Kaddoura, Marcella

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) with t(11;14)(CCND1;IGH) remains the only subset sensitive to the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax. However, not all patients with t(11;14)(CCND1;IGH) respond to treatment, and some progress early after initial response. To investigate this, we examined 44 whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data samples from 34 patients with t(11;14) MM treated with venetoclax. The presence of mutations in the RAS pathway was strongly associated with shortened progression-free survival (PFS) and was validated in an independent cohort of 21 patients with MM. The presence of 1q gain was also associated with shorter PFS in patients without RAS mutations. In 10 patients with paired prevenetoclax and postvenetoclax treatment samples, postvenetoclax progression was recurrently driven by the selection of genomic events in the BCL2/MCL1 and RAS pathways and of high-risk features (eg, loss of TP53 and CDKN2C). Overall, our study shows that comprehensive genomic profiling can identify most mechanisms underlying resistance to BCL2 inhibition in t(11;14)(CCND1;IGH) MM.

Abstract Cyclin D1, encoded by CCND1, is a cell cycle regulator, overexpressed in ~15% of multiple myeloma (MM) cases via CCND1::IGH super-enhancer juxtaposition through t(11;14). Cyclin D1 also plays a non-canonical role in transcriptional regulation, but in t(11;14) MM its function in gene regulation remains undefined. We investigated the global transcriptional and epigenomic consequences of CCND1overexpression in t(11;14) MM. To define a CCND1 signature, RNA-seq from two independent primary MM patient cohorts, CoMMpass and Mayo, was utilized to compare high CCND1 t(11;14) cases (≥300 transcripts-per-million [TPM], n=271) vs. low CCND1 hyperdiploid cases (<30 TPM, n=233). Two CCND1 knockout (KO) clones in t(11;14) MM U266B1 were also generated by CRISPR/Cas9, introducing a frameshift insertion (A) after chr11:69641478 (hg38) in exon 1. ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq (H3K4me3, H3K4me1, and H3K27ac) were performed in duplicates, and RNA-seq in triplicates in U266B1 wild-type (WT) and KO. Libraries were sequenced on Illumina NextSeq 2000 (2x51 bp for ChIP/ATAC, 2x150 bp for RNA-seq). Reads were mapped to hg38 by BWA (ChIP/ATAC) or STAR (RNA-seq), peaks called by MACS2 (FDR< 0.01), peak and gene raw counts estimated by featureCounts. Differential peaks (fold-change ≥1.5) and differentially expressed genes (fold-change ≥2) were identified by edgeR (FDR<0.05), including peaks detected in ≥2 samples and genes with TPM ≥0.1 in ≥1 sample. Interactions between promoters and distal regulatory regions were identified using publicly available chromatin interaction data in blood cell types. Pathway analysis was performed using Enrichr. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed in t(11;14) KMS12BM cells. Differential analysis comparing CCND1-high t(11;14) and CCND1-low MM cases in the two patient cohorts identified 21 upregulated and 21 downregulated genes associated with CCND1 expression which were also captured in the wild-typevs. CCND1 KO U266 cells. Enriched pathways (p<0.05) included Notch signaling, early/late estrogen response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and reduced mitotic spindle and myogenesis. Dysregulated genes included those related to apoptosis, ubiquitin-proteosome, extracellular matrix, adhesion, and immune response, demonstrating a broader role for cyclin D1 in MM beyond cell cycle control. To explore the epigenomic basis of this transcriptional regulation, for each of the 42 differentially expressed genes we examined the changes of histone marks and chromatin accessibility in promoter and the interacting distal regulatory regions in the U266 KO model. Ten of the 21 genes upregulated in CCND1-high (downloaded in KO; e.g., argininosuccinate synthase 1 [ASS1], PMAIP1, MYEOV, CCR7, and DTX1) and 12 of the 21 genes downregulated in CCND1-high (upregulated in KO; e.g., UACA, RASAL2, PTPRZ1, PPT2, and IL23R) showed concordant changes in histone marks and/or chromatin accessibility, predominantly in distal regulatory regions, suggesting a chromatin-mediated mechanism of gene regulation by cyclin D1. The most prominent changes involved H3K27ac, a mark defining active enhancers. As H3K27ac is deposited by histone acetyltransferases CBP, we tested for the possible cyclin D1-CBP interaction. Co-IP confirmed this interaction, suggesting a role for this complex in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional control in t(11;14) MM. One gene notably upregulated in association with CCND1 is ASS1, which encodes a urea cycle enzyme responsible for endogenous arginine synthesis. Metabolomic studies demonstrated KO cells had elevated aspartate and citrulline and lowered arginine and ornithine compared to WT cells (p<0.01) demonstrating impaired urea cycle function. Further, KO cells displayed significantly reduced ASS1 protein expression, cell growth and S-phase entry compared to WT cells in arginine-replete conditions, with both WT and KO cell types further inhibited by arginine depletion (p<0.05). Together, a cyclin D1-associated gene signature was identified supporting its role in t(11;14) MM beyond the CDK4/6 mediated cell cycle control, including a role in metabolic plasticity and survival under arginine depleted conditions. These findings highlight cyclin D1 as a therapeutic vulnerability and open new avenues for personalized treatment strategies.

