Back to Authors

Low, Donald E.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-0958

Mayo Clinic

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Citations 3

Development of a Preliminary Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Adults With Achalasia
Zhuo, Justin , Clarke, John O. , Gyawali, C. Prakash , Hawn, Mary T. , Hwang, Joo Ha , Katzka, David A. , Massey, Benson T. , Patel, Dhyanesh A. , Savarino, Edoardo , Smout, A. J. P. M. , Tatum, Roger P. , Vela, Marcelo F. , Zaninotto, Giovanni, Kamal, A. N. , Clarke, J , Gyawali, C P , Savarino, Edoardo , Triadafilopoulos, George , Bredenoord, Albert J. , Fass, Ronnie , Kahrilas, Peter J. , Low, Donald E. , Penagini, Roberto , Roman, Sabine , Swanström, Lee L. , Kamal, Afrin N.

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | February 18, 2022 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 159-164

10.1097/mcg.0000000000001671 Get It

Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions that enhance patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask questions during consultations. Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a preliminary achalasia-specific QPL created by esophageal experts. Methods: The QPL content was derived through a modified Delphi method consisting of 2 rounds. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts “What general questions should patients ask when given a new diagnosis of achalasia” and “What questions do I not hear patients asking, but given my expertise, I believe they should be asking?” In round 2, experts rated questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Questions considered “essential” or “important” were accepted into the QPL. Feedback regarding the QPL was obtained in a pilot study wherein patients received the QPL before their consultation and completed surveys afterwards. Results: Nineteen esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Of 148 questions from round 1, 124 (83.8%) were accepted into the QPL. These were further reduced to 56 questions to minimize redundancy. Questions were categorized into 6 themes: “What is achalasia,” “Risks with achalasia,” “Symptom management in achalasia,” “Treatment of achalasia,” “Risk of reflux after treatment,” and “Follow-up after treatment.” Nineteen patients participated in the pilot, most of whom agreed that the QPL was helpful (84.2%) and recommended its wider use (84.2%). Conclusions: This is the first QPL developed specifically for adults with achalasia. Although well-received in a small pilot, follow-up studies will incorporate additional patient feedback to further refine the QPL content and assess its usability, acceptability, and feasibility.
Outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia and prior bariatric surgery: A multicenter experience
Bomman, Shivanand , Klair, Jagpal S. , Ashat, Munish , Keech, John , Parekh, Kalpaj R. , Nau, Peter , Hanada, Yuriko, Song, Lei , Kozarek, Richard A. , Irani, Shayan , Ross, Andrew S., Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh , Abiad, Rami G. El , Gerke, Henning , Song, L M Wong Kee, Low, Donald E.

Diseases of the Esophagus | June 29, 2021 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/dote/doab044 Get It

Summary Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia who are status post bariatric surgery may be technically challenging due to postsurgical scarring and altered anatomy. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia in patients with prior bariatric surgery. A review of prospectively maintained databases at three tertiary referral centers from January 2015 to January 2021 was performed. The primary outcome of interest was clinical success, defined as a post-treatment Eckardt score ≤ 3 or improvement in Eckardt score by ≥ 1 when the baseline score was <3, and improvement of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were adverse event rates and symptom recurrence. Sixteen patients status post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 14) and sleeve gastrectomy (n = 2) met inclusion criteria. Indications for POEM were achalasia type I (n = 2), type II (n = 9), and type III (n = 5). POEM was performed either by anterior or posterior approach. The pre-POEM mean integrated relaxation pressure was 26.2 ± 7.6 mm Hg. The mean total myotomy length was 10.2 ± 2.7 cm. The mean length of hospitalization was 1.4 ± 0.7 days. Pre- and postprocedure Eckardt scores were 6.1 ± 2.1 and 1.7 ± 1.8, respectively. The overall clinical success rate was 93.8% (15/16) with mean follow-up duration of 15.5 months. One patient had esophageal leak on postprocedure esophagram and managed endoscopically. Dysphagia recurred in two patients, which was successfully managed with pneumatic dilation with or without botulinum toxin injection. POEM appears to be safe and effective in the management of patients with achalasia who have undergone prior bariatric surgery.