Walker, Brian A.

Despite significant improvements in survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. Importantly, traditional prognostic factors based on data from patients treated with older therapies no longer capture prognosis accurately in the contemporary era of novel triplet or quadruplet therapies. Therefore, risk stratification requires refinement in the context of available and investigational treatment options in routine practice and clinical trials, respectively. The current identification of high-risk MM (HRMM) in routine practice is based on the Revised International Staging System, which stratifies patients using a combination of widely available serum biomarkers and chromosomal abnormalities assessed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. In recent years, a substantial body of evidence concerning additional clinical, biological, and molecular/genomic prognostic factors has accumulated, along with new MM risk stratification tools and consensus reports. The International Myeloma Society, along with the International Myeloma Working Group, convened an Expert Panel with the primary aim of revisiting the definition of HRMM and formulating a practical and data-driven consensus definition, based on new evidence from molecular/genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts. The Panel proposes the following Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of HRMM which relies upon the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: (1) del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or TP53 mutation; (2) an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32); (3) monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32); or (4) β2 microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).

Background and significance: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by the production of amyloidgenic clonal light chains that deposit in various tissues. The addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) has improved the depth of hematologic and organ responses and is an approved induction therapy in newly diagnosed AL amyloid patients (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028631). However, this approach has not yet demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit and follow up remains short. With strict adherence to eligibility criteria, in particular severity of cardiac involvement, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidative therapy is safe with transplant related mortality on par with multiple myeloma. This approach generates deep and sustained responses, but it is unclear if it offers an additional survival benefit following Dara-VCD induction. The only randomized trial evaluating the role of ASCT in AL amyloid is outdated (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070484) and no randomized data exist to inform the optimal use of ASCT in the era of Dara-VCD induction. Furthermore, multi-organ involvement in AL amyloid drives morbidity and mortality thus the impact of any consolidative therapy on cardiac and renal involvement in addition to overall survival but must be defined. Finally, the approval of Dara-VCD therapy was based on complete hematologic response rates but there is increasing data demonstrating that achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by either bone marrow next generation flow cytometry (DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26562) or peripheral blood mass spectrometry (DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-0291-8) generates improved organ response, hematologic progression free survival, and possibly OS. Methods: This randomized phase 3 SWOG led intergroup trial (S2213; NCT06022939) is being conducted within the United States and will accrue a total of 143 participants per arm. The primary endpoint will compare MOD-PFS (major organ deterioration progression free survival: defined as time from randomization to death, cardiac/renal progression, or hematologic progression) between participants receiving an ASCT with those receiving 3 cycles of Dara-VCD consolidation following 3 cycles of uniform Dara-VCD induction. Following the assigned consolidation, all patients will receive 18 months of daratumumab maintenance therapy. A median MOD-PFS of 31 months is anticipated in the non-ASCT arm. This study has 90% power and a two-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.62 corresponding to a MOD-PFS of 50 months in the ASCT arm. Important additional endpoints include OS, hematologic PFS, cardiac and renal responses, MRD negativity both by peripheral blood mass spectrometry and bone marrow next generation flow cytometry, delayed utilization of ASCT, and quality of life. Key inclusion criteria include non-severe cardiac AL amyloid (NT-proBNP &lt;5000; TnT &lt; 0.06; NYHA I or II, EF ≥ 40%), CrCl ≥30 mL/min, serum dFLC &gt; 2 mg/dL, and supine systolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg. Importantly, patients are permitted to have up to one full cycle or 28 days of any plasma cell directed therapy prior to enrollment. This trial was activated on 12/1/2023 with the first patient enrolled 07/01/2024. Funding: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819; and in part by Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Johnson & Johnson (now J&J Innovative Medicine).