Abstract Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 are a therapeutic mainstay in multiple myeloma (MM). Although they have contributed to improved outcomes, most patients still experience disease relapse, and little is known about tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to these drugs. Antigen escape has been implicated as a mechanism of tumor-cell evasion in immunotherapy. Yet, it is unknown whether MM cells can develop permanent resistance to anti-CD38 antibodies by acquiring genomic events leading to biallelic disruption of the CD38 gene locus. Here, we analyzed whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data from patients 701 newly diagnosed MM, 67 patients at relapse with naivety to anti-CD38 antibodies, and 50 patients collected at relapse after anti-CD38 antibodies. We report a loss of CD38 in 10 of 50 patients (20%) after CD38 therapy, 3 of whom exhibited a loss of both copies. Two of these cases showed convergent evolution in which distinct subclones independently acquired similar advantageous variants. Functional studies on missense mutations involved in biallelic CD38 events revealed that 2 variants, L153H and C275Y, decreased binding affinity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of the commercial antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab. However, a third mutation, R140G, conferred selective resistance to daratumumab, while retaining sensitivity to isatuximab. Clinically, patients with MM are often rechallenged with CD38 antibodies after disease progression and these data suggest that next-generation sequencing may play a role in subsequent treatment selection for a subset of patients.

Introduction Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) directed against CD38 are a mainstay in multiple myeloma (MM). Downregulation of CD38 expression is a resistance mechanism of antigenic escape, however, cell surface expression may return. While this tumor cell plasticity is likely driven by epigenetic mechanisms, it is unknown if MM cells can develop permanent resistance to anti-CD38 MoAb by acquiring genomic events leading to biallelic disruption of CD38 thus precluding re-treatment. Here, we report biallelic loss of CD38 as a recurrent mechanism of resistance, often via convergent evolution where distinct subclones are advantaged towards the same selective pressure. Methods We interrogated two sets of patients (Mayo Clinic; n = 31, Calgary University; n =19) with relapse following anti-CD38 MoAbs. Two additional cases of interest were selected from Heidelberg University. Whole genome sequencing (WGS, 60-100x) or whole exome sequencing (WXS), flow cytometry (flow), and bulk RNAseq were used to validate the effect of genomic events on CD38. Missense mutations predicted to affect CD38 MoAb binding were validated with site-directed mutagenesis of a CD38 plasmid, transduction into K562 MM cells, and CD38 MoAb binding assays. Results The prevalence of biallelic inactivation of CD38 at anti-CD38 MoAb relapse was 6% (3/50). An additional selected biallelic event was noted in the Heidelberg set. Each case is described in detail: MM-19 (Calgary) received daratumumab (Dara), lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dex), and then had a second exposure to Dara, following relapse. At this second relapse, WGS was performed on two independent extramedullary disease localizations in the liver. Both samples had unique, large deletions (>3 Mb) on chromosome 4 coupled with additional unique focal deletions involving CD38. Flow confirmed the presence of CD138+/CD38- plasma cell populations in both sites. A second case of convergent evolution was seen in a patient (Mayo) after seventh-line Dara/Len/Dex. WGS revealed a common deletion encompassing CD38. On the remaining allele, one subclone had a structural variation-mediated loss of CD38(cancer cell fraction; CCF 40%) while another harbored an L153H missense mutation (CCF 60%). Flow confirmed presence of two CD138+ clones; one with diminished CD38 expression. L153H was functionally validated to abrogate Dara binding, while maintaining CD38 expression. The third sample was collected after fifth-line Dara and sixth-line Dara/Bortezomib/Dex (Heidelberg) and represents another case of convergent evolution with a common loss of chromosome 4 and two subclones detected by WGS (P98Lfs*12, CCF 39% resulting in biallelic inactivation; R140G, CCF 61%). Bulk RNAseq revealed, in comparison to NDMM from CoMMpass, CD38 expression below the first decile. Notably, the R140G variant reduced binding affinity to Dara but not to Isatuximab (Isa). A fourth case (Mayo) relapsing after 6 months of