Raimondo, Francesco Di

Scoring systems designed to improve the accuracy of prognostication in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) usually rely on discretized/dichotomic values of the clinical and biological variables. Here we analyzed the immunophenotypic and (immuno)genetic profiles of 2,243 CLL patients with Rai stage 0-I-II, by applying unsupervised machine learning methods, elaborating prognostic factors as continuous variables, to identify novel relationships and interactions likely missed in conventional hierarchical models. The study included an internal training cohort (n=863) and two external validation cohorts provided from Cardiff University/Brighton Medical School (n=455) and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN; n=925). Primary endpoint was Time to First Treatment (TTFT). Laboratory-based markers evaluated in the training cohort were: surface antigen expression by flow cytometry (as % of positive cells) of CD20, FMC7, CD49d, CD49c, CD38, CD23, CD43, CD22, ZAP-70; chromosomal aberrations (% of nuclei with abnormal signal) del13q, tris12, del11q and del17p,; mutational status of TP53 by NGS as % VAF; IGHV mutational status as % mutation. 420/863 cases received treatment (median 46 months). Univariate Cox regression identified FISH del11q, del17p and tris12, TP53 and IGHV mutations, CD38 and CD49d expression, as features associated with TTFT (p-value <0.001). An unsupervised k-means algorithm partitioned cases into 6 clusters (C1-C6), as selected by the elbow method, and centroid analysis evaluated which feature most contributed to each cluster (Panel A): C1 (n=275) was heavily IGHV-mutated (mutation range 4.5-22.0%) with low representation of all other features; C2 (n=208) was mostly IGHV-unmutated/intermediate (up to 4.5%) in the absence of other features; C3 (n=169) were CD49d-expressing cases (>50% expression), with low representation of other features, except CD38; C4 (n=127) were cases with trisomy 12 (>28%), also expressing CD49d and CD38; C5 (n=48) were cases with highly clonal del11q (44-98%) and IGHV-unmutated, mutually exclusive with TP53 disruption; C6 (n=34) contained TP53-disrupted cases with high mutation burden (VAF 36-97%) and/or del17p (range 40-96%), with low importance of all the other features. Of note, alternative use of either TP53 mutation or del17p as defining features of cluster 6 did not result in changes of the classification accuracy. Clinically, clusters 3-4-5-6 showed median TTFT of 26, 22, 9, 5 months respectively whereas median TTFT was not reached for clusters 1-2. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering aggregated the 6 clusters in 3 major risk tiers: high (C5-6), intermediate (C2-3-4) and low (C1), with median TTFT of 7, 45 and not reached, respectively (Panel B). Multivariate Cox analysis (MVA) with Rai staging demonstrated that the 3-tier risk score contributed significantly and independently to TTFT estimate (p<0.0001; Harrel's c-index=0.71). To classify novel patients, we designed a hierarchical algorithm, based on each clusters' estimated risk and according to calculated cut-off, i.e. C6, del17p/ TP53>36%; C5, del11q>43%; C4, tris12>28%; C3, CD49d>50%; C2, IGHV≤4.5%; C1, the remaining patients with IGHV>4.5%. This approach was highly robust by an internal training-validation bootstrap (cluster classification accuracy = 0.96±0.02). External samples from two independent cohorts were classified into the six clusters using the cut-offs defined by the hierarchical classifier, and then aggregated into the 3-risk tiers. The classifier performed robustly in both cohorts, again adding independent prognostic information to Rai stage in MVA, with p<0.0001 and c-index of 0.76 for Cardiff/Brighton cohort and p<0.0001 and c-index of 0.74 for Mayo cohort. In conclusion, our machine-learning-driven, laboratory-based classification identifies clusters of patients who at higher risk of requiring early treatment, independent of clinical staging, and may help to better identify patients who may benefit from early treatment or more frequent disease surveillance. For some features, TP53 or IGHV mutational status, our unsupervised approach selected cut-offs not recapitulating the canonical ones, envisioning different biological activities in the TTFT setting. For example, TP53 mutations were clinically relevant only if present in the vast majority of the clone , suggesting the involvement of specific activities of the TP53 mutant in this context.

