down-modulation of ADAR1-mediated GLI1 editing alters extracellular and immune response genes in multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4437.
A Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Among 97,898 Women to Identify Candidate Susceptibility Genes for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
Immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene and prediction of time to first treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Mutational load or mutational status? Analysis of 1003 cases
Key Points Using the largest set of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, we identified 63 mutated driver genes. We identified oncogenic dependencies, particularly relating to primary translocations, indicating a nonrandom accumulation of genetic hits.
Potential impact of introducing a nonavalent HPV vaccination
AbstractObjectiveTo test the theoretical utility of incorporating nonavalent vaccination against HPV into a clinical setting.MethodsThe present retrospective study included data from consecutive patients who underwent HPV‐DNA testing between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2015. Changes in the prevalence of different HPV types were assessed during three periods (T1, 1998–2003; T2, 2004–2009; and T3, 2010–2015) using XY analysis.ResultsThe study included a total of 13 665 patients. Overall, 1361, 5130, and 7174 patients were included in the T1, T2, and T3 periods, respectively. The quadrivalent vaccine would have potentially protected against HPV in 71.5% (973/1361), 46.5% (2385/5130), and 26.5% (1901/7174) of patients in T1, T2, and T3, respectively (P<0.001 for trend). The nonavalent vaccine could have protected against HPV in 92.5% (1259/1361), 72.3% (3709/5130), and 58.1% (4168/7174) of patients in T1, T2, and T3, respectively (P<0.001 for trend). The proportion of patients with genital dysplasia grade 2+ who did not have infections with HPV genotypes covered by the quadrivalent or nonavalent vaccines increased across the three periods (P<0.001 for trend). For all study periods, the protection provided by the nonavalent vaccine would have been superior to the quadrivalent vaccine (χ2 test P<0.001).ConclusionThe introduction of a nonavalent vaccine could improve protection against HPV infections and HPV‐related genital dysplasia.