Dara-based therapy similarly had a focal deletion of CD38 with an L18Sfs*16 frameshift deletion on the remaining allele associated with a 4.35-fold reduction in CD38 expression by RNAseq compared to pre-treatment. Interestingly, in 3/4 cases the CD38-negative clone emerged after a second exposure to anti-CD38 MoAb, suggesting emergence with the first exposure and then selection during the second. One other monoallelic event (C275Y; Heidelberg) was detected post-Isa. Copy number of the alternate allele is not known given targeted sequencing methodology, but the variant was seen to reduce binding affinity to both Dara and Isa. The prevalence of monoallelic loss of CD38 in newly diagnosed MM from MMRF CoMMpass was 7% (50/701) and two patients had mutations in CD38, but there were no cases of biallelic loss suggesting these events are driven by treatment pressure. Conclusion Distinction of the mode of CD38 loss is valuable for predicting outcome of re-challenge to anti-CD38 MoAbs. We see here an estimated 5-10% of anti-CD38 MoAb relapses are characterized by genomic antigen escape. Results here are in line with antigen escape to BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed immunotherapies (Lee et al, Nat Med 2023), suggesting that acquired antigen escape resulting from prolonged exposure to the selective pressures of immunotherapy is a recurrent mechanism of resistance in MM. Moreover, in select cases, non-overlapping resistance mutations provide rationale for switching agents at second exposure.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) with t(11;14)(q13;q32), resulting in CCND1;IGH rearrangement, remains the only subset amenable to targeted therapy with the BCL2 inhibitor, Venetoclax. Nevertheless, not all patients with this translocation respond to treatment and some progress early after initial response. The mechanisms behind this clinical heterogeneity are largely unknown. Methods: To investigate mechanisms of heterogeneity in response to Venetoclax, we interrogated 44 whole genome sequencing (WGS) and 24 whole exome sequencing data from a training cohort including 33 patients with t(11;14) MM treated with Venetoclax at the Mayo Clinic. In a validation cohort, we extracted single nucleotide variants (SNV) and indels from 17 MM patients with t(11;14) with available RNAseq data treated with Venetoclax at Emory University. Results: In the training cohort the median number of lines of therapy was 4 and Venetoclax drug regimens included combinations with dexamethasone, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 agents, and immunomodulatory agents. After a median follow up of 30 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 9 months, and 13 patients (39%) achieved a complete remission (CR) to therapy, while 9 (27%) were refractory (i.e. no response or progressed within the first 60 days). For our driver discovery analysis, we integrated SNV, indels, copy number variants (CNV) and structural variants (SV). Deletion 17p (del17p) or TP53 mutation, MCL1 gain/amp, and hyper-APOBEC did not correlate with PFS in our cohort (p=0.59, p=0.71, and p=0.05, respectively). In contrast, mutations involving the MAPK pathway (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, FGFR3) displayed the strongest association with short PFS, which was retained after adjusting for del17p/TP53 mutations, and 1q gain/amp (HR: 4.76, CI: 1.8-12.9, p=0.002). The association between suboptimal response and resistance to Venetoclax in MM patients with MAPK pathway mutations (n=7) was also observed in our validation cohort from Emory University (p=0.046). This is in line with what has been reported in functional studies in acute myeloid leukemia, where RAS pathway promotes MCL1 under the selective pressure of Venetoclax (Zhang et al. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022). While MAPK mutations explained most cases of refractory patients (86%), the mechanisms through which initially responding patients subsequently progressed remain unclear. To investigate this, we interrogated 10 patients with pre- and post-treatment samples collected at disease progression (PD). We identified genomic events acquired/selected at PD of genes involved in the anti-apoptotic MCL1/BCL2 and MAPK pathways in 6/10 cases. One patient was refractory to Venetoclax and had double minutes involving BCL2, which caused multiple focal amplifications (>30 copies), likely reflecting extrachromosomal DNA. Another patient progressed with an acquired, focal deletion on BCL2L11. In two patients, the progressing clones harbored mutations in MAPK pathways (one BRAF and the other WNK2). Two patients who relapsed after sustained