Abstract Introduction: Observation is the standard of care for asymptomatic early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) however these cases follow a heterogenous course. Recent studies show novel biomarkers can delineate indolent from aggressive early stage disease and current clinical trials are exploring the role of early intervention in high risk cases. Although several scoring systems have been established in CLL, most are designed for overall survival, do not circumscribe early stage disease, and require cumbersome calculations relying on extensive laboratory and clinical information. Aim: We propose a novel laboratory-based prognostic calculator to risk stratify time to first treatment (TTFT) in early stage CLL and guide candidate selection for early intervention. Methods: We included 1574 cases of early stage CLL in an international cohort from Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States using a training-validation model. Patient information was obtained from participating centers in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The training cohort included 478 Rai 0 cases from a multicenter Italian cohort, all referred to a single center (Clinical and Experimental Onco-Hematology Unit of the Centro Riferimento Oncologico in Aviano, IT) for immunocytogenetic lab analyses. Considering TTFT as an endpoint, we evaluated 8 variables (age>65, WBC>32K, 17p-, 11q-, +12, IGHV status, CD49d+, gender) with univariate and multivariate Cox regression internally validated using bootstrapping procedures. FISH thresholds were 5% for 11q-, and +12 and 10% for 17p-. Cases were categorized according to the hierarchical model proposed by Dohner. IGHV status was considered unmutated at ≥98%. CD49d+ was set at >30%. WBC cutoff of >32K was established by maximally selected log rank analysis. Variables were weighted based on the proportion of their normalized hazard ratios rounded to the nearest whole integer. We used recursive partitioning for risk-category determination and Kaplan-Meier analysis to generate survival curves. We compared the concordance index (C-index) of our model with the CLL international prognostic index (CLL-IPI) for 381/478 cases in the training cohort with available beta-2-microglobulin data and for all validation cohorts. We used 3 independent single-center cohorts for external validation. Results: The training cohort had 478 cases of Rai 0 CLL with a median (95% CI) TTFT of 124 months (m) (104-183m). Five prognostic variables emerged with respect to TTFT, and each assigned a point value of 1 or 2 according to their respective normalized HR values as follows: 17p-, and UM IGHV (2 pts); 11q-, +12, and WBC>32K (1 pt). We identified three risk groups, based on point cut-offs of 0, 1-2, and 3-5 established by recursive partitioning analysis with a median (95% CI) TTFT of 216m (216-216m), 104m (93-140m) and 58m (44-68m) (p<0.0001, C-index 0.75) for the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively (figure 1). A comparison with the CLL-IPI was possible in 381 cases with available beta-2-microglobulin data. In this subset, the C-index was 0.75 compared to 0.68 when patient risk groups were split according to the CLL-IPI. The scoring system was then validated in 3 independent cohorts of early stage CLL: i) Gemelli Hospital in Rome, IT provided 144 Rai 0 cases. Median (95% CI) TTFT was 86m (80-94m, 95% CI). Median (95% CI) TTFT for the low, intermediate and high-risk groups was 239m (239-239m), 98m (92-132m) and 85m (60-109m) respectively (p=0.002 between low and intermediate groups, p=0.09 between intermediate and high groups; C-index 0.64 v 0.60 for CLL-IPI). ii) Cardiff University Hospital in Wales, UK provided 395 Binet A cases. Median (95% CI) TTFT was 74 m (67-81m) overall and NR, 111m (97-146m) and 70m (29-114m) for the low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively (p<0.001 between low and intermediate groups, p=0.009 between intermediate and high groups; C-index 0.63 v 0.63 for CLL-IPI). iii) Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN provided 557 Rai 0 cases. Median (95% CI) TTFT was 127m (96m-NR) overall and NR, 76m (64m-NR) and 36m (31-59m) for the low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively (p<0.0001; C-index 0.72 v 0.68 for CLL-IPI). Conclusion: We present a novel laboratory-based scoring system for Rai 0/Binet A CLL to aid case selection in risk-adapted treatment for early disease. Further comparison to existing indices is needed to verify its utility in the clinical setting. Disclosures Zaja: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Fegan:Roche: Honoraria; Napp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Pepper:Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patents. Parikh:AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: Over the last two decades several phenotypic, molecular, and chromosomal markers have been identified that are significantly associated with the prognosis of CLL patients. Therefore, clinicians managing CLL patients would benefit from a simplified prognostic index. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from 337 Binet A CLL patients enrolled in Italian the O-CLL1-GISL protocol with the aim of developing scores capable of predicting treatment free survival (TFS). Factors independently associated with TFS were included in the prognostic indexes. To account for differences in the magnitude of the association between the individual independent factors and TFS, we assigned a weighted risk score to each factor based on ranges of their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (i.e., 1 point for HR 1.1-1.9; 2 points for HR 2.0-2.9, etc.). The total risk score was then calculated by the sum of the ratings of each factor on individual basis. Risk groups were identified combining risk categories with a non-statistically different TFS. Results: We developed two scores based on weighted multivariable models: the first included clinical and laboratory parameters [clinical score (c-score)], while the second was based on biological markers [biological score (b-score)] (Table 1). The c-score allowed to predict the TFS of patients through the combination of Rai stage, b2-microglobulin and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), while the b-score predicted TFS by IGHV mutational status and CD38 expression. The c-score showed a C-statistic of 0.72, while the b-score was 0.67, although cases stratified according to the b-score showed a more specific mRNA/microRNA profile. When the two scores were forced in a multivariate analysis, both showed an independent predictive value on TFS with a similar HR, demonstrating their complementarity. Thus, we attempted to integrate the two scores performing a further multivariate analysis in which all parameters, significantly associated with TFS at univariate analysis, were tested (Table 1). ALC, Rai stage, b2-microglobulin together with IGHV mutational status, resulted independently associated with TFS. We constructed a weighted score [comprehensive score (co-score)], including all the above 4 variables, which allowed the identification of 3 different risk groups with significantly different TFS (Figure 1). The C-statistic of the g-score was 0.75, showing a better concordance than the other two scores. Moreover, its validity was externally validated in a series of 297 newly diagnosed Binet A CLL patients from the Mayo Clinic, USA. Conclusions: Using this multistep process and external validation, we developed a score with high discriminatory power and predictive significance on the individual patient level. Table 1. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional Hazards Models Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Clinical model Biological model Comprehensive model HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score Age (years) <60/>60 1.12 (0.73-1.74) 0.59 - - - - - - - - - Sex Male/Female 0.93 (0.6-1.44) 0.93 - - - - - - - - - Rai stage 0/I-II 2.30 (1.47-3.50) <0.0001 2.13 (1.24-3.03) 0.004 0/2 - - - 1.76 (1.11-2.78) 0.015 0/1 ALC (109/L) <10/>10 3.43 (1.99-5.92) <0.0001 2.91 (1.85-5.20) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.70 (1.54-4.72) 0.001 0/2 b-2 microglobulin normal/elevated 3.04 (1.96-4.70) <0.0001 2.78 (1.79-4.30) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.65 (1.66-4.21) <0.0001 0/2 LDH normal/elevated 1.25 (0.57-2.71) 0.57 - - - - - - - - - CD38 negative/positive 3.22 (2.06-5.02) <0.0001 - - - 2.11 (1.15-3.16) 0.02 0/2 1.40 (0.80-2.42) 0.24 - ZAP-70 negative/positive 2.34 (1.51-3.61) <0.0001 - - - 1.21 (0.70-2.16) 0.485 - 1.0 (0.98-1.01) 0.72 - IGHV mutated/unmutated 3.57 (2.32-5.50) <0.0001 - - - 2.10 (1.12-3.90) 0.019 0/2 2.39 (1.27-4.50) 0.007 0/2 FISH risk low+int/high 2.93 (1.46-5.90) 0.002 - - - 1.65 (0.76-3.34) 0.216 - 1.80 (0.84-3.88) 0.13 - Abbreviations: ALC: absolute lymphocyte count; CI: confidential interval; HR: hazard ratio. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Disclosures Shanafelt: Cephalon: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kay:Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2877 Poster Board II-853 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, treatment with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) was superior to high-dose dexamethasone in terms of both response rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results suggest that the combination lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) compared to the RD regimen yields significantly better 2-year overall survival (OS) (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The combination of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) has been investigated in a phase I/II study showing promising results (Palumbo A et al, J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4459-4465). The goal of this case –control study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of