Introduction The pathogenic role of somatic non-coding (nc) single nucleotide variants (SNVs) is underexplored in multiple myeloma (MM) and additional characterization of these regions has the potential to provide significant new insights into disease progression. To investigate the role of ncSNVs and their relationship with MM pathogenesis, we have characterized a novel series of WGS from 294 cases of MGUS, SMM, and MM using computational tools optimized to identify functional driver SNVs in these regions. We hypothesize the ncSNVs that co-localize to sites of super-enhancers (SEs) active in plasma cells (PC) are sites of high functional impact SNVs and these mutations lead to the dysregulated expression of genes that should be silent at the terminally differentiated stage of PCs, providing a selective advantage that shapes the fitness of the MM genomic landscape. Methods We analyzed 294 high-coverage matched tumor/normal pairs (80x tumor and 40x normal) derived from 21 MGUS, 86 SMM, 167 NDMM and 40 RRMM. In addition to previously sequenced samples, newly sequenced patients were obtained from NYU Langone Health, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham and University of Miami following IRB-approved informed consent. DNA was extracted from CD138+ purified bone marrow plasma cells using standard approaches. We used the MGP1000 (https://github.com/pblaney/mgp1000) to process sequencing data which employs a union-consensus mechanism for determining the final set of variants. We collected enhancer elements (E/SEs) active in GC B-cells, ABC-DLBCL and GBC-DLBCL (Bal, et al. Nature, 2022) and PC specific E/SEs (Loven, et al. Cell 2013). FunSeq2 was used to score ncSNVs. GRAM was used to predict how variants alter TF binding and gene expression in a subset of 6 cases with paired WGS in our series and will expand this analysis on a validation set of 263 NDMM and 93 RRMM cases from University-Hospital Heidelberg enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 clinical trial. Results We identified 1,952,232 high-quality SNVs with 18,199 (0.93%) accumulating in 280 focal sites we termed “mutationally enriched regions” or MERs. To discern SNVs in MERs with the highest potential for imparting a selective advantage, we clustered mutations based on the density of FunSeq2 impact scores which uses reference data contexts on sequence conservation, modification of transcription factor (TF) binding, and gene linkage to regulatory elements and network hubs from pan-cancer studies. We show that MERs are enriched for ncSNVs with high impact scores (mean=2.57) compared to random similarly-sized regions of the genome (Fisher's exact test P&lt;9.7e-12, OR=10.10 [3.88-37.40]). The high impact ncSNVs (hi-ncSNVs) in MERs (n=220) account for 8.09% of all hi-ncSNVs and are present in 46.3% of cases (136/294) with some patients having up to 7. The proportion of cases carrying a MER hi-ncSNVs was similar across disease stages (MGUS=42.9%, SMM=46.5%, MM=40.7%, and RR=47.5%). Analysis of the VAF of MER hi-ncSNVs shows a minor shift towards more clonal versus subclonal mutations (53.6% vs 46.4% VAF&gt;=0.25) suggesting some high impact mutations are acquired in the GC but additional hi-ncSNV are acquired later in PC development, providing evidence that hi-ncSNVs accumulate in MERs throughout disease progression. We mapped these hi-ncSNVs to associated genes then intersected the loci with E/SEs active in GCBs and PCs to determine their functional context. This approach identified 12 genes affected by hi-ncSNVs including the previously identified nc-drivers NEAT1, MIR142, ZCCHC7, and IGLL5 as well as the PC differentiation genes IRF8, BACH2, proliferation genes RHOH, SPRED2, known coding MM drivers CCND1, ZFP36L1, and chr1q genes BTG2 and CROCC. We predicted the effect of ncSNVs on expression through modulation of TF binding at this set of putative nc drivers in MM and identified a trend towards increase in expression of SPRED2, CCND1, NEAT1, and IGLL5 compared to non-mutated cases (P=0.089). We will present data on the validation of this set of genes on a larger set of data derived from the Heidelberg group. Conclusions We identified a set of 12 putative nc driver genes in MM that modify expression and have the potential to significantly alter the pathogenesis of MM by providing a selective survival advantage. We will present the impact of these by clinical stage and on outcome.

PURPOSE Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) are heterogenous, with overall survival (OS) ranging from months to over 10 years. METHODS To decipher and predict the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of NDMM, we assembled a series of 1,933 patients with available clinical, genomic, and therapeutic data. RESULTS Leveraging a comprehensive catalog of genomic drivers, we identified 12 groups, expanding on previous gene expression–based molecular classifications. To build a model predicting individualized risk in NDMM (IRMMa), we integrated clinical, genomic, and treatment variables. To correct for time-dependent variables, including high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT), and maintenance therapy, a multi-state model was designed. The IRMMa model accuracy was significantly higher than all comparator prognostic models, with a c-index for OS of 0.726, compared with International Staging System (ISS; 0.61), revised-ISS (0.572), and R2-ISS (0.625). Integral to model accuracy was 20 genomic features, including 1q21 gain/amp, del 1p, TP53 loss, NSD2 translocations, APOBEC mutational signatures, and copy-number signatures (reflecting the complex structural variant chromothripsis). IRMMa accuracy and superiority compared with other prognostic models were validated on 256 patients enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02495922 ) clinical trial. Individualized patient risks were significantly affected across the 12 genomic groups by different treatment strategies (ie, treatment variance), which was used to identify patients for whom HDM-ASCT is particularly effective versus patients for whom the impact is limited. CONCLUSION Integrating clinical, demographic, genomic, and therapeutic data, to our knowledge, we have developed the first individualized risk-prediction model enabling personally tailored therapeutic decisions for patients with NDMM.

