Citations

ABSTRACT The last decade has seen a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications describing physiological and pathological functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a collective term covering various subtypes of cell‐released, membranous structures, called exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes, oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, and many other names. However, specific issues arise when working with these entities, whose size and amount often make them difficult to obtain as relatively pure preparations, and to characterize properly. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (“MISEV”) guidelines for the field in 2014. We now update these “MISEV2014” guidelines based on evolution of the collective knowledge in the last four years. An important point to consider is that ascribing a specific function to EVs in general, or to subtypes of EVs, requires reporting of specific information beyond mere description of function in a crude, potentially contaminated, and heterogeneous preparation. For example, claims that exosomes are endowed with exquisite and specific activities remain difficult to support experimentally, given our still limited knowledge of their specific molecular machineries of biogenesis and release, as compared with other biophysically similar EVs. The MISEV2018 guidelines include tables and outlines of suggested protocols and steps to follow to document specific EV‐associated functional activities. Finally, a checklist is provided with summaries of key points.

Aberrant hepatocyte Notch activation is required for development of NASH-associated fibrosis, and Notch inhibition ameliorates obesity-induced liver disease.

TPS8582 Background: Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1)-deficient malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is sensitive to arginine deprivation therapy with pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which also enhances the cytotoxicity of pemetrexed. The TRAP Phase 1 trial (NCT02029690) of ADI-PEG 20 combined with 1st-line pemetrexed (PEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy revealed a 94% disease control rate in non-epithelioid (biphasic and sarcomatoid) MPM subtypes characterized by a 75% rate of ASS1 loss. Thus, we plan to assess the efficacy of ADI-PEG20 or placebo combined with PEM and CDDP in patients (pts) with poor prognosis MPM in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2/3 global trial. Methods: Up to 386 good performance (ECOG 0-1) pts with non-epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma will be enrolled in a phase 2/3 adaptive, biomarker-driven study design. Biopsies will be required prior to randomization: ASS1-agnostic pts will be enrolled initially (phase 2 stage) with an option to restrict enrolment to ASS1-deficient MPM (phase 3 stage). Pts will be randomized to receive weekly ADI-PEG20 (36 mg/m2 IM) or placebo with standard doses of PEM and CDDP for a maximum of 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment. Pts who develop CDDP toxicity may be switched to carboplatin. Pts will be assessed every 6 weeks using modified RECIST (RECIST 1.1 allowed for pts with significant extrathoracic disease). The primary endpoint for the phase 2 stage will be overall response rate (ORR) with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), safety and toxicity. The phase 2 will test ORR proportions with the placebo triplet set at 15% vs. 35% for the ADI-PEG 20 triplet, with a 1:1 randomization, 80% power. After recruitment of 176 pts, the phase 2 will convert to a phase 3 study with the primary endpoint of OS. In summary, ATOMIC-Meso is the first triplet chemotherapy study to assess the role of targeted arginine deprivation in aggressive subtypes of mesothelioma. Pt accrual has commenced across the US and Asia, with enrolment due in Europe and Australia by 2nd quarter of 2017. [Trial sponsored by Polaris Group]. Clinical trial information: NCT02709512.

SummaryObjectivesAlthough secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has been reported in children with critical illness of various etiologies, it has not been reported in patients with febrile infection–related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). We describe a series of patients with concurrent HLH and FIRES in an effort to establish common pathophysiologic abnormalities.MethodsFive patients with FIRES who were assessed for HLH were identified from a neurocritical care database. All were previously healthy and had extensive diagnostic testing. All had clinical deterioration with multiorgan dysfunction prompting HLH screening 20‐29 days after hospitalization. Markers for inflammatory dysregulation were assessed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum at various time points. Outcomes were assessed 6 months after presentation.ResultsThree patients met clinical criteria for secondary HLH. Elevation of specific cytokines/chemokines was variable. CSF neopterin, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and C‐X‐C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) were significantly elevated in all. Interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and IL‐18 were not elevated in any of the samples. Treatment and outcomes were variable.SignificanceWe describe 3 patients with HLH and FIRES. The co‐occurrence of these 2 rare disorders suggests the possibility of a common immune dysregulation phenotype prolonging epileptogenesis. HLH screening in critically ill patients with FIRES may yield a broader understanding of shared inflammatory processes.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer-aided detection (CAD) and human readers to detect pulmonary nodules ≥5 mm using 100 kV ultra–low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) utilizing a tin filter. Materials and Methods: After informed consent, 55 patients prospectively underwent standard-dose chest CT (SDCT) using 120 kV followed by ULDCT using 100 kV/tin. Reference nodules ≥5 mm were identified by a thoracic radiologist using SDCT. Four thoracic radiologists marked detected nodules on SDCT and ULDCT examinations using a dedicated computer workstation. After a 6-month memory extinction, readers were shown the same ULDCT cases with all CAD markings as well as their original detections, and characterized CAD detections as true positive or false positive. Results: Volume CT Dose index (CTDIvol) for SDCT and ULDCT were 5.3±2 and 0.4±0.2 mGy (P<0.0001), respectively. Forty-five reference nodules were detected in 30 patients. Reader sensitivity varied widely but similarly for SDCT (ranging from 45% to 87%) and ULDCT (45% to 83%). CAD sensitivity was 76% (34/45) for SDCT and 71% (32/45) for ULDCT. After CAD, reader sensitivity substantially improved by 19% and 18% for 2 readers, and remained nearly unchanged for the other 2 readers (0% and 2%), despite reader perception that many more nodules were identified with CAD. There was a mean of 2 false-positive CAD detections/case. Conclusions: ULDCT with 100 kV/tin reduced patient dose by over 90% without compromising pulmonary nodule detection sensitivity. CAD can substantially improve nodule detection sensitivity at ULDCT for some readers, maintaining interobserver performance.