the lenalidomide/dexamethasone (len/dex) combination vs MPR as primary therapy for newly diagnosed elderly MM patients, to determine the additive value of melphalan compared to a regimen of lenalidomide plus corticosteroid. Patients and methods: Data from 51 newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in Italy in a phase I/II dose-escalating trial, from January to October 2005, with MPR, were analyzed. For comparison of their outcome, 37 patients were identified among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from March 2005 to December 2008 who received len/dex as primary therapy and were enrolled in phase II or III trials. Patients treated with MPR received 9 monthly cycles of oral melphalan (doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg on days 1-4) and lenalidomide (doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg/day on days 1-21). After 9 cycles, patients started maintenance with lenalidomide alone (10 mg, days 1-21) until relapse or progression. Patients treated with len/dex received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus dexamethasone, either at low-dose (n=17) (40 mg orally days 1, 8, 15, 22) or at high-dose (n=21) (40 mg orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20). Treatment was continued until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity, or could be stopped at the physician's discretion. Patients (n=13) were allowed to receive transplant if they wished and were deemed eligible. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: On intention-to-treat analysis, 15.7% versus 23.7% patients, respectively in the MPR and in the len/dex group, (p=0.342) achieved a complete response, and 43.2% vs 47.4%, (p=0.691) achieved at least a very good partial response. Time-to-progression (TTP) (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.98; p=0.903), PFS (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92; p=0.926) and OS (2-year OS: 86.2% in MPR group vs 89.1% in len/dex, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.38-1.98; p=0.730) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No significant differences in TTP, PFS and OS were reported when MPR patients were compared with the subgroup of patients treated with low-dose dexamethasone plus lenalidomide. Similar results were found when the analysis was restricted to MPR patients and len/dex pair mates receiving lenalidomide plus low/dose dexamethasone, matched according to age and sex, and who did not received transplant. The toxicity profile was different in the two groups. Hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with MPR compared with len/dex, in particular neutropenia (66.7% vs 21.1%, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (31.4% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001), respectively. Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal events (13.2% vs 2.0%, p= 0.080), thrombotic events (13.2 vs 5.9, p= 0.279) and fatigue (10.5% vs 3.9%, p= 0.395) were more common with len/dex compared with MPR. Conclusion: Results of this case-control study show that both MPR and Rd are efficacious regimens for elderly MM patients. Data need however to be carefully evaluated and randomized control trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzyme: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Musto:celgene: Honoraria. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Petrucci:celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Boccadoro:jansen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; pharmion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Background. Trisomy 12 (tris12) is a recurrent cytogenetic abnormality in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), occurring in approximately 15-20% of cases, often as the unique cytogenetic alteration, that is usually considered a clonal driver lesion occurring early in CLL evolution. In the Dohner hierarchical categorization, tris12 CLL are identified as having an intermediate prognostic risk, although recent reports suggest a more complex and heterogeneous clinical behavior. Compared to CLL lacking this cytogenetic abnormality, tris12 CLL show more atypical morphology and immunophenotype, more frequent expression of the negative prognostic markers CD49d and CD38, and presence of NOTCH1 mutations and an unmutated (UM) IGHV gene status. The increased fraction of tris12 CLL carrying adverse prognostic features is in contrast to the intermediate clinical behavior associated with most tris12 CLL cases. Aim. To perform a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of the major genetic, immunogenetic and immunophenotypic prognostic markers in tris12 CLL. Methods. The study was based on a multicenter series of tris12 CLL defined according to Dohner (n=283, including 73 cases also bearing del13q), and a comparison group (control) of 553 cases with either del13q (n=308) or without any cytogenetic abnormality (no