Summary: The multiple myeloma treatment landscape has changed dramatically. This change, paralleled by an increase in scientific knowledge, has resulted in significant improvement in survival. However, heterogeneity remains in clinical outcomes, with a proportion of patients not benefiting from current approaches and continuing to have a poor prognosis. A significant proportion of the variability in outcome can be predicted on the basis of clinical and biochemical parameters and tumor-acquired genetic variants, allowing for risk stratification and a more personalized approach to therapy. This article discusses the principles that can enable the rational and effective development of therapeutic approaches for high-risk multiple myeloma.

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy commonly preceded by the asymptomatic stage smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). MM is characterized with significant genomic heterogeneity of chromosomal gains and losses (CNVs), translocations, and point mutations (SNVs); alterations that are also observed in SMM patients. However, current SMM risk models rely solely on clinical markers and do not accurately capture progression risk. While incorporating some genomic biomarkers improves prediction, using all MM genomic features to comprehensively stratify patients may increase risk stratification precision in SMM. Methods: We obtained a total of 214 patient samples at SMM diagnosis. We performed whole-exome sequencing on 166 tumors; of these, RNA sequencing was performed on 100. Targeted capture was done on 48 additional tumors. Upon binarization of DNA features, we performed consensus non-negative matrix factorization to identify distinct molecular clusters. We then trained a random forest classifier on translocations, SNVs, and CNVs. The predicted clinical outcomes for the molecular subtypes were further validated in an independent SMM cohort of 74 patients. Results: We identified six genomic subtypes, four with hyperdiploidy (&gt;48 chromosomes, HMC, HKR, HNT, HNF) and two with IgH translocations (FMD, CND) (Table 1). In multivariate analysis accounting for IMWG (20-2-20) clinical risk stages, high-risk (HMC, FMD, HKR) and intermediate-risk (HNT, HNF) genetic subtypes were independent predictors of progression (Hazards ratio [HR]: 3.8 and 5.5, P = 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). The low-risk, CND subtype harboring translocation (11;14) was enriched for the previously defined CD-2 MM signature defined by the B cell markers CD20 and CD79A (FDR = 0.003 ), showed upregulation of CCND1, E2F1, and E2F7 (FDR = 0.01, 0.0004, 0.08), and was enriched for G2M checkpoint, heme metabolism, and monocyte cell signature (FDR = 0.003, 0.003, 0.003, respectively). The FMD subtype with IgH translocations (4;14) and (14;16) was enriched for P53, mTORC1, unfolded protein signaling pathways and plasmacytoid dendritic cell signatures (FDR = 0.01, 0.005, 0.008, respectively). The HKR tumors were enriched for inflammatory cytokine signaling, MYC target genes, T regulatory cell signature, and the MM proliferative (PR) signatures (FDR = 0.02, 0.03, 0.007, 0.02, respectively). The APOBEC mutational signature was enriched in HMC and FMD tumors (P = 0.005), while there was no statistical difference across subtypes in the AID signature. The median follow-up for the primary cohort is 7.1 years. Median TTP for patients in HMC, FMD, and HKR was 3.8, 2.6, and 2.2 years, respectively; TTP for HNT and HNF was 4.3 and 5.2, respectively, while it was 11 years in CND patients (P = 0.007). Moreover, by analyzing the changes in MM clinical biomarkers over time, we found that patients from high-risk subgroups had higher odds of developing evolving hemoglobin and monoclonal protein levels over time (P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively); Moreover, the absolute increase in M-protein was significantly higher in patients from the high-risk genetic subtypes at one, two, and five years from diagnosis (P = 0.001, 0.03, and 0,01, respectively). Applying the classifier to the external cohort replicated our findings where intermediate and high-risk genetic subgroups conferred increased risk of progression to MM in multivariate analysis after accounting for IMWG staging (HR: 5.5 and 9.8, P = 0.04 and 0.005, respectively). Interestingly, within the intermediate-risk clinical group in the primary cohort, patients in the high-risk genetic subgroups had increased risk of progression (HR: 5.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 17.3, P = 0.007). In the validation cohort, these patients also had an increased risk of progression to MM (HR: 6.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 38.3, P = 0.03), indicating that molecular classification improves the clinical risk-stratification models. Conclusion: We identified and validated in an independent dataset six SMM molecular subgroups with distinct DNA alterations, transcriptional profiles, dysregulated pathways, and risks of progression to active MM. Our results underscore the importance of molecular classification in addition to clinical evaluation in better identifying high-risk SMM patients. Moreover, these subgroups may be used to identify tumor vulnerabilities and target them with precision medicine efforts. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bustoros: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Casneuf: Janssen: Current Employment. Kastritis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Walker: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Davies: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Bergsagel: Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN mouse; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yong: BMS: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Morgan: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Getz: IBM, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Scorpion Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