CR had major branching evolution where a previously undetectable focal deletion of PMAIP1 (NOXA) was seen at PD. Importantly, one of these deletions was a biallelic event. Venetoclax sensitivity assays conducted on PMAIP1 knockout in the MM t(11;14) cell line, KMS12PE, demonstrated significantly reduced cell death across all drug concentrations (p<0.05), validating the loss of NOXA as a mechanism of resistance to Venetoclax in MM. Finally, similarly with what was previously reported in chronic lymphocyte leukemia treated with Venetoclax (e.g., Herling et al Nat Comm 2018), CDKN2A/B monoallelic and biallelic focal deletions were selected post-Venetoclax, at PD in 4 patients while TP53 SNV/deletions were selected from subclonal to clonal in 2 patients at PD. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that mutations involving the MAPK pathway identify a population of MM patients with t(11;14)(CCND1;IGH) who are unlikely to respond to Venetoclax. We also show that genomic events involving the MAPK and BCL2/MCL1 pathways are primarily responsible for disease progression after initial response. These findings highlight the critical role of comprehensive genomic profiling through WGS in identifying mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in MM, aiding patient selection for Venetoclax, and guiding the development of novel drug combinations.

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy with several recurrent primary cytogenetic abnormalities including t(11,14)(q13;q32), resulting in increased expression of CCND1. Although 40% of patients with t(11;14) MM respond favorably to the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (ven), 60% fail to achieve an objective response. Previous studies have suggested upregulation of PMAIP1, encoding the pro-apoptotic NOXA protein, in association with ven sensitivity (Leblay, Blood, 2024). Here we sought to evaluate the role for NOXA in ven response in t(11;14) MM. Methods: We analyzed whole exome, whole genome and RNA sequencing data of CD138+ tumor cells from 1,359 patients with MM in the CoMMpass and Mayo Clinic cohorts. The histone mark H3K27ac was assessed in t(11;14)+ KMS12PE and U266B1 human myeloma cell lines using ChIP-seq. Gene expression and protein levels of PMAIP1 (NOXA) were also detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. Live cell detection was evaluated by Annexin V and PI using flow cytometry and by YoYo3 dye using IncuCyte following treatment with ven. Results: The t(11;14) MM subtype was associated with a 1.6-5.5-fold increased expression of PMAIP1 compared to non-t(11,14) MM in the CoMMpass and Mayo Clinic cohorts (p<0.0001). These findings are consistent with a significant correlation between CCND1 and PMAIP1 expression in both cohorts (p<0.001). To evaluate whether cyclin D1 is directly associated with increasing expression of PMAIP1 in t(11;14) MM, we generated a cyclin D1 knock out (KO) version of the U266B1 line using CRISPR/cas9. Two independent U266B1 KO cell lines showed reduced expression of PMAIP1 and NOXA protein compared to the WT U266B1 consistent with a role for cyclin D1 in regulating PMAIP1 expression. In addition, the KO lines had a 4.8-fold reduced H3K27ac signal at the PMAIP1 locus in comparison to the WT control suggesting a role for cyclin D1 in promoting H3K27ac. We previously observed increased expression of CCND1 in association with the G allele compared to the A allele of rs9344 in both the CoMMpass and Mayo Clinic cohorts (Leukemia, in press). We next asked whether the G risk allele of rs9344 within CCND1 impacted gene expression and H3k27ac levels at the PMAIP1 locus. To study the allele specific effect of CCND1, we used the CRISPR/cas9 edited KMS12PE WT (rs9344 AA) and Knock In (KI) (rs9344 GG) cell lines. In the KI cells, the G allele was accompanied by an ~2-fold increased expression of PMAIP1 and NOXA protein detected by western blot (<0.05). Increased PMAIP1 expression in KI lines was also accompanied by a 2.2-fold increased H3K27ac further suggesting a role for the G allele of rs9344 in promoting H3K27ac and gene expression at the PMAIP1 locus. Finally, we evaluated the consequence of PMAIP1 expression levels in relation to ven response. Increased expression of PMAIP1 and elevated levels of NOXA protein in the KMS12PE KI lines was associated with increased sensitivity to ven resulting in ~50% increase in cell death of KI vs. WT lines (p<0.02). Conclusion: We demonstrate a role for cyclin D1 in regulating PMAIP1 expression through H3K27ac resulting in increased NOXA protein. Levels of NOXA are associated with the G allele of rs9344 and increased venetoclax response.

