Broekman, Marike L. D.

Abstract BACKGROUND In glioma surgery, awake craniotomy with Direct Electrical Stimulation (DES) is increasingly becoming the gold standard treatment to preserve language, cognition and motor function and to optimize extent of resection. Computer programming is historically seen as an integration of cognition, language, and mathematics but an intraoperative task to monitor computer programming does not exist yet. In this study we describe a new task for intraoperative monitoring, using visual Boolean Logic Puzzles. MATERIAL AND METHODS We describe a computer programmer who underwent awake craniotomy to resect an anaplastic astrocytoma in the left superior frontal gyrus. At the request of the patient we tested programming language. We developed a new task and set of logic puzzle visual stimuli to monitor underlying cognitive function used for programming language. This test was used during preoperative functional MRI (fMRI), direct electrical stimulation (DES) and ongoing monitoring during resection. RESULTS In fMRI this task showed bilateral activation in Brodmann area 6 and 8 and for left hemisphere in Brodmann area 10. These areas are below and lateral of the tumor. Monitoring of language, motor skills and Boolean mapping was performed during DES and while resection was performed. No deficits in programming ability could be identified intra- and postoperatively. CONCLUSION Boolean Logic Puzzles may be a useful intraoperative task to preserve programming skills.

ABSTRACT The last decade has seen a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications describing physiological and pathological functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a collective term covering various subtypes of cell‐released, membranous structures, called exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes, oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, and many other names. However, specific issues arise when working with these entities, whose size and amount often make them difficult to obtain as relatively pure preparations, and to characterize properly. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (“MISEV”) guidelines for the field in 2014. We now update these “MISEV2014” guidelines based on evolution of the collective knowledge in the last four years. An important point to consider is that ascribing a specific function to EVs in general, or to subtypes of EVs, requires reporting of specific information beyond mere description of function in a crude, potentially contaminated, and heterogeneous preparation. For example, claims that exosomes are endowed with exquisite and specific activities remain difficult to support experimentally, given our still limited knowledge of their specific molecular machineries of biogenesis and release, as compared with other biophysically similar EVs. The MISEV2018 guidelines include tables and outlines of suggested protocols and steps to follow to document specific EV‐associated functional activities. Finally, a checklist is provided with summaries of key points.

Abstract BACKGROUND Developmental incentives are fundamental to surgical progress, yet financial and professional incentives inherently create conflicts of interest (COI). Understanding how to manage COI held by neurosurgeons, industry, hospitals, and journal editors, without thwarting progress and innovation is critical. OBJECTIVE To present an overview of COI associated with innovation in neurosurgery, and review ways to manage these in an ethically sound manner. METHODS A review of the literature was performed to assess conflicts of interest that affect neurosurgical innovation, and review ways to manage COI of various parties while adhering to ethical standards. RESULTS COI are inherent to collaboration and innovation, and are therefore an unavoidable component of neurosurgery. The lack of a clear distinction between clinical practice and innovation, ability to use devices off-label, and unstandardized disclosure requirements create inconsistencies in the way that conflicts of interest are handled. Additionally, lack of requirements to compare innovation to the standard of care and inherent bias that affects study design and interpretation can have profound effects on the medical literature. Conflicts of interest can have both direct and downstream effects on neurosurgical practice, and it is possible to manage them while improving the quality of research and innovation. CONCLUSION Conflicts of interest are inherent to surgical innovation, and can be handled in an ethically sound manner. Neurosurgeons, device companies, hospitals, and medical journals can take steps to proactively confront bias and ensure patient autonomy and safety. These steps can preserve public trust and ultimately improve evidence-based neurosurgical practice.