Abstract Introduction Over the last 15 years gene expression profiling (GEP) has been used to define myeloma molecular subgroups and to determine clinical prognosis. Two major molecular subgroup classifications have been used: the UAMS which determines 7 subgroups and the TC classification based on the presence of IgH translocations and expression of D group cyclins. For prognosis, although a number of different GEP signatures have been defined, the widely used GEP70 identifies 15% of patients with high risk (HR) disease who have a median PFS and OS of 1.75 and 2.83 years. An ideal classification system would identify clinically relevant subgroups with distinct etiology and biology using standardized techniques. We have examined a large group of patients characterized at multiple genetic levels to optimize the diagnostic approach of newly diagnosed patients going forward. Materials and methods Study subjects included 1349 cases enrolled in Total Therapy trials (median follow up 7.5 years). Gene expression profiling was used to determine GEP70 risk status, molecular subgroup by UAMS and TC classifications, and to devise a new and extended TC classification (TC10). Interphase FISH associated with IgH translocations and 1q+ and 17p- were used to build GEP proxies. Data from mutational analysis generated by the FoundationOne targeted sequence panel was also incorporated. Results were validated on the UK MRC MyelomaIX and Hovon65/GMMG-4 studies. Results An initial agnostic analysis of GEP data using sparse k-means clustering verified the existence of TC based groups. Six groups were identified that corresponded overwhelmingly with known TC subgroups; CCND1-t(11;14), D1-HRD, D2-HRD, MMSET, MAF/CCND2, and CCND3. Further comparisons between the molecular subgroup and TC classifier revealed that the UAMS 7 subgroups clustered strongly within one predominant TC group: CD-1 and CD-2 to t(11;14), HY to D1, LB and PR to D2, MF to t(14;16) or t(14;20), and MS to t(4;14). As the UAMS molecular subgroups are largely contained within the TC framework, we aimed to extend the TC by developing the TC10. To extend the known TC subgroups, unsupervised clustering was applied to the 3 largest subgroups [t(11;14), D1, and D2] to determine the strongest single divisor within each respective subgroup. The dominant feature within the t(11;14) cases was CD20 expression, while the D1 and D2 subgroups both split according to RRAS2. CD20 is associated with PAX5 and VPREB3 expression, and RRAS2 is associated with decreased PTP4A3 and increased TNFAIP3 and BIRC3 expression. RRAS2 activation within D1 subgroup and CD20 activation within t(11;14) cases corresponds to an increased time to response to induction therapy suggesting they constitute important biological subgroups. The TC10 combines the known etiologic subgroups of the TC with functionally relevant subdivisions to create 10 novel subgroups: t(11;14) CD20+/-, D1: RRAS2+/-, D2: RRAS2+/-, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and t(6;14). Analysis of mutational data revealed that RRAS2 and CD20 activation within the D1, D2, and t(11;14) subgroups reduced the number of mutations in the MAPK pathway. Further mutational analysis revealed that median mutational load was highest in t(14;16) and lowest in D2: RRAS2+ subgroups. The GEP70 score identifies 15% of patients with HR disease and is specific for this purpose. In an analysis of risk assessment methods, we compared GEP detected adverse lesions [t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), 17p- and 1q+] with the GEP70 and revealed that GEP70 HR identified samples have lower OS rates than cases with more than one adverse lesion (validated in external sets). GEP70 HR segregates non-uniformly across molecular subgroups as over 40% of all HR cases are found in the TC10 t(4;14), t(14;16), and t(14;20) subgroups. GEP70 HR cases also have a higher mutational load than low risk cases. Furthermore, GEP70 HR is uniquely associated with 1q+ and 17p- as cases with at least one of these adverse lesions are 4.9 times as likely to be GEP70 HR as cases with neither. Conclusion GEP profiling has a central role in simplifying and standardizing the molecular subgroup designation and risk stratifying of MM patients. The GEP70 risk score reliably identifies HR cases and outperforms FISH in risk assessment, even in validation data sets. The TC10 provides a classification system that improves upon previous methods by defining both etiological and functionally meaningful