Introduction The pathogenic role of somatic non-coding (nc) single nucleotide variants (SNVs) is underexplored in multiple myeloma (MM) and additional characterization of these regions has the potential to provide significant new insights into disease progression. To investigate the role of ncSNVs and their relationship with MM pathogenesis, we have characterized a novel series of WGS from 294 cases of MGUS, SMM, and MM using computational tools optimized to identify functional driver SNVs in these regions. We hypothesize the ncSNVs that co-localize to sites of super-enhancers (SEs) active in plasma cells (PC) are sites of high functional impact SNVs and these mutations lead to the dysregulated expression of genes that should be silent at the terminally differentiated stage of PCs, providing a selective advantage that shapes the fitness of the MM genomic landscape. Methods We analyzed 294 high-coverage matched tumor/normal pairs (80x tumor and 40x normal) derived from 21 MGUS, 86 SMM, 167 NDMM and 40 RRMM. In addition to previously sequenced samples, newly sequenced patients were obtained from NYU Langone Health, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham and University of Miami following IRB-approved informed consent. DNA was extracted from CD138+ purified bone marrow plasma cells using standard approaches. We used the MGP1000 (https://github.com/pblaney/mgp1000) to process sequencing data which employs a union-consensus mechanism for determining the final set of variants. We collected enhancer elements (E/SEs) active in GC B-cells, ABC-DLBCL and GBC-DLBCL (Bal, et al. Nature, 2022) and PC specific E/SEs (Loven, et al. Cell 2013). FunSeq2 was used to score ncSNVs. GRAM was used to predict how variants alter TF binding and gene expression in a subset of 6 cases with paired WGS in our series and will expand this analysis on a validation set of 263 NDMM and 93 RRMM cases from University-Hospital Heidelberg enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 clinical trial. Results We identified 1,952,232 high-quality SNVs with 18,199 (0.93%) accumulating in 280 focal sites we termed “mutationally enriched regions” or MERs. To discern SNVs in MERs with the highest potential for imparting a selective advantage, we clustered mutations based on the density of FunSeq2 impact scores which uses reference data contexts on sequence conservation, modification of transcription factor (TF) binding, and gene linkage to regulatory elements and network hubs from pan-cancer studies. We show that MERs are enriched for ncSNVs with high impact scores (mean=2.57) compared to random similarly-sized regions of the genome (Fisher's exact test P<9.7e-12, OR=10.10 [3.88-37.40]). The high impact ncSNVs (hi-ncSNVs) in MERs (n=220) account for 8.09% of all hi-ncSNVs and are present in 46.3% of cases (136/294) with some patients having up to 7. The proportion of cases carrying a MER hi-ncSNVs was similar across disease stages (MGUS=42.9%, SMM=46.5%, MM=40.7%, and RR=47.5%). Analysis of the VAF of MER hi-ncSNVs shows a minor shift towards more clonal versus subclonal mutations (53.6% vs 46.4% VAF>=0.25) suggesting some high impact mutations are acquired in the GC but additional hi-ncSNV are acquired later in PC development, providing evidence that hi-ncSNVs accumulate in MERs throughout disease progression. We mapped these hi-ncSNVs to associated genes then intersected the loci with E/SEs active in GCBs and PCs to determine their functional context. This approach identified 12 genes affected by hi-ncSNVs including the previously identified nc-drivers NEAT1, MIR142, ZCCHC7, and IGLL5 as well as the PC differentiation genes IRF8, BACH2, proliferation genes RHOH, SPRED2, known coding MM drivers CCND1, ZFP36L1, and chr1q genes BTG2 and CROCC. We predicted the effect of ncSNVs on expression through modulation of TF binding at this set of putative nc drivers in MM and identified a trend towards increase in expression of SPRED2, CCND1, NEAT1, and IGLL5 compared to non-mutated cases (P=0.089). We will present data on the validation of this set of genes on a larger set of data derived from the Heidelberg group. Conclusions We identified a set of 12 putative nc driver genes in MM that modify expression and have the potential to significantly alter the pathogenesis of MM by providing a selective survival advantage. We will present the impact of these by clinical stage and on outcome.