del17p, del11q, tris12, del13q, n=245). Median follow-up of patients in the tris12 and control groups were 4 years (range 0-22) and 7 years (range 0-28), with 54% and 57% treated patients, and 18% and 15% deaths, respectively. Patient characterization included modified Rai stage, CD49d (CD49dhigh, ≥30% positive cells by flow cytometry), CD38 (CD38high, ≥30% positive cells by flow cytometry) and ZAP-70 (ZAP-70high, ≥20% positive cells by flow cytometry) expression, and IGHV mutational status (mutated, M, or UM according to the 2% cutoff). TP53, BIRC3, NOTCH1 andSF3B1 mutations were screened either at diagnosis or before therapy by NGS with at least 1000X coverage and 1% of sensitivity. Groups were compared by chi-square test; overall survival (OS) was computed from diagnosis to death or censored at last observation, and analyzed by Cox regression analysis. Results. Comparing the tris12 and the control groups, median age was 64 years (range 30-92) vs 66 years (range 33-92), male gender 55% vs 56% (p=0.86), the modified Rai stage was early in 52% vs 54%, intermediate in 41% vs 42% and advanced in 7% vs 4% (p=0.20). As previously reported, tris12 CLL were characterized by a higher prevalence of cases expressing CD49d (85% vs 31%) and CD38 (62% vs 17%; all p<0.0001), and of UM IGHV cases (55% vs 25%, p<0.0001). Analysis of recurrent mutations highlighted a higher prevalence of NOTCH1 mutations (26% vs 8%, p<0.0001) and of BIRC3 mutations (21% vs 1%, p<0.0001) in tris12 vs control group CLL. Conversely, no differences were found in the fraction of cases with TP53 mutations (3% vs 4%, p=0.38) or SF3B1 mutations (7% vs 7%, p=0.89), and in cases expressing ZAP-70 (62% vs 52%, p=0.09). The impact of these features on OS was tested by univariate analysis: in tris12 CLL, only the UM IGHV gene status predicted shorter OS (HR=2.37, p=0.0063), while none of the other characteristics reaching statistical significance as OS predictors (CD49d HR=1.36, p=0.36; CD38 HR=0.42, p=0.052; ZAP-70 HR=3.12, p=0.07; TP53 HR=2.33, p=0.25; NOTCH1 HR=1.40, p=0.22; SF3B1 HR=2.05, p=0.17; BIRC3 HR=1.22, p=0.61). On the other hand, in the control cohort, a significantly higher HR was found for CD49d (HR 3.11, p<0.0001) and CD38 (HR 3.45, p<0.0001) expression, TP53 (HR 2.88, p=0.0026), NOTCH1 (HR 3.57, p<0.0001), and SF3B1 (HR 2.57, p=0.0038) mutations, as well as for the UM IGHV gene status (HR=2.81, p<0.0001), but not for ZAP-70 expression and BIRC3 mutations (HR=1.74 and HR=1.91, p=0.15 and p=0.37, respectively). Conclusions. Mutational status of IGHV genes was the sole prognostic factor able to stratify OS in tris12 CLL. Despite the high frequency of NOTCH1 and BIRC3 mutations, as well as of CD49d and CD38 overexpression, these markers failed to convey a prognostic risk in tris12 CLL. The lack of a significant clinical impact for TP53 and SF3B1 mutations might be partly explained by the low number of mutated cases combined with a relative short follow up in our tris12 cohort. These findings are in keeping with the hypothesis of a different patho-biological mechanism occurring in tris12 CLL, which however remains to be fully elucidated. Disclosures D'Arena: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Rossi:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janseen: Honoraria. Gaidano:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.

The chronic lymphocytic leukemia International Prognostic Index (CLL‐IPI) combines 5 parameters (age, clinical stage, TP53 status [normal vs. del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation], IGHV mutational status, serum β2‐microglobulin) to predict survival and time‐to‐first‐treatment (TTFT) in CLL patients. We performed an observational study in 337 prospectively collected, Binet stage A patients to validate the ability of the CLL‐IPI to predict TTFT in an independent cohort of early stage CLL patients. The CLL‐IPI score stratified Binet stage A patients into three subgroups with different outcome. Since the CLL‐IPI was originally developed to predict survival, we next investigated the optimal cut‐off score to predict TTFT in Binet stage A patients. Recursive partitioning analysis identified three subsets with scores of 0 (n = 139), 1 (n = 90), and ≥ 2(n = 108). The probability of remaining free from therapy 5 years after diagnosis was 85%, 67% and 46% in these three categories (P < 0.0001.; C‐statistic:c = 0.72; 95% CI:0.58‐0.81). This optimized CLL‐IPI scoring for TTFT was subsequently validated in an independent cohort of Binet A patients from the Mayo Clinic (n = 525). The ability of either original or optimized CLL‐IPI to predict TTFT was equivalent to other prognostic models specifically designed for this endpoint (2011 MDACC score and O‐CLL1 score). Although originally developed to predict suvival, the CLL‐IPI is useful for predicting TTFT in early stage CLL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1090–1095, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.