subgroups. Disclosures Stein: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Davies:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Heuck:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Millenium: Other: Advisory Board; Foundation Medicine: Honoraria. Weinhold:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Janssen Cilag: Other: Advisory Board. Chavan:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Thanendrarajan:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Yaccoby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Zangari:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. van Rhee:University of Arkansa for Medical Sciences: Employment. Kaiser:Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BristolMyerSquibb: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Onyx, Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Barlogie:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Morgan:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Honoraria; CancerNet: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Weismann Institute: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Introduction The spectrum and frequency of mutations in newly diagnosed and relapsed MM has been reported and exhibits a pattern which is distinct from other peripheral lymphoid disorders. A number of data sources have suggested that MM is not a single disease, but rather a collection of molecularly diverse entities which present as malignancies of plasma cells with different clinical courses and response to therapy. To test this hypothesis we examined the spectrum of common mutations and their associations with gene expression in etiological subgroups defined by a simplified TC classification based on translocation subgroup and the deregulation of a D group cyclin. Materials and methods We examined a set of gene expression data from 907 newly diagnosed MM patients and classified them according to an updated TC model. An additional set of 482 cases underwent both sequencing by the FoundationOne Heme targeted panel and gene expression profiling. Mutational data were analyzed for significant associations with gene expression data within five primary TC subgroups: D1, D2, CCND (translocated 11q13 or 6p21), MMSET, and MAF. Results Gene expression signatures of GEP70 risk status, chromosomal aberrations [1q+, 1p-, 13q-, 17p-, HRD], proliferation index, NF-kB activation, and BCL2/MCL1 ratio were not distributed evenly across the TC subgroups, consistent with distinct biological differences amongst groups. Having noted differential expression patterns between subgroups, we hypothesized that distinct patterns of mutation may also exist across TC subgroups. Mutations in RB1 and CDKN2C, seen primarily in the D2 and MMSET subgroups, were mutually exclusive yet both associated with increased proliferation and HR status. Thus two paths to extreme proliferation emerge through either ahomozygous deletion of CDKN2C (with low expression of CDKN2C) or an RB1 alteration (with high expression of CDKN2C). Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were not evenly distributed across subgroups and were significantly inversely associated with an NF-kB signature. RRAS2 was also significantly inversely associated with MAPK mutations in the D1 and D2 subgroups, while genes encoding sprouty-related proteins, SPRED1 and SPRED2, were positively associated with MAPK mutations in the CCND-11q13 subgroup. Overall, MAPK mutations were most significantly associated with elevated expression of DKK1, a known Wnt antagonist, and DUSP6, a known inhibitor of the pathway. These gene expression patterns were primarily localized in the D1, D2, and CCND-11q13 subgroups. In contrast, the MMSET and MAF subgroups had a unique patterns of expression not seen in the D1, D2, or CCND subgroups. A gene set enrichment analysis showed that the DNA replication and cell cycle pathways were significantly enriched in the MMSET and MAF subgroups in the presence of MAPK pathway mutations. Within the MMSET subgroup, MAPK mutations were positively associated with GEP70 HR, proliferation index, and membership of the UAMS-PR subtype, while being negatively associated with FGFR3 expression. This result indicates that the reliance on FGFR3 signaling as an oncogenic driver is lost in the presence of a MAPK activating mutation. Conclusions In MM proliferative signals are delivered via the RAS and NF-kB pathways and activation of these two pathways appears to offer mutually exclusive pathways to disease progression since the majority of cases exhibit a reciprocal relationship between these two signaling pathways. The MMSET and MAF subgroups lack a strong association between NF-kB and MAPK signaling pathways, which may indicate that their initiating translocation event and subsequent genetic patterns provide a unique background in which MAPK alterations accelerate progression. As mutational interactions are differential across TC subgroups, we propose a comprehensive approach to MM classification that includes the etiologic designation by simplified TC subgroups and the subsequent use of genetic and biological markers characteristic of acquired features associated with disease progression, such as MAPK or NF-kB activation. Distinct