AbstractAchievement of a complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) correlates with improvement in survival outcomes; however, its impact on prognostic variables at baseline outside of clinical trial settings is not well described. We sought to determine the impact of achieving a CR within 2 years from diagnosis, its effect on the prognostic value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and International Staging System (ISS) risk, and examined additional predictors of outcome among those achieving a CR in a routine clinical setting. We evaluated 1869 newly diagnosed MM patients who had ≥ 2 monoclonal protein immunofixation studies in the serum and urine available within 24 months from diagnosis, categorizing those with ≥ 2 negative serum and urine immunofixations as achieving CR. With a landmark at 24 months, median progression‐free survival (PFS) for CR versus non‐CR patients was 29.8 versus 20.9 months (p ≤ .0002); median overall survival (OS) was 104 versus 70 months (p < .0001). The impact of achieving a CR was retained after adjusting for FISH, ISS, sex, transplant status, and involved heavy chain. Baseline FISH and ISS stage were not associated with PFS or OS among patients achieving a CR. The following variables were found as predictors of inferior OS within the CR cohort: age > 75 years, male gender, hypoalbuminemia, and non‐immunoglobulin G involved heavy chain. Our study confirms that achievement of CR within 2 years from diagnosis is associated with improvement in survival outcomes and neutralization of the impact of FISH and ISS risk, thereby confirming observations from the clinical trial setting among a clinical practice cohort.

Abstract Background: The use of immunotherapeutic agents in multiple myeloma (MM) has shown improvements in clinical outcomes, emphasizing the role the host immune system plays in disease control. In recognition of this relationship, efforts aimed at identifying biomarkers of immune surveillance in MM have identified prognostic value in the peripheral absolute lymphocyte (ALC) and absolute monocyte (AMC) counts at various stages of disease and following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), with lower ALC and AMC serving as a surrogate for immune dysregulation and correlating with inferior progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). With ASCT remaining the standard of care in the treatment of MM, we sought to examine whether CD3 content of the apheresis product during stem cell collection could be used as a biomarker for immune competence and whether it influences outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 1086 MM patients who underwent stem cell (CD34) collection with available CD3 data and subsequent ASCT at our institution. We recorded the total absolute CD3 and CD34 cell count upon completion of mobilization, with a higher CD3 count serving as a surrogate for immune competence. In addition to investigating the absolute CD3 count, we calculated the CD3/CD34 ratio given variation in the CD34 goals. Patients were dichotomized based on whether their absolute CD3 and CD3/CD34 ratio values were above or below medians. A Kaplan-Meier model was used to compare median PFS and OS between groups. A cox proportional hazards model was used to determine its prognostic impact, adjusting for ISS stage 3, high risk FISH, achievement of CR near day 100, and maintenance therapy received post-ASCT. Results: The median length of follow-up from date of ASCT for the entire cohort (N=1086) was 34.1 months (range: 0.26-157 months) and the median time from stem cell collection to ASCT was 9 days (range: 3-3143 days). The most common mobilizing regimen was Neupogen and plerixafor (N=425, 39%) and 694 (64%) patients received ASCT in the first line setting. The median absolute total CD3 count was 4.3 x 10^6/kg (range: 0.1-21.9) with 542 patients above and 544 patients at or below the median. The median absolute total CD34 count was 8.53 x 10^6/kg (range: 0.2-37.0) and median CD3/CD34 ratio was 0.50 (range: 0.01-15), with 536 patients above and 550 patients at or below the median ratio. The median PFS among patients with a CD3 count &gt; 4.25 x 10^6/kg was 23.1 vs. 16.9 months among patients with CD3 count ≤ 4.25 x 10^6/kg (p&lt;0.0001) and median OS was 65.3 months vs. 41.6 months (p&lt;0.0001), respectively. A similar trend was observed when dividing patients based on CD3/CD34 ratio, with median PFS of 22.4 vs. 17.5 months (p=.0003) and median OS of 61.5 vs. 45.7 months (p=.0001), both favoring the cohort with a CD3/CD34 ratio &gt; 0.5 (Figure 1). The prognostic value among patients with a CD3/CD34 ratio &gt; 0.5 was retained after adjusting for ISS stage III, high risk FISH features, and use of maintenance therapy as follows: PFS HR: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.86; p=0.0002); OS 