patterns of RNA expression are associated with DNA mutations in myeloma when contextualized by etiologic subgroups. This indicates that the cellular background in which a mutation occurs has a distinct impact on downstream expression patterns-this observation is particularly relevant to the MMSET and MAF subgroups. Disclosures Pawlyn: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Morgan:Univ of AR for Medical Sciences: Employment; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction High expression of the H3K27 histone methyltransferase EZH2 mRNA in myeloma (MM) patient samples is associated with molecular features of high risk disease, including increased proliferation, and adverse outcomes (1). Mutations or deletions in the H3K27 demethylase KDM6A are associated with similar findings (2) and would be expected to have the same epigenetic effect, increasing H3K27me3 levels, a mark associated with repression of gene expression. We, therefore, sought to identify the role EZH2 plays in controlling myeloma cell proliferation. Methods A panel of MM cell lines and primary patient samples (CD138 selected from bone marrow with consent) representing a variety of different MM molecular subgroups were used. Cell viability (WST-1), cell cycle (PI) and apoptosis (AnnexinV/PI, Caspase-Glo 3/7) assays were performed. Affymetrix gene expression arrays followed by validation with RT-PCR were used to identify patterns of gene expression change with EZH2i. Western blotting confirmed changes at the protein level and Chip-PCR was performed using a validated antibody and isotype control to identify H3K27me3 changes at the relevant gene promotors. Affymetrix gene expression data for 1213 patients enrolled in the Total Therapy studies were used to investigate the relevance of our findings in myeloma patient samples. Results We confirmed a reduction in viability following EZH2i using two chemically distinct, specific small molecule inhibitors (EPZ005687 and UNC1999) and the negative control compound UNC2400. There was a reduction in viability in 6/8 cell lines and 5/6 patient samples. Response to inhibition was not related to molecular subgroup or the presence of high-risk molecular features including del17p. Global levels of H3K27me3 measured by Western blot were reduced in all cell lines regardless of response to EZH2i. In responding cell lines EZH2i induced cell cycle arrest at G1/S followed by induction of apoptosis. Gene expression arrays performed using mRNA from KMS11 and KMM1 cell lines highlighted a change in expression of cell cycle control genes associated with EZH2i. This finding was validated using qRT-PCR, which demonstrated upregulation of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors CDKN2B, CDKN1A or both. These findings were confirmed at the protein level by Western blotting. Chip-PCR experiment using cell lysates from KMS11 cells following incubation with EZH2i over 6 days identified changes in H3K27me3 at the promoter and transcriptional start site (PROM/TSS) regions of the CDKN2B and CDKN1A genes. The most specific changes occurred at the CDKN1A PROM/TSS, which were more heavily marked with H3K27me3 at baseline compared to a region approx. 5KB upstream. Given these results, which suggest that CDKN1A expression may be controlled by changes in H3K27me3, we explored the effect of CDKN1A mRNA expression in our patient datasets. We found the expression of EZH2 and CDKN1A to be inversely correlated (R=-0.170, p<0.0001) and that low expression of CDKN1A was associated with a significantly shorter progression free and overall survival (p<0.001). In order to confirm whether these gene expression changes could be used as a potential biomarker of response we looked at our panel of cell lines with variable responses to EZH2i. We identified a consistent increase in expression of CDKN1A only in responding cell lines suggesting it could be used as a biomarker of efficacy in the clinic. Conclusions These data support the hypothesis that CDKN1A expression is suppressed by increased H3K27me3, due to high expression of EZH2 and that this can be reversed with pharmacological EZH2 inhibition leading to a reduction in proliferation of myeloma cells. We provide data which supports the investigation of EZH2i in clinical trials of myeloma patients, which has the potential to be an effective therapeutic strategy even for those with high-risk disease, for whom current treatment approaches are ineffective.Pawlyn et al, EZH2 Overexpression in Myeloma Patients Shortens Survival and in-vitro Data Supports a Potential New Targeted Treatment Strategy. AACR and IMW abstracts, 2015Pawlyn et al, The Spectrum and Clinical Impact of Epigenetic Modifier Mutations in Myeloma. Clinical Cancer Research, 2016 Disclosures Pawlyn: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Kaiser:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Chugai: Consultancy. Jones:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jackson:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bergsagel:Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte: Consultancy. Morgan:Univ of AR for Medical Sciences: Employment; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Davies:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.