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88; p=0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that patients who have higher CD3 content in their apheresis product have better PFS and OS following ASCT. These findings reveal a possible role for using absolute CD3 and CD3/CD34 ratios in the apheresis product as a surrogate marker for immune competence and in predicting clinical outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Dingli: GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor: Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Kumar: Novartis: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tenebio: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Carsgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Achievement of a complete response (CR) to therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) early in disease course correlates with improvement in clinical outcomes, reflective of therapeutically sensitive disease biology. While depth of response is known to impact overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the effect of known prognostic variables at baseline including FISH risk and International Staging System (ISS) score outside of clinical trial settings is not well described. We sought to determine the impact of known prognostic variables in MM including FISH and ISS risk in the context of NDMM patients achieving a CR to therapy and to also examine additional predictors of outcome among this cohort. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 1869 NDMM patients who had ≥ 2 consecutive monoclonal protein immunofixation (IFE) studies in the serum and urine available within 24 months from diagnosis. We identified the number of patients who had ≥ 2 negative serum and urine IFE as a surrogate for achieving CR (N=461), since a bone marrow biopsy is not routinely performed to confirm CR in the non-trial setting. A Kaplan-Meier model was used to compare median PFS and OS between patients achieving a CR vs. non-CR and a multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for known prognostic variables. A cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of baseline FISH (high risk vs. standard risk) and ISS scores (3 vs.1 and 2) on PFS and OS, among patients achieving a CR vs. non-CR, and identify additional prognostically significant variables within the CR cohort. Results: The median length of follow-up for the entire cohort (n=1869) was 64 months (range: 1-199). The median time from diagnosis to achievement of CR among the CR cohort was 9.8 months (0.20-23.8 months). The median PFS for CR (n=461) vs. non-CR (n=1408) patients was 42.0 vs. 29.3 months (p&lt;.0001) and median OS was 124.4 vs. 85.6 months (p&lt;.0001), respectively (Figure 1). The impact of achieving a CR on outcomes was retained after adjusting for FISH, ISS, age, sex, autologous stem cell transplant, and involved heavy chain as follows: PFS HR 0.57 (0.43-0.76; p=0.0001); OS HR 0.56 (0.43-0.74; p&lt;0.0001). The baseline FISH and ISS risk on PFS and OS comparing CR vs. non-CR patients are shown in Table 1, with both variables having statistically insignificant impact on PFS and OS among the CR cohort. We examined several variables present at baseline and at the time of CR to determine their impact on PFS and OS, including age, sex, and non-IgG involved heavy chain (baseline), and thrombocytopenia (&lt;150,000), hypoalbuminemia (&lt;3.5 g/dL), and immunoparesis (at time of CR). The following variables were found as inferior predictors on PFS within the CR cohort with hazard ratios as follows: male gender, HR 1.36 (1.05-1.75; p=0.02) and non-IgG involved heavy chain, HR 2.2 (1.55-3.2).The following variables were found as predictors for inferior outcomes on OS within the CR cohort with hazard ratios as follows: Age&gt; 75 years, HR 2.7 (1.54-4.8; p=.0005); male gender, HR 1.5 (1.1-2.02; p=.008); serum albumin &lt;3.5, HR 1.54 (1.1-2.08; p=.004); and non-IgG involved heavy chain, HR 1.75 (1.23-2.47; p=.002). On multivariate analysis, age, hypoalbuminemia, and non-IgG involved heavy chain retained prognostic significance for OS. Conclusion: Attainment of an early CR in NDMM confers improvement in PFS and OS. Our study confirms these findings and suggests that achievement of CR neutralizes the impact of baseline FISH and ISS risk on PFS and OS. Among the CR cohort, age&gt; 75 years, male sex, non-IgG involved heavy chain, and hypoalbuminemia at the time of CR predict for inferior overall survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dingli: Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy. Dispenzieri: Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lin: Vineti: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend: Consultancy. Kumar: Merck: Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Tenebio: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.